Do Long-Segment Blocking Screws Increase the Stability of Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Proximal Tibia Fractures, Eliminating the "Bell-Clapper Effect?"

OBJECTIVES: To determine change in stiffness and horizontal translation of a geriatric extra-articular proximal tibia fracture model after intramedullary nailing with distal (long)-segment blocking screws versus proximal (short)-segment blocking screws. METHODS: Unstable extra-articular proximal tibia fractures (OTA/AO 41-A3) were created in 12 geriatric cadaveric tibias. Intramedullary nails were locked with a standard construct (4 proximal screws and 2 distal screws). Specimens were then divided into 2 groups (6 matched pairs per group). Group 1 had a blocking screw placed lateral to the nail in the proximal segment (short segment). Group 2 had a blocking screw placed 1 cm distal to the fracture and medial to the nail (long segment). Specimens were then axially loaded and cycled to failure or cycle completion (50,000 cycles). RESULTS: Long-segment blocking screws significantly decreased the amount of horizontal translation at the fracture site compared with short-segment screws (0.77 vs. 2.0 mm, P = 0.039). They also resulted in a greater trend towards greater baseline stiffness, (807.32 ± 216.95 N/mm vs. 583.12 ± 130.1 N/mm, P = 0.072). There was no difference in stiffness after cyclic loading or survival through 50,000 cycles between the long-segment and short-segment groups. CONCLUSION: Long-segment blocking screws added to an intramedullary nail construct resulted in decreased horizontal translation at the fracture site compared with short-segment screws in this model of a geriatric proximal tibia fracture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Blocking screws are commonly used to aid in fracture alignment during intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures. Even when not required to attain or maintain alignment, the addition of a blocking screw in either the proximal or the distal (long) segment may help mitigate the "Bell-Clapper Effect" in geriatric patients.

OrthoPass: Long-term Outcomes following Implementation of an Orthopaedic Patient Handoff Template.

Standardized handoff tools improve communication and patient care; however, their widespread use in surgical fields is lacking. OrthoPass, an orthopaedic adaptation of I-PASS, was developed in 2019 to address handoff concerns and demonstrated sustained improvements across multiple handoff domains over an 18-month period. We sought to characterize the longitudinal effect and sustainability of OrthoPass within a single large residency program 3.5 years after its implementation. This mixed methods study involved electronic handoff review for quality domains in addition to survey distribution and evaluation. We conducted comparative analyses of handoff adherence and survey questions as well as a thematic analysis of provider-free responses. We evaluated 146 electronic handoffs orthopaedic residents, fellows, and advanced practice providers 3.5 years after OrthoPass implementation. Compared with 18-month levels, adherence was sustained across five of nine handoff domains and was markedly improved in two domains. Furthermore, provider valuations of OrthoPass improved regarding promoting communication and patient safety (83% versus 70%) and avoiding patient errors and near misses (72% versus 60%). These improvements were further substantiated by positive trends in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Surveys on Patient Safety Culture hospital survey data. Thematic analysis of free responses shared by 37 providers (42%) generated favorable, unfavorable, and balanced themes further contextualized by subthemes. At 3.5 years after its introduction, OrthoPass continues to improve patient handoff quality and to support provider notions of patient safety. Although providers acknowledged the benefits of this electronic handoff tool, they also shared unique insights into several drawbacks. This feedback will inform ongoing efforts to improve OrthoPass.

Impact of Age on Functional Outcome After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Proximal Humerus Fractures or Their Sequelae.

