Comparación de la mortalidad en pacientes en quimioterapia o inmunoterapia durante y antes de la pandemia de COVID-19. Estudio multicéntrico de cohortes emparejadas en Argentina / Comparison of mortality in patients on chemotherapy or immunotherapy during and before COVID-19 pandemic. Multicenter matched cohort study in Argentina

RESUMEN Objetivos. Comparar la mortalidad por todas las causas de pacientes oncológicos no vacunados que recibieron quimioterapia o inmunoterapia durante la pandemia, con aquellos tratados antes de la pandemia. Materiales y métodos. Realizamos un estudio de cohortes en cuatro hospitales terciarios en Argentina. Pacientes ambulatorios con una neoplasia sólida de cualquier estadio en tratamiento citotóxico o inmune intravenoso fueron elegibles. La cohorte pandémica se enroló durante la fase inicial del brote y se comparó con una cohorte de un período anterior a la pandemia utilizando emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión (PSM, por sus siglas en inglés). Los sujetos se emparejaron por edad, sexo, seguro de salud, factores de riesgo para complicaciones graves por COVID-19, estado funcional, tipo de cáncer y tratamiento, línea de tratamiento e índice de masa corporal. La mortalidad por todas las causas se estimó en ambas cohortes después de seis meses de seguimiento. Resultados. 169 pacientes fueron reclutados entre abril y agosto de 2020 para la cohorte pandémica y 377 para la cohorte prepandémica en el mismo período de 2019, 168 pacientes fueron emparejados. Luego de la PSM, la mortalidad por todas las causas fue del 17,9% en la cohorte pandémica y del 18,5% en la cohorte prepandémica, Riesgo Relativo: 0,97 (intervalo de confianza al 95 %: 0,61-1,52; p=0,888). En la cohorte pandémica, 30/168 pacientes fallecieron, ninguno por infección por COVID-19. Conclusiones. No hemos observado un aumento de mortalidad en pacientes ambulatorios no vacunados en tratamiento oncológico endovenoso activo durante la pandemia por COVID-19.

ABSTRACT Objectives. To compare all-cause mortality of unvaccinated oncology patients who received chemotherapy or immunotherapy during the pandemic with those treated before the pandemic. Materials and methods. We conducted a cohort study in four tertiary hospitals in Argentina. Outpatients with a solid neoplasm of any stage under-going cytotoxic or intravenous immunotherapy were eligible. The pandemic cohort was enrolled during the initial phase of the outbreak and compared with a pre-pandemic cohort using propensity score matching (PSM). Subjects were matched for age, sex, health insurance, risk factors for severe COVID-19 complications, performance status, cancer type and treatment, line of treatment, and body mass index. All-cause mortality was estimated for both cohorts after 6 months of follow-up. Results. A total of 169 patients were recruited between April and August 2020 for the pandemic cohort and 377 for the pre-pandemic cohort in the same months of 2019; 168 patients were matched. After PSM, all-cause mortality was 17.9% in the pandemic cohort and 18.5% in the pre-pandemic cohort; the Relative Risk was 0.97 (95 % confidence interval: 0.61-1.52; p=0.888). In the pandemic cohort, 30/168 patients died, but none from COVID-19. Conclusions. Our findings show that the mortality rate of unvaccinated ambulatory patients on active intravenous oncology treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic did not increase.

Comparison of mortality in patients on chemotherapy or immunotherapy during and before COVID-19 pandemic. Multicenter matched cohort study in Argentina. / Comparación de la mortalidad en pacientes en quimioterapia o inmunoterapia durante y antes de la pandemia de COVID-19. Estudio multicéntrico de cohortes emparejadas en Argentina.

