Race, Prevalence of POLE and POLD1 Alterations, and Survival Among Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Importance: Black patients with endometrial cancer (EC) in the United States have higher mortality than patients of other races with EC. The prevalence of POLE and POLD1 pathogenic alterations in patients of different races with EC are not well studied. Objective: To explore the prevalence of and outcomes associated with POLE and POLD1 alterations in differential racial groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study incorporated the largest available data set of patients with EC, including American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE (Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange; 5087 participants), Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms (1315 participants), and the Cancer Genome Atlas Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (517 participants), collected from 2015 to 2023, 2013 to 2021, and 2006 to 2012, respectively. The prevalence of and outcomes associated with POLE or POLD1 alterations in EC were evaluated across self-reported racial groups. Exposure: Patients of different racial groups with EC and with or without POLE or POLD1 alterations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was overall survival. Data on demographic characteristics, POLE and POLD1 alteration status, histologic subtype, tumor mutation burden, fraction of genome altered, and microsatellite instability score were collected. Results: A total of 6919 EC cases were studied, of whom 444 (6.4%), 694 (10.0%), and 4869 (70.4%) patients were self-described as Asian, Black, and White, respectively. Within these large data sets, Black patients with EC exhibited a lower weighted average prevalence of pathogenic POLE alterations (0.5% [3 of 590 cases]) compared with Asian (6.1% [26 of 424]) or White (4.6% [204 of 4520]) patients. By contrast, the prevalence of POLD1 pathogenic alterations was 5.0% (21 cases), 3.2% (19 cases), and 5.6% (255 cases) in Asian, Black, and White patients with EC, respectively. Patients with POLD1 alterations had better outcomes regardless of race, histology, and TP53 alteration status. For a total of 241 clinically annotated Black patients with EC, a composite biomarker panel of either POLD1 or POLE alterations identified 7.1% (17 patients) with positive outcomes (1 event at 70 months follow up) in the small sample of available patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective clinicopathological study of patients of different racial groups with EC, a composite biomarker panel of either POLD1 or POLE alteration could potentially guide treatment de-escalation, which is especially relevant for Black patients.

A cost-effective, machine learning-based new unified risk-classification score (NU-CATS) for patients with endometrial cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment for endometrial cancer (EC) is increasingly guided by molecular risk classifications. Here, we aimed at using machine learning (ML) to incorporate clinical and molecular risk factors to optimize risk assessment. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas-Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (n = 596), Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms (n = 1315) and the American Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (n = 4561) datasets were used to identify genetic alterations and clinicopathological features. Software packages including Keras, Pytorch, and Scikit Learn were tested to build artificial neural networks (ANNs) with a binary output as either intra-abdominal metastatic progression ('1') vs. non-metastatic ('0'). RESULTS: Black patients with EC have worse prognosis than White patients, adjusting for TP53 or POLE mutation status. Over 75% of Black patients carry TP53 mutations as compared to approximately 40% of White patients. Older age is associated with an increasing likelihood of TP53 mutation, high risk histology, and distant metastasis. For patients above age 70, 91% of Black and 60% of White EC patients carry TP53 mutations. A ML-based New Unified classifiCATion Score (NU-CATS) that incorporates age, race, histology, mismatch repair status, and TP53 mutation status showed 75% accuracy in prognosticating intra-abdominal progression. A higher NU-CATS is associated with an increasing risk of having positive pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes and distant metastasis. NU-CATS was shown to outperform Leiden/TransPORTEC model for estimating risk of FIGO Stage I/II disease progression and survival in Black EC patients. CONCLUSION: The NU-CATS, a ML-based, cost-effective algorithm, incorporates diverse clinicopathologic and molecular variables of EC and yields superior prognostication of the risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, disease progression, and overall survival.

Oligometastatic Breast Cancer.

