Revumenib for patients with acute leukemia: a new tool for differentiation therapy.

Treatment of acute leukemia is gradually moving away from a "one-size-fits-all" approach, as scientific and clinical advances expand the arsenal of available targeted therapies. One of the recent additions are the menin inhibitors; oral, selective, small molecules that disrupt the interaction between the chromatin adapter menin, and an epigenetic regulator, the Lysine Methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) complex. Two susceptible leukemia subtypes have been identified: 1) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with a mutation in Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1), and 2) any acute leukemia, myeloid or lymphoid, with a translocation resulting in the rearrangement of KMT2A. These leukemias share a distinct genetic expression, maintained by the KMT2A-menin interaction. Together they account for approximately 40% of patients with AML, and 10% of patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). This review follows the journey of revumenib, as a representative of menin inhibitors, from bench to bedside. It will focus on the pathophysiology of leukemias sensitive to menin inhibition, delineation of how this understanding led to targeted drug development, and data from clinical trials. The important discovery of resistance mechanisms will also be explored, as well as future directions in using menin inhibitors for treating leukemia.

Beat-AML 2024 ELN-Refined Risk Stratification for Older Adults with Newly Diagnosed AML Given Lower-Intensity Therapy.

While the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk classification reliably predicts outcomes in younger patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, it is unclear whether it applies to adults ≥ 60 years treated with lower-intensity treatment (LIT). We aimed to test the prognostic impact of ELN risk in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML ≥ 60 years given LIT and to further refine risk stratification for these patients. A total of 595 patients were included: 11% had favorable-risk, 11% had intermediate-risk, and 78% had adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN. ELN risk was prognostic for overall survival (OS) (P<0.001) but did not stratify favorable-risk from intermediate-risk (P=0.71). Within adverse-risk AML, the impact of additional molecular abnormalities was further evaluated. Multivariable analysis was performed on a training set (N=316) and identified IDH2 mutation as an independent favorable prognostic factor, and KRAS, MLL2, and TP53 mutations as unfavorable (P<0.05). A "mutation-score" was calculated for each combination of these mutations, assigning adverse-risk patients into two risk groups: -1 to 0 points ("Beat-AML-intermediate") vs 1+ points ("Beat-AML-adverse"). In the final refined risk classification, the ELN favorable- and intermediate-risk groups were combined into a newly defined "Beat-AML-favorable-risk", in addition to mutation scoring within the ELN adverse-risk. This approach redefines risk for older ND AML and proposes refined Beat-AML-favorable- (22%), Beat-AML-intermediate- (41%), and Beat-AML-adverse-risk (37%) groups with improved discrimination for OS (2-year OS: 48% vs 33% vs 11%, respectively, P<0.001; C-index: 0.60 vs 0.55 for ELN), providing patients and providers additional information for treatment decision-making.

Menin Inhibition With Revumenib for KMT2A-Rearranged Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia (AUGMENT-101).

PURPOSE: Revumenib, an oral, small molecule inhibitor of the menin-lysine methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) interaction, showed promising efficacy and safety in a phase I study of heavily pretreated patients with KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2Ar) acute leukemia. Here, we evaluated the activity of revumenib in individuals with relapsed/refractory (R/R) KMT2Ar acute leukemia. METHODS: AUGMENT-101 is a phase I/II, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study of revumenib conducted across 22 clinical sites in five countries (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04065399). We report results from the phase II, registration-enabling portion. Individuals age ≥30 days with R/R KMT2Ar acute leukemia or with AML and nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutation were enrolled. Revumenib was administered once every 12 hours, at 163 mg (95 mg/m2 if weight <40 kg) with a strong cytochrome P450 inhibitor, in 28-day cycles. The primary end points were the rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR + CRh) and safety. At a prespecified interim analysis, safety was assessed in all KMT2Ar treated patients; efficacy was assessed in those with centrally confirmed KMT2Ar. The separate NPM1 cohort of the trial is ongoing. RESULTS: From October 1, 2021, to July 24, 2023, N = 94 patients (median [range] age, 37 [1.3-75] years) were treated. Grade ≥3 adverse events included febrile neutropenia (37.2%), differentiation syndrome (16.0%), and QTc prolongation (13.8%). In the efficacy-evaluable patients (n = 57), the CR + CRh rate was 22.8% (95% CI, 12.7 to 35.8), exceeding the null hypothesis of 10% (P = .0036). Overall response rate was 63.2% (95% CI, 49.3 to 75.6), with 15 of 22 patients (68.2%) having no detectable residual disease. CONCLUSION: Revumenib led to high remission rates with a predictable safety profile in R/R KMT2Ar acute leukemia. To our knowledge, this trial represents the largest evaluation of a targeted therapy for these patients.

