Quality of life among older patients after elective ventral hernia repair: A retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair is a common elective general surgery procedure among older patients, a population at greater risk of complications. Prior research has demonstrated improved quality of life in this population despite increased risk of complications. This study sought to assess the relationship between post-ventral hernia repair quality of life and patient frailty. We hypothesized that frail patients would report smaller gains in quality of life compared to the non-frail group. METHODS: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative was used to identify a cohort of patients 65 years of age or older undergoing elective ventral hernia repair from 2018 to 2022. Patients were categorized based on their modified frailty index scores as not frail/prefrail, frail, and severely frail. Quality of life was assessed using a patient-reported 12-item scale preoperatively, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 3,479 patients were included: 30.93% non-frail, 47.17% frail, and 21.90% severely frail. Severely frail patients had lower quality of life scores at baseline (P = .001) but reported higher quality of life at both 30 days (1.24 points higher, 95% confidence interval (-1.51, 2.52), P = .010) and 6 months (0.92 points higher, 95% confidence interval (-2.29, 4.13), P = .005). Severely frail patients had higher rates of surgical site complications (P < .001) but no difference in 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: Our results found that frail patients reported the greatest increase in quality of life 1 year from baseline, showing that they, when selected appropriately, can gain equal benefits and have similar surgical outcomes as their non-frail counterparts.

Outcomes and quality of life of frail patients following elective ventral hernia repair: Retrospective review of a national hernia collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most common general surgery procedures among older adults but is often deferred due to a higher risk of complications. This study compares postoperative quality of life (QOL) and complications between frail and non-frail patients undergoing elective VHR. We hypothesized that frail patients would have higher complication rates and smaller gains in quality of life compared to non-frail patients. STUDY DESIGN: Patients 65 years of age and older, undergoing elective VHR between 2018 and 2022 were selected from the ACHQC (Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative) and grouped based on frailty scores obtained using the Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5). Logistic regression adjusting for hernia characteristics (size, recurrent, parastomal, incisional) were performed for 30-day outcomes including surgical site infections (SSI), surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections/occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), and readmission. Multivariable analyses controlling for patient and procedure characteristics were performed comparing QOL scores (HerQLes scale, 0-100) at baseline, 30 days, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 4888 patients were included, 29.17% non-frail, 47.87% frail, and 22.95% severely frail. On adjusted analysis, severely frail patients had higher odds of SSO (most commonly seroma formation) but no evidence of a difference in SSI, SSOPI, readmission or mortality. Severely frail patients had lower median QOL scores at baseline (48.3/100, IQR 26.1-71.7, p â€‹= â€‹0.001) but reported higher QOL scores at both 30-days (68.3/100, IQR 41.7-88.3, p â€‹= â€‹0.01) and 6-months (86.7/100, IQR 65.0-93.3, p â€‹= â€‹0.005). CONCLUSION: Severely frail patients reported similar increases in QOL and similar complications to their not frail counterparts. Our results demonstrate that appropriately selected older patients, even those who are severely frail, may benefit from elective VHR in the appropriate clinical circumstance.

Clinical evaluation of brief cognitive assessment measures for patients with severe dementia.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease has become an important public health burden for older adults. Clinicians face a challenging task to efficiently evaluate cognition in dementia in clinical settings. We sought to assess the validity and inter-correlations of brief cognitive assessments in a cohort of severely demented patients. METHODS: In total, 49 individual patients (N = 49) ranging in age from 62 to 97 years old were included in this performance improvement project. Over the course of two-three sessions, five cognitive instruments were administered to each patient: Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), Severe Impairment Battery-8 (SIB-8), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Severe Mini Mental State Examination (sMMSE) and Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS). We sought to assess patient factors that might have been barriers to optimal performance on cognitive/functional tests. Researchers assessed her impression of the participants' difficulty comprehending instructions, distractibility, apparent fatigue, and frustration, which were the four barriers rated. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 49 patients from the inpatient dementia unit with a total of 51 samples. All of the inter-correlations between the five cognitive instruments had Spearman coefficients of (rs) > 0.7 and were statistically significant with p < 0.001. The SIB-8 and sMMSE were positively correlated with the SIB. The perceived barrier scores ranged from 0- no issue to 1-mild issue on all five cognitive instruments. CONCLUSION: Brief cognitive tests designed for severe dementia such as the SIB-8 and sMMSE have been evaluated in this project to be shorter in administration duration and highly correlated with gold standard instruments: the SIB and MMSE.