Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
1.
J Community Health ; 48(3): 528-538, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36745356

RESUMO

State vaccine requirements are a tool for improving child and adolescent vaccination immunization coverage, but to be effective, parental buy-in is needed. The objective of this study was to assess the demographic, healthcare characteristics, and health beliefs associated with parental acceptance of general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements. Indiana parents (N = 601) with children ages 11-17 years old completed a survey during March 2020.Results showed that 47.2% and 43.1% of parents believed there should always be general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements, respectively. In multivariable analysis, higher odds of parental support for general state vaccine requirements were associated with being unsure whether HPV-associated cancer is a problem in the participant's county and having higher perceived benefits of HPV vaccines. Lower odds were associated with private insurance, having less than a bachelor's degree, and having less confidence in vaccines. In comparison, parents had higher odds of agreeing with HPV-specific state vaccine requirements if they reported higher interpersonal altruism and higher perceived benefits of HPV vaccines; they had lower odds if they were non-Hispanic White. Findings indicate that while similar percentages of parents agreed with general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements, there were different characteristics associated with acceptance of each. Results can inform the development of tailored interventions for improving parental support for general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Indiana , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pais , Vacinação , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect ; 14: 100577, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35252841

RESUMO

Although there has been extensive exploration of public opinion surrounding many non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) aimed at mitigating transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (e.g. mask-wearing and social distancing), there has been less discussion of the public's perception of the ethical appropriateness other NPIs. This paper presents the results of a survey of U.S. adults' opinions of the ethical permissibility of both state-to-state and international travel restrictions to mitigate transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Our research revealed overall high agreement with the ethical permissibility of both state-to-state and international travel restrictions, though we saw significant difference across political party affiliation and conservative/liberal ideologies. Other factors associated with agreement with state-to-state travel restrictions included increasing education, increasing income, and both high and low commitment altruism. When considering international travel restrictions, income, education, and low commitment altruism were associated with increased agreement with the ethical permissibility of international travel restrictions. Ethical analysis and implications are explored.

3.
Vaccine ; 39(14): 1921-1928, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715898

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Decisions about influenza vaccination for fall-winter 2020 were made against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. During May 2020, the authors examined intended vaccination in the next 12 months in relationship to demographic variables, healthcare attitudes, and personal COVID-19 experiences for two samples of adults--those who did not receive influenza vaccine during the prior 12 months, and those who did. METHODS: In May 2020, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a national US sample. Participants reported prior influenza vaccination (yes/no during prior 12 months) and anticipated vaccination (yes/no during next 12 months). Covariates included demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, race-ethnicity, political ideology), general beliefs (e.g., benefits of vaccines, altruistic attitudes), and COVID-19 health beliefs and experiences (COVID-19 worry and severity, perception of COVID-19 as a community threat, knowing someone with COVID-19). For each group, hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was conducted with intent to vaccinate as the outcome. RESULTS: Among participants (n = 3502), 47% did not receive influenza vaccine in the prior 12 months and 53% had; 25.5% of non-vaccinators and 91.9% of vaccinators intended future vaccination. For non-vaccinators, odds of intending vaccination was associated with race/ethnicity (Hispanics were more likely to intend than white-NH; AOR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.23-2.4), greater perceived benefits of vaccination (AOR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.88-2.54), and perception of COVID-19 as a community threat (AOR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.49-2.45). For vaccinators, odds of intending vaccination was associated with age (AOR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.03-1.05), race/ethnicity (Black-NH and Other-NH were less likely to intend than white-NH, AOR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.36-0.999; and AOR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.24-0.84, respectively), greater perceived benefits of vaccination (AOR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.45-2.45) and greater perception of collective benefits of vaccines (AOR = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.15-1.90). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic may have served as a cue to action for influenza vaccination intention among some prior non-vaccinators whereas intention among prior vaccinators is more related to positive attitudes toward vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(4): 1000-1005, 2021 04 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026274

