Recruiting people with HIV to an online self-management support randomised controlled trial: barriers and facilitators.

Background Recruitment of people to randomised trials of online interventions presents particular challenges and opportunities. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with the recruitment of people with HIV (PWHIV) and their doctors to the HealthMap trial, a cluster randomised trial of an online self-management program. METHODS: Recruitment involved a three-step process. Study sites were recruited, followed by doctors caring for PWHIV at study sites and finally PWHIV. Data were collected from study sites, doctors and patient participants. Factors associated with site enrolment and patient participant recruitment were investigated using regression models. RESULTS: Thirteen study sites, 63 doctor participants and 728 patient participants were recruited to the study. Doctors having a prior relationship with the study investigators (odds ratio (OR) 13.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0, 58.7; P = 0.001) was positively associated with becoming a HealthMap site. Most patient participants successfully recruited to HealthMap (80%) had heard about the study from their HIV doctor. Patient enrolment was associated with the number of people with HIV receiving care at the site (ß coefficient 0.10; 95% CI 0.04, 0.16; P = 0.004), but not with employing a clinic or research nurse to help recruit patients (ß coefficient 55.9; 95% CI -2.55, 114.25; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Despite substantial investment in online promotion, a previous relationship with doctors was important for doctor recruitment, and doctors themselves were the most important source of patient recruitment to the HealthMap trial. Clinic-based recruitment strategies remain a critical component of trial recruitment, despite expanding opportunities to engage with online communities.

Universal nevirapine upon presentation in labor to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission in high prevalence settings.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the uptake of and adherence to nevirapine to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission among women of unknown HIV serostatus presenting in labor. We also assessed preliminary efficacy of the approach. DESIGN: Women of unknown HIV serostatus presenting in labor were offered single-dose nevirapine in a prospective cohort study. Two additional contemporaneous comparison populations were also studied. METHODS: We measured uptake by counting the number of women that accepted enrollment when offered. We measured adherence with cord blood nevirapine assay. We measured preliminary efficacy with HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction of infant blood spots at 4-6 weeks of life. RESULTS: Of 1591 women approached in labor, 634 (40%) took up the intervention and received nevirapine, of whom 185 (29%) were HIV infected. Of 179 cord blood specimens from HIV-exposed infants that could be evaluated, 178 (99.4%) had nevirapine detected. This was higher than the 73 of 98 (74%) adherence rate observed in a comparison cohort in which women self-administered nevirapine before presenting to the labor ward (P < 0.001). Of 145 available infant specimens, 17 (11.7%) showed evidence of infection at 4-6 weeks, compared with 12 of 60 (20%) infants born immediately prior to study commencement whose HIV-infected mothers did not receive nevirapine (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nevirapine without HIV testing upon presentation in labor was accepted by two-fifths of women. Because therapy is directly observed, adherence is nearly perfect. Labor ward dosing to enhance nevirapine coverage should be considered as an adjunct to antenatal nevirapine administration for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.

Timing of the maternal drug dose and risk of perinatal HIV transmission in the setting of intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine.

CONTEXT: Single-dose intrapartum and neonatal nevirapine (NVP) reduces perinatal HIV transmission and is in increasingly common use throughout the developing world. OBJECTIVE: We studied risk factors for perinatal transmission in the setting of NVP. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study at two public obstetrical clinics in Lusaka, Zambia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a volunteer sample of HIV-infected pregnant women and their newborns, the women received a 200 mg oral dose of NVP at the onset of labor; their infants received 2 mg/kg of NVP syrup within 24 h of birth. The main outcome measure was the infant HIV infection status at 6 weeks of life, determined by DNA polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Only 31 of 278 (11.2%) infants were infected at 6 weeks. In logistic regression, viral load exceeding the median [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-8.7] and 1 h or less elapsing between NVP ingestion and delivery (AOR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8-14) were associated with transmission. Women delivering within 1 h of NVP ingestion had a lower mean drug concentration (351 versus 942 ng/ml; P<0.001) and were more likely to have a 'sub-therapeutic' NVP level of less than 100 ng/ml (56 versus 20%; P<0.001) than those who delivered more than 1 h post-ingestion. However, concentrations <100 ng/ml were not more likely to be associated with transmission than concentrations > or = 100 ng/ml (12.9 versus 11.7%; P=0.8). We did not identify a threshold concentration below which risk of transmission increased. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed low perinatal transmission rates with single-dose NVP. At least 1 h of pre-delivery NVP prophylaxis was a critical threshold for efficacy.

Comparison of two strategies for administering nevirapine to prevent perinatal HIV transmission in high-prevalence, resource-poor settings.

Universal nevirapine (NVP) therapy (provision of the drug without HIV testing) has been suggested as potentially superior to targeted NVP therapy (provision of the drug to seropositive patients identified through voluntary HIV counseling and testing [VCT]) for perinatal HIV prevention in low-resource, high-prevalence settings. The authors postulated that uptake (the proportion of women who accept the strategy when offered) may be higher for universal therapy, since it does not require a woman to learn her serostatus; they further postulated that adherence (the proportion of women who actually ingest the NVP tablet at labor onset) may be higher for targeted therapy, since knowledge of serostatus could motivate better adherence. Two clinics in Lusaka, Zambia were assigned to provide either the targeted or universal strategy. Halfway through the study period, the approach offered at each clinic was crossed over. Adherence was assessed by liquid chromatographic assay for NVP of cord blood. Regarding uptake, 1524 pregnant women were offered participation, and 1025 (67%) accepted. Of 694 women offered enrollment in the universal strategy, 496 (71%) accepted; of 830 women offered enrollment in the targeted strategy, 529 (64%) accepted (p <.01). Uptake was similar at both clinics for the universal strategy: 250 of 339 (74%) at clinic A and 246 of 355 (69%) at clinic B (p =.2), but differed significantly between clinics for the targeted strategy: 229 of 316 (72%) at clinic A and 300 of 514 (58%) at clinic B (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.23, 1.86). Increased uptake correlated with having been offered the universal rather than the targeted strategy (AOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.1), attendance at clinic A (AOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.01, 2.0), and maternal report of a prior fetal or infant death (AOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.5). Regarding adherence, in the universal strategy, 40 of 103 women (39%) were nonadherent compared with 25 of 98 women (26%) in the targeted strategy (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.004, 2.3). Failure to adhere correlated with participation in the universal strategy (AOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.04, 4.2) and illiteracy (AOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2, 5.3). In high-prevalence settings with adequate VCT services, uptake of NVP using the universal or targeted approach appears comparable. However, the universal strategy may result in better uptake in clinics with less well-functioning VCT services (as with clinic B). Adherence to the single-dose NVP intervention was lower among women who did not learn their HIV status. Programs that seek to save the greatest possible number of infants from perinatal HIV acquisition should consider a combination approach, in which women who desire HIV testing can access NVP through a targeted strategy, and women who do not desire testing can access NVP through a universal strategy.