Oligometastatic breast cancer is typically defined as the presence of 1-5 metastases and represents an intermediate state between locally advanced and widely metastatic disease. Oligometastatic cancer appears have a molecular signature that is distinct from widely metastatic disease and is associated with a superior prognosis. Due to its more limited capacity for widespread progression, oligometastatic disease could potentially benefit from aggressive ablative therapy to known sites of disease. The phase II SABR-COMET trial enrolled patients with oligometastatic disease of multiple histologies and randomized them to HIGRT vs. standard of care, finding a notable survival advantage in favor of HIGRT. There are many ongoing trials exploring the role of HIGRT for the treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer. Future studies may identify optimal candidates for ablative therapy by molecular signature; current clinically-based selection criteria include longer disease-free interval from diagnosis to metastasis (>2 years), fewer metastases, and fewer involved organs.

Treatment Strategies for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Oligometastatic breast cancer, typically defined as the presence of 1-5 metastases, represents an intermediate state between locally advanced and widely metastatic disease. Emerging research suggests that oligometastatic cancer has a unique molecular signature distinct from widely metastatic disease, and that it carries a superior prognosis. Owing to its more limited capacity for widespread progression, oligometastatic disease may benefit from aggressive ablative therapy to known metastases. Options for ablation include surgical excision, radiofrequency ablation, and hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HIGRT). The phase II SABR-COMET trial, which enrolled patients with oligometastatic disease of multiple histologies and randomized them to HIGRT vs. standard of care, found a notable survival advantage in favor of HIGRT. Other data suggest that HIGRT may synergize with immunotherapy by releasing powerful cytokines that increase anti-tumor immune surveillance and by recruiting tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, helping to overcome resistance to therapy. There are many ongoing trials exploring the role of ablative therapy, most notably HIGRT, with or without immunotherapy, for the treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer.We believe that patients with oligometastatic breast cancer should be offered enrollment on prospective clinical trials when possible. Outside the context of a clinical trial, we recommend that select patients with oligometastatic breast cancer be offered treatment with a curative approach, including ablative therapy to all sites of disease if it can be safely accomplished. Currently, selection criteria to consider for ablative therapy include longer disease-free interval from diagnosis to metastasis (>2 years), fewer metastases, and fewer involved organs. Undoubtedly, new data will refine or even upend our understanding of the definition and optimal management of oligometastatic disease.

Adaptability and Resilience of Academic Radiation Oncology Personnel and Procedures during COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive response to the unprecedented SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) challenges for public health and its impact on radiation oncology patients and personnel for resilience and adaptability is presented. METHODS: The general recommendations included working remotely when feasible, implementation of screening/safety and personal protective equipment (PPE) guidelines, social distancing, regular cleaning of treatment environment, and testing for high-risk patients/procedures. All teaching conferences, tumor boards, and weekly chart rounds were conducted using a virtual platform. Additionally, specific recommendations were given to each section to ensure proper patient treatments. The impact of these measures, especially adaptability and resilience, were evaluated through specific questionnaire surveys. RESULTS: These comprehensive COVID-19-related measures resulted in most staff expressing a consistent level of satisfaction in regard to personal safety, maintaining a safe work environment, continuing quality patient care, and continuing educational activities during the pandemic. There was a significant reduction in patient treatments and on-site patient visits with an appreciable increase in the number of telemedicine e-visits. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results demonstrated substantial adaptability and resilience, including in the rapid recovery of departmental activities during the reactivation phase. In the event of a future public health emergency, the measures implemented may be adopted with good outcomes by radiation oncology departments across the globe.

NRG Oncology/RTOG Consensus Guidelines for Delineation of Clinical Target Volume for Intensity Modulated Pelvic Radiation Therapy in Postoperative Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer: An Update.

