A Novel Case Study of the Use of Real-World Evidence to Support the Registration of an Osteoporosis Product in China.

On June 23, 2020, Prolia® (denosumab) was approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in the People's Republic of China as the first monoclonal antibody for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fractures. Its brand name in Chinese is , a transliteration from the English name "Prolia", which has an implied meaning of "to give strength to everyone"- a suitable name for a potent anti-resorptive therapy. The approval was supported by a novel marketing authorization application (MAA) that included data from Prolia's global clinical trial program establishing favorable efficacy and safety, augmented by results from a real-world evidence (RWE) study confirming the effectiveness and safety of Prolia in clinical practice within Taiwan and Hong Kong. Key constructs for this registration-quality RWE study included the fit-for-purpose assessment of data quality, methodology and quantitative assessment of potential biases, good practices of study conduct, and reproducibility of results. Using data from clinical practice in Taiwan and Hong Kong to evaluate the benefits versus risks of Prolia treatment in ethnic Chinese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, the RWE study results for effectiveness were comparable to efficacy demonstrated in the global clinical trial program and results for safety were consistent with the incidence observed in global post-marketing safety studies. While RWE is often used to monitor postmarket safety of drug products, support health insurance coverage decisions, and inform clinicians on real-world use of medicines, it has not been widely used to support regulatory approval for new medicines in lieu of clinical bridging studies in countries where such studies are required. Well-conducted registrational RWE studies can play a pivotal role in complementing the totality of evidence presented in an MAA. The benefits of such an approach include avoiding the collection of additional placebo-controlled trial data in populations where adequate ethnic characterization of efficacy, effectiveness, and safety may already exist from postmarketing sources, and accelerate access for patients to innovative medicines in important regions. Here, we describe a regulatory case study of a novel MAA incorporating RWE that provided important evidence to confirm the benefit:risk of a new drug and facilitated a label expansion to a new patient population.

Global Regulatory Dissonance: A Case Study of Industry Views on the Development of Drugs for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: The footprint of drug distribution is multinational, but the regulatory frameworks supporting drug development, review, and approval remain largely regional. As a result, industry faces regulatory standards that may be complementary, additive, or contradictory, resulting in global regulatory dissonance (GRD). METHODS: Global regulatory dissonance was explored through a case study of drug development (postmenopausal osteoporosis) using survey methodology. RESULTS: In the feedback received, respondents generally agreed that GRD increases the complexity, timelines, and size of registration studies. Dissonant regulatory feedback on proposed labeling, applications, and benefit-risk assessments was also reported. Multiple causes of GRD were identified, including dissonant drug regulatory authority advice, guidelines, benefit-risk assessments, drug approval precedents, medical standards of care, and health technology assessments. Harmonization of guidelines, scientific advice, benefit-risk procedures, and expanded use of mutual recognition agreements were identified as mechanisms thought to reduce GRD. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that global access to new drugs may be enhanced through a greater understanding of GRD.

The tactics of modern-day regulatory trials.

Fractures are an important public health problem affecting patients of all ages. Although most fractures heal quickly, some heal poorly and some do not heal at all. To achieve an optimal healing outcome, the standard of care for most fractures consists of reduction followed by immobilization, with a myriad of options regarding the approach to fracture-healing. Currently, biopharmaceutical companies are sponsoring research with regard to products that aim to enhance or accelerate fracture-healing; however, as there are no approved and marketed systemic therapies for fracture-healing, the development and commercialization process for such products will require close collaboration between industry, academia, and regulators to determine how to bring these products to market in the most efficient manner. The following manuscript provides a brief overview of the regulatory process in the United States for systemic therapies in fracture-healing and discusses key issues that may arise in connection with the regulatory approval of these novel investigational treatments.

Potent activity of soluble B7RP-1-Fc in therapy of murine tumors in syngeneic hosts.

We have characterized a receptor:ligand pair, ICOS:B7RP-1, that is structurally and functionally related to CD28:B7.1/2. We reported previously that B7RP-1 costimulates T cell proliferation and immune responses (Yoshinaga et al., Nature 1999;402:827-32; Guo et al., J Immunol 2001;166:5578-84; Yoshinaga et al., Int Immunol 2000;12:1439-47). We report that B7RP-1-Fc causes rejection or growth inhibition of Meth A, SA-1 and EMT6 tumors in syngeneic mice. Established Meth A tumors were rejected effectively with a single dose of B7RP-1-Fc, however, the treatment was less effective on larger tumors. Mice that rejected Meth A tumors previously by Day 30, also rejected a subsequent Meth A challenge on Day 60, without additional B7RP-1-Fc treatment, indicating a long-lived memory response. Tumor cells believed to be less immunogenic, such as P815 and EL-4 cells, were less responsive to this treatment. The EL-4 responsiveness to the B7RP-1-Fc treatment was enhanced, however, by pre-treatment of the mice with cyclophosphamide. As expected, T cells appeared to be targeted by B7RP-1-Fc treatment. Thus, the administration of soluble B7RP-1-Fc may have therapeutic value in generating or enhancing anti-tumor activity in a clinical setting.