Axillary necklace graft salvage of a locally infected Haemodialysis with Reliable Outflow (HeRO®) graft.

BACKGROUND: A 48-year-old patient presented 4 months after insertion of a right sided Haemodialysis with Reliable Outflow (HeRO®, Merit Medical) graft with a discharging abscess at the site of the brachial artery anastomosis. There was localised involvement of the arterial Gore® Acuseal inflow graft that necessitated its removal. The venous outflow component was thought salvageable as infection was well localised to the region of the antecubital fossa. OBJECTIVES: Alternative access options were limited so we sought to preserve the venous outflow portion of the patient's original graft - minimising tissue damage and avoiding the need for a dialysis line. METHODS: The infected arterial graft was excised, leaving behind the original SuperHero® connector and venous graft. A left sided tunnelled axillary necklace technique was utilised to restore arterial inflow. RESULTS: After a four-day recovery, the patient went on to successfully resume their usual haemodialysis regimen without any complications. Convalescent imaging, repeat blood cultures, and monitoring of inflammatory markers showed no signs of residual infection at 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The originality of this case was the way in which an axillary necklace inflow graft was connected to the pre-existing venous outflow portion of the HeRO® haemodialysis graft system, allowing the excision of the infected inflow graft at the brachial anastomosis. This technique could be viewed as an effective salvage procedure as it allowed the venous outflow portion of the original graft to remain in situ, minimised tissue damage and enabled the patient to swiftly resume haemodialysis without the need for a line.

Factors Related to Limb Occlusion After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR).

BACKGROUND: Limb occlusion is a potentially serious consequence of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). This case-control study identifies factors that predispose to limb occlusion. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients from 2 centers undergoing EVAR over an 11-year period 2007-2017 were identified retrospectively. Patient records were interrogated allowing collations of demographics, intraoperative and perioperative data and surveillance data. The preoperative computed tomography angiogram was analyzed to determine EVAR relevant anatomical data. The primary outcome was occlusion of the iliac limb of the implanted EVAR. Raw data are presented as percentages, with comparative data analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test and binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 787 patients (702 males; median age 78 years, range 53-94 years old) were analyzed. Fifty patients reached the primary outcome, resulting in an overall limb occlusion rate of 6.35%. Factors predictive of limb occlusion were oversizing by >10% native vessel diameter, with oversizing of >20% in 50% of those that occluded. External iliac artery landing zone (12/50 limb occlusions) 24% and postoperative kinking (5/50 limb occlusions) 10% were also more common in those that occluded. Fifty randomly selected controls with similar baseline characteristics were studied. Oversizing of the iliac endograft was found to be significantly greater in the limb occlusion group compared to the controls (P < 0.001) which remained significant on regression analysis. There was no correlation with iliac tortuosity. The Cook stent graft had a 9% limb occlusion rate across sites. Medtronic and Vascutek endografts had 2.4% and 2.5% limb occlusion rates respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oversizing of iliac limbs by >20% could be a contributing factor to limb occlusion after EVAR and judicious oversizing should be used.