PURPOSE: Accurate target definition is critical for the appropriate application of radiation therapy. In 2008, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) published an international collaborative atlas to define the clinical target volume (CTV) for intensity modulated pelvic radiation therapy in the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. The current project is an updated consensus of CTV definitions, with removal of all references to bony landmarks and inclusion of the para-aortic and inferior obturator nodal regions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An international consensus guideline working group discussed modifications of the current atlas and areas of controversy. A document was prepared to assist in contouring definitions. A sample case abdominopelvic computed tomographic image was made available, on which experts contoured targets. Targets were analyzed for consistency of delineation using an expectation-maximization algorithm for simultaneous truth and performance level estimation with kappa statistics as a measure of agreement between observers. RESULTS: Sixteen participants provided 13 sets of contours. Participants were asked to provide separate contours of the following areas: vaginal cuff, obturator, internal iliac, external iliac, presacral, common iliac, and para-aortic regions. There was substantial agreement for the common iliac region (sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.981, kappa 0.64), moderate agreement in the external iliac, para-aortic, internal iliac and vaginal cuff regions (sensitivity 0.66, 0.74, 0.62, 0.59; specificity 0.989, 0.966, 0.986, 0.976; kappa 0.60, 0.58, 0.52, 0.47, respectively), and fair agreement in the presacral and obturator regions (sensitivity 0.55, 0.35; specificity 0.986, 0.988; kappa 0.36, 0.21, respectively). A 95% agreement contour was smoothed and a final contour atlas was produced according to consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement among the participants was most consistent in the common iliac region and least in the presacral and obturator nodal regions. The consensus volumes formed the basis of the updated NRG/RTOG Oncology postoperative atlas. Continued patterns of recurrence research are encouraged to refine these volumes.

Impact of p53, HIF1a, Ki-67, CA-9, and GLUT1 Expression on Treatment Outcomes in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the association between pretreatment p53, hypoxia inducible factor 1a (HIF1a), Ki-67, carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9), and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated definitively with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and treatment outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional control (LC), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients treated definitively and consecutively for cervical cancer with CRT had p53, HIF1a, Ki-67, CA-9, and GLUT1 protein expression assessed and scored semiquantitatively by 3 pathologists, blinded to the treatment outcomes. Outcomes were stratified by p53 (H-score: <15 vs. ≥15), HIF1a (H-score: <95 vs. ≥95), Ki-67 (labeling index <41% vs. ≥41%), CA-9 (H-score: <15 vs. ≥15), and GLUT1 (H-score: <175 vs. ≥175) expression. OS, PFS, LC, and DMFS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were evaluated by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Notable clinical characteristics of the cohort included median age of 51 years (range: 32 to 74 y), FIGO stage IIB disease (57.2%), clinical node-negative disease (64.3%), squamous cell carcinoma (89.3%), and adenocarcinoma (10.7%). Treatment outcomes included 5-year OS (57.2%), PFS (48.1%), LC (72.1%), and DMFS (62.9%). For HIF1a H-score <95 and ≥95, the 5-year OS (52.0% and 68.4%, P=0.58), PFS (53.0% and 40.9%, P=0.75), LC (71.6% and 68.2%, P=0.92), and DMFS (59.7% and 52.0%, P=0.91) were not significantly different. For Ki-67 labeling index <41% and ≥41%, the 5-year OS (44.9% and 66.6%, P=0.35), PFS (38.9% and 55.4%, P=0.53), LC (57.7% and 85.7%, P=0.22), and DMFS (67.3% and 61.0%, P=0.94) were not significantly different. For CA-9 H-score <15 and ≥15, the 5-year OS (54.4% and 66.7%, P=0.39), PFS (57.3% and 40.0%, P=0.87), LC (70.0% and 70.0%, P=0.95), and DMFS (70.0% and 46.7%, P=0.94) were not significantly different. For GLUT1 H-score <175 and ≥175, the 5-year OS (43.6% and 43.6%, P=0.32), PFS (55.6% and 49.5%, P=0.72), LC (72.9% and 71.5%, P=0.97), and DMFS (62.5% and 59.6%, P=0.76) were not significantly different. For p53, H-score <15 and ≥15, the 5-year OS (62% and 53%), PFS (63% and 30.3%), LC (87.5% and 52%), and DMFS (79.6% and 41.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study population, HIF1a, Ki-67, CA-9, and GLUT1 expression did not predict treatment response or outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated definitively with CRT. There was a nonstatistically significant trend towards worse outcomes with p53 expression.

