Systolic and diastolic function in renal replacement therapy: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Heart disease is the main cause of death among uremic patients (pts). Our study aimed to assess left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function in all of our pts on renal replacement therapy (RRT), investigating any differences between hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and transplantation (TX) pts. METHODS: All pts on RRT at our nephrology unit were enrolled in the study and evaluated once over a period of 6 months: 125 pts were studied: 61 pts on HD, 30 pts on PD and 34 TX pts. Systolic and diastolic function indexes were compared between HD, PD and TX pts. All comparisons were corrected for the effects of age, gender and time on treatment. RESULTS: HD pts suffered from worse systolic function, with a lower mean fractional shortening and ejection fraction (EF), than TX pts. Twenty percent of HD pts had an EF value <55%. PD pts showed worse diastolic function than TX pts and >80% of them suffered from pathological diastolic indexes. The proportion of hypertensive pts was TX 88.2%, PD 86.7% and HD 50.8%. The percentage of pts with LV hypertrophy (LVH) was TX 55.9%, PD 53.3% and HD 36.1%. CONCLUSIONS: TX pts had better systolic and diastolic function than HD and PD pts, despite having more hypertension and LVH.

Transesophageal echocardiographic follow-up of pulmonary veins in patients undergoing ostial radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Ostial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of pulmonary veins (PVs) is a promising invasive approach for the non-pharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation, but PV stenosis has been reported as a possible complication of this intervention. The aim of this study was to assess PV anatomy and stenosis (i.e. number and progression) by means of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during the follow-up of patients undergoing RFCA. METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients with refractory and highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation underwent ostial radiofrequency isolation of arrhythmogenic triggers/foci, localized into the PVs, by an electroanatomic approach (CARTO system) or circular mapping with a multipolar catheter (LASSO) placed under radioscopic guidance. All patients were investigated using TEE and magnetic resonance angiography before radiofrequency application to evaluate PV anatomy. TEE examination was repeated after 2 months of follow-up and, in the presence of a stenosis, 1 year later. RESULTS: TEE allowed to identify 100% of the left and right superior PVs, 96% of right inferior PVs, and 74% of the left inferior PVs. Anatomic variants were detected at TEE in 33% of patients against 37% at magnetic resonance angiography (95% of concordance). After ostial RFCA, TEE disclosed a significant reduction in the mean diameters of the left superior PV (14.1 +/- 3.2 vs 12.0 +/- 2.7 mm, p < 0.01), left inferior PV (11.2 +/- 2.3 vs 9.8 +/- 2.2 mm, p = 0.05) and right superior PV (14.2 +/- 2.6 vs 12.9 +/- 2.7 mm, p < 0.05), and an increase in the mean peak velocities of the left superior PV (69.8 +/- 14.8 vs 91 +/- 42.4 cm/s, p < 0.05) and left inferior PV (59.2 +/- 18.1 vs 79.3 +/- 40.5 cm/s, p < 0.05). From a total of 88 PVs treated, 7 (7.9%) showed a higher significant stenosis in patients treated using the LASSO than the CARTO system (31.3 vs 2.8% respectively, p < 0.01). After 1-year follow-up there was no progression of PV stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: TEE was successful to evaluate PV anatomy and stenosis of patients undergoing ostial RFCA for atrial fibrillation. This complication is not rare and seems to be strictly related to the method of ablation, in particular when circular mapping and disconnection of triggers/foci was carried out by only a circular multipolar catheter without an electroanatomic approach.