Transformation and release of micronized Cu used as a wood preservative in treated wood in wetland soil.

Micronized Cu (µ-Cu) is used as a wood preservative, replacing toxic chromated copper arsenate (CCA). Micronized Cu is malachite [Cu2CO3(OH)2] that has been milled to micron/submicron particles, with many particle diameters less than 100 nm, mixed with biocides and then used to treat wood. In addition to concerns about the fate of the Cu from µ-Cu, there is interest in the fate of the nano-Cu (n-Cu) constituents. We examined movement of Cu from µ-Cu-treated wood after placing treated-wood stakes into model wetland ecosystems. Release of Cu into surface and subsurface water was monitored. Surface water Cu reached maximum levels 3 days after stake installation and remained elevated if the systems remained inundated. Subsurface water Cu levels were 10% of surface water levels at day 3 and increased gradually thereafter. Sequential filtering indicated that a large portion of the Cu in solution was associating with soluble organics, but there was no evidence for n-Cu in solution. After 4 months, Cu in thin-sections of treated wood and adjacent soil were characterized with micro X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (µ-XAFS). Localization and speciation of Cu in the wood and adjacent soil using µ-XAFS clearly indicated that Cu concentrations decreased over time in the treated wood and increased in the adjacent soil. However, n-Cu from the treated wood was not found in the adjacent soil or plant roots. The results of this study indicate that Cu in the µ-Cu-treated wood dissolves and migrates into adjacent soil and waters primarily in ionic form (i.e., Cu2+) and not as nano-sized Cu particles. A reduced form of Cu (Cu2S) was identified in deep soil proximal to the treated wood, indicating strong reducing conditions. The formation of the insoluble Cu2S effectively removes some portion of dissolved Cu from solution, reducing movement of Cu2+ to the water column and diminishing exposure.

Time dependence of fast electron beam divergence in ultraintense laser-plasma interactions.

We report on the measurement and computer simulation of the divergence of fast electrons generated in an ultraintense laser-plasma interaction (LPI) and the subsequent propagation in a nonrefluxing target. We show that, at Iλ(2) of 10(20) Wcm(-2)µm(2), the time-integrated electron beam full divergence angle is (60±5)°. However, our time-resolved 2D particle-in-cell simulations show the initial beam divergence to be much smaller (≤30°). Our simulations show the divergence to monotonically increase with time, reaching a final value of (68±7)° after the passage of the laser pulse, consistent with the experimental time-integrated measurements. By revealing the time-dependent nature of the LPI, we find that a substantial fraction of the laser energy (~7%) is transported up to 100 µm with a divergence of 32°.

Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons.

Minirhizotrons provide a nondestructive, in situ method for directly viewing and studying fine roots. Although many insights into fine roots have been gained using minirhizotrons, a review of the literature indicates a wide variation in how minirhizotrons and minirhizotron data are used. Tube installation is critical, and steps must be taken to insure good soil/tube contact without compacting the soil. Ideally, soil adjacent to minirhizotrons will mimic bulk soil. Tube installation causes some degree of soil disturbance and has the potential to create artifacts in subsequent root data and analysis. We therefore recommend a waiting period between tube installation and image collection of 6-12 months to allow roots to recolonize the space around the tubes and to permit nutrients to return to pre-disturbance levels. To make repeated observations of individual roots for the purposes of quantifying their dynamic properties (e.g. root production, turnover or lifespan), tubes should be secured to prevent movement. The frequency of image collection depends upon the root parameters being measured or calculated and the time and resources available for collecting images and extracting data. However, long sampling intervals of 8 weeks or more can result in large underestimates of root dynamic properties because more fine roots will be born and die unobserved between sampling events. A sampling interval of 2 weeks or less reduces these underestimates to acceptable levels. While short sample intervals are desirable, they can lead to a potential trade-off between the number of minirhizotron tubes used and the number of frames analyzed per tube. Analyzing fewer frames per minirhizotron tube is one way to reduce costs with only minor effects on data variation. The quality of minirhizotron data should be assessed and reported; procedures for quantifying the quality of minirhizotron data are presented here. Root length is a more sensitive metric for dynamic root properties than the root number. To make minirhizotron data from separate experiments more easily comparable, idiosyncratic units should be avoided. Volumetric units compatible with aboveground plant measures make minirhizotron-based estimates of root standing crop, production and turnover more useful. Methods for calculating the volumetric root data are discussed and an example presented. Procedures for estimating fine root lifespan are discussed.