A survey on murine gammaherpesvirus 68 in ticks collected in Slovakia.

Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68) is a natural pathogen that infects murid rodents which serve as hosts for Dermacentor reticulatus and Ixodes ricinus ticks. For the first time, MHV-68 was detected in immature I. ricinus ticks feeding on lizards trapped in Slovakia. Later on, MHV-68 infection was detected in D. reticulatus and Haemaphysalis concinna ticks collected on vegetation, which supported the idea that ticks can acquire the virus from feeding on infected hosts. Here, we report MHV-68 infection, which was detected by nested PCR, in D. reticulatus and I. ricinus adult ticks and I. ricinus nymphs collected in five geographically isolated localities, in west, southwest, south and central Slovakia. Viral incidence in ticks was 46.7% (121/259) without considering the season, site of collection and tick species and their life stage. MHV-68 infection was detected in all five localities investigated and in both tick species. Here, for the first time, we report MHV-68 infection in I. ricinus nymphs collected from the vegetation. The finding of virus in ticks from five separated localities suggested that ticks became infected with MHV-68 via feeding on infected rodents; thus, this virus might be a newfound natural pathogen in ticks.

What can morphology tell us about ecology of four invasive goby species?

This study presents a detailed comparative analysis of external morphology of four of the most invasive goby species in Europe (round goby Neogobius melanostomus, bighead goby Ponticola kessleri, monkey goby Neogobius fluviatilis and racer goby Ponticola gymnotrachelus) and interprets some ecological requirements of these species based on their morphological attributes. The results are evaluated within an ontogenetic context, and the morphological differences between the species are discussed in terms of the question: can special external shape adaptations help to assess the invasive potential of each species? The morphometric analyses demonstrate important differences between the four invasive gobies. Neogobius melanostomus appears to have the least specialized external morphology that may favour its invasive success: little specialization to habitat or diet means reduced restraints on overall ecological requirements. The other three species were found to possess some morphological specializations (P. kessleri to large prey, N. fluviatilis to sandy habitats and P. gymnotrachelus to macrophytes), but none of these gobies have managed to colonize such large areas or to reach such overall abundances as N. melanostomus.