Tricuspid regurgitation in the context of severe left-sided valvular disease: Patients characteristics and outcome.

Background: We aimed to assess the characteristics, management and long-term prognosis of a cohort of patients with multiple valvular disease, focusing on the context of severe mitral or aortic disease with concomitant significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Methods: After using a propensity score matching for age, 975 patients with ≥ moderate TR, diagnosed at our centers from 2012 to 2020, were included and divided in four groups, including isolated TR patients as reference group. Primary endpoint was all-cause death (ACD), secondary endpoint was the composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization + any valvular intervention. Results: Patients with isolated TR (356, 37 %) had more history of atrial fibrillation and were more often asymptomatic and with preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) + TR (466, 48 %) showed higher rates of concomitant coronary artery disease, advanced functional class symptoms and larger left atrial volumes. Severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients (131, 13 %) were older, with more comorbidities and lower LVEF. Patients with severe aortic regurgitation and TR (22, 2 %) were younger, with larger LV dimensions and higher pulmonary arterial pressures.After a median follow-up of 2.8 years, both endpoints were univariably more frequent in patients with severe AS + TR (all p < 0.001), but after comprehensive adjustment difference in the primary endpoint became insignificant, underscoring the serious outcomes of all significant TR groups significantly. Overall, in 44 (5 %) patients tricuspid intervention was performed, with no differences between groups in term of frequency of concomitant or staged tricuspid valve surgical treatment. Conclusions: In the context of severe left-sided VD, concomitant significant TR is common, and each subtype presents with different clinical and echocardiographic features: patients with severe AS and TR have considerable worse prognosis, although comprehensive adjustment reflected the poor outcomes affecting all types of patients with significant TR. In this scenario, TR was profoundly undertreated.

Impact on Outcome of Different Mechanisms, Baseline Degree and Changes of Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequent in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Although primary MR is an established negative prognostic factor, whether different mechanisms of MR have different effects on outcome is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the MR mechanism in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent TAVR for severe aortic stenosis in a high-volume tertiary care center. Echocardiographic comprehensive MR assessment was performed at baseline and within 3 months post TAVR. The study population was divided into 4 groups according to MR mechanism: Group I: fibro-calcific leaflet degeneration; Group II: prolapse/flail; Group III: ventricular secondary MR (functional MR); and Group IV: atrial functional MR. The study end point was a combination of death from cardiovascular cause and heart failure-related hospitalization. The study population included 427 patients (mean age 81.7±6.5 years; 71% primary MR; 62% ≥moderate MR). At 3-year follow-up, survival free from the composite end point significantly differs according to MR mechanism: it was higher in group IV (atrial functional MR, 96.6%) compared with group I (80.4%, P=0.002) and group II patients (60.7%, P=0.001), and group III (84.8%, P=0.037); patients with MR due to leaflet prolapse showed poorer prognosis compared with patients with functional MR (group III, P=0.023 and group IV, P=0.001) and with group I (P=0.040). Overall, severe MR after TAVR identified patients with poorer prognosis and was significantly more frequent in group II (46.4%, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TAVR, preprocedural identification of MR mechanism and mechanism provides prognostic insights.

Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation in Mitral Valve Prolapse by Three-Dimensional Vena Contracta Area: Derived Cutoff Values and Comparison With Two-Dimensional Multiparametric Approach.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic grading of mitral regurgitation (MR) in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is challenging. Three-dimensional (3D) vena contracta area (VCA) has been proposed as a valuable method. However, data defining the cutoff values of severity and validation in the subset of patients with MVP are scarce. The aim of this study was to validate the 3D VCA by 3D color-Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with MVP and to define the cutoff values of severity grading. The secondary aim was to compare 3D VCA to the effective regurgitant orifice area estimation by proximal isovelocity surface area (EROA-PISA) method. METHODS: A total of 1,138 patients with at least moderate MR who underwent TEE were included. Three-dimensional VCA was measured, and the cutoff value and area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of severe MR were estimated by receiver operating characteristic curve using a guideline-suggested multiparametric approach as the reference standard. In a subgroup of patients, 3D regurgitant volume (RV) and 3D fraction were calculated from mitral and left ventricular outflow tract stroke volumes to further validate 3D VCA against a 3D volumetric reference standard. RESULTS: The optimal 3D VCA cutoff value for predicting severe MR was 0.45 cm2 (specificity, 0.87; sensitivity, 0.90) with an AUC of 0.95 using a multiparametric approach as reference. Three-dimensional VCA had a good linear correlation with EROA-PISA (r = 0.62, P < .05) with larger values compared to EROA-PISA (0.63 cm2 vs 0.44 cm2, P < .05). A cutoff of 0.50 cm2 (AUC of 0.84; sensitivity, 0.78; specificity, 0.78) predicts an EROA-PISA of 0.40 cm2. Three-dimensional VCA had a good linear correlation with 3D RV (r = 0.56, P < .01), with an AUC of 0.86 to predict a 3D fraction >50%. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests 0.45 cm2 as the best cutoff value of 3D VCA to define severe MR in patients with MVP, showing an optimal agreement with the reference standard multiparametric approach and 3D RV.