Predicting Features of Visceral Stent Failure in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: Visceral stents in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) have a significant risk of complications and carry a considerable burden of reinterventions. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of visceral stent failure. MATERIALS: A retrospective review of 75 consecutive FEVARs in a single center from 2013 to 2021 was undertaken. Data on mortality, stent failure, and reintervention pertaining to 226 visceral stents were collected. METHODS: Anatomical features including aortic neck angulation, aneurysm diameter, and angulation of target viscerals were obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Stent oversizing and intraprocedural complications were recorded. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed to determine the length of cover of target vessels. RESULTS: Only bridging stents through fenestrations to visceral vessels were considered; 28 (37%) cases had 4 visceral stents, 24 (32%) had 3, 19 (25%) had 2, 4 (5%) had 1. Thirty day mortality was 8%, a third of which was related to visceral stent complications. Intraprocedural complexity was documented during the cannulation of 8 (3.5%) target vessels, with a technical success rate of 98.7%. A significant endoleak or visceral stent failure was identified in 22 stents (9.8%) postoperatively, of which 7 (3%) had in-patient reintervention within 30 days. Further reinterventions at 1, 2, and 3 years were 12 (5.4%), 2 (1%), and 1 (0.4%), respectively. Most reinterventions were for renal stents (n=19, 86%). A smaller stent diameter and a shorter length of visceral stent were significant predictors of failure. No other anatomical feature or stent choice was found to be a significant predictor of failure. CONCLUSIONS: The modality of visceral stent failures varies, but renal stents with a smaller diameter and/or shorter length are more likely to fail over time. Their complications and reinterventions are common and carry a significant burden; therefore, close surveillance must be continued long term. CLINICAL IMPACT: With this work we share the methodology adopted at our centre to treat juxtarenal aneurysm with FEVAR. Thanks to this detailed review of anatomical and technical features we provide guidance for endovascular surgeons to face hostile aneurysm with peculiar visceral vessels anatomy. With our findings will also motivate industries in their attempt to produce improved technologies able to overcome issues identified in this paper.

Patient and Healthcare Professional Priorities for a Mobile Phone Application for Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Introduction Supervised exercise therapy (SET) is the first-line treatment for the peripheral arterial disease (PAD), however, access and compliance are low. An alternative method of delivering this therapy is through mobile health applications, which can be more accessible and convenient for patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate patient, public and healthcare professional (HCP) priorities with regard to a dedicated mobile phone application to deliver remote SET. Methods Bespoke questionnaires were designed for patients and HCPs to assess app functionality and prioritisations for development. These were distributed through social media and the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. Results Functionality questionnaires were completed by 62 patients and 44 HCPs. Eighty-four per cent of patients wanted their therapy to be monitored by their vascular team with the majority (78%) interested in measuring walking distances. Most patients (76%) were interested in watching exercise videos. These views were shared by HCPs. A communication platform was prioritised for messaging and pictures by the patient (74% and 68% respectively), but not so by HCPs (40%). Documenting other forms of physical activity and the use of wearable technology was less valuable to patients but favoured by HCPs (50%). The ability to interact with other users was not prioritised by either group. Conclusion Delivery of a mobile phone application to deliver health programmes for SET in patients with PAD is an acceptable method for patients and HCPs. This data will enable the next stages of mobile phone application development to be appropriately prioritised, focusing on building exercise videos, a communication platform and further walking tests.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of the Omniflow II biosynthetic graft for aortic reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the improvements in xenogeneic grafts and surgical techniques, management of aortic graft infection has remained challenging. The optimal graft material has remained controversial, with high rates of reinfection using prosthetic grafts and a limited time for venous harvest in an emergent setting. Recent studies have highlighted an increase in the use of Omniflow II biosynthetic vascular grafts (LeMaitre Vascular, Burlington, MA) for aortic reconstruction. The primary aim of the present study was to review the key outcomes for the Omniflow II graft in terms of reinfection and complications. METHODS: The National Healthcare Service healthcare databases advanced search function was used to search nine databases for the search term "Omniflow." The present study complied with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) statement. Eligible studies related to aortic graft infection or in situ aortic reconstruction were selected in accordance with prespecified eligibility criteria and included for review. Data on the surgical technique, comorbidities, graft reinfection, mortality, and complications were combined. The data were analyzed using Stata/MP, version 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX), and the probabilities were pooled using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model with Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation. RESULTS: Six studies with 60 patients (44 men; age range, 29-89 years) were included. Of the 60 patients, 25 had undergone surgical reconstruction because of early graft infection (<4 months after the index procedure), 24 for late graft infection, and 3 because of mycotic aneurysms. Eight high-risk patients had undergone surgical reconstruction for prevention of an initial graft infection. Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and S. epidermis were the most common organisms. Early mortality was 8.83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12%-20.53%), and late mortality was 18.49% (95% CI, 5.51%-35.34%). Follow-up varied from 9 months to 2 years. No graft rupture or graft degeneration had occurred during follow-up. However, 6.2% (95% CI, 0.39%-15.81%) had experienced early graft occlusion, and 3.83% (95% CI, 0.00%-16.34%) had developed early graft stenosis. Two cases of postoperative reinfection were reported. The freedom from reinfection was 97.71% (95% CI, 87.94%-100.00%). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Omniflow II graft for aortic reconstruction is a feasible alternative with acceptable mortality and low reinfection rates. However, there is a risk of limb occlusion. Although these studies were of low quality, the Omniflow II graft shows promise in this difficult patient cohort, especially when bifurcated reconstruction is required.

