First-in-human evaluation of a biological regenerative vascular conduit for hemodialysis access.

INTRODUCTION: The long-term survival and low complication rate of autogenous fistulas for hemodialysis access is often offset by early thrombosis and slow or failed maturation leading to the use of central venous catheters. A regenerative material may have the potential to overcome these limitations. A completely biological acellular vascular conduit was investigated in this first-in-human clinical study. METHODS: With approval of the ethics board and patients' informed consent, five subjects were enrolled based on predetermined inclusion criteria. Five patients underwent implant of a novel acellular, biological tissue conduit (TRUE AVC™) in the upper arm in a curved configuration between brachial artery and axillary vein. After maturation, standard dialysis was commenced through the new access. Patients were followed up to 26 weeks with ultrasound and physical exam. Serum samples were evaluated for an immune response to the novel allogeneic human tissue implant. RESULTS: This new tissue conduit handled well surgically, with properties similar to that of native human vein. Post procedure conduit flow was excellent in all cases, averaging 1098 ± 388 ml/min at week 4 and remaining stable through 1248 ± 355 ml/min at 26 weeks. Surgical site healing was normal with no edema or erythema by week 4. Six-month primary assisted patency was 80% and secondary patency was 100%. Prescribed dialysis was successfully delivered without infection, and there was no significant change in conduit diameter. Serum testing showed no increase in PRA or IgG specific to the TRUE AVC. One implant required intervention at 5 months with thrombectomy and covered stent procedure. CONCLUSION: This first-in-human 6-month study with favorable patency and low complication rate establishes the initial safety and feasibility of this novel biological tissue conduit for dialysis access in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Its mechanical durability and lack of immune response establishes TRUE AVC as a potential regenerative material for clinical use.

Mechanisms of tissue uptake and retention of paclitaxel-coated balloons: impact on neointimal proliferation and healing.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) for restenosis prevention has been demonstrated in humans. However, the mechanism of action for sustained drug retention and biological efficacy following single-time drug delivery is still unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic profile and differences in drug concentration (vessel surface vs arterial wall) of two different paclitaxel coating formulations (3 µg/mm(2)) displaying opposite solubility characteristics (CC=crystalline vs AC=amorphous) were tested in vivo and compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). Also, the biological effect of both PCB formulations on vascular healing was tested in the porcine coronary injury model. One hour following balloon inflation, both formulations achieved similar arterial paclitaxel levels (CC=310 vs AC=245 ng/mg; p=NS). At 24 h, the CC maintained similar tissue concentrations, whereas the AC tissue levels declined by 99% (p<0.01). At this time point, arterial levels were 20-fold (CC) and 5-fold (AC) times higher compared to the PES group (p<0.05). At 28 days, arterial levels retained were 9.2% (CC) and 0.04% (AC, p<0.01) of the baseline levels. Paclitaxel concentration on the vessel surface was higher in the CC at 1 (CC=36.7% vs AC=13.1%, p<0.05) and 7 days (CC=38.4% vs AC=11%, p<0.05). In addition, the CC induced higher levels of neointimal inhibition, fibrin deposition and delayed healing compared with the AC group. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of paclitaxel deposits on the vessel surface driving diffusion into the arterial tissue in a time-dependent fashion supports the mechanism of action of PCB. This specific pharmacokinetic behaviour influences the patterns of neointimal formation and healing.

