Insulin receptor substrate-2 mediated insulin-like growth factor-I receptor overexpression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma through protein kinase Cdelta.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCA) is an almost invariably fatal disease. Recently, it has been shown by several groups as well as ours that insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) overexpression is related to higher proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, and highly invasive pancreatic tumors. Several studies have been carried out to understand the pathways that lead to growth factor-mediated signaling, but the molecular mechanism of receptor overexpression remains mostly unknown. Treatment with neutralizing antibodies or a specific kinase inhibitor against IGF-IR could block the receptor expression in PCA cells. Furthermore, we also showed that insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-2, but not IRS-1, is involved in regulation of IGF-IR expression, which is most likely not transcriptional control. By blocking mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway with rapamycin as well as other biochemical analysis, we defined a unique regulation of IGF-IR expression mediated by protein kinase Cdelta (PKCdelta) and mTOR pathway. Moreover, we showed that the down-regulation of IGF-IR expression due to IRS-2 small interfering RNA can be compensated by overexpression of dominant-active mutant of PKCdelta, suggesting that PKCdelta is downstream of IGF-IR/IRS-2 axis. Overall, these findings suggest a novel regulatory role of IRS-2 on the expression of IGF-IR through PKCdelta and mTOR in pancreatic cancer cells.

Effect of rapamycin alone and in combination with antiangiogenesis therapy in an orthotopic model of human pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: The overall 5-year survival of patients with pancreatic cancer remains <5%. Novel therapeutic strategies are needed. We examined the effect of rapamycin, alone and in combination with antiangiogenesis therapy, on pancreatic cancer in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Human pancreatic cancer AsPC-1 cells were orthotopically injected into severe combined immunodeficient/beige mice to evaluate primary tumor growth and liver metastasis after treatment with rapamycin alone or in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody 2C3. Tumor cell proliferation was determined by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. To detect tumor cell apoptosis, the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling assay was used. Tumor angiogenesis was investigated by using a monoclonal anti-CD31 antibody. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Rapamycin, alone and in combination with 2C3, strongly inhibited primary and metastatic tumor growth in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer animal model. Furthermore, the combination therapy significantly improved the effect on liver metastasis compared with single treatment with either rapamycin (P = 0.0128) or 2C3 (P = 0.0099). Rapamycin alone inhibited pancreatic tumor cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, and decreased tumor angiogenesis. Nevertheless, the combination therapy showed a significant, stronger inhibition of tumor cell proliferation (P = 0.0002 versus rapamycin alone and P < 0.0001 versus 2C3 alone). The induction of apoptosis was significantly higher than in the rapamycin-treated group (P = 0.0039). Additionally, the combination therapy further improved suppression of tumor cell angiogenesis compared with rapamycin treatment (P = 0.029) CONCLUSIONS: Our studies propose new therapeutic strategies to inhibit both primary and metastatic tumor growth in pancreatic cancer. Considering the fact that liver metastasis is a crucial problem in advanced stages of pancreatic cancer, the combination therapy of rapamycin plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody 2C3 is a significant advantage compared with single treatment with rapamycin.

Role of insulin receptor substrates and protein kinase C-zeta in vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor expression in pancreatic cancer cells.

Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VPF/VEGF), the critical molecule in tumor angiogenesis, is regulated by different stimuli, such as hypoxia and oncogenes, and also by growth factors. Previously we have shown that in AsPC-1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells, insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR) regulates VPF/VEGF expression. Insulin receptor substrate-1 and -2 (IRS-1 and IRS-2), two major downstream molecules of IGF-1R, are known to be important in the genesis of diabetes. In this study, we have defined a new role of IRS in angiogenesis. Both of the IRS proteins modulate VPF/VEGF expression in pancreatic cancer cells by different mechanistic pathways. The Sp1-dependent VPF/VEGF transcription is regulated mainly by IRS-2. Protein kinase C-zeta (PKC-zeta) plays a central role in VPF/VEGF expression and acts as a switching element. Furthermore, we have also demonstrated that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway, but not the Ras pathway, is a downstream event of IRS proteins for VPF/VEGF expression in AsPC-1 cells. Interestingly, like renal cancer cells, in AsPC-1 cells PKC-zeta leads to direct Sp1-dependent VPF/VEGF transcription; in addition, it also promotes a negative feedback loop to IRS-2 that decreases the association of IRS-2/IGF-1R and IRS-2/p85. Taken together, our results show that in AsPC-1 pancreatic carcinoma cells, Sp1-dependent VPF/VEGF transcription is controlled by IGF-1R signaling through IRS-2 proteins and modulated by a negative feedback loop of PKC-zeta to IRS-2. Our data also suggest that IRS proteins, which are known to play crucial roles in IGF-1R signaling, are also important mediators for tumor angiogenesis.

Esophageal perforation during left atrial radiofrequency ablation: Is the risk too high?

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (IRAAF) is a recently developed procedure being performed in an increasing number of patients. We have performed left atrial IRAAF in 387 patients since August 1998. The purpose of this article is to describe a serious complication of this procedure, namely IRAAF-induced esophageal perforation, in detail to identify possible risk factors. METHODS: Left atrial IRAAF was performed with a commercially available unipolar probe as an isolated procedure (n = 129) or in combination with mitral valve surgery (n = 163) or other surgical procedures (n = 95). Operations were performed either through a conventional sternotomy or right minithoracotomy. RESULTS: Four (1%) patients had esophageal perforation after radiofrequency ablation. All 4 patients presented after an initially unremarkable postoperative course, with sudden neurologic symptoms from esophagoatrial air embolization occurring in 3 of the patients. Three patients were successfully treated with extensive esophageal resection, and one died from massive air embolism. All perforations occurred in patients undergoing minimally invasive IRAAF. Comparison with other patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive IRAAF (n = 129) failed to reveal any reliable predictors of esophageal injury, including patient body size, operating times, or radiofrequency biophysical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial IRAAF is associated with a small but definite risk of esophageal perforation. Unfortunately, we were unable to identify any risk factors for this life-threatening complication. A high degree of vigilance must be maintained for esophageal injury after IRAAF, particularly in patients with new neurologic deficits. Until safer methods of ablation are developed, we currently recommend against the use of IRAAF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.