Novel MUC1 splice variants are expressed in cervical carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The MUC1 antigen can be used to identify epithelial cells from the background of hemopoietic cells. The present investigation describes patterns of overexpression of two novel MUC1 splice variants in human cervical carcinoma cell lines. METHODS: RT-PCR was carried out to determine MUC1 splice variants in the cervical cancer cell lines C-4 II, C-33A, DoTc 2 4510, C-4 I, SiHa, HT3, Hs 636 T (C4-I), and HeLa. RESULTS: The novel MUC1 splice variant D was expressed in all cell lines and the novel MUC1 splice variant C was expressed in all cell lines but C-33A. Variants A and B were expressed in all (variant A) and all but one (variant B) cell line. MUC1/REP was expressed in all cell lines and MUC1/SEC was positive in all but two cell lines (C-33 A, DoTc 2 4510). All but one cell line (C-33A) expressed MUC1/X and MUC1/Y, and two cell lines (C-33 A, DoTc 2 4510) did not express MUC1/Z, respectively. MUC1 variants A, D, and REP could be demonstrated consistently among all eight cervical carcinoma cell lines we have examined. CONCLUSIONS: The present study describes the feasibility of detecting a large number of MUC1 variants, including MUC1 variants C and D which are described for cervical carcinoma cells for the first time. Further studies will examine the presence of MUC1 splice variants' expression in human cervical carcinoma tissue.

Expression of mucins and cytokeratins in ovarian cancer cell lines.

The expression pattern of the epithelial cell markers MUC1 (CA15-3, EMA), CA125 (OC125), human epithelial antigen HEA (Ber-EP4) and cytokeratins (Ck7, Ck8, Ck7/8, Ck8/18/19) was studied in seven human ovarian cancer cell lines. We analyzed the cell lines by immunofluorescence to determine the surface as well as cytoplasmic expression. Furthermore, we evaluated the mRNA expression of MUC1, Ck18 and Ck19 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All cell lines were positive for MUC1. However, expression patterns and staining intensity depended on the different epitope-specific antibodies. CA125, a typical serum marker for ovarian carcinomas, was positive only in two cell lines. HEA was strongly positive in three cell lines, whereas the others expressed the antigen only weakly in the cytoplasm. Ck7 was not expressed in three of the seven cell lines. Ck7/8 was detectable in all cell lines and was strongly expressed in four of them. MUC1 mRNA was expressed by all cell lines as detected by RT-PCR. These findings permit selection of a suitable marker for the detection of disseminated ovarian cancer cells.

BRCA1 gene mutations in sporadic ovarian carcinomas: detection by PCR and reverse allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization.

BACKGROUND: Although germline mutations in BRCA1 play a central role in familial breast and ovarian cancers, to date, no somatic mutations in BRCA1 have been reported in sporadic breast cancer, and only five somatic mutations have been identified in the sporadic ovarian carcinomas. Because loss of heterozygosity appears frequently at the BRCA1 locus in nonfamilial breast and ovarian carcinomas, we searched for mutations in the BRCA1 gene in sporadic ovarian tumors. METHODS: We developed a detection system based on PCR and reverse allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization on membrane strips for the simultaneous detection of 17 frequently occurring mutations in the BRCA1 gene. RESULTS: As little as 2% mutant DNA in a sample could be detected. Two of 122 DNA samples isolated from sporadic ovarian tumor biopsies contained the Cys61Gly mutation. Both mutations were germline mutations. One of these was an ovarian metastasis of a primary fallopian tube carcinoma. The tubal carcinoma was also confirmed to contain the Cys61Gly mutation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report that a germline BRCA1 mutation is associated with primary tubal carcinoma. The 17 specific mutations in the BRCA1 gene do not play a major role in the tumorigenesis and progression of sporadic ovarian cancer.

Comparison of flow cytometry and RT-PCR for the detection of ovarian cancer cells in peripheral blood.

Recently, there has been significant effort in developing techniques designed to detect disseminated tumor cells in the peripheral blood (PB). These techniques include immunocytochemical staining of cytocentrifuge slides, flow cytometry, and RT-PCR. Several authors reported various results concerning the sensitivity of the detection limit when applying these methods. The aim of this study was to assess the value of two methods in the detection of ovarian carcinoma cells in the PB. For tumor cell detection we compared RT-PCR to immunomagnetic enrichment followed by flow cytometric analysis. In a model system, single cell suspensions of ovarian cancer cell lines were mixed with full blood samples from healthy donors in order to determine the sensitivity limit of the two methods and to analyze the reproducibility of each. In a multiparameter flow cytometric analysis, tumor cells were defined as cytokeratin 7/8 positive and CD45 negative. RNA was screened for MUC1 mRNA by RT-PCR. MUC1 mRNA expression turned out not to be a specific marker of disseminated ovarian cancer cells, because a weak expression was also found in samples of healthy persons. Using immunomagnetic enrichment followed by flow cytometry, one carcinoma cell per 1 x 10(6) leukocytes was detectable. However, a minimum of 10 ml blood had to be analyzed in order to clearly distinguish real positive tumor cells from false-positive signals.

