Improving technical and non-technical skills of emergency medicine residents through a program based on high-fidelity simulation.

We evaluated the effectiveness of a training program with high-fidelity simulation (HFS) to improve technical (TS) and non-technical skills (NTS) of residents in Emergency Medicine. We conducted a 2-year training program for the management of a critical patient based on HFS (6 sessions for every year, four teams who performed 4 scenarios per session). At the beginning of the training program, all participants received a presentation of Crisis Resource Management (CRM) principles. Each session covered a different topic in Emergency Medicine Curriculum. TSs were measured as the proportion of completed tasks in the following areas: airway, breathing, circulation, disability and exposure (ABCDE) assessment and management, completion of anamnesis based on AMPLE (allergy, medications, previous illness, last meal and event) scheme, diagnostic and therapeutic assessment. NTSs were rated by the Clinical Teamwork Scale (CTS). Scores' values and the percentage of correctly performed actions were presented as median with interquartile range. Friedmann non-parametric test was employed to evaluate the trend of TS and NTS over the following sessions. Among the TS, the assessment and management of ABCDE and completion of therapeutic tasks improved (all p < 0.05). The completion of diagnostic tasks (p = 0.050) tended toward significant improvement. The overall CTS score (first session 61 ± 17, last session 84 ± 16, p < 0.001) as well as Communication (first 13.7 ± 3.6, last 18.7 ± 3.5, p < 0.001), Situational Awareness (first 5.3 ± 1.8, last 6.4 ± 1.4, p = 0.012) and Role Responsibility subscores (first 9.7 ± 2.8, last 12.1 ± 3.7, p < 0.001) increased through the following sessions. Therefore, HFS has proven to be an effective instrument to improve TS and NTS among Emergency Medicine residents.

Comparison of Troponin I levels versus myocardial dysfunction on prognosis in sepsis.

In the context of sepsis, we tested the relationship between echocardiographic findings and Troponin, and their impact on prognosis. In this prospective study, we enrolled 325 septic patients (41% with shock), not mechanically ventilated, between October, 2012 and June, 2019 among those admitted to our High-Dependency Unit. By echocardiography within 24 h from the admission, sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) was defined as left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (speckle-tracking-based global longitudinal peak systolic strain, GLS, > - 14%) and/or right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion, TAPSE < 16 mm). Troponin I levels were measured upon admission (T0) and after 24 h (T1); it was considered normal if > 0.1 ng/mL. Mortality was assessed at day-7 and day-28 end-points. One-hundred and forty-two patients had normal Troponin level at T0 and T1 (G1), 69 had abnormal levels at T0 or T1 (G2) and 114 showed abnormal Troponin levels at both T0 and T1 (G3). Compared to G1, patients in G3 had worse LV and RV systolic function (GLS - 11.6 ± 3.4% vs - 14.0 ± 3.5%, p < 0.001; TAPSE 18 ± 0.5 vs 19 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.047) and greater day-28 (34% vs 20%, p = 0.015) mortality. In a Cox survival analysis including age, Troponin and SOFA score, mortality was predicted by the presence of SIMD (RR 3.24, 95% CI 1.72-6.11, p < 0.001) with no contribution of abnormal Troponin level. While abnormal Troponin levels were associated with SIMD diagnosed by echocardiography, only the presence of SIMD predicted the short- and medium-term mortality rate, without an independent contribution of increased Troponin levels.

Prognostic stratification in septic patients with overt and cryptic shock by speckle tracking echocardiography.

We evaluated the prevalence and prognostic value of left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular systolic dysfunction in the presence of overt and cryptic shock. In this prospective study, between October 2012 and June 2019, we enrolled 354 patients with sepsis, 41% with shock, among those admitted to the Emergency Department High-Dependency Unit. Patients were grouped based on the presence of shock, or by the presence of lactate levels ≥ (LAC +) or < 2 mmol/L (LAC-) evaluated within the first 24 h. By echocardiography performed within 24 h from the admission, LV systolic dysfunction was defined as global longitudinal strain (GLS) > -14%; RV systolic dysfunction as Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) < 16 mm. All-cause mortality was assessed at day-7 and day-28 follow-up. Mean values of LV GLS (-12.3 ± 3.4 vs -12.9 ± 3.8%) and TAPSE (1.8 ± 0.7 vs 1.8 ± 0.5 cm, all p = NS) were similar in patients with and in those without shock. LV GLS was significantly worse in LAC + than LAC- patients (- 11.2 ± 3.1 vs - 12.9 ± 3.7%, p = 0.001). In patients without shock, as well as in those LAC-, LV dysfunction was associated with increased day-28 mortality rate (78% vs 57% in non-survivors and survivors without shock and 74% vs 53% in non-survivors and survivors LAC-, all p < 0.01). LV (RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.37-3.74) and RV systolic dysfunction (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.22-2.81) were associated with increased 28-day mortality rate in addition and independent to LAC + (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.15-2.84). In conclusion, LV and RV ventricular dysfunction were independently associated with an increased mortality rate, altogether with the presence of cryptic shock.