Tissue uptake, distribution, and healing response after delivery of paclitaxel via second-generation iopromide-based balloon coating: a comparison with the first-generation technology in the iliofemoral porcine model.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate vascular drug uptake, distribution and response of second-generation paclitaxel coated balloon (PCB) (Cotavance, MEDRAD Interventional, Indianola, Pennsylvania) and compare it with first-generation technology, containing identical excipient and drug concentration. BACKGROUND: Original PCB technologies displayed a heterogeneous deposition of crystalline paclitaxel-iopromide inside the balloon folds, whereas second-generation PCBs consisted of more homogeneous, circumferential coatings. METHODS: Paclitaxel tissue uptake was assessed in 20 iliofemoral arteries of a domestic swine. Vascular healing response was assessed in the familial hypercholesterolemic model of iliofemoral in-stent restenosis. Three weeks after bare-metal stent implantation, vascular segments were randomly revascularized with first-generation PCBs (n = 6), second-generation PCBs (n = 6), or plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) (n = 6). At 28 days, angiographic and histological evaluation was performed in all treated segments. RESULTS: One-hour paclitaxel tissue uptake was 42% higher in the second-generation PCBs (p = 0.03) and resulted in more homogeneous segment-to-segment distribution compared with first-generation PCBs. Both angiography (percentage of diameter stenosis: second-generation 11.5 ± 11% vs. first-generation 21.9 ± 11% vs. PBA 46.5 ± 10%; p < 0.01) and histology (percentage of area stenosis: second-generation 50.5 ± 7% vs. first-generation 54.8 ± 18% vs. PBA 78.2 ± 9%; p < 0.01) showed a decrease in neointimal proliferation in both PCB groups. Histological variance of the percentage of area stenosis was lower in second-generation compared with first-generation PCBs (51.7 vs. 328.3; p = 0.05). The presence of peristrut fibrin deposits (0.5 vs. 2.4; p < 0.01) and medial smooth muscle cell loss (0 vs. 1.7; p < 0.01) were lower in the second-generation compared with first-generation PCBs. CONCLUSIONS: In the experimental setting, second-generation PCB showed a comparable efficacy profile and more favorable vascular healing response when compared to first-generation PCB. The clinical implications of these findings require further investigation.

Stent healing response following delivery of paclitaxel via durable polymeric matrix versus iopromide-based balloon coating in the familial hypercholesterolaemic swine model of coronary injury.

AIMS: The routine use of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) in combination with bare metal stents (BMS) in de novo coronary lesions has been questioned. In this study, we aimed to compare the vascular response of BMS implanted using a second-generation PCB (BMS+PCB) with the TAXUS stent (PES) and a BMS control (BMS) in the familial hypercholesterolaemic swine (FHS) model of coronary injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 17 stents (PES=6, BMS+PCB=6, and BMS=5) were implanted in the coronary territory of 10 FHS using a 20% overstretch injury ratio. Imaging evaluation (QCA and IVUS) was conducted in all animals at baseline and 28 days following stent implantation. Following terminal imaging all animals were euthanised and stented coronary segments harvested for histological evaluation. At 28 days, the lowest degree of percentage diameter stenosis by QCA was achieved by the PES (2.9 ± 9%) followed by the BMS+PCB (9.5 ± 16.4%) and the BMS group (25.65 ± 18.7%, p<0.05). In histology, percentage area of stenosis (BMS+PCB=29.6 ± 6.4% vs. PES=21.5 ± 3.3% vs. BMS=55.2 ± 12.9%; p<0.01) and neointimal thickness (BMS+PCB=0.26 ± 0.1 mm vs. PES=0.21 ± 0.1 mm vs. BMS=0.59 ± 0.2 mm; p<0.01) were significantly reduced in both paclitaxel groups in comparison to BMS controls. Both BMS+PCB and BMS groups had higher endothelialisation scores (PES=1.50 ± 0.9 vs. BMS+PCB=2.73 ± 0.4 vs. BMS=3.00; p<0.05) and lower peri-strut inflammatory scores (PES=0.83 ± 0.4 vs. BMS+PCB=0.20 ± 0.2 vs. BMS=0.43 ± 0.6, p<0.05) when compared to PES. Neointima maturity (PCB+BMS: 2.00 [2-2.4] vs. PES: 1.00 [0.3-1] vs. BMS: 3.00, p<0.05) and fibrin deposition (PCB+BMS: 1.40 ± 0.3 vs. PES: 2.17 ± 0.7 vs. BMS: 0.27 ± 0.3, p<0.05) scores in PCB+BMS appeared to fall between the PES and the BMS ranges. CONCLUSIONS: In the FHS coronary injury model, BMS implantation using a PCB yields a degree of neointimal inhibition comparable to the PES. The BMS+PCB combination presented lower degrees of inflammation and fibrin deposition; however, signs of delayed healing were still present.