RESUMO

HPV vaccination prevents most HPV-related cancers yet vaccination rates remain low. In this cross-sectional study, we examined the association between maternal HPV experiences and HPV vaccination uptake among children and whether this association may be explained by perceived benefits of vaccination. We used logistic regression models to estimate the effect of (1) maternal history of abnormal Pap smear, (2), family/friend history of cervical cancer, and (3) maternal history of cervical cancer on HPV vaccination uptake among children. Separate mediation analyses were conducted to determine if perceived benefits mediated the relationship between each maternal HPV experience and HPV vaccination uptake. History of abnormal Pap smear (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.97), family history of cervical cancer (OR = 1.72, CI = 1.26, 2.35), and personal history of cervical cancer (OR = 3.00, CI = 1.82, 4.95) predicted HPV vaccination of children. Perceived benefits mediated the relationship between history of abnormal Pap smear (indirect effect =.146, SE =.069, 95% CI =.014, .289), family history of cervical cancer (indirect effect =.228, SE =.079, CI =.080, .387), and personal history of cervical cancer (indirect effect =.298, SE =.116, CI =.082, .533) on HPV vaccination. Our results suggest that personal experiences with HPV-related disease may influence maternal HPV vaccine decision-making.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Papillomaviridae , Vacinação , Esfregaço Vaginal
5.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0241662, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33147261

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented public health threat, both in scope and response. With no vaccine available, the public is advised to practice non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) including social distancing, mask-wearing, and washing hands. However, little is known about public perceptions of the effectiveness of these measures, and high perceived effectiveness is likely to be critical in order to achieve widespread adoption of NPI. METHODS: In May 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among U.S. adults (N = 3,474). The primary outcome was a six-item measure assessing perceived effectiveness of recommended behaviors to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection from 1 (not at all effective) to 5 (extremely effective). The sample was divided into "higher" and "lower" perceived effectiveness groups. Covariates included demographics, healthcare characteristics, and health beliefs. Variables that were significant at p<0.01 in bivariate analyses were entered into a multivariable logistic regression and a best-fit model was created using a cutoff of p<0.01 to stay in the model. RESULTS: Mean age was 45.5 years and most participants were non-Hispanic White (63%) and female (52.4%). The high perceived effectiveness group was slightly larger than the low perceived effectiveness group (52.7% vs. 47.3%). Almost all health belief variables were significant in the best-fit regression model. COVID-19-related worry (aOR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.64-2.02), and perceived threat to physical health (aOR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.20-1.45) were positively associated with perceived effectiveness while perceived severity of COVID-19 (0.84; 95% CI = 0.73-0.96) and perceived likelihood of infection (0.85; 95% CI = 0.77-0.94) switched directions in the adjusted model and were negatively associated with perceived effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This research indicates people generally believe NPI are effective, but there was variability based on health beliefs and there are mixed rates of engagement in these behaviors. Public health efforts should focus on increasing perceived severity and threat of SARS-CoV-2-related disease, while promoting NPI as effective in reducing threat.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/psicologia , Adulto , COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Desinfecção das Mãos , Humanos , Masculino , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distância Psicológica , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Sci Commun ; 42(5): 698-723, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602991

RESUMO

With SARS-CoV-2 vaccines under development, research is needed to assess intention to vaccinate. We conducted a survey (N = 3,159) with U.S. adults in May 2020 assessing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions, intentions with a provider recommendation, and sociodemographic and psychosocial variables. Participants had high SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions (M = 5.23/7-point scale), which increased significantly with a provider recommendation (M = 5.47). Hierarchical linear regression showed that less education and working in health care were associated with lower intent, and liberal political views, altruism, and COVID-19-related health beliefs were associated with higher intent. This work can inform interventions to increase vaccine uptake, ultimately reducing COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality.

7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 14(7): 1626-1635, 2018 07 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29359986

RESUMO

The HPV vaccine debuted more than ten years ago in the United States and many strategies have been evaluated to increase HPV vaccination rates, which include not only improving current vaccination behaviors but also sustaining these behaviors. Researchers and practitioners from a variety of backgrounds have engaged in this work, which has included efforts directed at public health and government policies, health education and health promotion programs, and clinical and patient-provider approaches, as well as work aimed to respond to and combat anti-HPV vaccination movements in society. Using a previously developed conceptual model to organize and summarize each of these areas, this paper also highlights the need for future HPV vaccine promotion work to adopt a multi-level and, when possible, integrated approach in order to maximize impact on vaccination rates.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Programas de Imunização , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Saúde Pública , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinação/psicologia
8.
Acad Pediatr ; 18(2): 145-153, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28754504

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To understand the effect of a health messaging intervention focused on provider communication about vaccination on mothers' willingness to vaccinate children against human papillomavirus (HPV) and seasonal influenza. METHODS: A total of 2476 mothers of 9- to 13-year-olds in the United States completed a Web-based survey in August 2014. Mothers were randomized to 1 of 2 groups targeting HPV or influenza vaccine. Mothers whose child had not received the target vaccine (ie, zero doses of HPV vaccine/no prior-year administration of influenza vaccine) were randomized to the intervention. The study used a 3 × 2 between-subjects design; illustrated vignettes depicted 1 of 3 levels of provider recommendation strength (brief mention of vaccination, strong recommendation of vaccination, or personal disclosure of vaccination of own children), and presence or absence of information comparing safety of vaccination to the safety of a common daily activity. Outcome was mothers' willingness to have their child receive the target vaccine. Perceived benefits of vaccination were assessed before viewing the intervention and were included as a covariate in analyses, along with child gender. RESULTS: For HPV vaccine, there was a main effect of safety information (F(1,684) = 7.99, P = .005) and perceived benefits of vaccination (F(1,684) = 221.64, P < .001) on mothers' willingness to vaccinate. For influenza, perceived benefits of vaccination significantly related to willingness to vaccinate (F(1,462) = 105.78, P < .001). Child gender was not associated with willingness. CONCLUSIONS: Provider communication about vaccination may need to be tailored to the vaccine in question. A next step to increasing coverage for both HPV and influenza vaccines may be an intervention aimed at increasing mothers' perceived benefits of vaccination.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Mães , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Relações Profissional-Família , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto
9.
J Adolesc Health ; 61(2): 246-251, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28455129

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We sought to establish which human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine communication approaches by pediatricians were associated with same-day HPV vaccination of 11- to 12-year-olds by evaluating audio recordings of visits. METHODS: Verilogue, a market research company maintaining a panel of primary care pediatricians, provided audio recordings and transcriptions of well-child visits for 11- to 12-year-old patients from January through June 2013. Seventy-five transcripts from 19 pediatricians were coded for use of presumptive language (i.e., words conveying assumption of vaccine delivery), offer of delay, recommendation strength, and information provision. Using logistic regression, we evaluated the association between pediatrician communication approaches and agreement to same-day HPV vaccination. Generalized estimating equations accounted for clustering of patients within pediatricians. RESULTS: Same-day agreement to HPV vaccination occurred in 29% of encounters. Pediatricians in the sample often provided parents with inconsistent, mixed messages and sometimes offered information about HPV or HPV vaccination that was inaccurate. Pediatricians used presumptive language in only 11 of 75 encounters; when used, presumptive language was associated with higher odds of accepting HPV vaccine (73% vs. 22%; odds ratio = 8.96; 95% confidence interval = 2.32-34.70). Pediatricians offered or recommended delay in most encounters (65%). HPV vaccine acceptance occurred far more often when pediatricians did not mention delaying vaccination (82% vs. 6%; odds ratio = 80.84; 95% confidence interval = 15.72-415.67). Same-day vaccination was not associated with strength of recommendation or pediatrician reference to vaccinating their own children. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need to develop and evaluate physician-focused trainings on using presumptive language for same-day HPV vaccination.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Pais/psicologia , Pediatras/psicologia , Gravação em Fita/métodos , Criança , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Vaccine ; 35(18): 2338-2342, 2017 04 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28359619

