Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSIs) cause considerable morbidity in patients with cancer. We determined the incidence and risk factors for CABSI by performing a prospective observational cohort study of all adult patients requiring a central venous access device (CVAD) in a haematology-oncology unit. All CVADs were inserted under ultrasound guidance by trained operators in a dedicated interventional radiology facility. A total of 1127 CVADs were assessed in 727 patients over 51,514 line-days. The rate of CABSI per 1000 line-days was 2.50. Factors associated with CABSI included: type of CVAD, greatest for non-tunnelled lines [hazard ratio (HR): 3.50; P < 0.0001] and tunnelled lines (HR: 1.77; P = 0.011) compared to peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) lines; patient diagnosis, greatest for aggressive haematological malignancies (HR: 3.17; P = 0.0007) and least for oesophageal, colon and rectal cancers (HR: 0.29; P = 0.019) compared to other solid tumours; side of insertion, greatest for right-sided lines (HR: 1.60; P = 0.027); and number of prior line insertions (HR: 1.20; P = 0.022). In patients with aggressive haematological malignancies there was significantly more CABSI with non-tunnelled lines (HR: 3.9; P < 0.001) and a trend to more CABSI with tunnelled lines (HR: 1.43; P = 0.12) compared to patients with PICC lines, as well as increased CABSI for right-sided insertions (HR: 1.62; P = 0.047). This study highlights the utility of a standardised CABSI surveillance strategy in adult patients with cancer, provides further data to support the use of PICC lines in such patient populations, and suggests that the side of line insertion may influence risk of CABSI.

Post-discharge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections?

Post-discharge surgical wound infection surveillance is an important part of many infection control programs. It is frequently undertaken by patient self-assessment, prompted either by a telephone or postal questionnaire. To assess the reliability of this method, 290 patients were followed for six weeks postoperatively. Their wounds were photographed and also covertly assessed for signs of infection by two experienced infection control nurses (ICNs). Patients also responded to a postal questionnaire seeking evidence of infection at both week four and week six post-surgery. Correlation between the patient's assessment of their wound and the ICNs diagnosis was poor (r = 0.37) with a low positive predictive value (28.7%), although negative predictive value was high (98.2%). Assessment of photos for signs of infection by two experienced clinicians also correlated poorly with the ICNs diagnosis of infection (r = 0.54). The patient's recall of prescription of an antibiotic by their general practitioner (GP) for wound infection during the postoperative period correlated best with the ICNs diagnosis (r = 0.76). This latter measure, particularly when confirmed by the GP in those patients reporting an infection, appears to provide the most valid and resource efficient marker of post-discharge surgical wound infection.

The application of statistical process control charts to the detection and monitoring of hospital-acquired infections.

The monitoring of infection control indicators including hospital-acquired infections is an established part of quality maintenance programmes in many health-care facilities. However, surveillance data use can be frustrated by the infrequent nature of many infections. Traditional methods of analysis often provide delayed identification of increasing infection occurrence, placing patients at preventable risk. The application of Shewhart, Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) statistical process control charts to the monitoring of indicator infections allows continuous real-time assessment. The Shewhart chart will detect large changes, while CUSUM and EWMA methods are more suited to recognition of small to moderate sustained change. When used together, Shewhart and EWMA methods are ideal for monitoring bacteraemia and multiresistant organism rates. Shewhart and CUSUM charts are suitable for surgical infection surveillance.

Endemic nosocomial gram-negative bacteraemias resulting from contamination of intravenous heparin infusions.

Following several cases of Gram-negative bacteraemia secondary to intravenous heparin infusion contamination, we retrospectively reviewed nosocomial bacteraemias associated with heparin infusions at our institution. Thirty-one episodes of heparin-infusion related bacteraemia occurred in 30 patients over a 23-month period affecting 2% patients receiving heparin infusions for more than 48 h. Gram-negative bacteria were responsible for all bacteraemias. The care of infusions during clinical use was prospectively surveyed, revealing that approximately 20% of lines and cannulae were left for more than 72 h before replacement, and significant discordance occurred between line replacement and syringe and cannula exchange. We concluded that contamination of the infusions was probably extrinsic and secondary to manipulations of the system during use. Prolonged usage and discordant exchange of infusion components were likely important factors in initial contamination and subsequent bacterial proliferation. The problem resolved following the introduction of a policy for routine and simultaneous replacement of lines and syringes at 24-h intervals and upon cannula exchange.