Evaluation of efficacy and dose response of different paclitaxel-coated balloon formulations in a novel swine model of iliofemoral in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to validate a novel iliofemoral in-stent restenosis (ISR) model for the efficacy evaluation of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) using the familial hypercholesterolemic swine (FHS). BACKGROUND: Most of the validation work regarding PCB technologies has been performed in the coronary territory of juvenile domestic swine. Although invaluable for safety evaluation, this model is not suited for the evaluation of the efficacy of peripheral PCB technologies. METHODS: Twenty-four iliofemoral segments in 12 FHS underwent balloon injury and self-expanding stent placement. After 21 days, the resulting ISR lesions were treated with either 1 µg/mm(2) dose (n = 8), or 3 µg/mm(2) dose (n = 8) PCB (Cotavance, Bayer Pharma AG/MEDRAD, Indianola, Pennsylvania), or with an identical uncoated control balloon (n = 8). RESULTS: At termination (28 days after treatment), the percent diameter stenosis by quantitative vascular analysis in the control group was higher (31.2 ± 13.7%) compared with the 1 µg/mm(2) (19.3 ± 14.0%, 38% reduction) and 3 µg/mm(2) (8.6 ± 10.7%, 72% reduction) PCB groups. Intravascular ultrasound analysis showed 36% (1 µg/mm(2) dose, p = 0.04) and 55% (3 µg/mm(2) dose, p < 0.01) reductions in neointimal volume stenosis. In the histological analysis, the control group showed the highest degree of percent area stenosis (65 ± 14.3%). The reductions in percent area stenosis was 13.2% (p = 0.5) and 26% (p = 0.04) in the 1 µg/mm(2) and 3 µg/mm(2) dose groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FHS model of iliofemoral ISR demonstrated a dose-dependent effect on the inhibition of neointimal proliferation of a clinically validated PCB technology. This model represents a positive step toward the efficacy evaluation of PCB in the peripheral vascular territory.

Paclitaxel-iopromide coated balloon followed by "bail-out" bare metal stent in porcine iliofemoral arteries: first report on biological effects in peripheral circulation.

AIMS: Despite recent abundance of data on drug-coated balloon technology, the biological effects of paclitaxel coated balloon (PCB) treatment followed by bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in peripheral arteries (simulating bail-out stenting, a common clinical scenario), have not been published. METHODS AND RESULTS: PCB technology containing a paclitaxel-iopromide coating and identical iopromide-coated controls (without paclitaxel) were used in 16 porcine ilio-femoral arteries. The biological effects of inflating one (PCBx1) or two sequential (PCBx2) paclitaxel coated balloons before BMS implantation were compared to the single application of a control balloon (CCBx1; contrast coated balloons). At 30 days PCBx2 displayed significantly reduced late lumen loss by angiography (58% reduction vs. CCBx1; p=0.04) and neointimal area by histomorphometry (35% reduction vs. CCBx1 and 30% vs. PCBx1; p=0.02). Similarly, percent area stenosis in the PCBx2 group was reduced by 45% as compared to CCBx1 and PCBx1 (p=0.04). At this time, all parameters of vessel wall healing (including injury score, inflammation, and endothelialisation) following drug coated balloon treatment were comparable to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel delivery to porcine ilio-femorals using PCB followed by BMS implantation effectively decreased neointimal proliferation. More extensive and prolonged proliferative response of the vessel after stenting (necessitating higher drug dose) could potentially explain the undetectable effect of PEBx1 relative to CCBx1 in this pilot study. Histological analysis confirmed the safety and biocompatibility of PCB technology.