Epidemiology of right ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.

We evaluated whether in sepsis, right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (RVSD) predicts short-term all-cause mortality, independently to left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLS). This is a prospective observational study. We enrolled 252 septic patients (40% with shock) between October 2012 and July 2018 among those admitted to High-Dependency Unit. By echocardiography within 24 h from the admission (T1), RVSD was defined as Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) < 16 mm, while left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) was defined by bi-dimensional speckle-tracking-based global longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLS) > -14%. We assessed all-cause mortality at day-7 and at day-28 from admission. Mortality rate was 14% by day-7 and 26% by day-28 follow-up. RVSD was found in 85 patients (34%), was isolated in 29% (25/85) and coexisted with LVSD in 71% (60/85) patients. LVSD was present in 63% of patients (159/252), and was isolated in 99 patients. Day-7 mortality rate was twofold higher in the presence of RVSD (20% vs 11%), without reaching the statistical significance (p = 0.097). By day-28, mortality rate was as high as 44% with and 23% without RVSD (p = 0.001). In a Cox survival analysis, RVSD predicted higher mortality rate by day-28 follow-up (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.47-4.00, p = 0.001), independent to shock and in addition to LVSD. In sepsis, RVSD predicted all-cause mortality by day-28 follow-up, independent to LVSD.

Early discharge of patients with pulmonary embolism in daily clinical practice: A prospective observational study comparing clinical gestalt and clinical rules.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the efficiency and safety of clinicians' gestalt in the identification of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) candidates for early discharge and to compare the efficiency and safety of clinical gestalt with that of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI), the simplified PESI (sPESI) and the Hestia criteria (HC). METHODS: Consecutive adult patients presenting to the emergency department of four Italian hospitals with confirmed diagnosis of PE were included. Data for PESI, sPESI and HC assessment were prospectively collected. Patients were managed according to the clinical gestalt of the attending physician, independent of the results of PESI, sPESI and HC. Efficiency was defined as the prevalence of candidates to early discharge. The primary safety measure was the incidence of a composite of venous thromboembolic recurrence, major haemorrhage or all-cause mortality within 30 days. RESULTS: Out of 547 included patients, 178 (32.5%) were judged to be at low risk and discharged within 48 h from presentation. HC identified a higher proportion (41.7%) whereas both PESI (24.1%) and sPESI (18.3%) identified a lower proportion of candidates for early discharge when compared to clinical gestalt (P < 0.01 for all). The incidence of the safety outcome was 2.8% in early-discharged patients according to clinical gestalt and 2.3%, 3.0% and 2.6% in candidates to early discharge according to PESI, sPESI and HC, without differences between strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, clinical gestalt identified one-third of PE patients for early discharge. Among different strategies HC showed the highest efficiency sharing similar safety with the other strategies.

SOFA score and left ventricular systolic function as predictors of short-term outcome in patients with sepsis.

In a group of septic patients, we assess the short-term prognostic value of LV systolic performance, evaluated through conventional left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS). One hundred forty-seven patients with sepsis were recruited; LVEF by planimetry and peak GLS by 2D speckle tracking could be assessed within 24 h. The study population was stratified according to SOFA tertiles assessed at the time of the echocardiogram (G1: SOFA score <5; G2: SOFA score 5-7; G3: SOFA score >7). Day-7 follow-up data were used as reference. Patients in G2 and G3 show a significant hemodynamic derangement, paralleling the more pronounced organ damage by definition; nevertheless, LVEF and GLS are comparable among the three groups (both p > 0.1). All-cause mortality at day-7 follow-up is slightly lower in G1 (9%) versus G2 and G3 (14 and 26%, respectively, p = NS). Analyses through ROC curves focusing on day-7 mortality show that the SOFA score fairly correlates with events (AUC 0.635, p = 0.037), while low LVEF (AUC 0.35, p = 0.022) and less negative GLS (AUC 0.73, p = 0.001) do so. In multivariate analyses, mortality by day-7 follow-up is more likely per higher GLS (i.e., indicative of worst systolic dysfunction, HR 1.22/%, p = 0.005) and per increasing SOFA score (HR 1.22/unit, p = 0.010), whereas LVEF, adjusted for age and SOFA score, does not enter the prognostic model. In the very short term in patients with severe sepsis, LV systolic function assessment by means of GLS predicts the short-term prognosis, independent of SOFA.