The risk of harm whilst waiting for varicose veins procedure.

INTRODUCTION: Varicose veins (VV) negatively impact quality of life (QoL) and have risks of major complications including bleeding, ulceration and phlebitis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the VSGBI (Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland) and GIRFT (Get It Right First Time) classified VVs as lowest priority for intervention. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine harm caused and the impact on the QoL on patients waiting for their VVs procedures for more than 1 year. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH). Patients with VVs awaiting intervention for >1 year were included in the study. Patients with CEAP C6 disease were considered to be too high risk to be invited for treatment during the Covid-19 pandemic. Patients were sent QoL questionnaires and underwent a telephone consultation to assess harm. Both generic (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D) and disease-specific (AVVQ and CIVIQ-14) instruments were utilised. There were no control groups available for comparison. RESULTS: 275 patients were identified (37.1% male) with median time on waiting list of 60 weeks (IQR 56-65). 19 patients (6.9%) came to major harm, including phlebitis (3.6%), bleeding (1.8%) and ulceration (1.8%). Fifty-two patients (18.9%) had minor harm, including worsening pain (12.7%) and swelling (6.2%). 6.9% reported psychological harm. Rising CEAP stage was also associated with worsening level of harm in patients with C5-6 disease (p < 0.0001). Only 8.7% stated they would decline surgery during the pandemic. 104 QoL questionnaires were returned. Median EQ-VAS and EQ-5D was 75 (IQR: 60-85) and 0.685 (0.566-0.761), respectively. Median AVVQ score was 23.2 (14.9-31.0) and CIVIQ-14 score was 33 (21-44).ConclusionsThis study highlights the impact of delaying VVs surgery during a pandemic. A significant rate of both major and minor as well as psychological harm was reported. In addition, VVs had a significant detriment to quality of life.

Ligation Alone Versus Immediate Revascularization for Femoral Artery Pseudoaneurysms Secondary to Intravascular Drug Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Femoral artery pseudoaneurysms (FA-PSAs) remain a common vascular aneurysmal pathology associated with intravascular drug use (IVDU). To date no internationally agreed consensus regarding optimal surgical management of FA-PSAs exists. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the optimal surgical treatment of FA-PSAs associated with IVDU. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines identifying original studies reporting outcomes of ligation-debridement and/or excision-revascularization of FA-PSAs secondary to IVDU. Outcomes of interest were 30-day mortality, incidence of amputation at 12 months, chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) at any follow-up appointment, reintervention, and bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 39 cohort studies describing 1,217 FA-PSA operative outcomes met inclusion criteria, 993 (81.6%) treated by ligation-debridement and 224 (18.4%) by excision-revascularization. The incidence of 30-day mortality was 0.8% (n = 8) and 1.3% (n = 3) in the ligation-debridement and excision-revascularization groups, respectively, with only one study reporting mortality in both groups. This meta-analysis found no difference in amputation (8.89% vs. 8.03%, odds ratio (OR) 0.74 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-1.56, P = 0.42, 11 studies) or CLTI (21.5% vs. 12.4%, OR 1.24 95% CI 0.35-4.38, P = 0.74, 9 studies) after ligation and debridement compared with excision and revascularization. There was a higher incidence of reintervention (24.7% vs. 10.6%, OR 0.31 [95% CI 0.16, 0.62], P = 0.0009, 13 studies) and rebleeding (7.1% vs. 1.6%, OR 0.61 [95% CI 0.16, 2.38], P = 0.48, 5 studies) after excision and revascularization compared with ligation alone. CONCLUSIONS: For treatments of IVDU-related FA-PSAs, this study suggests no significant difference in association of mortality, incidence of amputation, or CLTI with ligation-debridement or excision-revascularization, but a significantly higher reintervention rate and greater rebleeding rate for revascularized patients.