Quantification of CD34+ cells: comparison of methods.

BACKGROUND: Quantification of CD34+ stem and progenitor cells is predominantly performed by flow cytometric analysis of cells prepared by whole blood staining and red cell lysis. This method also includes cell washing, which is thought to cause the destruction and loss of some of the nucleated cells (NCs). To address this cell loss and its influence on the outcome of enumeration, three techniques for preparing cells for quantification of CD34+ cells were compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood (n = 179), bone marrow (n = 60), and leukapheresis components (n = 64) were examined by the use of density separation of mononuclear cells (MNCs) and two red cell-lysis procedures (wash and no-wash). Cell counts were determined in the original materials and after cell preparation. Absolute CD34+ cell counts were calculated using the flow cytometry-analyzed proportions of CD34+ cells and the various white cell counts. RESULTS: Depending on the cell source and the cell preparation chosen, the loss of NCs ranged between 12 percent and 89 percent of the original white cell number. This loss of NCs was exclusively due to cell washing and predominantly affected granulocytic cells. Analysis of the flow cytometry data revealed that the relative CD34+ values in blood and bone marrow were roughly threefold higher in density separated MNCs than in those that underwent the lyse-and-wash procedure. Calculation of absolute CD34+ cell counts confirmed that the MNC procedure underestimated the CD34+ cell content by a median of 26 percent (blood), 21 percent (bone marrow), and 5 percent (leukapheresis component) when compared with the median yield from analysis and cell counting performed after the lyse-and-wash procedure. On the other hand, the conventional lysis procedure, which applies the original white cell counts for CD34+ quantification, was shown to overestimate the CD34+ cell content by a median of 1.2-fold, 1.33-fold, and 1.13-fold, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neither density separation nor the whole-blood lysis procedure seems appropriate for optimal CD34+ quantification.

The composition of CD34 subpopulations differs between bone marrow, blood and cord blood.

Our previous data obtained by flow cytometry and by clonogenic assay had consistently shown a lower cloning efficiency of hematopoietic progenitor cells in bone marrow (BM) compared to those in blood (PB) or in cord blood (CB). Also, recent clinical reports have described more rapid reconstitution after PB than after BM transplantation. We have applied two- or three-color flow cytometric analysis using monoclonal antibodies directed against the stem- and progenitor cell antigen CD34, in combination with other cell surface markers. We report significant differences in the composition of progenitor cells contained in BM (238 specimens from 53 healthy donors and from patients in remission), PB (301 samples from 92 patients with or without cytokine support) and CB (n = 37). Leukapheresis products (Pher, n = 69) were included in the study as well as positively selected CD34+ cells obtained from BM (BMsel, n = 2), PB (PBsel, n = 28) and CB (CBsel, n = 5). We used monoclonal antibodies directed against CD7, CD19, CD34, CD38, CD45RA and glycophorin A. The highest proportion of CD34+ cells (in % of the MNC) was found in BM (mean 5.37% +/- 4.5). In the other sources, the mean values were 1.79% +/- 2.46 (PB), 1.48% +/- 1.81 (Pher) and 1.1% +/- 1.69 (CB). However, BM was the only source in which a considerable proportion of the CD34+ cells coexpressed the B cell antigen CD19 (mean 30.1%, median 28, range 0 to 84%). The amount of earlier myeloid progenitors as determined by their non-expression of the CD45RA antigen was lowest among BM CD34+ cells (26.7% +/- 16.6). In the other sources, the respective values were 57.5% +/- 17.9 (PB), 63.6% +/- 13.9 (Pher) and 70.4% +/- 16.1 (CB). These results were confirmed by subtype analyses of the CD34+ cells positively selected from the three sources. Enrichment showed minor CD34+ subpopulations to be identified. The mean proportions of B cell progenitors were 0.11% +/- 0.24 (PBsel) and 1.3% +/- 1.42 (CBsel) of the CD34+ cells. The CD34+ cells from all cell sources coexpressed GPA (median 0.15%, range 0 to 1.8%) and CD7 (median 0.25%, range 0 to 1.2%). The proportion of CD38- cells ranged from 0.7 to 4% of the CD34+ MNC. Thus, despite higher CD34 counts in BM, the relative proportions of myeloid progenitors are higher in PB and in CB. This suggests that, if timely reconstitution depends on the number of CD34+ cells transplanted, the mean number of "stem cells' (SC) required is 1.4-fold (for myeloid cells) or 2.2-fold (for earlier myeloid cells) higher for BM than for PB.

Characterization of hematopoietic stem cells.

