Improvement of angiographic and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion after implementation of a dedicated team: a single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: In a Dutch heart centre, a dedicated chronic total occlusion (CTO) team was implemented in June 2017. The aim of this study was to the evaluate treatment success and clinical outcomes before and after this implementation. METHODS: A total of 662 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for a CTO between January 2013 and June 2020 were included and divided into pre- and post-CTO team groups. The primary endpoint was the angiographic success rate of CTO-PCI. Secondary endpoints included angiographic success stratified by complexity using the J­CTO score and the following clinical outcomes: in-hospital complications and myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularisation, all-cause mortality, quality of life (QoL) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30-day and 1­year follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with the pre-CTO team group, the success rate in the post-CTO team group was higher after the first attempt (81.4% vs 62.7%; p < 0.001) and final attempt (86.7% vs 73.8%; p = 0.001). This was mainly driven by higher success rates for difficult and very difficult CTO lesions according to the J­CTO score. The MACE rate at 1 year was lower in the post-CTO team group than in the pre-CTO team group (6.4% vs 16.0%; p < 0.01), while it was comparable at 30-day follow-up (0.1% vs 1.7%; p = 0.74). Angina symptoms were significantly reduced at 30-day and 1­year follow-up, and QoL scores were higher after 1 year. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated higher success rates of CTO-PCI and improved clinical outcomes and QoL at 1­year follow-up after implementation of a dedicated CTO team using the hybrid algorithm.

Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate real-world outcomes of patients with degenerated biological aortic valve prostheses who had undergone valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) or reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR) in the Netherlands. METHODS: Patients who had undergone ViV-TAVI or redo-SAVR for a degenerated biological aortic valve prosthesis in the Netherlands between January 2014 and December 2018 were eligible for this retrospective study. Patients with a prior homograft, active endocarditis or mechanical aortic valve prosthesis were excluded. Patients were matched using the propensity score. The primary endpoint was a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and in-hospital postoperative stroke. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality at different time points, in-hospital postoperative stroke, pacemaker implantation and redo procedures within one year. Baseline characteristics and outcome data were collected from the Netherlands Heart Registration. RESULTS: From 16 cardiac centres, 653 patients were included in the study (374 ViV-TAVI and 279 redo-SAVR). European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation I (EuroSCORE I) was higher in ViV-TAVI patients (19.4, interquartile range (IQR) 13.3-27.9 vs 13.8, IQR 8.3-21.9, p < 0.01). After propensity score matching, 165 patients were matched with acceptable covariate balance. In the matched cohorts, the primary endpoint was not significantly different for ViV-TAVI and redo-SAVR patients (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 0.57-3.02). Procedural, 30-day and 1­year all-cause mortality rates, incidence of in-hospital postoperative stroke, pacemaker implantation and redo procedures within one year were also similar between cohorts. CONCLUSION: Patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses treated with ViV-TAVI or redo-SAVR have similar mortality and morbidity.

IMPROV-ED trial: eHealth programme for faster recovery and reduced healthcare utilisation after CABG.

BACKGROUND: After coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), healthcare utilisation is high and is partly unplanned. eHealth applications have been proposed to reduce healthcare consumption and to enable patients to get actively involved in their recovery. This way, healthcare expenses can be reduced and the quality of care can be improved. OBJECTIVES: We aim to evaluate whether the use of an eHealth programme can reduce unplanned healthcare utilisation and improve mental and physical health in the first 6 weeks after discharge in patients who underwent CABG. In addition, patient satisfaction and use of the eHealth programme will be evaluated. METHODS: For this single-centre randomised controlled trial, at least 280 patients referred for CABG will be included at the preoperative outpatient clinic and randomised to an intervention or control group. The intervention group will have access to an eHealth programme, which consists of online educational videos developed by the Dutch Heart Foundation and postoperative video consultations with a physician. The control group will receive standard care and will not have access to the eHealth programme. The primary endpoint is healthcare utilisation; other endpoints include anxiety, duration of recovery, quality of life and patient satisfaction. Participants will complete several questionnaires at 6 time points during the study. RESULTS: Patient enrolment started in February 2020 and completion of the follow-up period is expected in August 2021. CONCLUSION: This randomised trial was initiated to test the hypothesis that patients who are partaking in our eHealth programme use less unplanned care and experience a better quality of life, less anxiety and a faster recovery than controls.

