The influence of biphasic positive airway pressure vs. sham biphasic positive airway pressure on pulmonary function in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: The effect of biphasic positive airway pressure (BPAP) at individualized pressures on the postoperative pulmonary recovery of morbidly obese patients (MOP) undergoing open bariatric surgery (OBS) and possible placebo device-related effects (sham BPAP) were investigated. METHODS: Forty-eight MOP scheduled for OBS were initially enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to: A) the BPAP group in which BPAP, at individualized inspiratory positive airway pressure/expiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP/EPAP), was applied for 3 days postoperatively and B) the sham BPAP group in which sham BPAP was applied for the same time. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry 24 h prior to surgery and at 24, 48 and 72 h postoperatively and respiratory complications were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects, 21 in the BPAP group and 14 in the sham BPAP group, completed the study. Baseline characteristics and pulmonary function were similar between groups preoperatively. Subjects in the BPAP group showed in general better spirometric performance and SpO2 values postoperatively and expedited pulmonary recovery. Atelectasis combined with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) symptoms was observed in 21% of subjects in the sham BPAP group and one of these subjects developed lower respiratory tract infection. No respiratory complications were recorded in the BPAP group. Use of higher BPAP pressures was not associated with anastomosis leakage or disruption in any patient. CONCLUSION: Use of BPAP, at individualized pressures, expedites postoperative pulmonary recovery and eliminates respiratory complications in MOP who have undergone OBS.

Successful Living-Related Renal Allograft in a Recipient With Factor V Leiden Deficiency: A Case Report.

Thrombophilia due to activated protein C resistance (Leiden mutation) is the most common inherited thrombophilic disorder with 5% incidence in whites. Renal transplant of these patients entails a risk of vascular thrombosis soon after the transplant; and acute rejection episodes and graft loss within the first year. We present a case of a successful living-related renal transplant in man with a recent history of repeat episodes of vascular access thrombosis attributed to inherited thrombophilia (heterozygosity for factor V mutation Q506 and homozygosity for mutation T677 for methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase). Transplant recipient was administered anticoagulation therapy with low molecular weight heparin pre- and postoperatively. No thrombotic or hemorrhagic events occurred posttransplant. A high suspicion of thrombophilic disorders in patients with end-stage renal disease with vascular access thrombotic events should be screened further to prevent failure of a subsequent renal transplant. Inherited thrombophilic disorders may not exclude living-related kidney transplant provided that anticoagulation therapy is admin-istered perioperatively.

Vasopressin, epinephrine, and corticosteroids for in-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Animal data on cardiac arrest showed improved long-term survival with combined vasopressin-epinephrine. In cardiac arrest, cortisol levels are relatively low during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We hypothesized that combined vasopressin-epinephrine and corticosteroid supplementation during and after resuscitation may improve survival in refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. We enrolled 100 consecutive patients with cardiac arrest requiring epinephrine according to current resuscitation guidelines. Patients received either vasopressin (20 IU per cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle) plus epinephrine (1 mg per resuscitation cycle) (study group; n = 48) or isotonic sodium chloride solution placebo plus epinephrine (1 mg per resuscitation cycle) (control group; n = 52) for the first 5 resuscitation cycles after randomization, followed by additional epinephrine if needed. On the first resuscitation cycle, study group patients received methylprednisolone sodium succinate (40 mg) and controls received saline placebo. Postresuscitation shock was treated with stress-dose hydrocortisone sodium succinate (300 mg daily for 7 days maximum, with gradual taper) (27 patients in the study group) or saline placebo (15 patients in the control group). Primary end points were return of spontaneous circulation for 15 minutes or longer and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Study group patients vs controls had more frequent return of spontaneous circulation (39 of 48 patients [81%] vs 27 of 52 [52%]; P = .003) and improved survival to hospital discharge (9 [19%] vs 2 [4%]; P = .02). Study group patients with postresuscitation shock vs corresponding controls had improved survival to hospital discharge (8 of 27 patients [30%] vs 0 of 15 [0%]; P = .02), improved hemodynamics and central venous oxygen saturation, and more organ failure-free days. Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In this single-center trial, combined vasopressin-epinephrine and methylprednisolone during resuscitation and stress-dose hydrocortisone in postresuscitation shock improved survival in refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00411879.

An evaluation of McCoy balloon laryngoscopy in patients with moderate-to-major endotracheal intubation difficulty.

UNLABELLED: We hypothesized that combined McCoy-balloon laryngoscopy may facilitate airway management relative to McCoy or balloon laryngoscopy. In 10 anesthetized/paralyzed patients with prior intubation difficulty scale scores of >5, McCoy-balloon laryngoscopy versus conventional/balloon/McCoy laryngoscopies resulted in greater laryngeal aperture exposure (2.3 +/- 0.6 versus 0.6 +/- 0.2/1.4 +/- 0.4/1.5 +/- 0.6 cm2, respectively), lower intubation difficulty scale score (0.00 (0.00-0.00) versus 6.00 (6.00-8.25)/1.50(0.00-4.00)/2.00(0.75-5.00), respectively, median [interquartile range]), and 9%-74% shorter time to intubation confirmation (P < 0.05-0.001 for all). Balloon and McCoy laryngoscopies improved laryngoscopic/intubating conditions relative to conventional laryngoscopy. In patients with moderate-to-major conventional airway management difficulty, McCoy-balloon laryngoscopy further improves laryngoscopic/intubating conditions. IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that, in patients with moderate-to-major conventional airway management difficulty, combined McCoy-balloon laryngoscopy results in improved laryngoscopic/intubating conditions when compared with the conventional, McCoy, and balloon laryngoscopic techniques. McCoy-balloon laryngoscopy combines the merits of McCoy and balloon laryngoscopy and can be recommended for patients with moderate-to-major intubation difficulty.