Comparative Safety of Originator and Biosimilar Epoetin Alfa Drugs: An Observational Prospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are biological molecules approved for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic renal failure. Biosimilars were licensed for use in Europe in 2007. AIM: This study aimed to compare the safety profile of biosimilars with respect to the reference product in a nephrology setting. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in four Italian regions between 1 October 2013 and 30 June 2015. The study population included patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing hemodialysis and treated with epoetins as per the clinical practice of the participating centers. The two comparison cohorts included patients treated with either an originator or a biosimilar epoetin alfa. Each patient was followed up until occurrence of any safety outcome of interest (grouped into three major categories), switch to a different ESA product, transplant or peritoneal dialysis, death, or end of the study period, whichever came first. RESULTS: Overall, 867 subjects were included in the study (originator: N = 423; biosimilar: N = 444). Biosimilar users were older than originator users (median age of 76 vs 64 years, respectively), more frequently affected by arrhythmia (29.3 vs 22.5%), and less frequently candidates for transplantation (3.8 vs 18.2%). Cox-regression analysis showed no increase in risk of safety outcomes in biosimilar users, even after adjusting for confounding factors: 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-1.3) for any outcomes; 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.8) for problems related to dialysis device; 0.9 (95% CI 0.6-1.5) for cardio- and cerebro-vascular conditions; 0.9 (95% CI 0.6-1.5) for infections. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the comparable safety profiles of originator and biosimilar epoetin alfa drugs when used in patients receiving dialysis.

Antidepressant-Induced Acute Liver Injury: A Case-Control Study in an Italian Inpatient Population.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-marketing clinical trials show that antidepressant-induced liver injury seems to be a rare adverse event. Because of short follow-up trial duration, the incidence of liver injury due to antidepressant use could be underestimated. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to quantify the risk of acute liver injury associated with antidepressant use through a case-control analysis among an inpatient population. METHODS: A multicenter study was carried out in nine Italian hospitals from October 2010 to January 2014, within the DILI-IT (Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Italy) study project. After exclusion of all patients with a clear competing cause of liver injury, cases were defined as adults admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of acute liver injury, while controls had any other acute clinical condition not related to the liver. Antidepressant exposure was evaluated within 90 days prior to the date of the first sign/symptom of liver injury. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated as a measure of risk estimates for liver injury. RESULTS: We included 17 cases exposed to antidepressants matched to 99 controls. According to the features of liver injury, all cases showed symptomatic liver function test abnormalities at hospital admission, with the main signs/symptoms represented by fatigue, nausea, asthenia, or dark urine. Citalopram was the antidepressant mostly involved in the increase of liver enzymes, mainly alanine aminotransferase. Compared with non-use, current use of antidepressants was associated with a significantly increased risk of liver injury (adjusted OR, ORADJ, 1.84; 95% CI 1.02-3.32). Specifically, an increased, but not significant, risk of developing liver injury was observed for citalopram, a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (ORADJ 1.82; 95% CI 0.60-5.53). CONCLUSION: The use of antidepressants is not as safe in terms of liver injury as expected; instead, the risk of antidepressant-induced liver injury is likely underestimated. The lack of significance does not reflect the absence of risk, but rather suggests the need to evaluate it in a wider setting of antidepressant users.

Ras signaling contributes to survival of human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type 1 (HTLV-1) Tax-positive T-cells.

Ras signaling pathways play an important role in cellular proliferation and survival, and inappropriate activation of Ras frequently results in cell transformation and cancer. Human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is the etiological agent of the adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), a severe malignancy that has a poor prognosis and exhibits resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Although the mechanisms involved in cell transformation by HTLV-1 have not been completely clarified, it is generally thought that Tax plays a pivotal role in the process. We have previously proposed that a functionally active Ras protein is needed for efficient anti-apoptotic activity of Tax. In this study we report data indicating that the apoptotic resistance of cells expressing Tax, constitutively or transiently, is linked to the intracellular levels of Ras-GTP. Indeed, we found that Tax-positive cells have a high content of active Ras, and that inhibition of Ras signaling, using the antagonist farnesyl thyosalicylic acid (FTS), increases their sensitivity to apoptosis. FTS treatment was also accompanied by a decrease in ERK, but not Akt, phosphorylation. Thus, all together our data suggest that the interaction between Tax and Ras could be important to ATLL pathogenesis, and indicate Ras as a possible target for therapeutic intervention in ATLL patients.