Long-term Outcomes Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Purpose: To investigate the long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) from a single center over an 11-year period. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 121 patients (median age 78 years; 100 men) with rAAA who underwent emergency EVAR at a single tertiary vascular center from January 2006 to December 2016. The study included only ruptures confirmed by evidence of hematoma on preoperative computed tomography; both iliac and aortic aneurysm ruptures were eligible. The primary outcome measures included mortality and reintervention rates. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and freedom from reintervention are reported with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates for emergency EVAR were 16.5%; 90-day mortality was 24.0%. The mortality estimates were 27.3% (95% CI 20% to 36%) at 1 year and 61.7% (95% CI 51% to 72%) at 5 years. In the observation period to 2017, 63 reinterventions were performed on 37 patients (30.6%). Median time to the first reintervention was 3.2 years. Freedom from reintervention in surviving patients at 1 year was 86% (95% CI 72% to 94%) and 51% (95% CI 26% to 71%) at 5 years. Four patients (3.3%) had a secondary sac rupture over the study period. Conclusion: Emergency EVAR for ruptured AAA can be performed with acceptable short-term outcomes; however, long-term surveillance is necessary, and reintervention is common.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of remote ischemic preconditioning for vascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a method of preparing the body for a later prolonged ischemic episode to protect against subsequent detrimental effects. This study aimed to identify the effects of RIPC in vascular surgery. METHODS: A standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was conducted of randomized controlled trials of RIPC in patients undergoing open or endovascular aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, or lower limb bypass reporting on mortality and renal or cardiac outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Center, Copenhagen, Denmark). RESULTS: A total of 13 randomized controlled trials in the meta-analysis included 548 patients in the RIPC cohort and 549 controls. There was no significant difference in mortality, renal dysfunction, myocardial infarction, myocardial injury, or length of stay between the groups, with subgroup and sensitivity analysis showing no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence demonstrates no benefit of RIPC in vascular surgery. Further large multicenter trials of RIPC in major vascular surgery should be considered.

The Impact of Operating Surgeon Experience, Supervised Trainee vs. Trained Surgeon, in Vascular Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The operative caseload of a surgeon has a positive influence on post-operative outcomes. For surgical trainees to progress effectively, maximising operating room exposure is essential, vascular surgery being no exception. Our aim was to ascertain the impact of supervised trainee led vs. expert surgeon led procedures on post-operative outcomes, across three commonly performed vascular operations. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 1 January 2018. Studies reporting outcomes following major lower limb amputation, fistula formation, or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) that involved a direct comparison between supervised trainee and experts were included, with odds ratios (ORs) calculated. Primary outcomes varied depending on the specific procedure: amputations-rate of amputation revision within 30 days; fistula formation-primary patency; CEA-stroke rate at 30 days. Meta-analysis with the Mantel-Haenszel method was performed for each outcome. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the final review. Overall, trainees accounted for a third of all procedures analysed (n = 2 421/7 017; 34.5%). Only one study was identified that described rates of amputation revision, precluding any further analysis. Four studies on fistula formation were included, showing no significant difference in outcomes between trainees and experts in primary patency (OR 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-6.75). Nine studies were identified reporting post-CEA stroke rates, also demonstrating no difference between trainees and experts (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59-1.32). CONCLUSION: In select cases, with appropriate training and suitable experience, supervised trainees can perform surgical procedures without any detriment to patient care. To ensure high standards for patients of the future, supported training programmes are essential for today's surgical trainees.

Outcomes of Sub-threshold Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Undergoing Surveillance in Patients Aged 85 Years or Over.