OBJECTIVES.: Motivation for the study. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the risk of death in cancer patients on chemotherapy and immunotherapy is controversial. Published studies mainly compared patients on anti-cancer therapy to those off treatment or COVID-19 positive cancer patients to COVID-19 negative ones. Few studies were conducted in developing countries. Main findings. Mortality didn't increase in unvaccinated outpatients on active intravenous oncology treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications. This is the first propensity score-matched cohort study evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the population of unvaccinated oncology patients receiving intravenous anticancer therapy. . To compare all-cause mortality of unvaccinated oncology patients who received chemotherapy or immunotherapy during the pandemic with those treated before the pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: We conducted a cohort study in four tertiary hospitals in Argentina. Outpatients with a solid neoplasm of any stage under-going cytotoxic or intravenous immunotherapy were eligible. The pandemic cohort was enrolled during the initial phase of the outbreak and compared with a pre-pandemic cohort using propensity score matching (PSM). Subjects were matched for age, sex, health insurance, risk factors for severe COVID-19 complications, performance status, cancer type and treatment, line of treatment, and body mass index. All-cause mortality was estimated for both cohorts after 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS.: A total of 169 patients were recruited between April and August 2020 for the pandemic cohort and 377 for the pre-pandemic cohort in the same months of 2019; 168 patients were matched. After PSM, all-cause mortality was 17.9% in the pandemic cohort and 18.5% in the pre-pandemic cohort; the Relative Risk was 0.97 (95 % confidence interval: 0.61-1.52; p=0.888). In the pandemic cohort, 30/168 patients died, but none from COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS.: Our findings show that the mortality rate of unvaccinated ambulatory patients on active intravenous oncology treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic did not increase.

OBJETIVOS.: Comparar la mortalidad por todas las causas de pacientes oncológicos no vacunados que recibieron quimioterapia o inmunoterapia durante la pandemia, con aquellos tratados antes de la pandemia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS.: Realizamos un estudio de cohortes en cuatro hospitales terciarios en Argentina. Pacientes ambulatorios con una neoplasia sólida de cualquier estadio en tratamiento citotóxico o inmune intravenoso fueron elegibles. La cohorte pandémica se enroló durante la fase inicial del brote y se comparó con una cohorte de un período anterior a la pandemia utilizando emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión (PSM, por sus siglas en inglés). Los sujetos se emparejaron por edad, sexo, seguro de salud, factores de riesgo para complicaciones graves por COVID-19, estado funcional, tipo de cáncer y tratamiento, línea de tratamiento e índice de masa corporal. La mortalidad por todas las causas se estimó en ambas cohortes después de seis meses de seguimiento. RESULTADOS.: 169 pacientes fueron reclutados entre abril y agosto de 2020 para la cohorte pandémica y 377 para la cohorte prepandémica en el mismo período de 2019, 168 pacientes fueron emparejados. Luego de la PSM, la mortalidad por todas las causas fue del 17,9% en la cohorte pandémica y del 18,5% en la cohorte prepandémica, Riesgo Relativo: 0,97 (intervalo de confianza al 95 %: 0,61-1,52; p=0,888). En la cohorte pandémica, 30/168 pacientes fallecieron, ninguno por infección por COVID-19. CONCLUSIONES.: No hemos observado un aumento de mortalidad en pacientes ambulatorios no vacunados en tratamiento oncológico endovenoso activo durante la pandemia por COVID-19.

Prevalence of HER2 overexpression and amplification in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The reported rates of HER2 positivity in cervical cancer (CC) range from 0% to 87%. The importance of HER2 as an actionable target in CC would depend on HER2 positivity prevalence. Our aim was to provide precise estimates of HER2 overexpression and amplification in CC, globally and by relevant subgroups. We conducted a PRISMA compliant meta-analytic systematic review. We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane database, and grey literature for articles reporting the proportion of HER2 positivity in CC. Studies assessing HER2 status by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization in invasive disease were eligible. We performed descriptive analyses of all 65 included studies. Out of these, we selected 26 studies that used standardized American Society of Clinical Oncology / College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) Guidelines compliant methodology. We conducted several meta-analyses of proportions to estimate the pooled prevalence of HER2 positivity and subgroup analyses using geographic region, histology, tumor stage, primary antibody brand, study size, and publication year as moderators. The estimated pooled prevalence of HER2 overexpression was 5.7% (CI 95%: 1.5% to 11.7%) I2 = 87% in ASCO/CAP compliant studies and 27.0%, (CI 95%: 19.9% to 34.8%) I2 = 96% in ASCO/CAP non-compliant ones, p < 0.001. The estimated pooled prevalence of HER2 amplification was 1.2% (CI 95%: 0.0% to 5.8%) I2 = 0% and 24.9% (CI 95%: 12.6% to 39.6%) I2 = 86%, respectively, p = 0.004. No other factor was significantly associated with HER2 positivity rates. Our results suggest that a small, but still meaningful proportion of CC is expected to be HER2-positive. High heterogeneity was the main limitation of the study. Variations in previously reported HER2 positivity rates are mainly related to methodological issues.