Background: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to treat displaced, unstable 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) has traditionally been reserved for patients over 70 years old. However, recent data suggest that nearly one-third of all patients treated with RSA for PHF are between 55-69 years old. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for patients younger than 70 versus patients older than 70 years of age treated with RSA for a PHF or fracture sequelae. Methods: All patients who underwent primary RSA for acute PHF or fracture sequelae (nonunion, malunion) between 2004 and 2016 were identified. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing outcomes for patients younger than 70 versus older than 70. Bivariate and survival analyses were performed to evaluate for survival complications, functional outcomes, and implant survival differences. Results: A total of 115 patients were identified, including 39 patients in the young group and 76 cases in the older group. In addition, 40 patients (43.5%) returned functional outcomes surveys at an average of 5.51 years (average age range: 3.04-11.0 years). There were no significant differences in complications, reoperation, implant survival, range of motion, DASH (27.9 vs 23.8, P=0.46), PROMIS (43.3 vs 43.6, P=0.93), or EQ5D (0.75 vs 0.80, P=0.36) scores between the two age cohorts. Conclusion: At a minimum of 3 years after RSA for a complex PHF or fracture sequelae, we found no significant difference in complications, reoperation rates, or functional outcomes between younger patients with an average age of 64 years and older patients with an average age of 78 years. To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically examine the impact of age on outcome after RSA for the treatment of a proximal humerus fracture. These findings indicate that functional outcomes are acceptable to patients younger than 70 in the short term, but more studies are needed. Patients should be counseled that the long-term durability of RSA performed for fractures in young, active patients remains unknown.

High- Versus Low-Energy Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in Young Patients: Injury Characteristics and Factors Associated With Complications.

OBJECTIVE: To compare fracture patterns and associated injuries for young patients with high- versus low-energy intertrochanteric hip fractures and to report on factors associated with complications after surgical fixation of high-energy fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS: A total of 103 patients 50 years of age or younger were included: 80 high-energy fractures and 23 low-energy fractures. INTERVENTION: Cephalomedullary nailing (N = 92) or a sliding hip screw (N = 11). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic characteristics of fracture morphology, implant position, and reduction quality and postoperative complications were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Compared with young patients with low-energy fractures, those with high-energy fractures had more fracture comminution ( P = 0.013) and higher ISS scores ( P < 0.003) and were more likely to require open reduction ( P < 0.001). Patients with low-energy fractures from a ground-level fall had higher rates of alcohol abuse (0.032), cirrhosis (0.010), and chronic steroid use (0.048). Overall reoperation rate for high-energy fractures was 7%, including 2 IT fracture nonunions (5%) and 1 deep infection (2%). For high-energy fractures, ASA class ( P = 0.026), anterior lag screw position ( P = 0.001), and varus malreduction ( P < 0.001) were associated with malunion. Four-part fracture (OTA/AO 31A2.3/Jensen 5) ( P = 0.028) and residual calcar gap >3 mm ( P = 0.03) were associated with reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of high-energy IT fractures in young patients is technically demanding with potential untoward outcomes. Injury characteristics and severity are significantly different for young patients with high-energy IT fractures compared with low-energy fractures. For young patients with a high-energy IT fracture, surgeons can anticipate a high rate of associated injuries and complex fracture patterns requiring open reduction. For young patients with a low-energy IT fracture, comanagement with a hospitalist or a geriatrician should be considered because they may be physiologically older. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does a Reduced Secondary Operation Rate Offset Higher Implant Charges when Utilizing Suture Button Fixation for Syndesmotic Injuries?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a reduced secondary operation rate offsets higher implant charges when using suture button fixation for syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single, urban, Level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Three-hundred twenty-seven (N = 327) skeletally mature patients with rotational ankle fractures (OTA/AO type 44) necessitating concurrent syndesmotic fixation. INTERVENTION: Suture button or solid 3.5-mm screw syndesmotic fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: To compare implant charges with secondary operation charges based on differential implant removal rates between screws and suture buttons. RESULTS: Patients undergoing screw fixation were older (48.8 vs. 39.6 years, P < 0.01), had more ground-level fall mechanisms (59.3% vs. 51.1%, P = 0.026), and sustained fewer 44C type injuries (34.7% vs. 56.8%, P = 0.01). Implant removal occurred at a higher rate in the screw fixation group (17.6% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.005). Binomial logistic regression identified nonsmoker status (B = 1.03, P = 0.04) and implant type (B = 1.41, P = 0.008) as factors associated with implant removal. Adjusting for age, the NNT with a suture button construct to prevent one implant removal operation was 9, with mean resulting additional implant charges of $9747 ($1083/case). Backward calculations using data from previous large studies estimated secondary operation charges at approximately $14220, suggesting a potential 31.5% cost savings for suture buttons when considering reduced secondary operation rates. CONCLUSIONS: A reduced secondary operation rate may offset increased implant charges for suture button syndesmotic fixation when considering institutional implant removal rates for operations occurring in tertiary care settings. Given these offsetting charges, surgeons should use the syndesmotic fixation strategy they deem most appropriate in their practice setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Sustained Improvement in Quality of Patient Handoffs After Orthopaedic Surgery I-PASS Intervention.