Better survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement by process improvements.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the effects on procedural, 30-day, and 1­year all-cause mortality by a newly introduced quality improvement strategy in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: In October 2015, a coherent set of quality improving interventions with respect to patient geriatric screening, general diagnostic examination and safety of the procedure was implemented at a single centre in the Netherlands. Patients undergoing TAVR in 2013-2018 were included for retrospective analysis. Mortality was assessed in the pre-quality improvement strategy cohort (January 2013 to October 2015; cohort A) and in the post-quality improvement strategy cohort (November 2015 to December 2018; cohort B). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the influence of patient and procedural characteristics on the results of the quality improvement strategy in terms of procedural, 30-day, and 1­year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: In total, 806 patients were analysed with 274 patients in cohort A and 532 patients in cohort B. After introduction of the quality improvement strategy, procedural (4.4% to 1.3%, p < 0.01), 30-day (8.4% to 2.7%, p < 0.01) and 1­year (16.4% to 8.5%, p < 0.01) all-cause mortality significantly decreased. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the quality improvement strategy also significantly reduced 30-day (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.42) and 1­year (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24-0.61) all-cause mortality if corrected for patient characteristics. CONCLUSION: Structural meetings on evaluation of outcomes highlight potential areas for improvement and subsequent outcome-based quality improvement initiatives can result in lower procedural, 30-day, and 1­year all-cause mortality.

Cross-sectional assessment of ELISA reactivity in leprosy patients, contacts, and normal population using the semisynthetic antigen natural disaccharide octyl bovine serum albumin (ND-O-BSA) in Cebu, The Philippines.

An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using natural disaccharide octyl bovine serum albumin (ND-O-BSA) as antigen was used in testing leprosy patients, contacts and a normal population in Cebu, The Philippines, from 1985 to 1989. A total of 1413 persons were studied. The results suggested that ELISA reactivity and the bacterial index (BI) correlate in a general way. In multibacillary (MB) leprosy, positivity ranges from 54.2% to 92.3% among patients with a BI of < 2+ to > 4+ on the Ridley scale, with an overall average of 84.5%. Paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients have a low degree of reactivity, with only 15.0% ELISA positive. The test is more efficient in detecting MB than PB leprosy. The contacts of MB leprosy showed 6.5% positivity; contacts of PB leprosy, 7.0% positivity. The normal population showed 1.7% positive ELISA or 17 per thousand population, which is very much less than that of the household contacts. However, because the normal population is a much larger population than the household contact population in a community, more new leprosy cases would emanate from it. Leprosy workers are concerned about the transmission of the disease to household contacts. However, for the reason stated above, we should be more concerned with the silent spread of the disease to the normal population in the community.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Leprosy control in Zambia.

Leprosy was a serious public health problem in Zambia until recently, with over 16,000 cases in 1982. Since then leprosy patients in the country have been put under multidrug therapy (MDT), as recommended by WHO, with support from the Sasakawa Memorial Health Foundation. Leprosy control in Zambia is combined with tuberculosis control and integrated within general health services. By 1990 52 districts (93%) had MDT, with an overall coverage of about 70% of all patients. As a result the number of registered cases has come down steadily from 16,642 in 1982 to 3,663 in 1989. Similarly, the number of new cases detected has been reduced from 1,010 cases in 1982 to 577 in 1989. On the whole the programme has gained significant momentum, although it is too early to expect a complete eradication of the disease in the near future, given the continued low level of observed new cases. Further, the implementation of MDT still lags behind the projected targets so that the potential of MDT is not being fully utilized. In addition, the problem of rehabilitation of disabled patients needs special attention. A subprogramme aimed at reducing disability through community participation is being developed within the framework of primary health care.