Development of a gynecologic brachytherapy curriculum and simulation modules to improve radiation oncology trainees' skills and confidence.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy in the management of cervical cancer is directly linked to improved survival. Unfortunately, we continue to see a decline in its utilization. A recent survey of U.S. residents demonstrated limited caseload as the greatest barrier to achieving independence in brachytherapy practice. To improve residents' brachytherapy skills and confidence in performing brachytherapy independently, a gynecologic brachytherapy simulation course was developed and tested. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The gynecologic brachytherapy curriculum and simulation modules were developed using a combination of didactic education, self-study, practicums, and patient-centered cases. The simulation modules consisted of 2-h sessions. The first hour occurred within a simulated OR environment, where residents independently performed all aspects of applicator insertion in a cadaver model. The second hour consisted of contouring, dosimetric planning, and treatment evaluation. A brachytherapy training survey developed by the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology was given before and after the course. RESULTS: The perceived ability to perform brachytherapy independently for a given disease site correlated directly with number of cases performed. Most residents believed that after performing five cases they would be capable of performing additional cases independently (10 of 18). All strongly agreed (8 of 18) or agreed (10 of 18) this to be true after 15 cases. Compared with survey data before the brachytherapy simulation course, trainees felt that their ability to independently perform brachytherapy (p < 0.001) improved. CONCLUSIONS: A brachytherapy simulation course can be used to gain further experience in a controlled environment. Our results demonstrate that gynecologic brachytherapy simulation increased trainees' confidence in performing the procedures independently.

Radiation dermatitis in patients treated with concurrent trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).

Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) improves outcomes for patients with HER2+ breast cancer, and is given concurrently with radiation. We have noted increased radiation dermatitis in these patients, which may have been underreported on the KATHERINE clinical trial, and call for clinicians to remain vigilant of unexpected toxicities with newly approved therapies.

Mechanical properties of the shoulder and pectoralis major in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with axillary surgery and radiotherapy.

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy reduce breast cancer recurrence but can cause functional deficits in breast cancer survivors. A cross-sectional study quantified the long-term pathophysiological impact of these treatments on biomechanical measures of shoulder stiffness and ultrasound shear wave elastography measures of the shear elastic modulus of the pectoralis major (PM). Nine node-positive patients treated with radiotherapy to the breast and regional nodes after BCS and axillary lymph node dissection (Group 1) were compared to nine node-negative patients treated with radiotherapy to the breast alone after BCS and sentinel node biopsy (Group 2) and nine healthy age-matched controls. The mean follow-up for Group 1 and Group 2 patients was 988 days and 754 days, respectively. Shoulder stiffness did not differ between the treatment groups and healthy controls (p = 0.23). The PM shear elastic modulus differed between groups (p = 0.002), with Group 1 patients exhibiting a stiffer PM than Group 2 patients (p < 0.001) and healthy controls (p = 0.027). The mean prescribed radiotherapy dose to the PM was significantly correlated with passive shear elastic modulus (p = 0.018). Breast cancer patients undergoing more extensive axillary surgery and nodal radiotherapy did not experience long-term functional deficits to shoulder integrity but did experience long-term mechanical changes of the PM.

Clinical implementation, logistics and workflow guide for MRI image based interstitial HDR brachytherapy for gynecological cancers.

Interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) is often utilized to treat women with bulky endometrial or cervical cancers not amendable to intracavitary treatments. A modern trend in IBT is the utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a high dose rate (HDR) afterloader for conformal 3D image-based treatments. The challenging part of this procedure is to properly complete many sequenced and co-related physics preparations. We presented the physics preparations and clinical workflow required for implementing MRI-based HDR IBT (MRI-HDR-IBT) of gynecologic cancer patients in a high-volume brachytherapy center. The present document is designed to focus on the clinical steps required from a physicist's standpoint. Those steps include: (a) testing IBT equipment with MRI scanner, (b) preparation of templates and catheters, (c) preparation of MRI line markers, (d) acquisition, importation and registration of MRI images, (e) development of treatment plans and (f) treatment evaluation and documentation. The checklists of imaging acquisition, registration and plan development are also presented. Based on the TG-100 recommendations, a workflow chart, a fault tree analysis and an error-solution table listing the speculated errors and solutions of each step are provided. Our workflow and practice indicated the MRI-HDR-IBT is achievable in most radiation oncology clinics if the following equipment is available: MRI scanner, CT (computed tomography) scanner, MRI/CT compatible templates and applicators, MRI line markers, HDR afterloader and a brachytherapy treatment planning system capable of utilizing MRI images. The OR/procedure room availability and anesthesiology support are also important. The techniques and approaches adopted from the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) recommendations and other publications are proven to be feasible. The MRI-HDR-IBT program can be developed over time and progressively validated through clinical experience, this document is expected to serve as a reference workflow guideline for implementing and performing the procedure.

Determining the Organ at Risk for Lymphedema After Regional Nodal Irradiation in Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Lymphedema after regional nodal irradiation is a severe complication that could be minimized without significantly compromising nodal coverage if the anatomic region(s) associated with lymphedema were better defined. This study sought to correlate dose-volume relationships within subregions of the axilla with lymphedema outcomes to generate treatment planning guidelines for reducing lymphedema risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women with stage II-III breast cancer who underwent breast surgery with axillary assessment and regional nodal irradiation were identified. Nodal targets were prospectively contoured per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines for field design. The axilla was divided into 8 distinct subregions that were retrospectively contoured. Lymphedema outcomes were assessed by arm circumferences. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression assessed patient, surgical, and dosimetric predictors of lymphedema outcomes. RESULTS: Treatment planning computed tomography scans for 265 women treated between 2013 and 2017 were identified. Median post-radiation therapy follow-up was 3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9-3.6). Dose to the axillary-lateral thoracic vessel juncture (ALTJ; superior to level I) was most associated with lymphedema risk (maximally selected rank statistic = 6.3, P < .001). The optimal metric was ALTJ minimum dose (Dmin) <38.6 Gy (3-year lymphedema rate 5.7% vs 37.4%, P <.001), although multiple parameters relating to sparing of the ALTJ were highly correlated. Multivariate analysis confirmed ALTJ Dmin <38.6 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.13; P < .001), body mass index (HR, 1.06/unit; P = .002), and number of lymph nodes removed (HR, 1.08/node; P < .001) as significant predictors. Women with ALTJ Dmin <38.6 Gy maintained median V45Gy of 99% in the supraclavicular (IQR, 94-100%), 100% in level III (IQR, 97%-100%), 98% in level II (IQR, 86%-100%), and 91% in level I (IQR, 75%-98%) nodal basins. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic studies suggest the ALTJ region is typically traversed by arm lymphatics and appears to be an organ at risk in breast radiation therapy. Ideally, avoidance of the ALTJ may be feasible while simultaneously encompassing breast-draining nodal basins. Confirmation of this finding in future prospective studies is needed.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Lymphedema After Axillary Surgery and Radiation Therapy in Women With Breast Cancer From the NCIC CTG MA.20 Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: Regional nodal irradiation for women with breast cancer is known to be an important risk factor for the development of upper extremity lymphedema, but tools to accurately predict lymphedema risks for individual patients are lacking. This study sought to develop and validate a nomogram to predict lymphedema risk after axillary surgery and radiation therapy in women with breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 1832 women accrued on the MA.20 trial between March 2000 and February 2007 were used to create a prognostic model with National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Version 2.0 grade 2 or higher lymphedema as the primary endpoint. Multivariable logistic regression estimated model performance. External validation was performed on data from a single large academic cancer center (N = 785). RESULTS: In the MA.20 trial cohort, 3 risk factors were predictive of lymphedema risk: body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05 per unit body mass index; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08, P < .001), extent of axillary surgery (adjusted odds radio for 8-11 lymph nodes removed, 3.28 [95% CI, 1.53-7.89] P = .004; 12-15 lymph nodes, 4.04 [95% CI, 1.76-10.26] P = .002; ≥16 nodes, 5.08 [95% CI, 2.26-12.70] P < .001), and extent of nodal irradiation (adjusted odds radio for limited, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.08-2.56] P = .02; for extensive, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.28-4.10] P = .004). A nomogram was created from these data that predicted lymphedema risk with reasonable accuracy confirmed by both internal (concordance index, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.74) and external validation (concordance index, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.66-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram created from the MA.20 randomized trial data using clinical information may be useful for lymphedema screening and risk stratification for therapeutic intervention trials.

