Quantifying the Vial Capping Process: Residual Seal Force and Container Closure Integrity.

Capping completes the closure of parenteral drug products in the final packaging container and is critical in maintaining an integral seal to ensure product quality. Residual seal force (RSF) is considered the sole quantifiable attribute for measuring seal "goodness" and potentially enables nonsubjective, consistent setting of cappers across manufacturing sites. However, the consistency and reliability of RSF measurement and data have been scarcely reported, and the relationship between RSF and container closure integrity (CCI) remains poorly understood.Here, we present a large data set generated from a commercial capper and the results from a laboratory capper of glass vials and rubber stoppers with aluminum caps. All RSF values exhibited significant variability. We evaluated four potential sources of variability: the capper, the RSF tester, the time-dependent nature of RSF, and the components. We determined that the capper, the tester, and the time-dependent nature are not main sources. Dimensional tolerances of the packaging components were the root cause for the container closure system (CCS) configurations tested in this study.This study correlated RSF with CCI (via helium leakage), although CCI is not sensitive to RSF; CCI was maintained even for loosely capped vials with no measurable RSF. This was attributed to the stopper's two sealing surfaces: the valve seal and the land seal. A methodology capable of differentiating the two seals' functions demonstrated that vials with only the valve seal always passed leakage testing for a selected CCS configuration in this study, while vials with only the land seal failed CCI at low RSF values. This observation allows proposal of a low RSF limit that is safe even when the valve seal is defective. Simplified statistical analysis of commercial capping data, with the input of sample size, allowed the relationship between RSF's low limit and an allowable failing rate to be established. Overall, despite the inherent variability of RSF, this study shows that it is a feasible parameter for capping process quantification and demonstrates the potential of RSF measurement in capper setup.LAY ABSTRACT: Pharmaceutical vials are typically closed off with an elastomeric stopper that is secured onto the vial with an aluminum crimp cap (or seal) such that the entire assembly is meant to protect the vial's contents from external contamination. Therefore, the capping process is critical for ensuring container closure integrity. Characterizing the effectiveness of a seal in a nonsubjective and quantifiable manner is challenging. In this communication, we report the evaluation of residual seal force measurements (the compression force that the crimp cap exerts on the stopper) to evaluate capping for a large set of samples generated on both an at-scale commercial capper and a benchtop laboratory capper. We propose a test methodology, based on a statistical approach, for establishing permissible lower residual force limits that would provide a high degree of confidence to the capping process. This is a useful tool for consistent capper setup and capping process quantification.

Residual Seal Force Testing: A Suitable Method for Seal Quality Determination of (High Potent) Parenterals.

Vial capping plays a critical role in the drug product manufacturing process owing to the complex interplay of several adjustable process steps. Seal quality and integrity and containment assurance are essential for parenteral pharmaceuticals, as the vial's content may be contaminated or, in the case of highly potent drugs (e.g., antibody drug conjugates), may bear a risk of contamination. The residual seal force (RSF) method can enable further insight in capping equipment settings independently of the container closure system (CCS) and their resulting seal quality.The present study investigates the accuracy of the RSF method focusing on different force settings, RSF development over time, distance between capping plates and vial neck (roller-axis), time point of flip-off button removal, and internal and external vial pressure differences (flight simulation and vials closed under vacuum).Results show that the forces used on an RSF tester should be kept low to minimize CCS deformation, and a period of stable RSF values after the initial decrease should be implemented between capping and RSF measurement to increase accuracy. Variations in the distance between the capping plates and vial neck (roller-axis) can result in incomplete crimps or visual defects of the seals. In addition, the time point of flip-off button removal as part of the sample preparation had no significant impact on RSF measurements. Finally, pressure differences between the vial interior and exterior had no significant impact on the RSF data.LAY ABSTRACT: Vial capping plays a critical role in the drug product manufacturing process due to the complex interplay of several adjustable process steps. Seal quality, integrity, and containment are essential for parenteral pharmaceuticals, as the vial's content varies and may be contaminated, sensitive to stress, and/or highly potent (eg, antibody drug conjugates). The residual seal force (RSF) method can enable further insight in capping equipment settings independently of the container closure system and their resulting seal quality.In this study, we determined RSF values by applying different force settings of the RSF tester and investigated the influence of sample preparation on the determination of RSF. Furthermore, the capping process parameter roller-axis was evaluated by RSF and visual inspection. In addition, we investigated the influence of pressure differences of vials on the RSF as they occurred during air transport and products closed under vacuum.

