RESUMO
Optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) is typically diagnosed based on clinical suspicion and imaging characteristics and is most often treated with radiation. Historically, biopsy, optic nerve sheath decompression, and debulking surgeries have been avoided for fear of optic nerve vascular disruption and tumor spread into the orbit. This is a case of a 48-year-old man who presented with unilateral optic disc edema, declining visual acuity, and a visual field defect. Despite an initial improvement with acetazolamide, his vision subsequently worsened. With an elevated lumbar puncture opening pressure and imaging showing right optic nerve sheath enhancement, the differential diagnosis included ONSM, perineuritis and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Optic nerve sheath decompression (ONSD) with biopsy was performed, simultaneously decompressing the nerve and yielding a sample for pathologic analysis. A pathologic diagnosis of ONSM was made and treatment with radiation was subsequently initiated, but vision began to improve after the surgical decompression alone.
Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica , Meningioma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Nervo Óptico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Meningioma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias do Nervo Óptico/cirurgia , Papiledema/diagnóstico , Pseudotumor Cerebral/cirurgia , Punção Espinal , Transtornos da Visão/diagnóstico , Acuidade Visual , Campos VisuaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe a clinical case of an orbital paraganglioma that displayed regression after biopsy alone. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 75-year-old female was examined for a right orbital tumor suspected to be metastatic breast carcinoma. An orbital biopsy was performed with significant hemorrhage encountered requiring extensive cautery. There was apparent clinical regression of the tumor with no signs of proptosis or eye movement restriction two years after this patient's biopsy. Histology was consistent with paraganglioma (glomus tumor). CONCLUSION: Although we cannot rule out spontaneous regression of this unique tumor, we postulate that tissue necrosis caused by the use of cautery induced regression. Unless encapsulated and easily accessible, we suggest that the best management of this rare tumor is that of observation after being found negative for malignancy by biopsy given their propensity for slow progression and in rare cases, regression.