On the basis of density-separated mononuclear cells isolated from bone marrow, peripheral blood, and cord blood, we have repeatedly shown good correlation between two-color flow cytometric (FACS) CD34 analysis and colony formation in the clonogenic assay. We have analyzed the distributions of CD34 subpopulations in these three stem cell sources using patients' and donors' bone marrow biopsies (n = 196), cord blood samples from full-term deliveries (n = 14), and peripheral blood from patients mobilized by chemotherapy and/or cytokine treatment (n = 258). Irrespective of absolute cell counts, the mean (+/- SD) proportions of CD34+ cells were clearly higher in bone marrow (5.6 +/- 4.6% of mononuclear cells) than in peripheral blood (1.9 +/- 2.6) and cord blood (1.7 +/- 2.6). However, two-color FACS analyses revealed significant differences among these cell sources with regard to their distribution of CD34 subpopulations: B-cell progenitors coexpressing CD34 and CD19, at considerable concentrations of > 0.5%, were only found in bone marrow (mean 30 +/- 24.3% of CD34+ mononuclear cells, median 28.7%, minimum 0%, maximum 83.3%). In addition, CD34+ cells in S/G2M phase were never detected in peripheral blood or cord blood, but only in bone marrow at a concentration of 10-15% of CD34+ mononuclear cells. On the other hand, the proportions of relatively immature myeloid progenitors, as characterized by not expressing CD45RA and by higher clonogenic capacity, were significantly higher in cord blood (76.7 +/- 17.2) and peripheral blood (58.2 +/- 17.5) than in bone marrow (26.4 +/- 16.7). These data were confirmed by analysis of apheresis products and of progenitors positively selected from different cell sources, and they may explain why, in autologous transplantations of analogous amounts of CD34+ cells, peripheral blood is superior to bone marrow. We conclude from our results that if successful transplantation and timely recovery depend on the number of CD34+ cells transplanted, the mean amount of stem cells required is 1.4- (for myeloid cells) or 2.2-fold (for early myeloid cells) higher for bone marrow than for peripheral blood.

[Phenotypic differences between CD34 positive cells in various transplantation tissues]. / Phänotypische Unterschiede zwischen CD34 positiven Zellen in verschiedenen Transplantations-Materialien.

Transplantations to restore the hematopoietic system were originally performed with cells from the bone marrow (BM) (20) which was considered the only cell source comprising repopulating progenitor cells. The discovery that chemotherapy induced the mobilization of CD34+ cells into the peripheral blood (PB) (14) gave rise to the successful autologous transplantation of PBSC (1, 13). Also cord blood (CB) was found to contain considerable numbers of "stem cells", and to date at least 42 allogeneic transplantations have been performed with this cell source (22, J. Wagner, personal communication). Further investigations led to the successful autologous transplantation of positively selected CD34+ cells from BM and PB (18), and the latest results indicate that it is promising to transplant purified CD34+ cells obtained from cytokine-stimulated donors (4, 10, 15-16). Despite such achievements it remains unclear how many "stem cells" are required per kg of the recipient and how they are phenotypically characterized. In this communication we give examples of typical differences observed by flow cytometry and clonogenic assay between the CD34+ cells contained in the different cell sources. They may explain why it is not sufficient only to analyze the CD34+ cell populations which may represent progenitors of different lineages as well as of various states of differentiation. CB CD34+ cells are early myeloid progenitor cells with the highest incidence of CFU-mix among the three cell sources. They have a high proliferative potential in vitro. They hardly coexpress B cell antigens and they are partially negative for CD38.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Does cord blood contain enough progenitor cells for transplantation?

We analyzed 125 blood samples obtained from umbilical cord immediately after delivery of full-term neonates. Between 0.1 and 10.4% (mean 1.13%, SD 1.34) of the density-separated glycophorin A (GPA)-negative mononuclear cells (MNC) expressed CD34 as analyzed by flow cytometry. These hematopoietic progenitor cells did not coexpress CD19, and the majority were negative for CD45RA. The number of MNC determined per ml cord blood ranged from 1 x 10(5) to 200 x 10(5) (mean 20.2 x 10(5), SD 24.7). Regression analysis revealed that a mean of 56% (n = 26, R = 0.8) and 120% (n = 35, R = 0.94) of the analyzed CD34+ MNC gave rise to day 14 colonies in the clonogenic assay when cultured without or with stem cell factor (SCF). The number and the exact phenotype of progenitor cells required for successful transplantation are not known. If the transplantation of 5 x 10(5) CD34% cells/kg body weight is required for engraftment and one-third of the progenitor cells are lost to cell processing, and if 180 ml blood can be collected from a single umbilical cord (and placenta), our data suggest that 90% of the collections do not contain enough precursors to transplant a 25 kg recipient. To meet these conditions, an average of 1439 ml cord blood would be necessary for transplantation.