Impact of Vial Capping on Residual Seal Force and Container Closure Integrity.

UNLABELLED: The vial capping process is a critical unit operation during drug product manufacturing, as it could possibly generate cosmetic defects or even affect container closure integrity. Yet there is significant variability in capping equipment and processes, and their relation to potential defects or container closure integrity has not been thoroughly studied. In this study we applied several methods-residual seal force tester, a self-developed system of a piezo force sensor measurement, and computed tomography-to characterize different container closure system combinations that had been sealed using different capping process parameter settings. Additionally, container closure integrity of these samples was measured using helium leakage (physical container closure integrity) and compared to characterization data. The different capping equipment settings lead to residual seal force values from 7 to 115 N. High residual seal force values were achieved with high capping pre-compression force and a short distance between the capping plate and plunge. The choice of container closure system influenced the obtained residual seal force values. The residual seal force tester and piezoelectric measurements showed similar trends. All vials passed physical container closure integrity testing, and no stopper rupture was seen with any of the settings applied, suggesting that container closure integrity was warranted for the studied container closure system with the chosen capping setting ranges. LAY ABSTRACT: The vial capping process is a critical unit operation during drug product manufacturing, as it could possibly generate cosmetic defects or even affect container closure integrity. Yet there is significant variability in capping equipment and processes, and their relation to potential defects or container closure integrity has not been thoroughly studied. In this study we applied several methods-residual seal force tester, a self-developed system of a piezo force sensor measurement, and computed tomography-to characterize different container closure system combinations that had been sealed using different capping process parameter settings. The residual seal force tester can analyze a variety of different container closure systems independent of the capping equipment. An adequate and safe residual seal force range for each container closure system configuration can be established with the residual seal force tester and additional methods like computed tomography scans and leak testing. In the residual seal force range studied, the physical container closure integrity of the container closure system was warranted.

Influence of Different Container Closure Systems and Capping Process Parameters on Product Quality and Container Closure Integrity (CCI) in GMP Drug Product Manufacturing.

Capping equipment used in good manufacturing practice manufacturing features different designs and a variety of adjustable process parameters. The overall capping result is a complex interplay of the different capping process parameters and is insufficiently described in literature. It remains poorly studied how the different capping equipment designs and capping equipment process parameters (e.g., pre-compression force, capping plate height, turntable rotating speed) contribute to the final residual seal force of a sealed container closure system and its relation to container closure integrity and other drug product quality parameters. Stopper compression measured by computer tomography correlated to residual seal force measurements.In our studies, we used different container closure system configurations from different good manufacturing practice drug product fill & finish facilities to investigate the influence of differences in primary packaging, that is, vial size and rubber stopper design on the capping process and the capped drug product. In addition, we compared two large-scale good manufacturing practice manufacturing capping equipment and different capping equipment settings and their impact on product quality and integrity, as determined by residual seal force.The capping plate to plunger distance had a major influence on the obtained residual seal force values of a sealed vial, whereas the capping pre-compression force and the turntable rotation speed showed only a minor influence on the residual seal force of a sealed vial. Capping process parameters could not easily be transferred from capping equipment of different manufacturers. However, the residual seal force tester did provide a valuable tool to compare capping performance of different capping equipment. No vial showed any leakage greater than 10(-8)mbar L/s as measured by a helium mass spectrometry system, suggesting that container closure integrity was warranted in the residual seal force range tested for the tested container closure systems. LAY ABSTRACT: Capping equipment used in good manufacturing practice manufacturing features different designs and a variety of adjustable process parameters. The overall capping result is a complex interplay of the different capping process parameters and is insufficiently described in the literature. It remains poorly studied how the different capping equipment designs and capping equipment process parameters contribute to the final capping result.In this study, we used different container closure system configurations from different good manufacturing process drug product fill & finish facilities to investigate the influence of the vial size and the rubber stopper design on the capping process. In addition, we compared two examples of large-scale good manufacturing process capping equipment and different capping equipment settings and their impact on product quality and integrity, as determined by residual seal force.