PURPOSE: The I-PASS tool has been shown to decrease medical errors in patient handoffs in nonorthopaedic surgery fields. We prospectively studied the implementation of a version of this handoff tool modified for orthopaedic surgery patients in an academic practice at two level I trauma centers. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a multicenter handoff improvement program. Handoffs were evaluated preintervention and at 1, 6, 9, and 18 months postintervention for key data elements defined by I-PASS. Rates of adverse clinical outcomes were compared before and after the handoff intervention. RESULTS: Seven hundred five electronic patient handoffs were analyzed. From preintervention to the 18-month time point, notable improvement was observed in 8 of 9 targeted quality elements. In Poisson regression analysis, adherence to the standardized handoff format was sustained at markedly improved levels throughout all postintervention time points. No statistically significant differences were observed between rates of 30-day readmission, 90-day readmission, urinary tract infection, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, surgical site infection, or delirium before and after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Introduction of an orthopaedic-specific I-PASS tool produced sustained adherence from a group of over 50 orthopaedic providers. Objective quality of handoffs improved markedly as defined by the I-PASS standard, and 86% of the providers supported the ongoing use of the tool. Despite the improvement in handoff quality, we were unable to demonstrate a notable change in measured clinical outcomes. Methods for the development and implementation of the orthopaedic-specific I-PASS tool are described. Orthopaedic residency programs should consider using a version of I-PASS to standardize care.

Single versus dual incision approaches for dual plating of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures have comparable rates of deep infection and revision surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The use of one midline incision versus dual medial/lateral incisions for dual plating of bicondylar tibial plateau (BTP) fractures is controversial. This study aimed to compare rates of infection and secondary surgery in patients treated with dual plating for a BTP fracture using a single versus double incisions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients > 18 years with a closed AO/OTA 41-C BTP fracture without compartment syndrome treated with a single midline or dual incision (lateral with medial or posteromedial) approach for dual plating. INTERVENTION: Dual plating through either a single anterior incision, or dual medial/lateral incisions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of deep infection and reoperation were compared using Chi-square analysis (p-value of < 0.05). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In total 636 AO/OTA 41-C BTP fractures treated between 1/1/01 and 12/31/18 were identified and assessed. After exclusions for limited follow up, other techniques, open fracture and the need for fasciotomies, 346 patients were studied. Of these 254 had been treated with a single plate / single approach technique while 92 had been dual plated, 41 through a single anterior incision while 51 had dual plating through separate lateral and medial or posteromedial incisions. For these 92 fractures, there was no significant difference in the rate of deep infection (22.0% vs 23.5%, s=0.858) or reoperation (31.7% vs 31.4%, p=0.973) between the single and dual incision groups. Injuries that had been treated with single plating via a single incision had comparably lower rates of deep infection (10.2% vs. 22.8%, p=0.003) and reoperation (12.2% vs. 31.5%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in any demographic parameters between patients undergoing single versus dual plating. Although retrospective, not randomized and subject to single surgeon bias these data suggest that these complications are more based on injury than the approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Radiographic Outcomes and Complications of Delayed Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons are sometimes presented with patients with distal radius fractures who present in a delayed fashion or lose reduction after several weeks of attempted closed management. There are limited studies on delayed surgical treatment of distal radius fractures to assist providers in decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a matched cohort study to compare radiographic outcomes and complications for patients with a distal radius fracture treated with delayed (3-5 weeks) or early (0-2 weeks) surgical fixation. Patients ages 18+ who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures by a volar approach at 2 Level I trauma centers between 2003 and 2015 were eligible. We measured radiographic outcomes and reviewed medical records to determine operative approach and complications. RESULTS: There were 25 cases and 50 controls matched for age (18-87), sex, and AO fracture type. The delayed group had surgery at a mean of 24.8 days from injury and the early group at 5.6 days. There was no statistically significant difference between the delayed and early cohorts in radiographic parameters on injury x-rays, in improvement in radiographic parameters on first postoperative x-rays, or in maintenance of radiographic parameters at union. CONCLUSION: We did not find significant differences in radiographic outcomes or complication rates between patients with delayed versus early surgical treatment for distal radius fracture. Providers treating patients with late presentation or late displacement have the option of surgical fixation beyond the first few weeks after injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (Retrospective matched cohort study).

