RESUMO
Background: The risks of osteoporosis and breast cancer are increasing in elderly women. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are recommended for treatment of osteoporosis. They have different and overlapping pharmacodynamics and previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding their risk association with breast cancer. We intend to further look into this issue through a comparative study. Methods: Electronic health records of 91,626 women older than 50 years with no previous history of malignancy and no nonbreast cancer during follow-up were retrieved from southern California and retrospectively analyzed using univariate, bivariate, and log-rank tests. Medication use, breast cancer risk, and associated demographic and clinical history were assessed. Results: Over an average of 3.6 years follow-up, the breast cancer relative risks (RRs) counted after 365 days of latency are 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-1.97) for denosumab ever users and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.21-0.66) for bisphosphonates ever users, when covariates are comparable. The significant difference is supported by the Log-rank test (p = 0.0004). Excluding statins coprescribers, the breast cancer RR is 1.31 (0.71, 2.43) in denosumab group and 0.26 (0.11, 0.62) in bisphosphonates group. There is a reduced RR in statins ever users (0.47, 95% CI: 0.38-0.58), and the breast cancer risk difference is not significant between concomitant denosumab/statins and bisphosphonates/statins ever users with RR 0.65 (0.16, 2.58) versus 0.55 (0.26, 1.16), p = 0.692. Conclusions: Our data support an association of lower breast cancer risk with bisphosphonates use in elderly women. We did not observe a lower breast cancer risk in denosumab group; however, our data revealed a potential lower breast cancer risk in denosumab users with concurrent statins use and this requires further study.
RESUMO
The stage I uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumor (MMMT) shows different potential for progression. We reason that MMMTs with high-grade carcinomatous component and positivity for HB-EGF are prone to recurrence/metastasis in the early stage. A retrospective clinical and histopathologic review with immunohistochemical staining for HB-EGF, EGFR, and integrin-α5 was performed for 62 surgically staged MMMT cases. Recurrence/metastasis (RM) is 6/18 (33%) in stage I disease. Of all the clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers analyzed for stage I MMMT, serous carcinomatous component (83% [5/6] versus 17% [1/12], P = .0015) and HB-EGF expression (100% [6/6] versus 50% [6/12], P=.0339) were significantly different between groups with RM and without RM. The presence of serous carcinoma in all stages was 83% (5/6) in stage I with RM, 8% (1/12) in stage I without RM, 20% (1/5) in stage II, 36.4% (8/22) in stage III and 64.7% (11/17) in stage IV; this was paralleled by HB-EGF expression of 100% (6/6), 50% (6/12), 40% (2/5), 50% (11/22) and 71% (12/17) with a correlation coefficient r=0.9131 (P=.027). HB-EGF and integrin-α5 were highly expressed in MMMTs bearing serous carcinoma component, compared to endometrioid and unclassifiable/miscellaneous subtypes (84.6%/47.6%/33.3%, P=.025 for HB-EGF; and 61.5%/42.9%/20.0%, P=.021 for integrin-α5). The EGFR positivity was comparable among the three subtypes (48.1%, 47.6% and 26.7%, P=.326). This study indicates that serous carcinomatous component championed by expression of HB-EGF predisposes to recurrence/metastasis in stage I MMMT. This process might involve integrin-α5 and does not seem to require overexpression of EGFR. Further study is required.
