Technical Performance as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between technical performance and patient outcomes in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer is an advanced procedure with high rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Many variables including patient, disease, and perioperative management factors have been shown to impact postoperative outcomes; however, the role of surgical performance is insufficiently investigated. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all patients who had undergone laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer at 3 teaching institutions between 2009 and 2015. Patients with available, unedited video-recording of their procedure were included in the study. Video files were rated for technical performance, using Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Generic Error Rating Tool instruments. The main outcome variable was major short-term complications. The effect of technical performance on patient outcomes was assessed using logistic regression analysis with backward selection strategy. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with available video recordings were included in the study. The overall complication rate was 29.5%. The mean Charlson comorbidity index, type of procedure, and the global OSATS score were included in the final predictive model. Lower performance score (OSATS ≤29) remained an independent predictor for major short-term outcomes (odds ratio 6.49), while adjusting for comorbidities and type of procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative technical performance predicts major short-term outcomes in laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer. Ongoing assessment and enhancement of surgical skills using modern, evidence-based strategies might improve short-term patient outcomes. Future work should focus on developing and studying the effectiveness of such interventions in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

Urologic complications of composite resection following combined modality treatment of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is a common perception that preoperative radiation increases the incidence of urologic complications following composite resection, but there is little evidence to support or refute this claim. METHODS: Patients who underwent ureteric reconstruction as a component of en bloc resection for locally advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer were identified from a multicenter institutional database (1982-2007). Charts were reviewed to determine the incidence, nature, management, and predictors of serious urologic complications. RESULTS: 126 patients (34 female, 92 male) met the inclusion criteria: (1) division of one or both ureters; and (2) ureteric reconstruction involving anastomosis to ureter, bladder, small bowel or colon. Urologic complications requiring intervention occurred in 30 (24%) patients, including: anastomotic leak (n = 11), anastomotic stricture (n = 10), fistula (n = 5), conduit/stoma problem (n = 5), and other (n = 3). Eight patients required surgical revision. The rate of urologic complications was similar in patients who had received radiation at some time prior to the index surgery and those who had not (25% and 19%, respectively, P = 0.61). There was a trend towards a higher complication rate with more complex compared with simpler reconstructive procedures (38% versus 20%, P = 0.069). CONCLUSION: 24% of patients who underwent ureteric reconstruction following composite resection developed a urologic complication that required intervention. Preoperative radiotherapy did not appear to predispose patients to urologic complications. Optimization of surgical technique at the time of en bloc resection may obviate the need for subsequent revision.

Safe implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy in a community-based general surgery practice.

BACKGROUND: This study reviewed a 3-year experience with the implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy at a community hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified all patients that underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy between January 2004 and March 2007. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, length of stay, operative time, and short-term outcomes (postoperative complications and death) were examined. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were identified; 25 (51%) were male. Median age was 68 years (range 31-90 years). Thirty-five (71%) and seven (14%) patients presented with adenocarcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), respectively. Median operative time was 169 min (range 23-387 min). Conversion to open laparotomy was necessary in six cases (12%). Median length of stay was 5 days (range 0-48 days). There were four (8.2%) postoperative deaths, and eight major complications, which included: myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, duodenal stump leak, bleeding, dehiscence, anastomotic leak, and obstruction. Of patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy with curative intent, 36/38 (95%) underwent R0 resection. Median number of lymph nodes that were pathologically evaluated was 11 (range 1-27). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy in a community hospital setting. Laparoscopic gastrectomy can be performed safely in a community hospital setting with operative times and length of stay that are comparable to open cases. Our short-term outcomes are comparable with existing studies from academic/university centers.