Anatomic Structures at Risk During Posterior to Anterior Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Cadaveric Study.

Background. There are no established guidelines for fixation of posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs). However, fixation of PMFs appears to be increasing with growing evidence demonstrating benefits for stability, alignment, and early functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk to anatomic structures utilizing a percutaneous technique for posterior to anterior (PA) screw fixation of PMFs. Methods. Percutaneous PA screw placement was carried out on 10 fresh frozen cadaveric ankles followed by dissection to identify soft tissue and neurovascular structures at risk. The distance from the guidewire to each anatomic structure of interest was measured. The correlation between the mean distances from the guidewire to each structure was calculated. Results. The sural nerve was directly transected in 1/10 specimens (10%) and in contact with the wire in a second specimen (10%). There was a significant correlation between the proximity of the guidewire to the apex of Volkmann's tubercle and its proximity to the sural nerve. The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle belly was perforated by the guidewire 40% of the time but was not tethered or entrapped by the screw. Conclusions. Percutaneous PA screw placement is a safe technique which can be improved with several modifications. A mini-open technique is recommended to protect the sural nerve. There may be potential for tethering of the FHL with use of a washer or large screw head. Risk to the anterior and posterior neurovascular bundles is minimal.Levels of Evidence: Level V.

Is It Safe to Prep the External Fixator In Situ During Staged ORIF of Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures? A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of deep infection and unplanned reoperation after staged open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of bicondylar tibial plateau (BTP) fractures whether elements of the temporizing external fixator were prepped into the surgical field or completely removed before definitive fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study. SETTING: Two academic Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-seven OTA/AO 41-C (Schatzker 6) BTP fractures treated with a 2-stage protocol of acute spanning ex-fix followed by definitive ORIF between 2001 and 2018. INTERVENTION: Seventy-eight fractures had retained elements of the original ex-fix prepped in situ during surgery for definitive internal fixation, and 69 had the ex-fix construct completely removed before prepping and draping. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Deep infection and unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: Among 147 patients treated with staged ORIF, the overall deep infection rate was 26.5% and the reoperation rate was 33.3%. There were high rates of deep infection (26.9% vs. 26.1%, P = 0.909) and unplanned reoperation (30.8% vs. 36.2%, P = 0.483) in both groups, but no difference whether the ex-fix was prepped in or completely removed. Within the retained ex-fix group, there was no difference in infection with retention of the entire ex-fix compared with only the ex-fix pins (28.1% vs. 26.1%, P = 0.842). CONCLUSIONS: We observed high complication rates in this cohort of OTA/AO 41C BTP fractures treated with staged ORIF, but prepping in the ex-fix did not lead to a significant increase in rates of infection or reoperation. This study provides the treating surgeon with clinical data about a common practice used to facilitate definitive fixation of unstable BTP fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Correlation and responsiveness of global health, upper extremity-specific, and shoulder-specific functional outcome measures following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture.