Mortalidad en pacientes oncológicos tratados con quimio o inmunoterapia durante la pandemia de COVID-19 / Mortality in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCCIÓN Los datos sobre el riesgo de muerte de pacientes oncológicos en tratamiento citotóxico e inmune durante la pandemia provienen predominantemente de estudios retrospectivos o aquellos que incluyen pacientes positivos para COVID-19. OBJETIVO Estimar la mortalidad en la población general de pacientes oncológicos en tratamiento citotóxico e inmunomodulador en Argentina e identificar sus predictores clínicos. MÉTODOS En esta cohorte prospectiva multicéntrica incluimos pacientes con tumores sólidos en tratamiento quimio o inmunomodulador en cuatro hospitales de distintas zonas geográficas. El desenlace de interés fue mortalidad por cualquier causa. Para el análisis de sobrevida usamos el método de Kaplan-Meier, prueba log-rank y regresión de Cox. Como variables predictoras utilizamos edad, sexo, status tabáquico, hipertensión, diabetes, índice de masa corporal (IMC), puntaje ECOG, el tipo y la línea de tratamiento. RESULTADOS Se incluyeron 158 pacientes. La mediana de edad fue 61 años, rango intercuartil (47­ 71 años). El 48% realizaba tratamiento (neo)adyuvante, el 52% - terapia para enfermedad avanzada. El 92% recibía drogas citotóxicas, el 8% inmunoterapia, La mediana de seguimiento fue 92 días. Diez pacientes (6%) habían fallecido, todos ellos tenían enfermedad metastásica. En los análisis uni- y multivariable la línea de tratamiento (segunda línea vs primera línea HR 2,89 [IC 95% 0,58-14,3] p = 0.2; tercera o mayor línea vs primera línea HR 6,07 [IC 95% 1,34-27,5] p = 0,019), ECOG (ECOG2 vs ECOG0 HR 10,4, [IC 95% 1,08-100], p = 0,043; ECOG3 vs ECOG0 HR 50,8 [IC 95% 4,54-568] p = 0,01) y el IMC >30, (HR 4,61 IC 95% [1,24-17,2] p = 0,023) estaban significativamente asociados a la probabilidad de muerte. DISCUSIÓN La (neo)adyuvancia podría ser administrada con seguridad durante la Pandemia por COVID-19. Las líneas avanzadas de tratamiento, el pobre puntaje ECOG y la obesidad implicarían un mayor riesgo de muerte en pacientes en tratamiento citotóxico o inmune

Access of patients with breast and lung cancer to chemotherapy treatment in public and private hospitals in the city of Buenos Aires.

