Predicting Deformity Correction of Growth Modulation in Late-onset Tibia Vara.

BACKGROUND: Growth modulation in late-onset tibia vara (LOTV) has been reported to yield variable results. We hypothesized that parameters of deformity severity, skeletal maturity, and body weight could predict the odds of a successful outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of tension band growth modulation for LOTV (onset ≥8 y) was performed at 7 centers. Tibial/overall limb deformity and hip/knee physeal maturity were assessed on preoperative anteroposterior standing lower-extremity digital radiographs. Tibial deformity change with first-time lateral tibial tension band plating (first LTTBP) was assessed by medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA). Effects of a growth modulation series (GMS) on overall limb alignment were assessed by mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA) and included changes from implant removal, revision, reimplantation, subsequent growth, and femoral procedures during the study period. The successful outcome was defined as radiographic resolution of varus deformity or valgus overcorrection. Patient demographics, characteristics, maturity, deformity, and implant selections were assessed as outcome predictors using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (76 limbs) had 84 LTTBP procedures and 29 femoral tension band procedures. For each 1-degree decrease in preoperative MPTA or 1-degree increase in preoperative mTFA the odds of their successful correction decreased by 26% in the first LTTBP and 6% by GMS, respectively, controlling for maturity. The change in odds of success for GMS assessed by mTFA was similar when controlling for weight. Closure of a proximal femoral physis decreased the odds of success for postoperative-MPTA by 91% with first LTTBP and for final-mTFA by 90% with GMS, controlling for preoperative deformity. Preoperative weight ≥100 kg decreased the odds of success for final-mTFA with GMS by 82%, controlling for preoperative mTFA. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, type of implant, and knee center peak value adjusted age (a method for bone age) were not predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of varus alignment in LOTV using first LTTBP and GMS, as quantified by MPTA and mTFA, respectively, is negatively impacted by deformity magnitude, hip physeal closure, and/or body weight ≥100 kg. The presented table, utilizing these variables, is helpful in the prediction of the outcome of the first LTTBP and GMS. Even if complete correction is not predicted, growth modulation may still be appropriate to reduce deformity in high-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Predicting Success of Deformity Correction With Tension Band Plating in Early-Onset Tibia Vara.

BACKGROUND: Angular deformity correction with tension band plating has not been as successful in early-onset tibia vara (EOTV) as it has been in other conditions. Our hypothesis is that perioperative factors can predict the success of lateral tibial tension band plating (LTTBP) in patients with EOTV. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at 7 centers evaluating radiographic outcomes of LTTBP in patients with EOTV (onset <7 y of age). Single-event tibial LTTBP outcome was assessed through medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). The final limb alignment following comprehensive limb growth modulation (CLGM), which could include multiple procedures, was assessed by mechanical axis zone (MAZone), mechanical tibio-femoral angle (mTFA), and mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Preoperative age, weight, deformity severity, medial physeal slope, and Langenskiöld classification +/- modification were investigated as predictors of outcome. Success was defined as the correction or overcorrection to normal age-adjusted alignment. The minimum follow-up was 2 years except when deformity correction, skeletal maturity, or additional surgery occurred. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with 80 limbs underwent 115 tibial LTTBP procedures at a mean age of 5.3 y, including 78 primary, 21 implant revisions, and 15 reimplantations for recurrence. Tibial LTTBP resulted in a mean change of +8.6 o in MPTA and corrected 53% of tibias. CLGM resulted in MAD correction for 54% of limbs.Univariate analysis showed that success was best predicted by preoperative age, weight, MPTA, and MAD. Multivariate analysis identified that preoperative-MPTA/MAD and preoperative-weight<70 kg were predictive of MPTA and MAD correction, respectively. The probability of success tables are presented for reference. CONCLUSION: Successful correction of MPTA to age-adjusted norms following a single-event LTTBP occurred in 53% of tibias and was best predicted by preoperative-MPTA and preoperative body weight <70 kg. Comprehensive growth modulation corrected limbs in 54%. The probability of correction to age-adjusted MAD is best estimated by preoperative-MAZone 1 or 2 (MAD ≤40 mm). Limbs with preoperative-MAD>80 mm improved, but ultimately all failed to correct completely with CLGM. Osteotomy may need to be considered with these severe deformities. While modified Langenskiöld classification and medial physeal slope have been shown to predict the outcome of osteotomy, they were not predictive for LTTBP. Change in MPTA was common after physeal untethering. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-III.