The Pharmaceutical Capping Process-Correlation between Residual Seal Force, Torque Moment, and Flip-off Removal Force.

The majority of parenteral drug products are manufactured in glass vials with an elastomeric rubber stopper and a crimp cap. The vial sealing process is a critical process step during fill-and-finish operations, as it defines the seal quality of the final product. Different critical capping process parameters can affect rubber stopper defects, rubber stopper compression, container closure integrity, and also crimp cap quality. A sufficiently high force to remove the flip-off button prior to usage is required to ensure quality of the drug product unit by the flip-off button during storage, transportation, and until opening and use. Therefore, the final product is 100% visually inspected for lose or defective crimp caps, which is subjective as well as time- and labor-intensive. In this study, we sealed several container closure system configurations with different capping equipment settings (with corresponding residual seal force values) to investigate the torque moment required to turn the crimp cap. A correlation between torque moment and residual seal force has been established. The torque moment was found to be influenced by several parameters, including diameter of the vial head, type of rubber stopper (serum or lyophilized) and type of crimp cap (West(®) or Datwyler(®)). In addition, we measured the force required to remove the flip-off button of a sealed container closure system. The capping process had no influence on measured forces; however, it was possible to detect partially crimped vials. In conclusion, a controlled capping process with a defined target residual seal force range leads to a tight crimp cap on a sealed container closure system and can ensure product quality. LAY ABSTRACT: The majority of parenteral drug products are manufactured in a glass vials with an elastomeric rubber stopper and a crimp cap. The vial sealing process is a critical process step during fill-and-finish operations, as it defines the seal quality of the final product. An adequate force to remove the flip-off button prior to usage is required to ensure product quality during storage and transportation until use. In addition, the complete crimp cap needs to be fixed in a tight position on the vial. In this study, we investigated the torque moment required to turn the crimp cap and the force required to remove the flip-off button of container closure system sealed with different capping equipment process parameters (having different residual seal force values).

The pharmaceutical vial capping process: Container closure systems, capping equipment, regulatory framework, and seal quality tests.

Parenteral drug products are protected by appropriate primary packaging to protect against environmental factors, including potential microbial contamination during shelf life duration. The most commonly used CCS configuration for parenteral drug products is the glass vial, sealed with a rubber stopper and an aluminum crimp cap. In combination with an adequately designed and controlled aseptic fill/finish processes, a well-designed and characterized capping process is indispensable to ensure product quality and integrity and to minimize rejections during the manufacturing process. In this review, the health authority requirements and expectations related to container closure system quality and container closure integrity are summarized. The pharmaceutical vial, the rubber stopper, and the crimp cap are described. Different capping techniques are critically compared: The most common capping equipment with a rotating capping plate produces the lowest amount of particle. The strength and challenges of methods to control the capping process are discussed. The residual seal force method can characterize the capping process independent of the used capping equipment or CCS. We analyze the root causes of several cosmetic defects associated with the vial capping process.

Drug delivery to the upper small intestine window using gastroretentive technologies.

The bioavailability of drugs with an absorption window in the upper small intestine is generally limited with conventional pharmaceutical dosage forms. The residence time of such systems and, thus, of their drug release into the stomach and upper intestine is often short. To overcome this restriction and to increase the bioavailability of these drugs, controlled drug delivery systems with a prolonged residence time in the stomach can be used. Approaches to achieving prolonged residence times of the devices in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract include the use of bioadhesive, size-increasing, and floating drug delivery systems.

Gastroretentive drug delivery systems.

A controlled drug delivery system with prolonged residence time in the stomach is of particular interest for drugs that i) are locally active in the stomach, ii) have an absorption window in the stomach or in the upper small intestine, iii) are unstable in the intestinal or colonic environment, or iv) exhibit low solubility at high pH values. This article gives an overview of the parameters affecting gastric emptying in humans as well as on the main concepts used to design pharmaceutical dosage forms with prolonged gastric residence times. In particular, bioadhesive, size-increasing and floating drug delivery systems are presented and their major advantages and shortcomings are discussed. Both single- and multiple-unit dosage forms are reviewed and, if available, results from in vivo trials are reported.