OBJECTIVES: Describe the time elapsed from the diagnosis to treatment with chemotherapy for patients with breast and lung cancer at public and private hospitals in Buenos Aires. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three public and three private academic hospitals in Buenos Aires. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with breast (n = 168) or lung cancer (n = 100) diagnosis treated with chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Clinical and sociodemographic data were collected in a stratified sample. We used the Kaplan-Meier estimator to analyse the time elapsed and the log rank test to compare both groups. RESULTS: For breast cancer patients, median time elapsed between diagnosis and treatment with chemotherapy was 76 days (95% CI: 64-86) in public and 60 days (95% CI: 52-65) in private hospitals (P = 0.0001). For adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments, median time was 130 (95% CI: 109-159) versus 64 (95% CI: 56-73) days (P < 0.0001) and 57 days (95% CI: 49-75) versus 26 (95% CI: 16-41) days, respectively (P = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in the time from first consultation to diagnosis. In patients with lung cancer, median time from diagnosis to treatment was 71 days (95% CI: 60-83) in public hospitals and 31 days (95% CI: 24-39) in private hospitals (P = 0.0002). In the metastatic setting, median time to treatment was 63 days (95% CI: 45-83) in public and 33 (95% CI: 26-44) days in private hospitals (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant disparity in the access to treatment with chemotherapy for patients in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Prognosis of metastatic giant cell tumor of bone in the pre-denosumab era. A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data on long-term prognosis of metastatic GCT (mGCT) is scant. The frequency of spontaneous regressions (SRs) is unknown. We aimed to estimate the prognosis of mGCT. METHODS: We searched electronic scientific literature databases and generic Internet from January 1980 to August 2017. After identifying eligible studies we performed descriptive analyses and meta-analyses to estimate overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) and frequency of SRs in the years before the widespread use of denosumab. We performed pre-specified subgroup analyses of studies published before and after 2000 and of those with more and less than 10 years of follow-up. RESULTS: After retrieving and combining data from 26 relevant retrospective case-series totaling 242 patients with a median follow-up of 6.9 years, the estimated pooled OS was 86.9% (95% CI 78.0-94.2). Pooled DSS was 88.0% (95% CI 79.7-94.7). SRs were observed in 4.5% of patients. In the subgroup of studies published after 2000 mGCT was the only cause of death of affected subjects. In case-series with a follow-up longer than 10 years pooled DSS was 69.7% (95% CI 25.5-99.8). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first study to derive estimated pooled OS and DSS of mGCT based on a large dataset. SRs were not exceptional phenomena. In a long run the disease could impact in a significant way on the life expectancy of affected subjects.

Respuesta completa y prolongada al tratameinto con pamidronato en metástasis pulmonares de un tumor de células gigantes óseo / Complete and prolonged response to treatment with pamidronate in lung metastases from a giant cell tumor of the bone

A pesar de ser considerado benigno, el tumor de células gigantes (TCG) de hueso con baja frecuencia puede presentar metástasis (MTS) a distancia, mayormente pulmonares. El curso clínico de las MTS, aunque habitualmente indolente, es muy variable. Se comunicaron tanto muertes por progresión de MTS, como su regresión sin mediar tratamiento alguno. Los marcadores pronósticos moleculares están aún en desarrollo. El manejo terapéutico de las MTS pulmonares es controversial. Las principales modalidades de tratamiento fueron tradicionalmente la cirugía, la quimioterapia y observación. En la última década los bifosfonatos (BF) y el denosumab, fueron empleados con éxito en el tratamiento adyuvante y neoadyuvante, pero la efectividad de estos fármacos, especialmente los BF, en pacientes con MTS está estudiada en menor medida. Presentamos un caso de MTS pulmonares múltiples histológicamente verificadas de TCG con respuesta completa al tratamiento con pamidronato que continúa a los 7 años de seguimiento (AU)

Although it is considered benign, on rare occasions giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone may present systemic dissemination, predominantly to the lung. The clinical course of metastasis (MTS), while usually indolent, is unpredictable. Both, deaths from progressive lung MTS and regressions without any treatment were reported. Molecular prognostic biomarkers are under development yet. The management of GCT is controversial. Surgical removal, chemotherapy and observation were traditionally the treatment modalities of choice. In the last decade biphosphonates and denosumab were successfully used in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant/unresectable setting. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of these drugs in metastatic disease is less studied. We submit a case report of complete response of multiple histopathologically confirmed unresectable lung MTS of TCG to the treatment with pamidronate with total follow-up length of 7 years (AU)