Femoral Deformity in Tibia Vara and Its Response to Growth Modulation.

BACKGROUND: While tibia vara is a disorder of the proximal tibial physis, femoral deformity frequently contributes to the overall limb malalignment. Our purpose was to determine how femoral varus deformity in tibia vara responds to growth modulation, with/without lateral tension band plating (LTBP) to the femur. METHODS: One-hundred twenty-seven limbs undergoing LTBP for tibia vara were reviewed. All had tibial LTBP and 35 limbs also had femoral LTBP for varus. Radiographs were measured for correction of the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Preoperative-femoral varus was defined with an age-adjusted guide: mLDFA >95 degrees for 2 to below 4 years and mLDFA >90 degrees for 4 to 18 years. The 35 limbs having femoral LTBP were compared with 50 limbs with femoral varus and no femoral LTBP. In addition, 42 limbs that did not have preoperative-femoral varus were followed. Patients with early-onset (below 7 y) tibia vara were compared with those with late-onset (≥8 y). Outcome success was based on published age-adjusted mLDFA and MAD norms. RESULTS: Following femoral LTBP, the mean mLDFA decreased from 98.0 to 87.1 degrees. All femurs had some improvement, with 28/35 femurs (80%) achieving complete correction. One limb, with late follow-up, overcorrected, requiring reverse (medial) femoral tension band plating.For the 50 limbs with femoral varus and only tibial LTBP, 16/22 limbs (73%) with early-onset and 11/28 limbs (39%) with late-onset completely corrected their femoral deformities. If the limb had preoperative-femoral varus, femoral LTBP statistically correlated with successful mLDFA correction and improvement of MAD, only in the late-onset group.Forty-two limbs, without preoperative-femoral varus, had no change in their mean mLDFA of 87 degrees. However, 4 femurs (10%) ended with posttreatment varus. CONCLUSIONS: Femoral LTBP is effective in correcting femoral varus deformity in the tibia vara. For femoral varus associated with late-onset tibia vara, femoral LTBP should be considered. Those that had femoral LTBP had statistically more successful femoral and overall limb varus correction. However, in early-onset tibia vara, with associated femoral varus, observation is warranted because 73% of femurs are corrected without femoral intervention. This study was underpowered to show additional improvement with femoral LTBP in the early-onset group. Even limbs with normal femoral alignment, should be observed closely for the development of femoral varus, during tibial LTBP treatment for tibia vara. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Guided Growth for Varus Deformity Following Early Tibial Osteotomy in Infantile Tibia Vara-A Multi-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite early osteotomy, many patients with infantile tibia vara (ITV) have persistent or recurrent varus deformity and disordered growth at the medial proximal tibial physis. Our hypothesis was that lateral tibial tension band plating (LTTBP) could guide correction. METHODS: A retrospective review at 6 centers of 15 patients (16 extremities) was performed of LTTBP for varus deformity following early osteotomy in ITV, diagnosed≤4years of age. Correction of deformity parameters on digital standing anteroposterior lower extremity radiographs determined outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-two LTTBP procedures were performed at mean age of 7.5 years, including 4 revisions for implant failure and 2 reimplantations for recurrence. Single event LLTBP, improved the medial proximal tibial angle with a mean change of 13.4 degrees (0.39 degrees/month). Eleven limbs had preoperative mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA)>90 degrees. While n degree femoral procedures were performed, at study end, 11 femurs had mechanical lateral distal femoral angle≤90°. Pretreatment, 13 extremities had mechanical axis zone (MAZone) III varus (81%) and 3 had MAZone II varus (19%). LTTBP's were able to initially correct 13 limbs to MAZone I or valgus but 4 limbs rebounded to MAZone II varus after implant removal. Final limb alignment, after all surgeries and rebound, included 9 in MAZone I, 5 in MAZone II varus and 2 in MAZone III varus. Average follow-up was 3.0 years at mean 10.7 years of age. Fifteen procedures resulted in improvement in MAZone and 7 had no change. On average, those that improved were younger (7.3 vs. 8.0 y), weighed less (45.5 kg with body mass index 26.5 kg/m 2 vs. 67.8 kg and body mass index 35.7 kg/m 2 ), had lower mechanical axis deviation (37.1 mm vs. 43.9 mm), lower medial physeal slope (61.7 vs. 68.7 degrees) and had a higher percentage of open triradiate phases (87 vs. 57%). CONCLUSIONS: LTTBP for residual varus, after initial osteotomy in ITV, resulted in 81% of limbs initially achieving MAZone I or valgus with implant failure revisions and femoral remodeling. Rebound after implant removal reduced the corrected rate to 56%. Ninety-four percent avoided osteotomy during the study period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Guided Growth Procedures: Broken Tension Band Implants in Patients With Blount Disease.

