Mitigating data quality challenges in ambulatory wrist-worn wearable monitoring through analytical and practical approaches.

Chronic disease management and follow-up are vital for realizing sustained patient well-being and optimal health outcomes. Recent advancements in wearable technologies, particularly wrist-worn devices, offer promising solutions for longitudinal patient monitoring, replacing subjective, intermittent self-reporting with objective, continuous monitoring. However, collecting and analyzing data from wearables presents several challenges, such as data entry errors, non-wear periods, missing data, and wearable artifacts. In this work, we explore these data analysis challenges using two real-world datasets (mBrain21 and ETRI lifelog2020). We introduce practical countermeasures, including participant compliance visualizations, interaction-triggered questionnaires to assess personal bias, and an optimized pipeline for detecting non-wear periods. Additionally, we propose a visualization-oriented approach to validate processing pipelines using scalable tools such as tsflex and Plotly-Resampler. Lastly, we present a bootstrapping methodology to evaluate the variability of wearable-derived features in the presence of partially missing data segments. Prioritizing transparency and reproducibility, we provide open access to our detailed code examples, facilitating adaptation in future wearable research. In conclusion, our contributions provide actionable approaches for improving wearable data collection and analysis.

Unlocking the potential of smartphone and ambient sensors for ADL detection.

The detection of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) holds significant importance in a range of applications, including elderly care and health monitoring. Our research focuses on the relevance of ADL detection in elderly care, highlighting the importance of accurate and unobtrusive monitoring. In this paper, we present a novel approach that that leverages smartphone data as the primary source for detecting ADLs. Additionally, we investigate the possibilities offered by ambient sensors installed in smart home environments to complement the smartphone data and optimize the ADL detection. Our approach uses a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model. One of the key contributions of our work is defining ADL detection as a multilabeling problem, allowing us to detect different activities that occur simultaneously. This is particularly valuable since in real-world scenarios, individuals can perform multiple activities concurrently, such as cooking while watching TV. We also made use of unlabeled data to further enhance the accuracy of our model. Performance is evaluated on a real-world collected dataset, strengthening reliability of our findings. We also made the dataset openly available for further research and analysis. Results show that utilizing smartphone data alone already yields satisfactory results, above 50% true positive rate and balanced accuracy for all activities, providing a convenient and non-intrusive method for ADL detection. However, by incorporating ambient sensors, as an additional data source, one can improve the balanced accuracy of the ADL detection by 7% and 8% of balanced accuracy and true positive rate respectively, on average.

Patients with chronic cluster headache may show reduced activity energy expenditure on ambulatory wrist actigraphy recordings during daytime attacks.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes in activity energy expenditure (AEE) throughout daytime cluster headache (CH) attacks in patients with chronic CH and to evaluate the usefulness of actigraphy as a digital biomarker of CH attacks. BACKGROUND: CH is a primary headache disorder characterized by attacks of severe to very severe unilateral pain (orbital, supraorbital, temporal, or in any combination of these sites), with ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms and/or a sense of restlessness or agitation. We hypothesized increased AEE from hyperactivity during attacks measured by actigraphy. METHODS: An observational study including patients with chronic CH was conducted. During 21 days, patients wore an actigraphy device on the nondominant wrist and recorded CH attack-related data in a dedicated smartphone application. Accelerometer data were used for the calculation of AEE before and during daytime CH attacks that occurred in ambulatory settings, and without restrictions on acute and preventive headache treatment. We compared the activity and movements during the pre-ictal, ictal, and postictal phases with data from wrist-worn actigraphy with time-concordant intervals during non-headache periods. RESULTS: Four patients provided 34 attacks, of which 15 attacks met the eligibility criteria for further analysis. In contrast with the initial hypothesis of increased energy expenditure during CH attacks, a decrease in movement was observed during the pre-ictal phase (30 min before onset to onset) and during the headache phase. A significant decrease (p < .01) in the proportion of high-intensity movement during headache attacks, of which the majority were oxygen-treated, was observed. This trend was less present for low-intensity movements. CONCLUSION: The unexpected decrease in AEE during the pre-ictal and headache phase of daytime CH attacks in patients with chronic CH under acute and preventive treatment in ambulatory settings has important implications for future research on wrist actigraphy in CH.