Genetic risk classification for adults with AML receiving less-intensive therapies: the 2024 ELN recommendations.

The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic risk classifications were developed based on data from younger adults receiving intensive chemotherapy. Emerging analyses from patients receiving less-intensive therapies prompted a proposal for an ELN genetic risk classification specifically for this patient population.

A practical approach on the classifications of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: WHO and ICC.

In 2022, two new classifications of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias were published: the 5th edition WHO Classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). As with prior classifications, the WHO-HAEM5 and ICC made updates to the prior classification (revised 4th edition WHO Classification, WHO-HAEM4R) based on a consensus of groups of experts, who examined new evidence. Both WHO-HAEM5 and ICC introduced several new disease entities that are based predominantly on genetic features, superseding prior morphologic definitions. While it is encouraging that two groups independently came to similar conclusions in updating the classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias, there are several divergences in how WHO-HAEM5 and ICC define specific entities as well as differences in nomenclature of certain diseases. In this review, we highlight the similarities and differences between the WHO-HAEM5 and ICC handling of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias and present a practical approach to diagnosing and classifying these diseases in this current era of two divergent classification guidelines.

How I Treat: Differentiation Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

An increasing number of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapeutics have been developed, not as cytotoxic therapies, but rather as targeted agents able to restore the aberrant and leukemogenic "block" in normal differentiation. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) are classic examples of differentiating agents for treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); newer therapies functioning through differentiation include isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 inhibitors, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors, and menin inhibitors. The terminal differentiation of leukemic blasts via differentiating agent therapy can lead to a constellation of signs and symptoms, originally referred to as "retinoic acid syndrome" and now termed "differentiation syndrome" (DS), characterized predominantly by systemic inflammatory response system (SIRS)-like features of dyspnea, pulmonary infiltrates, pleural and pericardial effusions, unexplained fevers, hypotension, edema, and renal insufficiency. DS in patients with newly diagnosed APL is generally straightforward to identify, however DS in patients with multiply relapsed AML can be more challenging to diagnose, due to non-specific signs and symptoms which can be mistakenly attributed to infectious etiologies or the underlying refractory leukemia itself. Prompt consideration of DS, rapid initiation of systemic corticosteroids, and early cytoreduction in the setting of concomitant hyperleukocytosis, are essential for optimal management.

Intensive Induction Chemotherapy versus Hypomethylating Agents in Combination with Venetoclax in NPM1-mutant AML.

While intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) remains the standard of care for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), data from older patients shows that hypomethylating agents + venetoclax (HMA/VEN) can lead to durable remissions among patients with NPM1 mutations. Whether IC or HMA/VEN is superior in patients ≥60 years-old with NPM1-mutant AML is unknown. To compare IC and HMA/VEN, we performed an international, multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed, NPM1-mutant AML.We included 221 patients (147 IC, 74 HMA/VEN) with previously untreated NPM1-mutant AML. Composite complete remission (cCR; defined as CR + CR with incomplete count recovery [CRi]) rate was similar for IC and HMA/VEN (cCR: 85% vs. 74%; p=0.067). While OS was favorable with IC in unselected patients compared to HMA/VEN (24-month OS 59% [95% CI: 52-69%] vs. 38% [95% CI 27-55%]; p=0.013), it was not statistically different among patients 60-75 years-old (60% [95% CI 52-70%] vs. 44% [95% CI 29-66%]; p=0.069) and patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant (70% [95% CI: 58-85%] vs. 66% [95% CI: 44-100%]; p=0.56). Subgroup analyses suggested that patients with normal cytogenetics (24-month OS with IC 65% [95% 56-74%] vs. 40% [95% CI: 26-60%] with HMA/VEN; p=0.009) and without FLT3-ITD mutations might benefit from IC compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS: 68% [95% CI: 59-79%] vs. 43% [95% CI: 29-63%]; p=0.008). In multivariable analysis, OS was not statistically different for patients treated with IC and HMA/VEN (hazard ratio for death HMA/VEN vs. IC: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.40-1.27; p=0.25).