PURPOSE: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is effective and increasingly utilized for the management of proximal humerus fracture (PHF). However, the optimal patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) for the evaluation of patient outcomes after this surgery are unclear. We investigated the correlation among global, upper extremity-specific, and shoulder-specific PROMs in patients undergoing rTSA for PHF as well as the responsiveness of these PROMs as assessed by floor and ceiling effects. We hypothesized that patients' post-operative outcome would be best reflected by a combination of these metrics. METHODS: Thirty patients with a history of rTSA for ipsilateral PHF filled out the following outcomes questionnaires at a minimum of 3 years post-op: EQ-5D, EQ-5D VAS, PROMIS physical function, DASH, SSV, SPADI, and ASES. Correlation between metrics was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the proportion of patients reaching floor or ceiling values using McNemar's test. RESULTS: Global health metrics (EQ-5D and PROMIS physical function) were strongly correlated with the upper extremity-specific metric (DASH). Shoulder-specific outcomes (SPADI, ASES, and ASES) were moderately correlated with both the global metrics and DASH. There was no significant difference between PROMs with regards to floor and ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The DASH score has been shown to be valid and responsive for shoulder interventions, and our data demonstrate that it correlates strongly with overall quality of life. Shoulder-specific metrics are valid and responsive for shoulder interventions but correlate less with global quality of life. An optimal PROM strategy in rTSA for PHF might involve both DASH and a shoulder-specific score. Based on our assessment of floor and ceiling effects, none of these metrics should be excluded for poor responsiveness.

Acute versus delayed reverse total shoulder Arthroplasty for the management of Proximal Humerus Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common, yet their optimal management remains debated. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is an increasingly popular option, particularly for non-reconstructible or osteoporotic fractures. Despite this trend, current literature provides limited guidance with regards to surgical timing and patient selection for rTSA. A trial of non-operative management might be beneficial for many patients who are not clearly indicated for surgery, provided this does not have a major negative impact on results for those who ultimately require rTSA. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether delayed reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture (>28 days from injury) is associated with any difference in complication rates or functional outcomes relative to acute surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 114 consecutive patients who underwent rTSA as the primary management of a PHF at two Level 1 trauma centers and one academic community hospital between 2004 and 2016. INTERVENTION: rTSA as primary management of proximal humerus fracture MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications, range of motion, and patient-reported functional outcomes scores (DASH, PROMIS physical function, and EQ-5D) RESULTS: Eighty-two of 114 patients (72%) underwent early surgery. Complex (4-part, head-split, dislocated) fractures were significantly more common in the acutely treated group. There was no significant difference in complications. Overall complication rate was 11.4%. There was a significant difference in DASH score favoring early surgery, with an average score of 22.4 in acutely treated patients versus 35.1 in delayed patients (p = 0.034). There was a non-statistically significant trend towards better PROMIS physical function scores and ROM in the acutely treated group. CONCLUSION: Delay in performing primary rTSA for management of PHF does not lead to an increase in complication rates but it may come at the cost of worse functional outcomes in patients who ultimately require rTSA.

Acute and Chronic Syndesmotic Instability: Role of Surgical Stabilization.

Acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries significantly impact athletic function and activities of daily living. Patient history, examination, and judicious use of imaging modalities aid diagnosis. Surgical management should be used when frank diastasis, instability, and/or chronic pain and disability ensue. Screw and suture-button fixation remain the mainstay of treatment of acute injuries, but novel syndesmotic reconstruction techniques hold promise for treatment of acute and chronic injuries, especially for athletes. This article focuses on anatomy, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, and surgical reduction and stabilization of acute and chronic syndesmotic instability. Fixation methods with a focus on considerations for athletes are discussed.

Surgical Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Knee Infection with Concurrent Presumed COVID-19: A Case Report.

CASE: We report the case of a 64-year-old man who presented with a late onset of acute periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty and a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 polymerase chain reaction test. We describe our perioperative protocol and challenges for ensuring the safety of healthcare providers while operating on a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive patient. CONCLUSIONS: Given the incredible spread of COVID-19 globally, hospitals should anticipate perioperative protocols for the surgical management of COVID-19-positive patients with concurrent pathology to ensure safety to healthcare providers.

Getting the Starting Point Right: Prevention of Skiving and Fibular Cortical Breach During Suture Button Placement for Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries.