OBJECTIVE: Despite an increasing elderly population there is limited evidence regarding the surveillance and management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in octogenarians. This study investigated outcomes of patients aged ≥85 years undergoing AAA surveillance to identify whether discontinuation of surveillance might be safe. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients aged 85 years undergoing surveillance with a small (30-54 mm) AAA between January 2007 and November 2017. Patients were stratified depending on aneurysm diameter at index (<40 mm, 40-50 mm, > 50 mm). A threshold of 55 mm was used to decide intervention in all patients. Subsequent management of threshold aneurysms, aneurysm related and all cause mortality were also collected. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included (88 male, mean diameter at index 45 mm, median follow up 56.0 months). The majority of patients (72.3%) undergoing surveillance had not reached threshold at the end of follow up. Only one patient in the <40 mm group developed a threshold aneurysm, compared with five (11.6%) and 22 (75.9%) in the 40-50 mm and >50 mm groups, respectively (p < .0001). Of the 28 patients reaching threshold, eight (28.6%) underwent surgical repair (5 standard endovascular, one complex endovascular, and two open). Twenty-six (25.7%) patients died during follow up, with cardiorespiratory pathologies being the leading cause of death. Only three aneurysm related deaths were observed, including two fatal ruptures and one death following repair from an infected stent graft (all in the >50 mm index group). CONCLUSION: The present data suggests that discontinuation of aneurysm surveillance in patients aged 85 years with aneurysms < 40 mm might be safe. In patients with a larger aneurysm or those approaching threshold, early assessment of fitness for surgery may prevent unnecessary surveillance. The decision to treat aneurysms reaching threshold is complex but is appropriate in selected patients.

Review of adjustable velcro wrap devices for venous ulceration.

Compression therapy is the mainstay of treatment for patients with venous leg ulcers. Current gold standard is 4 layer bandaging, which has a significant impact on patients comfort, ability to wear their own shoes, and quality of life, as well as taking significant time to apply, and losing compression over time. This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of Velcro wrap devices for the treatment of venous ulceration. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to identify articles reporting the use of Velcro wrap devices in patients with venous ulceration. Sixteen articles were identified (14 case series, 1 randomised trial, and 1 audit) reporting on 192 patients. There were reports of improved time to healing, reduced cost by >50%, reduced number and duration of nursing appointments, and improved quality of life in patients in Velcro wrap devices. Although the evidence remains poor, Velcro devices have potential to improve outcomes for patients with venous ulceration and further good quality studies should be undertaken to evaluate these further.

Meta-analysis of Renal Function Following Infrarenal EVAR using Suprarenal or Infrarenal Fixation Devices.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The effect of suprarenal (SR) as opposed to infrarenal (IR) fixation on renal outcomes post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to update current understanding of this issue. METHODS: A prior meta-analysis was updated through a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses search for additional studies published in the last 3 years reporting on renal dysfunction or related outcomes post-EVAR. Random effects meta-analysis was undertaken using SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 25 non-randomised studies comparing SR with IR fixation were included, totalling 54,832 patients. In total, 16,634 underwent SR and 38,198 IR. Baseline characteristics, including age, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, cardiac disease, and smoking, were similar between the groups. There was a small but significant difference in outcomes for renal dysfunction at the study end point (SR 5.98% vs. IR 4.83%; odds ratio [OR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.40 [p < .001]); however, at 30 days and 12 months there was no significant difference, and this did not hold up to sensitivity analysis. Incidence of renal infarcts (SR 6.6% vs. IR 2.3%; OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.46-5.29 [p = .002]), renal stenosis (SR 2.4% vs. IR 0.8%; OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.00-8.38 [p = .05]), and renal artery occlusion (SR 2.4% vs. IR 1.2%; OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.15-4.25 [p = 0.02]) favoured IR fixation; however, there was no difference in haemodialysis rates. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis has identified small but significantly worse renal outcomes in patients having SR fixation devices compared with IR; however, there was no difference in dialysis rates and a small effect on renal dysfunction, which did not stand up to rigorous sensitivity analysis. This should be taken into consideration during graft selection, and further studies must assess renal outcomes in the longer term, and in those with pre-existing renal dysfunction.

