Empowerment interventions designed for persons living with chronic disease - a systematic review and meta-analysis of the components and efficacy of format on patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Empowerment approaches are essential for building the capacity of individuals with chronic disease to be in control of their health. Reviews of empowerment interventions have been focused on specific chronic diseases, thereby limiting the scope of findings. This study had three aims: 1) to describe the characteristics of empowerment interventions covering a broad range of chronic diseases, 2) to clarify consistency with the World Health Organization`s (WHO) definition of empowerment as a process composed of four fundamental components and 3) to summarize outcome measures and estimate the effects in group and individual intervention formats. METHODS: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. CINAHL, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, COCHRANE and Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using Chronic Disease, NCD, Empowerment, as MeSH terms. Eligible randomized and quasi randomized controlled trials were included. Review Manager 5.4 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2). RESULTS: Thirty-nine articles representing 8,011 participants were included in the review. A majority (82%) of studies reported robust evidence for changes on study-defined outcome measures in favor of interventions. Intervention content was assessed against WHO's four fundamental components of empowerment, showing that all studies incorporated one component, but none targeted all components. Components reflecting knowledge acquisition, patient engagement with their health care providers and facilitating environment were scarcely reported. Meta-analyses found evidence for positive effects of group-format interventions measuring empowerment, HbA1c, and self-efficacy. Effects on empowerment were also found in some individual-format interventions. High levels of heterogeneity and variability among the conceptual frameworks were identified. CONCLUSION: Empowerment interventions in group-format were most efficient, however, considerable conceptual inconsistencies were identified. Future studies should consolidate conceptual understandings by using WHO's empowerment framework to ensure that fundamental components of empowerment are explicitly included in intervention design. Furthermore, there is a need to clarify the role of empowerment through pathways that include patient activation, self- management, and clinical outcomes. This systematic review will inform the clinicians and researchers who aim to develop novel empowerment interventions to assist patients in the process of gaining control of their health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: International Prospective register of systematic reviews ID=CRD42020178286.

Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Facilitating Patient Activation and Empowerment in Chronic Illness using a Person-Centered and Strengths-Based Self-Management Program.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic illness who are empowered and activated are more likely to engage in self-management in order to stabilise their condition and enhance their quality of life. This study aimed to explore Health Care Professional's (HCP) assessment of a person-centered intervention called 'The Bodyknowledging Program' (BKP) for the facilitation of empowerment and patient activation in the context of chronic illness. METHODS: This study employed a qualitative process evaluation after programme completion. Data was collected through focus-groups and individual interviews with HCPs and content analysis was used in the analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: 1) Shifts towards the patient-perspective, 2) The value of a patient-centered conceptual framework, 3) Patient activation through dialogue based support and 4) Challenging competencies. Discussion: This study introduces 'The Bodyknowledging Program' as a useful tool to uncover patients' needs and to activate and empower them to take more responsibility for their health through self-care management. The usability of the new intervention depends on HCP's ability to develop their counselling skills and changing their approach towards utilising patients' individual resources in the promotion of their health.

Health-care professionals' assessment of a person-centred intervention to empower self-management and health across chronic illness: Qualitative findings from a process evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: Person-centred care (PCC) empowers patients to manage their chronic illness and promote their health in accordance with their own beliefs, values and preferences. Drawing on health-care professional's (HCP's) experiences implementing an empowerment-focused, person-centred intervention called the Bodyknowledging Program (BKP), we undertook a process evaluation that aimed to assess the impact on patient health and well-being. METHODS: We used individual in-depth interviews and semi-structured focus groups comprising n = 8 interprofessional HCP who facilitated intervention sessions with n = 58 patients situated in Norwegian specialist care sites. Content analysis was used to analyse the data and summarize major themes. RESULTS: Health-care professional interviews revealed four main ways in which the intervention operated in support of health-related patient outcomes: (i) addressing the whole person; (ii) hope and affirmation; (iii) expanding recovery; and (iv) social support and revitalized relationships. The intervention provided new tools for patients to understand the social, emotional and physical impact of their illness. Health-care professional reported new insights to facilitate patient engagement and to promote patients' health. CONCLUSIONS: The Bodyknowledging Program facilitated patient engagement through the promotion of patient-centred care while developing the patients' ability to exploit their own resources for effectively managing their health within illness. The process evaluation supported the underlying theoretical basis of the intervention and was suggestive of its potential transferability elsewhere.