The use of suture button (SB) devices in the treatment of syndesmotic ankle injuries is increasing. These constructs have demonstrated better syndesmotic reduction, improved clinical outcomes, and lower rates of hardware removal compared with screw fixation. However, placing a SB device without a fibular plate can be technically challenging. In this technique tip, we use an illustrative case to demonstrate a technique tip that minimizes the risk of anterior or posterior cortical breach of the fibula and helps facilitate more accurate placement of a SB device.Levels of Evidence: Level V: Expert opinion.

Medial tenderness revisited: Is medial ankle tenderness predictive of instability in isolated lateral malleolus fractures?

INTRODUCTION: Determining deltoid ligament incompetence in supination external rotation (SER) injuries commonly relies on stress radiography, given several studies demonstrating low predictive value of physical examination. Stress radiography can be difficult to obtain and may result in suboptimal radiographs with equivocal determination of stability. This study revisits the concept of medial ankle tenderness and its association with mortise instability. METHODS: Patients who presented with an isolated lateral malleolus fracture underwent prospective data collection. VAS scores were recorded with palpation at the lateral malleolar fracture site, anterior deltoid ligament, and posterior deltoid ligament. Three non-weightbearing radiographs of the ankle and a gravity stress view were obtained. Statistical analysis was performed to determine a correlation between tenderness and instability defined as MCS widening > 4 mm on gravity stress x-ray. RESULTS: 51 patients met inclusion criteria. Group I (stable) and Group II (unstable) demonstrated no difference in tenderness over the lateral malleolus (p = 0.94) or anterior deltoid (p = 0.12), but patients in Group II reported significantly more tenderness over the posterior deltoid (p = 0.03). Taking the higher pain score from either anterior or posterior deltoid palpation, patients with unstable ankle fractures reported significantly more tenderness with medial palpation (p = 0.02). The relative risk of having an unstable ankle fracture with any tenderness to palpation over either the anterior or posterior deltoid ligament was 1.77 (95% CI 1.03 - 3.06, P = 0.039). When comparing no pain versus the presence of any pain with palpation medially, the sensitivity for any medial tenderness to detect an unstable ankle fracture was 0.76 (specificity 0.59, PPV 0.79, NPV 0.56). CONCLUSION: Patients with any medial tenderness were at significantly higher risk of having an unstable SER ankle fracture in this study, but strict reliance on the presence or absence of medial tenderness without stress radiographs would lead to an unacceptable number of both false positive and false negative determinations of instability. However, our findings suggest that medial tenderness is associated with instability. The 0.79 PPV of any medial tenderness for instability may be useful to cast doubt on equivocal stress radiography and prompt surgeons to repeat stress radiography or shorten the interval for radiographic follow up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II-1 (development of diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients [with universally applied reference "gold" standard]).

Development of Patient Education Materials for Total Joint Replacement During an International Surgical Brigade.

BACKGROUND: Temporary brigade trips to deliver international surgical care are increasingly common. For the purposes of this work, we use the term brigade to describe self-contained short-term medical or surgical mission trips where healthcare professionals are brought in from foreign regions to provide care to an underserved population. Many brigade programs have begun to collect and publish data on outcomes and complications, but few have examined their own patient education practices. METHODS: We used evidence-based readability and suitability analyses along with patient interviews to develop improved patient education materials for a total joint replacement surgical brigade in the Dominican Republic. RESULTS: Existing patient education materials required an eighth grade reading level and lacked suitability based on the principles of educational theory. The redesigned materials required fifth grade reading skills or less and had superior suitability. Pilot testing with patients from the target population suggested that the materials were appealing and appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education may play an important role in optimizing outcomes in the setting of medical or surgical brigades where resources and access to follow-up care are limited. More research is needed to bring attention to the importance of patient education during brigades, and programs should work with patients to develop educational materials that are suitable and effective.

Strategies to Avoid Syndesmosis Malreduction in Ankle Fractures.