Association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy sequence with overall survival in locoregionally advanced endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal adjuvant management of women with FIGO Stage III-IVA endometrial cancer (EC) is unclear. While recent prospective data suggest that treatment with pelvic radiotherapy (RT) prior to chemotherapy (CT) is not associated with a survival benefit compared to CT alone, no prospective randomized trial has included a treatment arm in which CT is given before RT. METHODS: An observational cohort study was performed on women with FIGO Stage III-IVA Type 1 (grade 1-2, endometrioid) EC who underwent hysterectomy and received multi-agent CT and/or RT from 2004 to 2014 at Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals. Multivariable parametric accelerated failure time models were performed to estimate the association of sequence of adjuvant CT and RT with overall survival (OS) using propensity score-adjusted matched cohorts. RESULTS: Of 5795 women identified, 1260 (21.7%) received RT only, 2465 (42.5%) received CT only, 593 (9.7%) received RT before CT, and 1506 (26.0%) received RT after CT. Women who received RT after CT experienced significantly longer 5-year OS than women who received RT before CT (5-year OS: 80.1% vs 73.3%; time-ratio (TR) = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18-1.58, P < 0.001), CT only (68.9%; TR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.19-1.48, P < 0.001), or RT only (64.5%, TR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.32-1.70, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For women with advanced EC, treatment with multi-agent CT followed by RT is associated with longer OS compared with treatment with RT followed by CT or either treatment alone. These hypothesis-generating data support inclusion in future prospective trials of regimens in which multi-agent CT starts prior to RT.

Updates on adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article will provide an opinion on adjuvant treatment of stage I-III endometrial cancer based on existing and evolving evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: For early-stage (I and II) intermediate risk endometrial cancer, vaginal brachytherapy reduces the risk of locoregional relapse. Recent studies have investigated the use of chemotherapy in early stage, high-risk patient population, but did not demonstrate a survival benefit. As such, chemotherapy is only recommended for selected patients at high risk for distant recurrence. On the other hand, for stage III disease, chemotherapy has a well established role. A landmark trial recently reported confirmed that chemoradiation improves recurrence-free survival compared with radiation alone in stage III endometrial cancer. However, in another randomized phase III trial, chemoradiotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy alone in this group, raising questions as to whether addition of radiation is necessary. Therefore, improved risk stratification using molecular markers in addition to traditional pathological criteria is critically needed to better predict the risk of local and systemic recurrence and to assist therapy decision-making. SUMMARY: Endometrial cancer care is evolving and recent pivotal trials highlight the significance of chemotherapy to the treatment of stage III endometrial cancer and not to the approach for stage I and II cancer. The role of radiation therapy for stage III disease is raised into question.