Cost-effectiveness of adding quizartinib to induction chemotherapy for patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia.

The FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib has been shown to improve overall survival when added to intensive induction chemotherapy ("7 + 3") in patients 18-75 years old with newly diagnosed AML harboring a FLT3-ITD mutation. However, the health economic implications of this approval are unknown. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of quizartinib using a partitioned survival analysis model. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. In the base case scenario, the addition of quizartinib to 7 + 3 resulted in incremental costs of $289,932 compared with 7 + 3 alone. With an incremental gain of 0.84 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with quizartinib + 7 + 3 induction vs. 7 + 3 alone, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the addition of quizartinib to standard 7 + 3 was $344,039/QALY. Only an 87% reduction in the average wholesale price of quizartinib or omitting quizartinib continuation therapy after completion of consolidation therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant would make quizartinib a cost-effective option.

Differentiation syndrome associated with treatment with IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib: pooled analysis from clinical trials.

ABSTRACT: Treatment with enasidenib, a selective mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase isoform 2 (IDH2) inhibitor, has been associated with the development of differentiation syndrome (DS) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Studies on the incidence and clinical features of DS are limited in this setting, and diagnosis is challenging because of nonspecific symptoms. This study assessed the incidence, diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and correlation with clinical response of DS based on the pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials in patients with IDH2-mutated AML treated with enasidenib as monotherapy, or in combination with azacitidine or with chemotherapy. Across the total AML population, 67 of 643 (10.4%) had ≥1 any-grade DS event, with highest incidence in patients who received enasidenib plus azacitidine and lowest incidence in patients who received enasidenib plus chemotherapy (13/74 [17.6%] and 2/93 [2.2%]). The most common symptoms of DS were dyspnea/hypoxia (80.6%) and pulmonary infiltrate (73.1%). Median time to onset of first DS event across all studies was 32 days (range, 4-129). Most patients (88.1%) received systemic steroids for treatment of DS. Evaluation of baseline risk factors for DS identified higher levels of bone marrow blasts and lactate dehydrogenase as independent factors associated with increased grade 3 to 5 DS risk. Overall, these results suggest that DS associated with IDH inhibition is manageable, given the benefits of enasidenib treatment in IDH2-mutated AML. We further characterized enasidenib-related DS in these patients and identified risk factors, which could be used for DS management in clinical practice. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as # NCT01915498, NCT02577406, NCT02677922, and NCT02632708.

Cell-free DNA from nail clippings as source of normal control for genomic studies in hematologic malignancies.

Comprehensive genomic sequencing is becoming a critical component in the assessment of hematologic malignancies, with broad implications for patient management. In this context, unequivocally discriminating somatic from germline events is challenging but greatly facilitated by matched analysis of tumor:normal pairs. In contrast to solid tumors, conventional sources of normal control (peripheral blood, buccal swabs, saliva) could be highly involved by the neoplastic process, rendering them unsuitable. In this work we describe our real-world experience using cell free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from nail clippings as an alternate source of normal control, through the dedicated review of 2,610 tumor:nail pairs comprehensively sequenced by MSK-IMPACT-heme. Overall, we find nail cfDNA is a robust source of germline control for paired genomic studies. In a subset of patients, nail DNA may have tumor DNA contamination, reflecting unique attributes of the hematologic disease and transplant history. Contamination is generally low level, but significantly more common among patients with myeloid neoplasms (20.5%; 304/1482) compared to lymphoid diseases (5.4%; 61/1128) and particularly enriched in myeloproliferative neoplasms with marked myelofibrosis. When identified in patients with lymphoid and plasma-cell neoplasms, mutations commonly reflected a myeloid profile and correlated with a concurrent/evolving clonal myeloid neoplasm. For nails collected after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, donor DNA was identified in 22% (11/50). In this cohort, an association with recent history of graft-vs-host disease was identified. These findings should be considered as a potential limitation for the use of nail as normal control but could also provide important diagnostic information regarding the disease process.

Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax compared with intensive induction chemotherapy regimens in molecularly defined secondary AML.

Molecularly defined secondary acute myeloid leukemia is associated with a prior myeloid neoplasm and confers a worse prognosis. We compared outcomes of molecularly defined secondary AML patients (n = 395) treated with daunorubicin and cytarabine (7 + 3, n = 167), liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351, n = 66) or hypomethylating agents (HMA) + venetoclax (VEN) (n = 162). Median overall survival (OS) was comparable between treatment groups among patients aged >60 years. In a multivariable model HMA + VEN vs. 7 + 3 was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.98, p = 0.041]), whereas CPX-351 vs. 7 + 3 was not (HR 0.79 [CI 95% 0.50-1.25, p = 0.31]). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, BCOR and IDH mutations were associated with improved OS; older age, prior myeloid disease, NRAS/KRAS mutations, EZH2 mutation, and monosomal karyotype were associated with worse OS. When analyzed in each treatment separately, the IDH co-mutations benefit was seen with 7 + 3 and the detrimental effect of NRAS/KRAS co-mutations with HMA + VEN and CPX-351. In pairwise comparisons adjusted for age, HMA + VEN was associated with improved OS vs. 7 + 3 in patients with SF3B1 mutation and improved OS vs. CPX-351 in those with RNA splicing factor mutations. In molecularly defined secondary AML treatment with HMA + VEN might be preferred but could further be guided by co-mutations.

Results from phase 1 of the MANIFEST clinical trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of pelabresib in patients with myeloid malignancies.

Pelabresib (CPI-0610), a BET protein inhibitor, is in clinical development for hematologic malignancies, given its ability to target NF-κB gene expression. The MANIFEST phase 1 study assessed pelabresib in patients with acute leukemia, high-risk myelodysplastic (MDS) syndrome, or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs) (NCT02158858). Forty-four patients received pelabresib orally once daily (QD) at various doses (24-400 mg capsule or 225-275 mg tablet) on cycles of 14 d on and 7 d off. The most frequent drug-related adverse events were nausea, decreased appetite, and fatigue. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 225 mg tablet QD. One patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) showed partial remission. In total, 25.8% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and 38.5% of high-risk MDS patients had stable disease. One AML patient and one CMML patient showed peripheral hematologic response. The favorable safety profile supports the ongoing pivotal study of pelabresib in patients with myelofibrosis using the recommended phase 2 dose of 125 mg tablet QD.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02158858.

A study to assess the efficacy of enasidenib and risk-adapted addition of azacitidine in newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML.

ABSTRACT: Enasidenib (ENA) is an inhibitor of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) approved for the treatment of patients with IDH2-mutant relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this phase 2/1b Beat AML substudy, we applied a risk-adapted approach to assess the efficacy of ENA monotherapy for patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML in whom genomic profiling demonstrated that mutant IDH2 was in the dominant leukemic clone. Patients for whom ENA monotherapy did not induce a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) enrolled in a phase 1b cohort with the addition of azacitidine. The phase 2 portion assessing the overall response to ENA alone demonstrated efficacy, with a composite complete response (cCR) rate (CR/CRi) of 46% in 60 evaluable patients. Seventeen patients subsequently transitioned to phase 1b combination therapy, with a cCR rate of 41% and 1 dose-limiting toxicity. Correlative studies highlight mechanisms of clonal elimination with differentiation therapy as well as therapeutic resistance. This study demonstrates both efficacy of ENA monotherapy in the upfront setting and feasibility and applicability of a risk-adapted approach to the upfront treatment of IDH2-mutant AML. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03013998.

Traditional Medicare or Medicare Advantage? The Leukemia and Cancer Perspective.

Today, approximately 50% of patients eligible for Medicare have opted for Medicare Advantage as their primary coverage. Whereas Medicare Advantage is a reasonable option for healthy senior Americans, issues arise once they have serious or chronic medical problems, which are prevalent among older Americans. This review details the pros and cons of standard Medicare vs Medicare Advantage. The authors recommend considering standard Medicare as a better form of insurance coverage. In addition, patients should also enroll in Medicare Part D to get prescription drug coverage; buy a supplemental MediGap policy; and buy additional coverage for hearing, vision, and dental care. Although this is a more complicated process, it is also a better one until Medicare Advantage revises its plans to address the current issues facing Americans on such plans who have serious illnesses.

