Modeling the target dose fall-off in IMRT and VMAT planning techniques for cervical SBRT.

There has been growing interest in the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) technique for the treatment of cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to characterize dose distributions as well as model the target dose fall-off for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery techniques using 6 and 10 MV photon beam energies. Fifteen (n = 15) patients with non-bulky cervical tumors were planned in Pinnacle3 with a Varian Novalis Tx (HD120 MLC) using 6 and 10 MV photons with the following techniques: (1) IMRT with 10 non-coplanar beams (2) dual, coplanar 358° VMAT arcs (4° spacing), and (3) triple, non-coplanar VMAT arcs. Treatment volumes and dose prescriptions were segmented according to University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Phase II study. All plans were normalized such that 98% of the planning target volume (PTV) received 28 Gy (4 fractions). For the PTV, the following metrics were evaluated: homogeneity index, conformity index, D2cc, Dmean, Dmax, and dose fall-off parameters. For the organs at risk (OARs), D2cc, D15cc, D0.01cc, V20, V40, V50, V60, and V80 were evaluated for the bladder, bowel, femoral heads, rectum, and sigmoid. Statistical differences were evaluated using a Friedman test with a significance level of 0.05. To model dose fall-off, expanding 2-mm-thick concentric rings were created around the PTV, and doses were recorded. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were noted in the dose fall-off when using 10 MV and VMAT3-arc, as compared with IMRT. VMAT3-arc improved the bladder V40, V50, and V60, and the bowel V20 and V50. All fitted regressions had an R2 ≥ 0.98. For cervical SBRT plans, a VMAT3-arc approach offers a steeper dose fall-off outside of the target volume. Faster dose fall-off was observed in smaller targets as opposed to medium and large targets, denoting that OAR sparing is dependent on target size. These improvements are further pronounced with the use of 10-MV photons.

Dosimetric effect of photon beam energy on volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan quality due to body habitus in advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically compare 6- and 10-MV photon beam energies in high-risk prostate cancer patients of various body habitus using a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiation delivery technique. The objectives of the study were to evaluate whether dosimetric differences exist and to investigate whether differences are dependent on patient body habitus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients with various body habitus who had previously received treatment to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes with VMAT techniques were chosen. Patients were planned in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system with double or triple SmartArc plans with 6- and 10-MV photon energies. All patients were optimized with the same planning objectives and normalized such that 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received the prescription dose. Patients were evaluated for PTV and organ at risk (OAR) parameters for the bladder, rectum, small bowel, penile bulb, and sigmoid colon. Metrics used for comparison were D2%, D98%, homogeneity, conformity, and dose falloff for the PTV and D(2%), D(mean), V(80%), V(60%), and V(40%) for OARs. Statistical differences were evaluated with a paired-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test with a significance level of .05. RESULTS: For the PTV, there were no statistically significant differences in D(mean), D(2cc), conformation number, and homogeneity index values, but the dose falloff parameters, R50 and R25, showed a median improvement of 6.7% (P<.01) and 6.2% (P<.01), respectively, with 10 MV. A correlation between patient anterior-posterior distance (d(AP)) and percentage reduction in R50 of 0.436% per centimeter (P<.01) was determined. For OARs, statistically significant reductions in dose metrics were found in the small bowel and bladder, but increases in the D(2cc) of 3.5% in the penile bulb (P<.01) and 0.2% in the rectum (P=.02) were shown with 10 MV. The use of 10 MV also demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the total number of monitor units of 15.9% (P<.01) compared with 6 MV. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that 10 MV provides a faster dose falloff than 6 MV for patients whose prostate and pelvic lymph nodes are treated using a VMAT technique irrespective of body habitus; however, the improvement in dose falloff is dependent on body habitus and increases as the patient body habitus increases.