BACKGROUND: Tension band plate and screw implants (TBI) are frequently used for temporary hemiepiphyseodeses to manage angular deformity in growing children. The reported implant breakage rate, when TBI is used for deformities in patients with Blount disease, is much higher than when used in other diagnoses. Our hypothesis is that perioperative factors can identify risks for TBI breakage. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed of 246 TBI procedures in 113 patients with Blount disease at 8 tertiary pediatric orthopaedic centers from 2008 to 2018. Patient demographics, age at diagnosis, weight, body mass index (BMI), radiographic deformity severity measures, location, and types of implants were studied. The outcome of implant breakage was compared with these perioperative factors using univariate logistic regression with Bonferroni correction for multiplicity to significance tests. RESULTS: There were 30 broken implants (12%), failing at mean 1.6 years following implantation. Most failures involved the metaphyseal screws. Increased BMI was associated with increased implant breakage. Increased varus deformity was directly associated with greater implant breakage and may be a more important factor in failure for those below 7 years compared with those 8 years or above at diagnosis. There was a 50% breakage rate for TBI with solid 3.5 mm screws in Blount disease with onset 8 years or above of age. No demographic or implant factors were found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Breakage of TBI was associated with increased BMI and varus deformity in patients with Blount disease. Larger studies are required to determine the relative contribution and limits of each parameter. Solid 3.5 mm screws should be used with caution in TBI for late-onset Blount disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedic Quality, Safety, and Value? A Systematic Review With Results of the 2016 POSNA Quality, Safety, and Value Initiative (QSVI) Challenge.

BACKGROUND: Enhancing the safety, quality, and value of care provided is a point of emphasis for modern health care systems. We performed a review of recent literature to highlight those efforts relevant to pediatric musculoskeletal care. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for all papers related to quality improvement, patient safety, and/or value in pediatric orthopaedics published from October 1, 2012 to October 31, 2017, yielding 193 papers. RESULTS: A total of 36 papers were selected for review based upon new findings. Papers were selected based on significant contributions in the following categories: casting safety, antibiotic stewardship/infection prevention, perioperative care pathways, blood conservation, venous thromboembolic disease prevention, and imaging safety/appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS: There have been numerous advances in safety, quality, and value in pediatric orthopaedic care. Quality improvement efforts emphasizing provider education and safety monitoring can lead to a decrease in cast-related complications. Perioperative care pathways and bundles are associated with a decrease risk of surgical site infection and decreased length of stay in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Increased scrutiny has been placed on the value of routine follow-up radiographs in pediatric fracture and spinal deformity care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4-literature review.