Dual-Task Obstacle Crossing Training Could Immediately Improve Ability to Control a Complex Motor Task and Cognitive Activity in Chronic Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.

Background: The effectiveness of dual-task training has been reported in individuals with cognitive impairments. To date, there is no clear evidence on the incorporation of dual-task training in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who have intact cognitive functions but have various degrees of sensorimotor dysfunction. Objectives: To compare the immediate effects of dual-task obstacle crossing (DTOC) and single-task obstacle crossing (STOC) training on functional and cognitive abilities in chronic ambulatory participants with SCI. Methods: This is a randomized 2 × 2 crossover design with blinded assessors. Twenty-two participants were randomly trained using a 30-minute DTOC and STOC training program with a 2-day washout period. Outcomes, including 10-Meter Walk Tests (single- and dual-task tests), percent of Stroop Color and Word Test task errors, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and five times sit-to-stand test, were measured immediately before and after each training program. Results: Participants showed significant improvement in all outcomes following both training programs (p < .05), except percent of Stroop Color and Word Test task errors after STOC training. Obvious differences between the training programs were found for the percent of Stroop task errors and TUG (ps = .014 and .06). Conclusion: Obstacle crossing is a demanding task, thus the obvious improvement was found immediately after both training programs in participants with long post-injury time (approximately 5 years). However, the findings primarily suggest the superior effects of DTOC over STOC on a complex motor task and cognitive activity. A further randomized control trial incorporating a complex dual-task test is needed to strengthen evidence for the benefit of DTOC for these individuals.

Failures in dual-task obstacle crossing could predict risk of future fall in independent ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE:: To determine whether cognitive-motor interference using ability of dual-task obstacle crossing could predict a risk of fall in 90 ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury. DESIGN:: Six-month prospective study. SETTING:: A rehabilitation center and community hospitals. SUBJECTS:: Independent ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Subjects were interviewed and evaluated for personal characteristics, dual-task obstacle crossing ability, and functional ability using the 10 Meter Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test. Then they were prospectively monitored for fall data every month for six months in total. RESULTS:: A total of 90 chronic ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury with an average age of 52.51 ± 13.43 years, who mostly had mild lesion severity ( n = 71, 79%) and walked with a walking device ( n = 54, 60%) completed in the study. More than one-third of the subjects ( n = 32, 36%) failed in dual-task obstacle crossing. The failures were obviously associated with the fall (unadjusted odds ratio = 7.07, P < 0.002, power = 1.000). CONCLUSION:: Cognitive-motor interference is important for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury, as it could detect those with low functional ability and risk of future falls.

Effects of dual- and complex-task on walking ability of ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Attempting to perform dual- and complex-tasks obviously reduces the walking ability of individuals with impaired cognitive functions. However, there is no clear evidence describing the effects of dual- and complex-tasks on the walking ability of ambulatory individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) who have intact cognitive functions, but suffer from various degrees of sensorimotor deterioration. AIM: To primarily investigate the effects of dual- and complex-task on the walking ability of ambulatory subjects with SCI as compared to healthy individuals. In addition, the study secondarily compared the effects in subgroups of subjects with SCI, including different age groups, lesion severity and level of ability. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: A major tertiary referral and community hospitals in Thailand. POPULATION: Thirty-seven ambulatory individuals with SCI and 13 healthy subjects. METHODS: All subjects were evaluated for outcomes while they walked under four conditions, including single-task overground walking (ST-OG), dual-task overground walking (DT-OG) using a color word Stroop task, single-task obstacle crossing (ST-OC) and dual-task obstacle crossing (DT-OC). The outcomes were compared among the conditions and between the groups of subjects in terms of walking time, obstacle crossing ability and percent of Stroop task errors. RESULTS: With the increasing complexity of the tasks, both SCI and healthy subjects walked significantly slower (P<0.001 for those with SCI and P<0.05 for healthy subjects), but not when compared between the ST-OC and DT-OG conditions (P>0.05). Subjects also showed a greater percentage of cognitive task errors when they encountered a dual- and complex-task, particularly those with SCI who were over 50 years old, had mild lesion severity or walked with a walking device (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of dual- and complex-task challenged cognitive-motor interference of ambulatory individuals with SCI. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The application of such tasks may benefit rehabilitation outcomes in a real-world situation for patients, especially for those who are older than 50, have mild lesion severity or use a walking device.

Levels of Community Ambulation Ability in Patients with Stroke Who Live in a Rural Area.

BACKGROUND: Community ambulation is essential for patients with stroke. Apart from treatments, an assessment with a quantitative target criterion is also important for patients to clearly demonstrate their functional alteration and determine how close they are to their goal, as well as for therapists to assess the effectiveness of the treatments. The existing quantitative target criteria for community ambulation were all derived from participants in a developed country and ability was assessed using a single-task test. To explore cutoff scores of the single-task and dual-task 10-meter walk test (10MWT) in ambulatory patients with stroke from rural areas of a developing country. METHODS: Ninety-five participants with chronic stroke were interviewed concerning their community ambulation ability, and assessed for their walking ability using the single- and dual-task 10MWT. RESULTS: A walking speed of at least 0.47 m/s assessed using the single-task 10MWT, and at least 0.30 m/s assessed using the dual-task 10MWT, could determine the community ambulation ability of the participants. CONCLUSION: Distinct contexts and anthropometric characteristics required different target criteria for community walking. Thus, when establishing a target value for community ambulation, it needs to be specific to the demographics and geographical locations of the patients.

Functional assessments for predicting a risk of multiple falls in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Many ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) encountered multiple falls and serious consequences after falls, but there was no quantitative practical measure for early identification of individuals at a risk of multiple falls. This study compared the utility of the Berg Balance Scale, Timed "Up & Go" Test, 10-Meter Walk Test, Functional Reach Test (FRT), Step Test, and Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test to predict risk of multiple falls (fall ≥2 times) in these individuals. METHODS: Eighty-three independent ambulatory subjects with SCI were assessed for their functional abilities using the six tests. Then, their fall data were monitored prospectively every 2 weeks for 6 months in total. The first 25 subjects were also involved in the reliability tests. RESULTS: The FRT showed the best predictive ability for the risk of multiple falls (cut-off score ≥20 cm, sensitivity = 73%, specificity = 55%, area under the receiver characteristic curve = 0.64, and adjusted odd ratio = 3.18, P < 0.05), excellent inter-tester reliability, and good feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: The FRT may be used as a screening tool to predict risk of multiple falls in independent ambulatory individuals with SCI. However, with a moderate level of specificity, a further comprehensive test may be needed to clearly indicate individuals at a risk of falls. In addition, the findings suggest that a higher level of ability increases the risk of multiple falls. Thus, programs for functional integration in an actual environment may be needed to reduce the risk of falls for these individuals.