Medium-term outcome of cementless, mobile-bearing, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cemented, mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) yields good functional results. However, radiolucent lines (RLL) are not uncommon, even in asymptomatic patients, and it has been debated whether these "physiological" RLLs are indicative of loosening. Cementless UKA may lead to fewer RLLs compared with cemented devices. The present study was designed to document mid-term outcome with an emphasis on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We included 153 knees of 150 consecutive patients in a retrospective study. All patients had received a cementless medial mobile-bearing UKA. Patients were evaluated with use of the Knee Society Score (KSS), which was obtained at baseline and at final follow-up. The WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS-12) were administered at the final follow-up. Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were taken at final follow-up. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 3-7 years), implant survival was 97.1% (95% confidence interval, 91.1-99.1%). Excellent postoperative KSS, WOMAC, OKS and FJS scores were obtained. Postoperative radiography was available for 78 knees. RLL was observed in 10.3% of the cases, but no cases with complete RLLs were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Favourable results were found for cementless, mobile-bearing UKA, with no aseptic loosening at an average follow-up of 5 years. Cementless UKA fixation may lead to a clinically "forgotten joint" and may decrease the rate of RLLs.

Midterm Results of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series.

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate about whether to use cementless or cemented fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess midterm survivorship of the Vanguard cementless system, and to demonstrate the utility of the Bone Hardness Test (BHT) for the selection of cementless fixation TKA. METHODS: From September 2009 through November 2014, 123 total knee arthroplasties were completed, with cementless Vanguard Cruciate Retaining TKA in 110 knees (102 patients) and cemented Vanguard in 13 cases (12 patients). Implant fixation was based on intraoperative assessment of posterior cruciate ligament stability, bone quality, and BHT. All patients with a cementless Vanguard implant were eligible for this retrospective study. Preoperative and postoperative Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were obtained. Standardized standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken. RESULTS: Three patients (4 TKAs) were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.4 years. All scores significantly improved postoperatively. No radiographic failures were observed. Five-year implant survival, with revision of any component for any reason as an endpoint, was 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 91.7 - 99.1%). Five-year survival with revision for aseptic loosening was 100%. Only one knee required revision due to an isolated unrelated bearing exchange, and two additional knees required secondary resurfacing of the patella for retropatellar pain. CONCLUSION: Good midterm results were obtained with the cementless Vanguard Cruciate Retaining TKA for the treatment of osteoarthritis. The Bone Hardness Test appears to be an effective way to determine the selection of cementless TKA.

Effect of elliptical deformation of the acetabulum on the stress distribution in the components of hip resurfacing surgery.

Hip resurfacing surgery is a matter of controversy. Some authors present very good late results of 99% survival outcomes. However, national records of implants point to the series of complications connected with biomechanical flaws of the implant. These results implicate the experimental research on biomechanical properties of HRS. The aim of the research was to define the nature of cooperation between the components of hip resurfacing surgery (HRS) and the influence of the deformation of acetabulum, the size of the implant and the nature of the bone surface on the stress distribution in the acetabulum and the femoral component. The calculations were run with the use of the finite element method (FEM), using the ANSYS bundle for this purpose. Four decrete models of the studied system were made: a model with the elements of the system connected with glue, a perfect spherical model with cooperating surfaces, a model reflecting an elliptical deformation of the acetabulum, and a model with different sizes of the implant. The results indicate that the stress values obtained for models with the ideally spherical acetabulum cannot cause significant deformation of cooperating implants. In the case of loads of the elliptically deformed acetabulum significant point stress concentrations can be observed in the spots of joint. The size of the acetabular and femoral components of HRS has influence on the stress concentration on the internal surface of the acetabulum as well as in the bone tissue surrounding the madrel of the femoral component. Moreover, physical properties of the base surface surrounding the HRS components have influence on the size of stress in the acetabulum and the femoral component.

Midterm Results of Cementless and Cemented Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty with Mobile Meniscal Bearing: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) yields good clinical outcome but common revision reasons are loosening and pain. Cementless UKA may reduce the revision rate. OBJECTIVE: The current study was designed to assess clinical and radiographic outcome of cemented and cementless UKA, using bone quality as determined by the Bone Hardness Test (BHT) as selection criterion for cementless implantation. METHODS: In this prospective comparative cohort study we analyzed 50 cementless and 29 Oxford consecutive UKA cases. Patients with sufficient bone quality were eligible for cementless UKA. Bone quality was assessed with the BHT, which consisted of exercising pressure with the thumb on the bone surface created after resection of the tibia. RESULTS: The average surgical times were 62.5 ± 12.6 and 78 ± 16 minutes in the cementless and the cemented group, respectively (p < 0.01). The average thickness of the polyethylene insert was 4.3 ± 1.2 (range, 3 - 9) and 3.7 ± 0.8 (range, 3 - 6) mm, respectively (p = 0.02). Both types of implants yielded excellent clinical and functional results. At an average follow-up time of seven years, we found non-significant differences between clinical results of cementless versus cemented implants. CONCLUSION: Shorter surgical time makes cementless implantation more attractive to surgeons when considering UKA options for their patients. The average thickness of the polyethylene insert in cementless group was 0.6 mm thinner than in the cemented group. The BHT is a simple and useful test to assess whether patients are eligible for cementless UKA.

[Vanguard Signature TKR--first experiences]. / Alloplastyka stawu kolanowego Vanguard Signature --pierwsze doswiadczenia.

On 15th May 2010 in Poland first computer planned total knee arthroplasty Vanguard Signature was performed and until now, including Orthopedic Traumatology Department of Central Clinical Hospital Ministry of Interior and Administration in Warsaw and Orthopedic Surgery Department of Promienista Clinic in Poznan, 65 patients have been operated with this method. The new system includes programming technical parameters of operation on the basis of diagnostic analysis of lower extremity using CT or MRI scans. Data are transmitted on Signature Positioning Guides (SPG) which implements function of navigation during surgery. Minimal bone resection, implants sizing and placement with reconstruction of mechanical axis of the limb provides proper functioning of the knee joint and reduces the risk of implants loosening. Further benefits include: instrument reduction, lower degree of femur trauma and reduction of average postoperative blood transfusion volume. The operator using Signature technology is required to have advanced knowledge in the conventional method TKR and medium level computer skills. Access to the program and materials and online communication with the Signature team in the USA allows the surgeon to modify the parameters of the operation and the necessary expert feedback. The rapid increase in the number of registered surgeons in Signature system shows a considerable interest in this technology.