Neoaortic Xenoprosthetic Grafts for Treatment of Mycotic Aneurysms and Infected Aortic Grafts.

BACKGROUND: There is no international consensus regarding the optimum management of infected aortae (mycotic aneurysms, infected aortic grafts). Neoaortoiliac reconstruction has advantages over extra-anatomical bypass grafting; however, the use of autologous vein is associated with venous hypertension and compartment syndrome, alternatively cadaveric homografts are associated with high rates of perianastomotic hemorrhage, limb occlusion, and pseudoaneurysm. Arterial repair using xenoprosthetic patches is associated with lower infection rates compared to the use of prosthetic material. The aim of this case series and literature review is to report the use of xenoprosthetic bovine biomaterial for neoaortic repair of mycotic aneurysmal disease and infected aortic grafts. METHODS: Patients with evidence of infected aortic grafts or mycotic aneurysms who were suitable for open aortic surgery were included. Following removal of the graft/excision of the aneurysmal sac, a 10 × 16 cm XenoSure Biologic Surgical Patch (LeMaitre, Germany) was rolled into a tube, or bifurcated tube graft, and secured with prolene sutures. Proximal and distal anastomoses were conducted as per standard aortic anastomoses. Patients were continued on long-term antibiotics and surveyed with computerized tomography at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Six patients underwent bovine aortic repair between 2013 and 2015: an infected Dacron aortobi-iliac graft causing iliac pseudoaneurysm, an infected Dacron aortic graft from open repair later relined with endovascular stent graft, a mycotic iliac aneurysm, and 3 mycotic aortic aneurysms. All were treated with bovine reconstructed aortic grafts or patches. Patients had a median age of 69.5 years (range 67-75), with perioperative and 30-day mortality of 0%. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 2-23). Postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed no evidence of infection at the operative site in all patients. Freedom from reinfection and reintervention was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Xenoprosthetic (bovine) neoaortic grafts are an alternative method to treat infected aortae with excellent short-term freedom from infection and reintervention. Optimum duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy remains undetermined. Further cases and longer follow-up are required to determine the true efficacy of this technique.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm sealing: A systematic review of early outcomes.

Objectives There has been a clear move towards endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms owing to better peri-operative outcomes compared with open surgical repair. However, follow-up has continued to reveal relatively high rates of endoleaks and re-interventions. Improvements in endovascular stent-grafts aim to decrease these complications. This systematic review aims to determine the early outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm sealing. Methods Standard PRISMA guidelines were followed. A literature search was performed with the aim to extract any publication related to the endovascular aneurysm sealing device. Results The total number of patients in this systematic review of 11 studies is 684, with a mean age of 73.2 years, and 587 (88.0%) males. The majority were undergoing elective procedures ( n = 606, 91.0%), the remainder as emergencies ( n = 30, 4.5% as ruptures, n = 30, 4.5% as symptomatic). Technical success rate including emergency cases was 99.1%. Thirty-day mortality rate was 2.6% ( n = 17) including all cases, and 1.0% ( n = 6) including elective cases only. Thirty -day endoleak detection rate was 4.7% ( n = 31) including all cases, and 4.8% ( n = 29) including elective cases only. Thirty-day aneurysm-related re-intervention rate was 5.7% ( n = 38) including all cases, and 4.6% ( n = 28) including elective cases only. There was no conversion to open surgery within 30 days post-op in the elective cases. There were three delayed conversions to open surgery within 30 days and one report of stent migration causing rupture in the emergency setting. Conclusions This novel endovascular aneurysm-sealing device for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has shown respectable early outcomes. Good technical success rates, in both elective and emergency settings, low rates of all-type endoleaks and low re-intervention rates have all been demonstrated. It is proving to be a safe alternative to open and endovascular aneurysm repair; however, longer term follow-up results are needed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the device in the long term.