A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of a Novel, Noninvasive Perfusion Enhancement System for the Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Sacral Pressure Injuries.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a novel, noninvasive perfusion enhancement system versus beds with integrated alternating pressure capabilities for the prevention of hospital-acquired sacral region (sacral, coccygeal, and ischium) pressure injuries in a high-risk, acute care patient population. DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial of high-risk inpatients without preexisting sacral region pressure injuries was conducted. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 431 randomly enrolled adult patients in a 300-bed tertiary care community teaching hospital. METHODS: Subjects were randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: control and experimental. Both groups received "standard-of-care" pressure injury prevention measures per hospital policy, and both were placed on alternating pressure beds during their hospital stays. In addition, patients in the experimental group used a noninvasive perfusion enhancement system placed on top of their alternating pressure beds and recovery chairs throughout their hospital stay. Fischer's exact probability test was used to compare group differences, and odds ratio (OR) were calculated for comparing pressure injury rates in the experimental and control groups. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine patients completed the trial; 186 patients were allocated to the experimental group and 213 patients to the control group. Eleven patients in the control group versus 2 in the experimental group developed hospital-acquired sacral region pressure injuries (51.6% vs 1.07%; P = .024). Control patients were 5.04 times more likely to develop hospital-acquired sacral region pressure injuries (OR = 0.1996; 95% CI, 0.0437-0.9125). CONCLUSIONS: Patients using a noninvasive perfusion enhancement system developed significantly fewer hospital-acquired sacral pressure injuries than those using an alternating pressure bed without the perfusion enhancement system. These findings suggest that a perfusion enhancement system enhances the success of use of pressure redistributing beds for prevention of hospital-acquired sacral pressure injuries.

Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box.

Here, we report intermediate follow-up details after using a technique of confluent posterior left atrial wall epicardial ablation designed to eliminate both existing and future atrial fibrillation (AF) substrates. The method is part of the Convergent hybrid procedure for AF ablation. In this study, multiple confluent epicardial ablations with radiofrequency energy were delivered, spanning the vertical and transverse dimensions of the posterior left atrium, along with facilitated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Endocardial mapping and ablation were performed to complete PVI and to ablate the cavotricuspid isthmus. All patients were followed clinically and using two-to-four weeks of continuous monitoring at six, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The average length of follow-up was 488 days. Of the 57 largely unselected patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF (NPAF), mean duration of AF was 5.6 years. Single procedure freedom from AF through 24 months was 64.5%, and that for all arrhythmias, was 58.9%. Sixty-eight percent of patients were off antiarrhythmic drugs. Four patients (7%) required a second endocardial ablation procedure. A sub-analysis of the observed arrhythmia burden present through follow-up showed this to be small (ie, <1%) in the majority of patients involved in this study. In conclusion, the extended posterior left atrial wall ablation technique discussed here, as part of the Convergent hybrid method, achieved notable single-procedure success in a particularly challenging series of patients with NPAF.

Diabetes and evidence of atherosclerosis are major risk factors for adverse outcome after elective thoracic aortic surgery.

BACKGROUND: To predict risk after elective repair of ascending aorta and aortic arch aneurysms, we studied 464 consecutive patients. METHODS: Adverse outcome (stroke or hospital death) was analyzed in 372 patients who underwent proximal repair and 92 patients who underwent aortic arch replacement from 1986 to the present. Preoperative risk factors with a P value less than.2 in a univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate model, and an equation incorporating independent risk factors was derived separately for proximal aorta and arch surgery. RESULTS: Age more than 65 years (P =.04), diabetes (P =.02), cause (P =.01), and prolonged total cerebral protection time (duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion, P =.001) were significant univariate risk factors for elective proximal aortic repair. Diabetes (P =.005, odds ratio 5.1), atherosclerosis (P =.003, odds ratio 4.0), and dissection (P =.048, odds ratio 2.5) were independent factors. For elective arch surgery, female sex (P =.07), age more than 65 years (P =.04), coronary artery disease (P =.02), diabetes (P =.06), cause (P =.07), and prolonged total cerebral protection time (P =.025) were univariate risk factors. Female sex (P =.05, odds ratio 4.7), coronary artery disease (P =.02, odds ratio 6.5), diabetes (P =.13, odds ratio 4.0), and total cerebral protection time (P =.03, odds ratio 1.02/min) were independent factors. To calculate risk of adverse outcome (P), enter 1 if factor is present, 0 if absent, and estimate total cerebral protection time (in minutes). [equation: see text]. CONCLUSION: In this large series of patients, the presence of diabetes and manifestations of atherosclerosis emerge as extremely important risk factors for adverse outcome after ascending aorta or arch surgery, displacing age. Multivariate equations derived from these data allow more precise calculation of risk for each individual contemplating elective surgery.

Is the Bentall procedure for ascending aorta or aortic valve replacement the best approach for long-term event-free survival?

BACKGROUND: This retrospective analysis of a selected series of Bentall procedures may be useful in evaluating the results of valve-sparing operations, an increasingly popular alternative for replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve. METHODS: One hundred forty-two elective patients younger than 65 years without concomitant procedures who underwent replacement of the thoracic aorta and aortic valve between 1989 and 2000 were studied; 85% were men, and the median age was 46 years (range, 13 to 64 years). Degenerative disease of the aorta was the most common cause requiring operation (86%, including 46% with a bicuspid aortic valve); 8% had chronic dissection, and 6% had atherosclerotic aneurysms. The ascending aorta was replaced in 94 patients (66%); 45 patients (32%) underwent hemiarch replacement, and in 3 patients (2%) the total arch was replaced. A mechanical valve was used in 88%, and a biologic valve, in 12%. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative deaths. Two patients had a stroke postoperatively, one of which was fatal. Complications during follow-up included 2 cases of endocarditis, 1 peripheral thromboembolic event, and 10 instances of significant bleeding (requiring hospitalization or transfusion). Surgery for distal aortic segments was performed in 4 patients, but no patient required reoperation in the proximal aorta. Kaplan-Meier curves show overall survival is 0.95 (95% confidence intervals, 0.9 to 0.99) at 5 years and 0.93 (95% confidence intervals, 0.86 to 0.99) at 8 years, and event-free survival is 0.85 (95% confidence intervals, 0.78 to 0.92) at 5 years and 0.78 (95% confidence intervals, 0.68 to 0.88) at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: The button Bentall procedure can be performed with excellent short-term and long-term results in relatively uncomplicated elective patients in whom aortic valve disease is combined with dilatation of the ascending aorta. Results of this traditional operation are the standard against which the long-term outcome of newer approaches, such as valve-sparing operations, should be compared.