Efficacy of vitamin E and N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast induced kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney disease: a double blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Contrast induced acute kidney injury is one of the most frequent causes of hospital acquired acute kidney injury. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy of vitamin E or N-acetylcysteine as an adjunct to current standard therapy in the prevention of this clinical predicament. We tested the hypothesis that vitamin E or N-acetylcysteine added to standard therapy with 0.45 % saline is superior in preserving renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 1-4 undergoing elective computer-assisted tomography with nonionic radiocontrast agents when compared to 0.45 % saline alone. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-center, double-masked, double dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel clinical trial. METHODS: The patients were randomized to either vitamin E (total dose 2160 mg i.v.) or N-acetylcysteine (total dose 4800 mg p.o.) in addition to 0.45 % saline (1 mL/kg/h over 24 h) or saline alone. Serum creatinine change between baseline and 24 h after radiocontrast was the primary outcome. Contrast induced acute kidney injury was defined as a rise in serum creatinine > 25 % over the baseline value within 48 h. RESULTS: Thirty patients (mean age 74.6 years; 17 females; 9 diabetics; all Caucasians; mean serum creatinine 1.35 mg/dL; mean creatinine clearance 56 mL/min) were enrolled. No patient developed contrast induced acute kidney injury. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine change between the three study arms. CONCLUSION: Following radiocontrast administration, neither vitamin E nor N-acetylcystein in addition to saline demonstrated an additional beneficial effect on kidney function when compared to saline alone.

The accuracy of ultrasound for measurement of mobile- bearing motion.

After anterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing total knee replacement, mobile bearings sometimes have paradoxic movement but the implications of such movement on function, wear, and implant survival are not known. To study this potential problem accurate, reliable, and widely available inexpensive tools for in vivo mobile-bearing motion analyses are needed. We developed a method using an 8-MHz ultrasound to analyze mobile-bearing motion and ascertained accuracy, precision, and reliability compared with plain and standard digital radiographs. The anterior rim of the mobile bearing was the target for all methods. The radiographs were taken in a horizontal plane at neutral rotation and incremental external and internal rotations. Five investigators examined four positions of the mobile bearing with all three methods. The accuracy and precision were: ultrasound, 0.7 mm and 0.2 mm; digital radiograph, 0.4 mm and 0.2 mm; and plain radiographs, 0.7 mm and 0.3 mm. The interrater and intrarater reliability ranged between 0.3 to 0.4 mm and 0.1 to 0.2 mm, respectively. The difference between the methods was not significant for neutral rotation but ultrasound was significantly more accurate than any one degree of rotation or higher. Ultrasound of 8 MHz provides an accuracy and reliability that is suitable for evaluation of in vivo meniscal bearing motion. Whether this method or others are sufficiently accurate to detect motion leading to abnormal wear is not known.