Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 50(5): 616-628, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106117

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare transperineal (TP) vs transrectal (TR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-guided prostate biopsy (PBx) in a large, ethnically diverse and multiracial cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent multiparametric (mp) MRI followed by TP or TR TRUS-fusion guided PBx, were identified from a prospective database (IRB #HS-13-00663). All patients underwent mpMRI followed by 12-14 core systematic PBx. A minimum of two additional target-biopsy cores were taken per PIRADS≥3 lesion. The endpoint was the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa; Grade Group, GG≥2). Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1491 patients met inclusion criteria, with 480 undergoing TP and 1011 TR PBx. Overall, 11% of patients were Asians, 5% African Americans, 14% Hispanic, 14% Others, and 56% White, similar between TP and TR (p=0.4). For PIRADS 3-5, the TP PBx CSPCa detection was significantly higher (61% vs 54%, p=0.03) than TR PBx, but not for PIRADS 1-2 (13% vs 13%, p=1.0). After adjusting for confounders on multivariable analysis, Black race, but not the PBx approach (TP vs TR), was an independent predictor of CSPCa detection. The median maximum cancer core length (11 vs 8mm; p<0.001) and percent (80% vs 60%; p<0.001) were greater for TP PBx even after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In a large and diverse cohort, Black race, but not the biopsy approach, was an independent predictor for CSPCa detection. TP and TR PBx yielded similar CSPCa detection rates; however the TP PBx was histologically more informative.


Assuntos
Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Períneo , Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista/métodos , Gradação de Tumores , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Urology ; 113: e9-e10, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29288787

RESUMO

Although iatrogenic ureteral injuries are rare, they have potentially devastating consequences for both patients and physicians, and their management remains challenging. We report a case of a 51-year-old morbidly obese (body mass index = 63) woman who suffered an iatrogenic 15-cm right ureteral avulsion during hysteroscopic biopsy. Preoperative antegrade and retrograde pyelograms demonstrated no true renal pelvis and a 3-cm blind-ending distal ureteral stump. The patient underwent a right robotic downward nephropexy, psoas hitch, lower pole calycostomy, and 11-cm appendiceal interposition. At 6 months postoperatively, renal scan demonstrated stable right renal function with no evidence of obstruction.


Assuntos
Histeroscopia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade Mórbida , Ureter/lesões , Doenças Ureterais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Apêndice/cirurgia , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Biópsia/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Histeroscopia/métodos , Doença Iatrogênica , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrotomia/métodos , Músculos Psoas/cirurgia , Doenças Raras , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureter/cirurgia , Doenças Ureterais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Ureterais/etiologia , Urografia/métodos , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Uterina/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA