Every drop counts: Providing lactation support to breastfeeding surgical patients.

ABSTRACT: Over half of surgeries in the US are conducted in physician-owned ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). While ASCs provide cost-effective and quality healthcare comparable to inpatient hospitals, they often lack robust support services, including lactation support. This article presents key information on breastfeeding benefits, early weaning risks, and strategies for nurses in ASCs to educate and support patients who are breastfeeding.

Surgical Safety Does Not Happen By Accident: Learning From Perioperative Near Miss Case Studies.

Adverse surgical events cause negative patient health outcomes and harm that can often overshadow the safe and effective patient care provided daily by nurses as members of interprofessional healthcare teams. Near misses occur far more frequently than adverse events and are less visible to nurse leaders because patient harm is avoided due to chance, prevention, or mitigation. However, near misses have comparable root causes to adverse events and exhibit the same underlying patterns of failure. Reviewing near misses provides nurses with learning opportunities to identify patient care weaknesses and build appropriate solutions to enhance care. As the operating room is one of the most complex work settings in healthcare, identifying potential weaknesses or sources for errors is vital to reduce healthcare-associated risks for patients and staff. The purpose of this manuscript is to educate, inform, and stimulate critical thinking by discussing perioperative near miss case studies and the underlying factors that lead to errors. Our authors discuss 15 near miss case studies occurring across the perioperative patient experience of care and discuss barriers to near miss reporting. Nurse leaders can use our case studies to stimulate discussion among perioperative and perianesthesia nurses in their hospitals to inform comprehensive risk reduction programs.

Periop 101: Improving Perioperative Nursing Knowledge and Competence in Labor and Delivery Nurses Through an Evidence-Based Education and Training Program.

INTRODUCTION: To reach the highest levels of health care quality, all nurses providing intraoperative care to surgical patients should have a firm grasp of the complex knowledge, skills, and guidelines undergirding the perioperative nursing profession. In military treatment facilities, either perioperative registered nurses or labor and delivery (L&D) nurses provide skilled intraoperative nursing care for cesarean deliveries. However, L&D and perioperative nurses occupy vastly different roles in the continuum of care and may possess widely differing levels of surgical training and experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The purpose of this project was to improve surgical care quality by standardizing and strengthening L&D nurse perioperative training, knowledge, and competence. Our population, intervention, comparative, and outcome question was, "For labor and delivery nurses of a regional military medical center (P), does implementing an evidence-based training program (I), as compared to current institutional nursing practices (C), increase nursing knowledge and perioperative nursing competence (O)?" We implemented Periop 101: A Core Curriculum-Cesarean Section training for 17 L&D nurses, measured knowledge using product-provided testing, and assessed competence using the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised. RESULTS: We found that perioperative nursing knowledge and competence significantly improved and were less varied among the nurses after completing the training program. Nurses demonstrated the greatest knowledge area improvements in scrubbing, gowning, and gloving; wound healing; and sterilization and disinfection, for which median scores improved by more than 100%. Nurses reported significantly greater perceived competence across all six domains of the Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised, with the largest improvements realized in foundational skills and knowledge, leadership, and proficiency. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that health care leaders develop policies to standardize perioperative education, training, and utilization for nurses providing intraoperative care to reduce clinician role ambiguity, decrease inefficiencies, and enhance care.

Surgical Team Structure: How Familiarity and Team Size Influence Communication Effectiveness in Military Surgical Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Preventable patient harm has persisted in health care despite recent advances to reduce errors. There is increasing recognition that non-technical skills, including communication and relationships, greatly impact interprofessional team performance and health care quality. Team familiarity and size are critical structural components that potentially influence information flow, communication, and efficiency. METHODS: In this exploratory, prospective, cross-sectional study, we investigated the key structural components of surgical teams and identified how surgical team structure shapes communication effectiveness. Using total population sampling, we recruited surgical clinicians who provide direct patient care at a 138-bed military medical center. We used statistical modeling to characterize the relationship between communication effectiveness and five predictors: team familiarity, team size, surgical complexity, and the presence of surgical residents and student anesthesia professionals. RESULTS: We surveyed 137 surgical teams composed of 149 multidisciplinary clinicians for an 82% response rate. The mean communication effectiveness score was 4.61 (SD = 0.30), the average team size was 4.53 (SD = 0.69) persons, and the average surgical complexity was 10.85 relative value units (SD = 6.86). The surgical teams exhibited high variability in familiarity, with teams co-performing 26% (SD = 0.16) of each other's surgeries. We found for every unit increase in team familiarity, communication effectiveness increased by 0.36 (P ≤ .05), whereas adding one additional member to the surgical team decreased communication effectiveness by 0.1 (P ≤ .05). Surgical complexity and the influence of residents and students were not associated with communication effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: For military surgical teams, greater familiarity and smaller team sizes were associated with small improvements in communication effectiveness. Military leaders can likely enhance team communication by engaging in a thoughtful and concerted program to foster cohesion by building familiarity and optimizing team size to meet task and cognitive demands. We suggest leaders develop bundled approaches to improve communication by integrating team familiarity and team size optimization into current evidence-based initiatives to enhance performance.

Associations of Surgical Team Communication With the Layout of Physical Space: A Network Analysis of the Operating Room in a Military Medical Center.

AIM: To examine how the spatial topology of the operating room (OR) within the medical center impacts surgical team communication. BACKGROUND: Understanding the complex association between surgical team communication and the OR's spatial network location is critical to patient safety. Effective surgical communication is associated with fewer adverse events and medical errors. METHODS: We employed a cross-sectional, quantitative, case study, and network-centric study design. We studied the population of 204 clinicians in a large military medical center (36 perioperative nurses, 34 surgical technicians, 62 anesthesia providers, and 72 surgeons), focusing on surgical teams with cases completed within duty hours. Data were collected from December 2020 to June 2021 using an electronic survey. Spatial network analysis was done using electronic floor plans. Statistical analysis was done with descriptive statistics and linear regressions. The outcomes were general and task-specific communication, and team-level variables were aggregated from scores for all team members. Spatial effects were assessed with network centrality (degree, Laplacian, and betweenness). RESULTS: The individual-level survey response rate was 77% (157 of 204). Data were collected on 137 surgical teams. On a 5-point scale, general and task-specific communication ranged from 3.4 to 5.0 and 3.5 to 5.0, respectively (for both, median = 4.7). Team size ranged from 4 to 6 individuals (median = 4). Surgical suites with higher network centralities were associated with significantly lower communication scores. CONCLUSIONS: The OR's spatial network location has important impacts on surgical team communication. Our findings have design and workflow implications for ORs and even surgical care in combat zones.

Impacts of Austerity on Urogenital Infection Rates in Active Duty Servicewomen.

INTRODUCTION: Female warfighters are at increased risk of urogenital infections (UGIs) when serving in austere environments with varying levels of access to water, sanitation, and hygiene resources. Urogenital infections among servicewomen were among the top five reported medical encounters and one of the top seven reasons for medical evacuation from deployed locations between 2008 and 2013. In this study, we examine the use of water and sanitation resources across three environments (home duty station, field training, and deployment) and analyze associations between water, sanitation, and hygiene resource access and UGIs during training or deployment. The analyses are based on answers from 751 diverse active duty servicewomen (ADSW) at a large military installation in the southeastern USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for this population-based, prospective, cross-sectional survey design were collected during the administration of the Military Women's Readiness Urogenital Health Questionnaire. This research study was guided by two specific research questions derived from self-reported data in sections 2 and 3 of the questionnaire. RESULTS: The sample consisted of an extremely diverse pool of U.S. Army ADSW attached to highly operational units with robust field training and deployment tempos. Over one-half of the participants reported being diagnosed with one or more UGIs before military service. Of that participant group, more than 76.0% experienced one or more infections since joining the military. We found that the majority of UGIs occurred while U.S. Army ADSW were at their home duty stations rather than during field training or deployment. Of the three types of UGIs, bacterial vaginosis is more often associated with water and sanitation constraints. None of the water factors were significantly associated with UGIs during deployment. Intentional dehydration was not associated with UGIs in either field training or deployment, but intentionally delaying urination was associated with a significant increase in the odds of developing urinary tract infection during deployment. We identified trends in hygiene practices that may put ADSW at a higher risk for UGIs. CONCLUSIONS: Austere conditions, which may exist in any service environment, pose risks to the urogenital health and wellness of a female warfighter. Access to clean water and sanitation resources in military settings is essential for optimal health and operational readiness. It is necessary to identify and investigate critical research and policy gaps in need of investment and support for successful, evidence-based integration of female warfighters into military combat roles and to optimize their performance.

Patterns in Urogenital Health in Active Duty Servicewomen: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Survey Evaluating Impacts of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Resources Across Three Military Environments.

INTRODUCTION: Female warfighters are at risk for sex-specific and frequently unrecognized urogenital health challenges that may impede their ability to serve. The constraints on water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) resources by austere environments, whether at home or abroad, require women to practice unhealthy hygiene behaviors that jeopardize their urogenital health. In this manuscript, we examine the use of WASH resources by U.S. Army active duty servicewomen (ADSW) across three settings-home duty, field training, and deployment-to determine how the changing availability of WASH resources alters hygiene and sanitation practices in austere environments. Additionally, we report findings from a previously developed theoretical framework for determining the impacts of austere environments on ADSW's hygiene knowledge, behaviors, and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a prospective, cross-sectional survey design with population sampling and generalized ordered logit regression models. We recruited ADSW assigned to a large military installation in the southeastern United States after conducting a structured field hygiene training for female readiness. RESULTS: We surveyed a highly diverse sample of 751 ADSW and found that the use of WASH resources significantly differs between field training and deployment. Clean running water significantly differed among all settings, with nearly 70% reporting clean running water to be rarely or never available during field training. Bathing facility types significantly differed in each setting, with Cadillac bathrooms more often used during deployment than during field training and wipe baths more often used during field training than during deployment. We found that women were significantly less likely to wash their private areas more than 2 days a week during field training, compared to deployment. Women reported changing their underwear ≤2 times per week in field training environments as compared to during deployment. Soap and water were reported as the most common ways of washing in both home duty stations and during deployment, followed by wipes at home duty stations and in deployed settings. Participants reported wipes as their primary bathing method during field training, followed by soap and water. Participants used intentional dehydration or delayed urination more frequently in field training than during deployment. Women reported significant differences in holding their urine between field training and deployment, with principal reasons reported as "dirty facilities" and "distance to the nearest restroom." Significantly, they reported safety concerns when bathing, using the bathroom, or toileting facilities across the three settings. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize sex-specific challenges by a large sample of operational ADSW and to explore the use of WASH resources in home duty, field training, and deployment settings. The results show that field training is more austere than deployed settings, indicating that austerity, not deployment, increases the urogenital infection risk for ADSW. With women more integrated into the military strategy than at any time in U.S. history, military leaders can use our results to develop interventions that ameliorate the unique challenges that influence the military readiness and overall health of female warfighters.

Differences in Perioperative Nurse Job Satisfaction by Specialty Certification Status.

PURPOSE: To describe differences in perioperative RN job satisfaction by specialty certification status. DESIGN: A retrospective, exploratory, cross-sectional design. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of annual data from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) RN Survey with 12 Job Satisfaction Scales. The sample consisted of 776 perioperative units in 206 hospitals with 13,061 study participants. We used multilevel mixed modeling to examine differences in job satisfaction for nurses holding CAPA (Certified Ambulatory Perianesthesia Nurse), CPAN (Certified Post Anesthesia Nurse), CNOR (certification for perioperative registered nurses), CRNFA (Certified RN First Assistant), other specialty certification, and not specialty certified. FINDINGS: Twelve percent of RN participants held a perioperative nursing certification (CAPA, CPAN, CNOR, CRNFA), 15% held other nursing specialty certifications, and 73% were not certified. Regardless of certification status, nurses were the most satisfied with nurse-nurse interactions and task. They were the least satisfied with nursing administration, decision-making, and pay. CNOR certified nurses reported the lowest levels of job satisfaction in the study. CAPA and CPAN certified nurses reported higher job satisfaction than their noncertified colleagues on multiple job satisfaction scales (ie, CAPA 10 of 12; CPAN 5 of 12). CNOR certified nurses did not report meaningful differences in job satisfaction from non-certified nurses. CONCLUSIONS: As job satisfaction impacts retention, productivity, and patient care quality, our findings have important implications for hospital leaders, nurses, and health care consumers. Based on our findings, we identified nursing professional development as a potential gap in job satisfaction that leaders can target for improvement. Our findings suggest that higher specialty nursing certification rates in perianesthesia nurses may potentially improve job satisfaction and retention of nurses.

Trust and Nursing: Delivering Effective Change Management and Driving a Culture of Innovation.

Trust is foundational for all interpersonal communication and activities in an increasingly networked and interdependent world. Trust is also essential to the effective delivery of health care and for building collegial environments rich in innovation and readily adaptable to change. As the world's most trusted profession and vested peer collaborators across interprofessional health care teams, nurses are uniquely qualified to shepherd change and foster an innovation mindset across organizations and systems. Innovation requires creative teams that are appropriately resourced and supported, and team-based innovation requires time, space, and safety for groups to realize their full potential and maximize contributions. Appropriate staffing, resourcing, internal engagement, and external partnerships are essential to successfully conceive, launch, sustain, and deliver change initiatives that successfully challenge the status quo. Diverse teams are vital to enhancing the performance, effectiveness, and delivery of change and innovation. Effective change management and innovation practices require courage and imagination, skills that nurses have long possessed. Nurses are uniquely equipped to champion human-centered design through all phases of innovation while bringing knowledge of patients and communities to bear in ways that deliver innovation, are respectful of challenges, and mindful of opportunities to strengthen individuals and communities.

Fire in the Operating Room: Surgical Case Report From a Forced-Air Warming Device Equipment Fire.

Surgical fires are critical life-threatening events that can result in patient morbidity and mortality. This case report describes an equipment fire originating from a forced-air warming device occurring during a shoulder arthroscopy operation and discusses how the surgical team responded to mitigate risks to the patient and staff. Rapid response by the anesthesia professional and the surgical team helped prevent the fire from negatively impacting patient and staff safety. The patient was discharged from the hospital without any complications. We recommend that surgical teams engage in a coordinated and continual cycle of fire prevention, including enhanced education and interprofessional team training.

Operation Allies Refuge and Operation Allies Welcome: Military Perioperative and Perianesthesia Nursing Support to the Afghan Evacuation Mission.

Nursing has a long and celebrated history of providing life-saving care during crises and periods of great need. Following the government collapse in Afghanistan and the withdrawal of US troops, a severe humanitarian and human rights crisis emerged. The US military participated in one of the largest and most complex humanitarian missions in history to aid Afghan relief efforts. US and coalition forces evacuated more than 130,000 people in the chaotic Allied airlift from the Kabul Airport. The overarching missions, Operation Allies Refuge and Operation Allies Welcome, provided humanitarian support to at-risk Afghan nationals who contributed to the Global War on Terrorism efforts, as well as US citizens living in Afghanistan. Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC), an overseas military treatment facility located in Germany, supported the healthcare needs of Afghan evacuees and injured US service members during the humanitarian crisis. LRMC clinicians provided emergent, urgent, and specialty care while advocating for evacuee health, wellness, and living conditions. Perioperative and perianesthesia nurses were essential to the humanitarian response, as many evacuees and injured US service members arrived in Germany requiring immediate surgical interventions. In this article, we describe the vital contributions of military perioperative and perianesthesia nurses to the Operation Allies Refuge and Operation Allies Welcome missions, and share our experiences providing humanitarian relief. Military and civilian healthcare planners can learn from our humanitarian relief contributions, experiences, and lessons to strategically prepare their health systems to respond to future crises.

Military Surgical Team Performance: The Impact of Familiarity, Team Size, and Nurse Anesthesia Students.

PURPOSE: To examine the key factors impacting surgical team performance in a military medical center. DESIGN: A retrospective, exploratory, cross-sectional design. METHODS: We reviewed 751 orthopedic surgical cases to determine the association of surgical team familiarity, surgical complexity, team size, and the presence of student registered nurse anesthetists (SRNAs) with the surgical performance measures of total operative time, turnover time, and on-time surgical start. FINDINGS: We found increases in surgical team familiarity significantly reduced turnover time by 7.84% (1-0.9216 = 0.0784; P = .0260) after controlling for surgical complexity and the presence of an SRNA on the team. Familiarity did not significantly impact total operative time or the odds of a first case on-time start. With a significant interaction of surgical complexity and team size on total operative time, the surgical complexity marginal effect (at the mean of team size) showed that a one-point increase prolonged total operative time by 6.89% (P < .0001), after controlling for team familiarity and an SRNA. The team size marginal effect (at the mean of surgical complexity) showed that adding one member to the surgical team prolonged total operative time by 6.45% (P < .0001), after controlling for team familiarity and an SRNA. Higher surgical complexity not only increased turnover time by 1.46% (P = .0265) while holding surgical complexity and an SRNA presence constant, but also reduced the likelihood of an on-time surgical start by 0.9359 (P = .0060). Larger teams decreased the odds of an on-time start by 0.7750 (P = .0363). We found that SRNAs potentially offer efficiency benefits, as their presence on a surgical team was associated with a 0.82% (1-0.9185 = 0.0815; P = .0007) decrease in total operative time, and a 21.01% (1-0.7899=0.2101; P = .0002) reduction in expected turnover time, after adjusting for confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical efficiency is a modifiable function of surgical teams. Although we suggest additional research, surgical leaders can potentially improve team performance by improving familiarity and forming small and cohesive surgical teams. As OR inefficiencies degrade the financial vitality of healthcare systems, surgical leaders should engage in a multifaceted program to improve efficiency by building familiarity and optimizing team size.

The Paradox of Network Inequality: Differential Impacts of Status and Influence on Surgical Team Communication.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: Healthcare is a dynamic and complex system predisposed to adverse events caused by human and technical errors. The ability of multidisciplinary clinicians to effectively communicate clinical information influences healthcare quality. Authority gradients, culture, and organizational hierarchy frequently constrict communication and contribute to surgical adverse events. Hierarchy is especially pronounced in military medicine, where military status, rank, and professional roles potentially create barriers to communication. METHODS: We used an exploratory, prospective, cross-sectional design to determine how the social structure of military surgical teams influences group (network) communication effectiveness. Using a social network questionnaire, we surveyed members of surgical teams concerning their close-working relationships with other team members and perceptions of their communication effectiveness. We addressed the following research question: In surgical teams, how do the status (indegree) and influence (outdegree) of its individual members impact communication within the team? RESULTS: We surveyed 50 surgical teams comprised of 45 clinicians and found that for close-working relationship networks communication effectiveness improved with lower concentrations of status and higher concentrations of influence. Network indegree (i.e., status) (ß=-0.893, p=.019) had a larger impact than outdegree (i.e., influence) (ß=0.617, p=.015), indicating status had a larger effect on communication effectiveness than influence. Put simply, our results show communication improves when there is more equality of status in the surgical team. Paradoxically, communication improves when there are higher concentrations of network influence among surgical team members. CONCLUSIONS: Inequality in surgical team networks has paradoxical effects on communication effectiveness. The impact of network structure on organizational behavior is of high interest to the military and provides essential insights into clinicians' ability to communicate in a highly complex and task-based environment. Communication will likely improve in surgical teams through methods to foster equality of team member status and promote surgical leadership. Military medical policies could both amplify the positive effects and mitigate the negative effects of network inequality.

Nursing Leadership During COVID-19: Leading an Inpatient Response at a Regional Military Medical Center.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic stressed healthcare systems worldwide and exposed major flaws in military and civilian healthcare systems. Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC) serves as the only military medical center for over 205,000 U.S. service members, beneficiaries, and coalition partners stationed throughout Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. The pandemic response required LRMC leaders to reconfigure services to meet pandemic concerns while providing lifesaving care to injured service members from combatant commands. The quickly evolving pandemic challenged leaders to ensure healthcare delivery amid constant change and imperfect information. While LRMC senior leaders developed a strategic pandemic response plan, a multidisciplinary team of nurses, doctors, and technicians collaborated to create an inpatient team to support the dual mission of coronavirus disease 2019 response and casualty care for the warfighter. In this manuscript, we discuss how a multidisciplinary clinical working group at a regional medical center prepared and responded to the pandemic, strategically planned patient care, and ensured support to combatant commands for ongoing forward military operations. Additionally, we share our experiences and lessons learned to inform other military facilities across the medical community and global healthcare systems.

Nursing Leadership and COVID-19:: Defining the Shadows and Leading Ahead of the Data.

The COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed health care systems and exposed major gaps in preparedness and response plans. The crisis challenged nurse leaders to develop and implement novel care delivery plans while preventing disease transmission to patients and staff. COVID-19 required nurse leaders to make decisions in an environment of conflicting data and directives. The authors share essential nurse leader competencies vital to the development and support of thriving nurse leaders. As crises persist and future challenges arise, nurse leaders can leverage these essential competencies to successfully drive engagement, lead ahead of consensus, and define the shadows of limited, incomplete, and conflicting data.

COVID 19: An unprecedented opportunity for nurse practitioners to reform healthcare and advocate for permanent full practice authority.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic ushered in a new era for advanced practice registered nurses, as emergency regulatory and policy changes expanded the nurse practitioner (NP) scope of practice. The legislative changes enabled NPs to bolster the national pandemic response by working to the full extent of their education and training. The changes are only temporary, and many have contemplated the permanent impact of COVID-19 when healthcare transitions to a postpandemic normal. NPs now have a unique opportunity to educate others about the merit of their role and advocate for permanent legislative changes. In this creative controversy manuscript, we build a case that national NP full practice authority increases access to care and is vital for a sustainable and resilient healthcare system that can react to future pandemic crises.

A Protocol to Examine Surgical Team Communication in a Large Military Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Preventable clinician communication errors are the most frequent root cause of surgical adverse events. Effective communication among surgical team members is an important overall indicator of clinical nursing excellence and is crucial to promote patient safety and reduce healthcare risk. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this publication is to describe our research protocol, which will comprehensively investigate surgical team communication and surgical team structure. There are two overall study objectives: (a) to characterize the network factors that influence perioperative clinician communication and (b) to identify how team structure shapes communication effectiveness. Specifically, we will study the association among clinician relationships, surgical team familiarity, surgical team size, and communication effectiveness. METHODS: We will use an exploratory, prospective, cross-sectional, network-centric approach using social network analysis to determine how interdependent clinician relationships influence surgical communication patterns. Targeting an 80% response rate, we will use total population sampling to recruit all clinicians (nurses, surgeons, anesthetists, surgical technologists, students, residents) who directly provide surgical care in the operating room at a large military medical center. We will administer an electronic survey to surgical teams at the end of the surgical day to elicit clinician communication assessments and relational preferences. From the survey questions, we will develop six relational networks (interaction, close working relationship, socialization, advice seeking, advice giving, speaking up/voice) and three models that represent communication effectiveness for each participant and team. We will use various statistical methods to characterize the network factors that shape operating room clinician communication and identify how team structure shapes communication effectiveness. RESULTS: This study will start enrolling participants in 2020. DISCUSSION: We are among the first to comprehensively investigate operating room communication using social network analysis. The results of this study will provide valuable insight into nurse collaboration and communication in interprofessional teams, enable a thoughtful analysis of surgical staffing and perioperative team building, and inform future-targeted interventions to improve operating room communication weaknesses.

Surgical Team Familiarity: An Integrative Review.

The dynamic nature of perioperative care often brings unfamiliar clinicians together yet requires them to collectively provide complex health care in a challenging environment. In this review, we comprehensively evaluated evidence regarding surgical team familiarity and its relationship to surgical team performance. Using a comprehensive and iterative search strategy, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and EMBASE for surgical team familiarity manuscripts. We identified 598 manuscripts, 16 of which met our inclusion criteria. We found that surgical team familiarity is associated with improved performance for many metrics, including shorter total operative time, team member safety, decreased surgical errors and disruptions, reduced miscommunication, and fewer patient readmissions. Although additional research would be helpful, surgical managers should consider team familiarity and consistency in team membership when assigning staff members to surgical teams to optimize surgical care, decrease inefficiencies, and promote safe patient outcomes.