RESUMO
Bloodstream infection (BSI), a frequent cause of severe sepsis, is a life-threatening complication in critically ill patients and still associated with a high mortality rate. Rapid pathogen identification from blood is crucial for an early diagnosis and the treatment of patients with suspected BSI. For this purpose, novel diagnostic tools on the base of genetic analysis have emerged for clinical application. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of additional next-generation sequencing (NGS) pathogen test for patients with suspected BSI in a surgical ICU and its potential impact on antimicrobial therapy. In this retrospective single-centre study, clinical data and results from blood culture (BC) and NGS pathogen diagnostics were analysed for ICU patients with suspected BSI. Consecutive changes in antimicrobial therapy and diagnostic procedures were evaluated. Results: 41 cases with simultaneous NGS and BC sampling were assessed. NGS showed a statistically non-significant higher positivity rate than BC (NGS: 58.5% (24/41 samples) vs. BC: 21.9% (9/41); p = 0.056). NGS detected eight different potentially relevant bacterial species, one fungus and six different viruses, whereas BC detected four different bacterial species and one fungus. NGS results affected antimicrobial treatment in 7.3% of cases. Conclusions: NGS-based diagnostics have the potential to offer a higher positivity rate than conventional culture-based methods in patients with suspected BSI. Regarding the high cost, their impact on anti-infective therapy is currently limited. Larger randomized prospective clinical multicentre studies are required to assess the clinical benefit of this novel diagnostic technology.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rapid pathogen identification and appropriate antimicrobial therapy are crucial in critically ill COVID-19 patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and potential therapeutic benefit of additional next-generation sequencing (NGS) of microbial DNA from plasma in these patients. METHODS: This monocentric descriptive retrospective study reviewed clinical data and pathogen diagnostics in COVID-19 ICU patients. NGS (DISQVER®) and blood culture (BC) samples were obtained on suspicion of BSIs. Data were reviewed regarding the adjustment of antimicrobial therapy and diagnostic procedures seven days after sampling and analyzed using the Chi²-test. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases with simultaneous NGS and BC sampling were assessed. The NGS positivity rate was 52% (13/25) with the detection of 23 pathogens (14 bacteria, 1 fungus, 8 viruses), and the BC positivity rate was 28% (7/25, 8 bacteria; p = 0.083). The NGS-positive patients were older (75 vs. 59.5 years; p = 0.03) with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (77% vs. 33%; p = 0.03). These NGS results led to diagnostic procedures in four cases and to the commencement of four antimicrobial therapies in three cases. Empirical treatment was considered appropriate and continued in three cases. CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 patients with suspected BSIs, NGS may provide a higher positivity rate than BC and enable new therapeutic approaches.
