Ureteral stenting in the clinic: a safe and cost-effective alternative to the operating room.

PURPOSE: Ureteral stent placement is one of the most common procedures performed by urologists, and is typically done in the operating room. At Ochsner-LSU Health Shreveport, urologists have a unique setting allowing them to place ureteral stents for patients present in the outpatient ambulatory clinic without the need for nitrous oxide. This allows patients to avoid being admitted to the hospital and receiving subsequent general anesthesia in the operating room. Therefore, our novel study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness of ureteral stents insertion in the clinic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, we analyzed 240 patients with a total of 279 different ureteral stent insertion encounters to evaluate the safety and costs of stenting in the clinic compared to the operating room. Stents were placed in the outpatient clinic for 126 patients, which required either a new ureteral stent insertion or a scheduled stent exchange. RESULTS: Overall, there was an increased age and length of stent duration among those who were stented in the clinic. We did not observe any increase in narcotics use, pain, adverse injuries, or differences in stent length. The total cost of a stent insertion operating room was $16,349.91 whereas the clinic procedure cost $7,865.69, however: medicare reimbursement remained the same. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate a novel use of stenting in the clinic is feasible as an outpatient alternative. It is a safe alternative to the operating room, and more cost-effective.

Impact of preoperative pelvic floor muscle training (pretraining) on urinary storage and emptying symptoms in women undergoing sling surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is an option for female mixed incontinence (MUI), the role of PFMT prior to midurethral sling (MUS) surgery is not well defined. We hypothesize that preoperative PFMT (pretraining) positively impacts urinary storage and voiding symptoms prior to retropubic MUS. METHODS: We carried out an institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review of women with stress-predominant MUI undergoing a retropubic MUS. Seventy-two women elected for initial PFMT before MUS (group 1). These were age-matched with 72 women who underwent MUS only (group 2). The primary outcome was the change in urinary voiding and storage symptoms (Emptying [E] and Inhibition [I; UUI] subsets of the SEAPI classification). Additional outcomes were stress urinary incontinence (SUI) resolution and change in quality of life (QoL) indices. RESULTS: Mean age and follow-up were 49 ± 12 years and 33 ± 12 months respectively. After MUS, SUI resolved in 79.2% and 69.4% in groups 1 and 2 respectively (p > 0.05). In group 1, 18% and 20.8% had improvement/resolution in the E and I subsets prior to MUS. Postoperatively, similar rates of improvement/resolution in the E (25% for both) and I (68% vs 63.9%) subsets were observed in groups 1 and 2 respectively. Postoperative QoL indices were statistically improved in both groups, with no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pretraining with PFMT before MUS was associated with preoperative improvement in emptying symptoms and UUI. Although not statistically significant, pretraining was associated with a higher chance of SUI resolution in the long term. If pretraining is beneficial before MUS, the effect appears to be small.