RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare surgical outcome and complications in canine eyes with stable, cataractous lenses undergoing routine phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with or without implantation of a capsular tension ring device (CTR). PROCEDURES: Dogs undergoing routine bilateral phacoemulsification and IOL implantation had one eye randomly chosen to have a CTR (47 eyes) inserted while the contralateral eye served as a control (47 eyes). The CTR was placed in the capsular bag following phacoemulsification and immediately prior to IOL implantation. All eyes received acrylic foldable IOLs. Patients were evaluated intra- and postoperatively, and complications were compared between eyes with and without a CTR. RESULTS: There were no intra-operative complications associated with implantation of the CTR. Postoperatively, the overall incidences of glaucoma (6%), intraocular hemorrhage (4%), and retinal detachment (2%) were equal between control and CTR eyes at the time of last follow-up. There was no significant difference in overall incidence of immediate postoperative uveitis (35% vs. 38%) or fibrin (19% vs. 15%) between control and CTR eyes. Follow-up time ranged from 2 weeks to 21 months. CONCLUSION: In canine eyes with stable cataractous lenses undergoing routine phacoemulsification and IOL implantation placement of a CTR does not increase the risk of intra- or postoperative complications.
