Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow in Healthy and Obstructed Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) is a practical and affordable tool that measures maximum inspiratory flow rate through both nostrils. Although NPIF values for healthy controls and patients appear to differ considerably, a generally expected value for populations with and without nasal obstruction has yet to be established. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the mean NPIF value in populations with and without nasal obstruction. METHODS: Medline (1946-) and Embase (1947-) were searched until July 1, 2017. A search strategy was used to identify studies that reported NPIF values for defined healthy or disease states. All studies providing original data were included. The study population was defined as having either normal nasal breathing or nasal obstruction. A meta-analysis of the mean data was presented in forest plots, and data were presented as mean (95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: The search yielded 1,526 studies, of which 29 were included. The included studies involved 1,634 subjects with normal nasal breathing and 817 subjects with nasal obstruction. The mean NPIF value for populations with normal nasal breathing was 138.4 (95% CI: 127.9-148.8) L/min. The mean value for populations with nasal obstruction was 97.5 (95% CI: 86.1-108.8) L/min. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence confirms a difference between mean NPIF values of populations with and without nasal obstruction. The mean value of subjects with no nasal obstruction is 138.4 L/min, and the mean value of nasally obstructed populations is 97.5 L/min. Prospective studies adopting a standardized procedure are required to further assess normative NPIF values. Laryngoscope, 131:260-267, 2021.

Part-time in general practice-a remedy to a time-based problem?

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of GPs are reducing the hours they work in clinical practice. The reasons for and implications of this are not well-understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how the demands of general practice, especially new time pressures, impact GPs' professional and personal lives and work hour choices. METHOD: Using a grounded theory approach, we conducted 26 in-depth interviews with GPs working in Australia. RESULTS: Time-bound consultation windows, the complexity of patients presenting to general practice and consequent administrative and emotional burdens placed upon GPs combined to increase time pressures and an intensifying clinical load. Many GPs also strove to sequester time for family and reported burnout and poor health along with abiding concerns for quality of care. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a need for new policies on how clinical consultations are timed and remunerated in keeping with a changed GP demography, new demands and a more complex patient care profile.

Association Between Mental Health Status and Patient Satisfaction With the Functional Outcomes of Rhinoplasty.

IMPORTANCE: Mental health can have an impact on patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty. However, the association between mental health and patient satisfaction with functional outcomes of rhinoplasty is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preoperative mental health is associated with satisfaction with functional outcomes of rhinoplasty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This case-control study assessed baseline nasal function and postsurgical functional outcomes for 88 consecutive patients undergoing rhinoplasty with both cosmetic and functional goals at 2 tertiary rhinologic centers in Sydney, Australia. EXPOSURES: Poor mental well-being was defined preoperatively by the Optum SF-36v2 Health Survey mental component summary. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Nasal function was assessed with patient-reported outcome measures, including visual analog scales, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale (NOSE), the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and Likert scales. Objective outcomes included nasal peak inspiratory flow, nasal airway resistance, and minimum cross-sectional area. All outcomes were assessed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The 36-item Optum SF-36v2 Health Survey mental component summary was used to assess mental well-being, with a score of less than 40 indicating poor mental well-being and a score 40 or higher indicating normal well-being. RESULTS: Mean (SD) patient age was 37.6 (12.9) years and 53 of 88 (60.2%) were women. The mental component summary defined impaired well-being in n = 24 (cases) and normal well-being in n = 64 (controls). There were improvements in the total study population across most nasal function outcomes and in both groups. After rhinoplasty, benefit was seen for both groups in visual analog scale (left side mean [SD] change, 18 [30]; P < .001 and right side mean [SD] change, 24 [30]; P < .001); NOSE (mean [SD] change, 1.35 [1.21]; P < .001); and SNOT-22 (mean [SD] change, 0.81 [0.88]; P < .001) scores. Nasal peak inspiratory flow improved for both groups (mean [SD] change, 32 [45] L/min; P < .001), while nasal airway resistance and minimum cross-sectional area remained similar (change in nasal airway resistance, 0.086 Pa/cm3/s; 95% CI, -0.007 Pa/cm3/s to 0.179 Pa/cm3/s and change in minimum cross-sectional area, -0.04 cm2; 95% CI, -0.21 cm2 to 0.13 cm2). Patients with poor mental health had similar improvements in nasal function compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Rhinoplasty imparts similar benefits to nasal function assessed by patient-reported outcome measures and objective airflow measures regardless of preoperative mental health status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Association of Mental Health Status With Perception of Nasal Function.

IMPORTANCE: Mental health issues are thought to be overrepresented among patients undergoing rhinoplasty and may be associated with patient presentation prior to surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of poor mental health with perception of nasal function. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study of patients presenting for airway assessment was performed from December 1, 2011, to October 31, 2015, at 2 tertiary rhinoplasty centers in Sydney, Australia. Mental health was independently defined preoperatively by the Mental Component Summary of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (a score of <40 indicated poor mental well-being), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (a score of <15 indicated low self-esteem), and the Dysmorphic Concerns Questionnaire (a score of >11 indicated above-average dysmorphic concerns). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Nasal function was assessed with patient-reported outcome measures, including the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale, the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test, a visual analog scale to rate ease of breathing on the left and right sides, and Likert scales to assess overall function and nasal obstruction. Nasal airflow was assessed by nasal peak inspiratory flow, nasal airway resistance, and minimum cross-sectional area. RESULTS: Among 495 patients in the study (302 women and 193 men; mean [SD] age, 36.5 [13.6] years), compared with patients with good mental health, those with poor mental health had poorer scores in all patient-reported outcome measures, including the visual analog scale for the left side (mean [SD], 51 [25] vs 42 [25]; P = .001), visual analog scale for the right side (mean [SD], 54 [24] vs 45 [26]; P < .001), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale (mean [SD], 2.64 [0.95] vs 1.96 [1.04]; P < .001), 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (mean [SD], 2.14 [0.84] vs 1.33 [0.83]; P < .001), nasal obstruction (58 of 145 [40.2%] vs 83 of 350 [23.7%] with severe or worse obstruction; P < .001), and nasal function (72 of 145 [49.7%] vs 111 of 350 [31.8%] with poor or worse function; P < .001). Subclinical differences in nasal peak inspiratory flow could be demonstrated, but all other nasal airflow measures were similar. Low self-esteem produced a similar pattern, but dysmorphia did not. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Poor mental health status is associated with a poorer self-perception of nasal function compared with those who are mentally healthy with clinically similar nasal airflow. Clinicians should be aware that patients with poor mental health reporting obstructed airflow may in part be representing an extension of their negative emotions rather than true obstruction and may require further assessment prior to surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.