Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics-A Cadaveric Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics have been shown to be important for good knee function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of component rotation on tibiofemoral kinematics during knee flexion. We asked which axial component alignment best reconstructs physiological tibiofemoral kinematics and which combinations should be avoided. METHODS: Ten healthy cadaveric knees were examined. By means of a navigational device, tibiofemoral kinematics between 0° and 90° of flexion were assessed before and after TKA using the following different rotational component alignment: femoral components: ligament balanced, 6° internal, 3° external rotation, and 6° external rotation in relation to the posterior condylar line; tibial components: self-adapted, 6° internal rotation, and 6° external rotation. RESULTS: Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics could be partly reconstructed by TKA. Ligament-balanced femoral rotation and 6° femoral external rotation both in combination with 6° tibial component external rotation, and 3° femoral external rotation in combination with 6° tibial component internal rotation or self-aligning tibial component were able to restore tibial longitudinal rotation. Largest kinematical differences were found for the combination femoral component internal and tibial component external rotations. CONCLUSION: From a kinematic-based view, surgeons should avoid internal rotation of femoral components. However, even often recommended combinations of rotational component alignment (3° femoral external and tibial external rotation) significantly change tibiofemoral kinematics. Self-aligning tibial components solely restored tibiofemoral kinematics with the combination of 3° femoral component of external rotation. For the future, navigational devices might help to axially align components to restore patient-specific and natural tibiofemoral kinematics.

Are We Subluxating Knees in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Cadaveric Investigation.

BACKGROUND: In comparison to coronal, sagittal, and rotational alignment, translational alignment parameters have been widely neglected in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) so far. As there is a certain variable range of possible component placement in mediolateral, ventrodorsal, and proximodistal direction, we hypothesized that relative positions between the femoral and tibial bones are changed after TKA, resulting in a subluxation of knees. METHODS: In 10 knees of Thiel-embalmed whole body cadavers, the relative position between the femur and the tibia during passive flexion was measured before and after TKA by means of a navigational device. RESULTS: After TKA, in extension, femoral bones in average shifted 5.3 mm (standard deviation [SD] = 4.0, P = .002) laterally and 2.4 mm (SD = 3.1, P = .038) proximally in extension which, however, decreased throughout flexion. Furthermore, the ventrodorsal femoral position was altered, resulting in a slight relative dorsal shift (2.6 mm, SD = 4.5, P = .099) in extension, which continuously changed into a ventral shift (2.6 mm, SD = 4.3, P = .087) during flexion. CONCLUSION: The present investigation reveals changed translational parameters between the tibia and the femur after TKA. The resulting subluxation of the knee may be responsible for changed kinematic patterns. These changes in tibofemoral position should be considered in future biomechanical studies. Main reasons for this effect might be a noncentral placement of tibial and femoral implants in relation to the proximal tibial and distal femoral anatomy, obscured intraoperative articular geometry, symmetric implants, and operative techniques. Smaller steps between different component sizes, asymmetric tibial implant design, or individual (anatomic) implants could help to minimize subluxation in TKA.

Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study.

BACKROUND: Improper femoral and acetabular component positioning can be associated with instability, impingement, component wear and finally patient dissatisfaction in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The concept of "femur first"/"combined anteversion", incorporates various aspects of performing a functional optimization of the prosthetic stem and cup position of the stem relative to the cup intraoperatively. In the present study we asked two questions: (1) Do native femoral anteversion and anteversion of the implant correlate? (2) Do anteversion of the final broach and implant anteversion correlate? METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a prospective controlled trial, a subgroup of 55 patients, who underwent computer-assisted, cementless THA with a straight, tapered stem through an anterolateral, minimally invasive (MIS) approach in a lateral decubitus position were examined retrospectivly. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to verify a "best-fit" position of the final broach. An image-free navigation system was used for measurement of the native femoral version, version of the final broach and the final implant. Femoral neck resection height was measured in postoperative CT-scans. This investigation was approved by the local Ethics Commission (No.10-121-0263) and is a secondary analysis of a larger project (DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register May-02-2011). RESULTS: The mean difference between native femoral version and final implant was 1.9° (+/- 9.5), with a range from -20.7° to 21.5° and a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.39 (p < 0.003). In contrast, we observed a mean difference between final broach and implant version of -1.9° (+/- 3.5), with a range from -12.7° to 8.7° and a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.89 (p < 0.001). In 83.6 % (46/55) final stem version was outside the normal range as defined by Tönnis (15-20°). The mean femoral neck resection height was 7.3 mm (+/- 5.6). There was no correlation between resection height and version of the implant (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.14). CONCLUSION: Native femoral version significantly differs from the final anteversion of a cementless, straight, tapered stem and therefore is not a reliable reference in cementless THA. Measuring anteversion of the final "fit and fill" broach is a feasible assistance in order to predict final stem anteversion intraoperatively. There is no correlation between femoral neck resection height and version of the implant.

Lower Limb Anatomy and Alignment Affect Natural Tibiofemoral Knee Kinematics: A Cadaveric Investigation.

BACKGROUND: During flexion, normal knee kinematics consists of a complex combination of rolling, gliding, and rotation between femur and tibia. Although in vivo studies have shown wide interindividual variability, we hypothesized that knee kinematics is either correlated to the anatomy of the individual knee joint or to the anatomic alignment of the entire lower extremity. METHODS: The passive kinematics of 10 healthy knees was assessed in whole cadavers using a commercial computed tomography-free navigation device with intracortical pins. Rotational limb alignment or local anatomic parameters obtained by computed tomography scan or within a navigational procedure were correlated to tibial internal rotation and tibiofemoral abduction during flexion. RESULTS: Mean tibial adduction in full extension was 3.3° (range -2.2° to 7.8°). Tibial abduction and internal rotation showed significant interindividual variability, measuring 3.9° (range -0.8° to 9.7°) and 4.9° (range -3.5° to 14.8°) during flexion. An increase in both the mechanical tibiofemoral axis and the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle correlated with increased tibial internal rotation, whereas a decrease in the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle and an increase in the mechanical tibiofemoral axis were associated with increased tibial adduction. CONCLUSION: The main finding of the present study is that knee kinematics is influenced by both intra-articular and extra-articular parameters. These results may be of interest in component alignment in total knee arthroplasty, correction of deformities, and malalignment after fracture healing of the lower extremity. Possible relationships should be investigated in future studies.

The influence of component alignment on patellar kinematics in total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Postoperative anterior knee pain is one of the most frequent complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Changes in patellar kinematics after TKA relative to the preoperative arthritic knee are not well understood. We compared the patellar kinematics preoperatively with the kinematics after ligament-balanced navigated TKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured patellar tracking before and after ligament-balanced TKA in 40 consecutive patients using computer navigation. Furthermore, the influences of different femoral and tibial component alignment on patellar kinematics were analyzed using generalized linear models. RESULTS: After TKA, the patellae shifted statistically significantly more laterally between 30° and 60°. The lateral tilt increased at 90° of flexion whereas the epicondylar distance decreased between 45° and 75° of flexion. Sagittal component alignment, but not rotational component alignment, had a significant influence on patellar kinematics. INTERPRETATION: There are major differences in patellar kinematics between the preoperative arthritic knee and the knee after TKA. Combined sagittal component alignment in particular appears to have a major effect on patellar kinematics. Surgeons should be especially aware of altering preoperative sagittal alignment until the possible clinical relevance has been investigated.