The minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) lift: A systematic review of literature 18 years after its introduction.

BACKGROUND: One of the most popular short-scar rhytidectomy techniques used nowadays is the minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) lift developed by Tonnard and Vaerpele. The technique uses purse-string sutures in combination with limited skin undermining to obtain a clear vertical tissue repositioning. Since its introduction, the technique has extensively been described and used around the world by facial plastic surgeons. Now, 18 years after its introduction, a systematic review concerning the results and complications of the MACS lift is presented to establish its current position in facial rejuvenation. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies evaluating the MACS lift (June 10, 2020). Outcomes of interest were long-term effect, satisfaction, and complications of the MACS lifting as determined by the patient and/or surgeon. RESULTS: Six studies were included, with 739 patients treated with the MACS lift in total. No major complications were reported, four studies did report on the occurrence of minor complications. All of the six studies reported relatively high levels of satisfaction. Three studies reported a shorter procedural duration for the MACS lift compared with the conventional facelift. In three of the six included studies, the level of evidence was low. The effect on neck rejuvenation is limited. CONCLUSION: The MACS lift can be considered a minimally invasive facelift procedure with a relatively low complication rate. The procedure, often combined with additional procedures, results in evident patient and/or surgeon satisfaction. To obtain a better desired result on an aged neck area, additional procedures are warranted.

The effects of platelet-rich plasma on recovery time and aesthetic outcome in facial rejuvenation: preliminary retrospective observations.

BACKGROUND: This study focused on the possible effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on recovery time and aesthetic outcome after facial rejuvenation. We conducted a retrospective analysis with regard to recovery time and the aesthetic improvement after treatment among four groups of patients: those treated with fat grafting only (Group I), those treated with fat grafting and PRP (Group II), those treated with a minimal access cranial suspension (MACS)-lift and fat grafting (Group III), and those treated with a MACS-lift, fat grafting, and PRP (Group IV). METHODS: For the first part of this study, i.e., evaluation of recovery time after surgery, the following selection criteria were used: nonsmoking females, aged 35-65 years, with a complete documented follow-up. In total, 82 patients were included in the evaluation of patient-reported recovery time. For the second part of the study, i.e., evaluation of potential differences in aesthetic outcome, the records of these 82 patients were screened for the presence of pre- and postoperative standardized photographs in three views (AP, lateral, and oblique), leaving 37 patients to evaluate. A questionnaire was developed to evaluate the aesthetic outcome in all four groups of patients. This questionnaire was given to an expert panel that consisted of ten plastic surgeons. RESULTS: The addition of PRP to a lipofilling procedure resulted in a significant drop in the number of days needed to recover before returning to work or to restart social activities [Group I (no PRP) took 18.9 days vs Group II (PRP) took 13.2 days, p = 0.019]. There seemed to be no effect when PRP was added to a MACS-lift + lipofilling procedure. Also, the aesthetic outcome of the lipofilling and MACS-lift + lipofilling groups that received PRP (Groups II and IV) was significantly better than the groups without PRP (Groups I and III). CONCLUSIONS: Adding PRP to facial lipofilling reduces recovery time and improves the overall aesthetic outcome of a MACS-lift. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Results and long-term patient satisfaction after gluteal augmentation with platelet-rich plasma-enriched autologous fat.

BACKGROUND: Buttock augmentation is gaining increasing popularity in aesthetic surgery. The relatively high incidence of complications after silicone implant placement lead to the increased use of lipofilling techniques, yielding variable results with respect to graft take rate and long-term stability. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been shown to have beneficial effects on wound healing and angiogenesis in the past. Therefore, we aimed at investigating the long-term results and patient satisfaction after PRP-enriched lipofilling for buttock augmentation. METHODS: Twenty-four bilateral gluteal augmentations with PRP-enriched autologous fat were performed. Additionally, contour shaping was achieved by liposuction of the adjacent zones. Post-operative results and complications were recorded, and satisfaction with buttock shape was estimated by a patient questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 44 months, and mean amount of transferred fat was 481 cc for both sides. No seroma or hematoma formation, infection or liponecrosis were reported during the post-operative follow-up. Subjective patient satisfaction in general increased from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively and declined only slightly in the long-term course. Satisfaction levels in general were specific for each patient. Patient recovery was quick, and the majority of patients returned to work within 10 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: PRP-enhanced lipofilling of the buttocks proved to be a safe procedure including a low complication rate and consistent results. However, subjective patient expectations have to be taken into account when choosing the indication. Further large volume studies are needed to elucidate the potential and benefit of PRP in this context. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Lipofilling with minimal access cranial suspension lifting for enhanced rejuvenation.

BACKGROUND: Loss of volume is an important aspect in facial aging, but its relevance is frequently neglected during treatment. OBJECTIVES: The authors discuss lipofilling as an ancillary procedure to improve the impact of facelifting procedures. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) lifting alone were retrospectively analyzed, and their results were compared to 42 retrospective cases of MACS lifting with adjuvant lipofilling. The results were evaluated with a photographic ranking system by two panels (five plastic surgeons and five medical students). RESULTS: Combined MACS lifting and lipofilling yielded overall cosmetic results that were significantly better than the results achieved with MACS lifting alone. Photographic evaluations showed that improvements were more pronounced in the tear trough (P < .05) and malar eminence (P < .01) than in the nasolabial groove (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Volume restoration with lipofilling following MACS lifting procedures produces significantly better postoperative results than MACS lifting alone. This combined procedure produces the most dramatic improvements in the tear trough and malar eminence regions.

"Scarless" umbilicoplasty: a new umbilicoplasty technique and a review of the English language literature.

Many techniques have been described for umbilicoplasty after abdominoplasty, but none of these techniques seems ideal. In this report, we wish to report a new "scarless" umbilicoplasty technique, which bears many of the characteristics of an ideal technique: it is easy to perform and results in the complete absence of visible scars and with a preferred vertical orientation. The aesthetic results of this technique are subjectively and objectively evaluated as compared with the classic umbilicoplasty and these results are discussed among the English language literature. In the period of 2004 to 2005, a series of 138 female patients have had an abdominoplasty with either the classic umbilicoplasty (n = 31) or with our scarless umbilicoplasty (n = 107). After a follow-up period of at least 3 (of 6) months, a questionnaire was send to all of these patients to evaluate patient satisfaction. Twenty-five patients from the classic umbilicoplasty group responded, 53 patients from the scarless umbilicoplasty group. Age (mean 45 with range, 22-66 years) and body mass index (29 with range, 22-35) did not differ among both groups. Also a random selection of fifteen photos from both groups was analyzed and rated according to the system of Strasser by an independent panel. There were no major complications in both groups, but in the classic group, there were some cases with hypertrophic scarring. Patients who underwent the scarless umbilicoplasty technique graded the appearance of their umbilicus significantly better on shape, depth, hygiene, and scar. No significant differences were found in grading size and wound healing. Objective evaluation of the photos demonstrated significant better results for the scarless umbilicoplasty technique. Based on our subjective and objective analysis we conclude that our new technique of the scarless umbilicoplasty features many of the characteristics of the ideal umbilicoplasty: a rather simple and reliable method for creating a natural looking umbilicus when performing an abdominoplasty.