Acute myeloid leukemia with mixed phenotype is characterized by stemness transcriptomic signatures and limited lineage plasticity.

Mixed phenotype (MP) in acute leukemias poses unique classification and management dilemmas and can be seen in entities other than de novo mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). Although WHO classification empirically recommends excluding AML with myelodysplasia related changes (AML-MRC) and therapy related AML (t-AML) with mixed phenotype (AML-MP) from MPAL, there is lack of studies investigating the clinical, genetic, and biologic features of AML-MP. We report the first cohort of AML-MRC and t-AML with MP integrating their clinical, immunophenotypic, genomic and transcriptomic features with comparison to MPAL and AML-MRC/t-AML without MP. Both AML cohorts with and without MP shared similar clinical features including adverse outcomes but were different from MPAL. The genomic landscape of AML-MP overlaps with AML without MP but differs from MPAL. AML-MP harbors more frequent RUNX1 mutations than AML without MP and MPAL. RUNX1 mutations did not impact the survival of patients with MPAL. Unsupervised hierarchal clustering based on immunophenotype identified biologically distinct clusters with phenotype/genotype correlation and outcome differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed an enrichment for stemness signature in AML-MP and AML without MP as compared to MPAL. Lastly, MPAL but not AML-MP often switched to lymphoid only immunophenotype after treatment. Expression of transcription factors critical for lymphoid differentiation were upregulated only in MPAL, but not in AML-MP. Our study for the first time demonstrates that AML-MP clinically and biologically resembles its AML counterpart without MP and differs from MPAL, supporting the recommendation to exclude these patients from the diagnosis of MPAL. Future studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of mixed phenotype in AML. Key points: AML-MP clinically and biologically resembles AML but differs from MPAL. AML-MP shows RUNX1 mutations, stemness signatures and limited lymphoid lineage plasticity.

Enhanced clinical assessment of hematologic malignancies through routine paired tumor and normal sequencing.

Genomic profiling of hematologic malignancies has augmented our understanding of variants that contribute to disease pathogenesis and supported development of prognostic models that inform disease management in the clinic. Tumor only sequencing assays are limited in their ability to identify definitive somatic variants, which can lead to ambiguity in clinical reporting and patient management. Here, we describe the MSK-IMPACT Heme cohort, a comprehensive data set of somatic alterations from paired tumor and normal DNA using a hybridization capture-based next generation sequencing platform. We highlight patterns of mutations, copy number alterations, and mutation signatures in a broad set of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms. We also demonstrate the power of appropriate matching to make definitive somatic calls, including in patients who have undergone allogeneic stem cell transplant. We expect that this resource will further spur research into the pathobiology and clinical utility of clinical sequencing for patients with hematologic neoplasms.

Prospective analysis to determine barriers to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with acute leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with acute leukemia. Despite this, studies have shown that only a minority of patients ultimately proceed to allo-HCT. The primary objective of this prospective, observational study was to identify the rate of allo-HCT in patients for whom it was recommended, and reasons why patients deemed appropriate and eligible for HCT did not subsequently undergo transplant. Between April 2016 and April 2021, adult patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory acute leukemia were enrolled at the time of induction/reinduction therapy. Initial transplantation workup and allo-HCT recommendations were made during the early phase of induction/reinduction. Of the 307 enrolled patients, allo-HCT was recommended to 85% (n = 259), of whom 66% (n = 170) underwent transplant. Donor sources comprised 54% human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donors, 20% HLA-matched sibling donors and HLA-mismatched graft sources with 15% umbilical cord blood units, 8% HLA-mismatched unrelated donors, and 4% HLA-haploidentical donors. The most common reason for transplant disqualification in the 89 patients in whom it was initially recommended was persistent/relapsed disease (70%), followed by early patient death (10%). In this prospective study, we report a high allo-HCT rate, which may be due to early transplant referral and workup. The main allo-HCT barrier was disease control, followed by early patient death. With the increasing availability of HLA-mismatched graft sources, the lack of donor availability was not a transplant barrier. Further development of novel transplant strategies for patients not achieving remission and improvements in induction regimens could result in increased allo-HCT utilization.