Nearly half of surgically treated ankle fractures may have associated syndesmotic disruption, and the quality of reduction has been shown to affect functional outcomes. Malreduction ranges from 15% to 50% in the literature, and achieving anatomic reduction remains a significant challenge, even for experienced surgeons. Keys to success include having a stepwise plan and an understanding of reliable fluoroscopic parameters to help achieve reduction in both the coronal and sagittal planes. This article summarizes the literature on syndesmotic reduction and provides the authors' preferred technique using fluoroscopy.

Entrapment of the urinary bladder: A rare mechanism of bladder injury in pelvic trauma.

A pelvic fracture with entrapment of the urinary bladder in the fracture site is a rare pattern of injury. As the "team captains" in the trauma bay and in the care of polytraumatized patients, trauma surgeons must be aware of this entity and its implications. We report a case of acute bladder entrapment in the fracture site of a lateral compression pelvic fracture. A review of the English literature yielded four previous reports, including two patients with delayed diagnosis (Ghuman et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 1980; Wright and Taitsman, 1996; Min et al., 2010 [1-4]). Kumar and colleagues first documented bladder entrapment by a pelvic fracture in 1980 (Kumar et al., 1980 [2]). Ghuman et al. described a similar case treated with fixation of the pelvic fracture (Ghuman et al., 2014 [1]). Wright and colleagues treated a patient with bladder perforation due to entrapment diagnosed two weeks after a pelvic ring fracture (Wright and Taitsman, 1996 [3]). In this case the bladder injury was repaired, but internal fixation of the pelvis fracture was avoided due to fear of contamination. Finally, Min et al. documented a case of bladder entrapment and perforation presenting six months after non-operative management of a pelvic ring fracture. The female patient developed recurrent UTIs and dyspareunia, and imaging revealed fracture malunion with the bladder entrapped in the fracture site (Min et al., 2010 [4]). This collection of case reports demonstrates the potential for acute or delayed bladder injury even in seemingly benign pelvic fractures. A high index of suspicion is required to intervene and prevent morbidity from bladder injuries in pelvic trauma. Entrapment of the bladder may require surgical intervention even when the injury pattern would not normally dictate surgery for the pelvis or bladder alone (Bryk and Zhao, 2016 [5]). We describe the diagnosis and surgical management of bladder entrapment and present a brief review of bladder injuries associated with pelvic fractures.

Calcaneofibular Ligament Transfer for Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Subluxation in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: Peroneal tendon subluxation is an uncommon cause of lateral ankle pain and instability but can be disabling for some young patients. Surgical management may be required to restore function for patients who fail nonoperative management. The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcomes after surgical management of peroneal tendon subluxation in pediatric and adolescent patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients presenting to our institution over a 10-year period yielded 18 cases of recurrent subluxation refractory to nonoperative management in 14 children or young adults (mean age 15.0 y). All patients failed nonoperative management and were treated operatively with isolated calcaneofibular ligament transfer to construct a new soft tissue restraint for the peroneal tendons. Patients were evaluated clinically and sent validated questionnaires, including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. RESULTS: All 18 ankles of 14 patients had minimum 2-year follow-up. Ten of 18 ankles (55.6%) returned the outcome surveys at an average of 5.7 years after the index procedure (range, 2. 0 to 9.7 y). The average FAAM activities of daily living score was 93.5 (±2.9) and the sports subscale was 77.8 (±6.1). The mean AOFAS subjective scaled score was 84.3 (±4.5). All patients returned to sports and recreational activity. Complications included 1 case of recurrent subluxation (1/18, 5.5%) treated with revision to a Chrisman-Snook procedure and 4 ankles (4/18, 22.2%) with stiffness or arthrofibrosis treated with a secondary procedure of peroneal tendon release or lysis of adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management with rerouting of the peroneal tendons under the calcaneofibular ligament appears to be safe and effective for young patients with chronic peroneal tendon subluxation. It provides a low rate of recurrent subluxation, excellent stability, and good long-term functional outcomes. However, the potential for postoperative stiffness appears to be a limitation to the procedure and necessitates aggressive physical therapy to maintain ankle motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV- retrospective case series.