Relentless increase of resistance to fluoroquinolones and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in Escherichia coli: 20 years of surveillance in resource-limited settings from Latin America.

Previous studies on commensal Escherichia coli from healthy children in the Bolivian Chaco have shown remarkable resistance rates to the old antibiotics since the early 1990s, and the emergence of resistance to newer drugs (fluoroquinolones and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins) in the 2000s. Here we report the results of a new survey conducted in 2011 in the same setting. Rectal swabs were obtained from 482 healthy children (aged 6-72 months) from three urban areas of the Bolivian Chaco. Screening for antibiotic-resistant E. coli was performed by a direct plating method, as in the previous studies. The blaCTX-M genes were investigated by PCR/sequencing, and CTX-M-producing isolates were subjected to genotyping and detection of several plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance mechanisms. Results showed high rates of resistance to nalidixic acid (76%), ciprofloxacin (44%) and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins (12.4%), demonstrating a relentless increase of resistance to those drugs over the past two decades. CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases were found to be widespread (12%, 97% of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers). Compared with the previous studies, CTX-M-producing E. coli underwent a dramatic dissemination (120-fold increase since early 2000s) and a radical change of dominant CTX-M groups (CTX-M-1 and CTX-M-9 groups versus CTX-M-2 group). Most CTX-M producers were not susceptible to quinolones (91%), and 55% carried plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes (different combinations of aac(6')-Ib-cr, qnrB and qepA). This study shows the rapid and remarkable increasing trend for resistance to fluoroquinolones and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in one of the poorest regions of Latin America, and underscores the need for urgent control strategies aimed at preserving the efficacy of those drugs in similar settings.

Chagas disease in Italy: breaking an epidemiological silence.

Chagas disease, a neglected tropical disease that due to population movements is no longer limited to Latin America, threatens a wide spectrum of people(travellers, migrants, blood or organ recipients,newborns, adoptees) also in non-endemic countries where it is generally underdiagnosed. In Italy, the available epidemiological data about Chagas disease have been very limited up to now, although the country is second in Europe only to Spain in the number of residents from Latin American. Among 867 at-risk subjectsscreened between 1998 and 2010, the Centre for Tropical Diseases in Negrar (Verona) and the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, University of Florence found 4.2% patients with positive serology for Chagas disease (83.4% of them migrants, 13.8% adoptees).No cases of Chagas disease were identified in blood donors or HIV-positive patients of Latin American origin. Among 214 Latin American pregnant women,three were infected (resulting in abortion in one case).In 2005 a case of acute Chagas disease was recorded in an Italian traveller. Based on our observations, we believe that a wider assessment of the epidemiological situation is urgently required in our country and public health measures preventing transmission and improving access to diagnosis and treatment should be implemented.

Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the serologic diagnosis of tuberculosis in Italy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine specificity, sensitivity and predictive values of a rapid immunochromatographic assay (ICT tuberculosis) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in an Italian clinical setting, and to identify tentative new guidance for the interpretation of test results. METHODS: The ICT tuberculosis test is an immunochromatographic test based on the detection of IgG antibodies directed against five highly purified antigens secreted by Mycobacterium tuberculosis during active growth. Sera from 60 patients with active pulmonary (48 sputum smear-positive and six sputum smear-negative cases) and extrapulmonary (six cases) TB were obtained. Personal, anamnestic and clinical data were investigated and recorded for each patient. The control groups comprised 156 subjects: 40 healthy individuals, half of them Mycobacterium bovis BCG-vaccinated, and 116 patients with mycobacterial diseases other than TB (five cases), with nonmycobacterial lung diseases (30 cases), with nonmycobacterial nonlung diseases (30 cases), with nonmycobacterial diseases and rheumatoid factors positivity (30 cases), and with asymptomatic HIV infection (21 cases). For 21 individuals the test was simultaneously performed with both serum and whole blood sample. Each positive result of the ICT test was reported with regard to the number (1-4), position (A, B, C, D) and color intensity (+ to ++++) of the evidenced lines in order to assess the quality of the antibody response. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity were 56.7% and 90.4%, respectively. The sensitivity for pulmonary TB patients was 61.1% (66.7% for smear-positive and 16.7% for smear-negative cases) and 16.7% for extrapulmonary TB patients. The difference between ICT results in pulmonary TB patients and control subjects was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The analysis of the positive ICT tests revealed that samples with strong color intensity (>/=++) and specific antibodies bound to antigens immobilized on line D were significantly more frequent in TB patients than in controls (P = 0.001 and P= 0.027, respectively). ICT test results with the presence of at least three visible lines were more often observed in the TB patients than in controls, although not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.052). No difference was observed between the results of the ICT test performed both on serum and whole blood sample. CONCLUSIONS: The ICT tuberculosis test was confirmed to be rapid and easy to perform without requiring special equipment, both on serum and whole blood sample. Our data, in accordance with those obtained in a previous study conducted in extra-European countries, confirmed higher sensitivities for the smear-positive TB patients than for the smear-negative TB patients, and for pulmonary TB patients than for the extrapulmonary TB patients. Data obtained on the quality of antibody response in the ICT positive samples, might be used to improve the performance of the test.

Multicenter randomized trial comparing meropenem (1.5 g daily) and imipenem/cilastatin (2 g daily) in the hospital treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

An open, multicenter study with 144 patients, aged between 18 and 94 years, was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of meropenem with imipenem/cilastatin in the hospital treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous meropenem (500 mg every 8 h) or intravenous imipenem/cilastatin (1,000 mg every 12 h). The primary end point was considered to be clinical efficacy and the secondary end points were bacteriological response and safety assessment. At the end of therapy, cure or improvement in signs and symptoms as a satisfactory clinical response was observed in 57 of 64 (89.1%) meropenem-treated patients and in 60 of 66 (90.9%) imipenem/cilastatin patients. The mean duration of treatment was 10 days for meropenem and 9.7 days for imipenem/cilastatin. In patients who were followed up for weeks 2-4, the response was satisfactory (100%) for both treatments. A satisfactory bacteriological response, defined as either presumed or confirmed eradication of all pathogens, was found in eight patients who had received meropenem and in 14 patients who had received imipenem/cilastatin. Response was considered satisfactory in 100% of the meropenem group and in 92.9% of the imipenem/cilastatin group and at follow-up, it was 100% for both treatments. Drug-related adverse events were reported in three (4.2%) meropenem-treated patients and in eight (11.0%) imipenem/cilastatin-treated patients. None of these events was classified as serious. The results of this study show that the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerability of meropenem (500 mg every 8 h) are similar to that of imipenem/cilastatin (1,000 mg every 12 h) in the hospital treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.