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: U.S. estimates of seasonal influenza (flu) vaccine uptake in 2014-2015 were 62% for 5-12year olds, dropping to 47% for 13-17year olds. The Healthy People 2020 goal for these age groups is 80%. It is important to understand factors associated with influenza vaccination, especially for those ages where rates begin to decline. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with influenza vaccination acceptance in 9-13year old children. METHODS: An online U.S. survey of mothers of children aged 9-13 assessed children's influenza vaccine uptake in the previous season, healthcare utilization, sociodemographics, and vaccine attitudes. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of influenza vaccine status. RESULTS: There were 2363 respondents (Mean age=38years old). Referent children were 57% female and 66% non-minority race/ethnicity with a mean age of 10.6years. By maternal report, 59% of children had received an influenza vaccine in the previous season. Predictors of influenza vaccine uptake included a recommendation or strong recommendation from a health care provider, seeing a health care provider in the past year, positive attitudes regarding the influenza vaccine, and being a minority race. Child gender, age, insurance coverage, and whether the child had a regular healthcare provider were not associated with influenza vaccine uptake (p=n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: This sample reported overall rates of influenza vaccine uptake similar to national surveillance data, but still lower than national goals. Provider recommendations along with health attitudes and seeing a health care provider were associated with vaccine uptake. Promising interventions may include more directive physician messaging for influenza vaccine uptake in youth, encouraging more regular well-child visits during the adolescent years, and promoting influenza vaccination at alternative sites.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Mães , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
11.
Infant Ment Health J ; 37(6): 617-627, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27870193

RESUMO

The work of home visitors in early childhood fields may include addressing many challenges to achieving curricular outcomes, including issues such as maintaining boundaries and managing one's own reactions to children, parents, and overall family situations. Increasingly, reflective supervision and consultation are recognized as a way for workers in home-visiting early intervention and early care fields to address these personal and professional challenges and build competence (Watson, Gatti, Cox, Harrison, & Hennes, ). The features of home visiting that make reflective supervision/consultation essential are discussed. Next, results of a pilot project in which a sample of Part C early intervention providers respond to a vignette portraying a challenging parent-child interaction are briefly presented and discussed. Despite often stating the importance of relationships, participants did not identify concrete methods of supporting relationship or demonstrate recognition of parallel process. In addition, providers seldom endorsed the use of reflective skills such as observing, listening, wondering, or reflecting (Weatherston, ), and no providers discussed a need for reflective supervision/consultation. We suggest that these findings illustrate some of the areas in which early intervention home visitors could benefit from participation in reflective supervision/consultation to move from identifying reflective skills as important to actually being able to use such skills in their work with families.


Assuntos
Intervenção Educacional Precoce , Pessoal de Saúde , Visita Domiciliar , Relações Pais-Filho , Competência Clínica , Educação não Profissionalizante , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Humanos , Lactente , Entrevistas como Assunto , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Poder Familiar , Projetos Piloto , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Pensamento
12.
J Pediatr Psychol ; 41(10): 1144-1160, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27567023

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES : In the midst of large-scale changes across our nation's health care system, including the Affordable Care Act and Patient-Centered Medical Home initiatives, integrated primary care models afford important opportunities for those in the field of pediatric psychology. Despite the extensive and growing attention, this subspecialty has received in recent years, a comprehensive set of core professional competencies has not been established. METHODS : A subset of an Integrated Primary Care Special Interest Group used two well-established sets of core competencies in integrated primary care and pediatric psychology as a basis to develop a set of integrated pediatric primary care-specific behavioral anchors. CONCLUSIONS : The current manuscript describes these behavioral anchors and their development in the context of professional training as well as with regard to Triple Aim goals and securing psychology's role in integrated pediatric primary care settings.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Competência Profissional , Psicologia da Criança/normas , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos
13.
Am J Public Health ; 106(2): 273-8, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26691123

RESUMO

Childhood immunization involves a balance between parents' autonomy in deciding whether to immunize their children and the benefits to public health from mandating vaccines. Ethical concerns about pediatric vaccination span several public health domains, including those of policymakers, clinicians, and other professionals. In light of ongoing developments and debates, we discuss several key ethical issues concerning childhood immunization in the United States and describe how they affect policy development and clinical practice. We focus on ethical considerations pertaining to herd immunity as a community good, vaccine communication, dismissal of vaccine-refusing families from practice, and vaccine mandates. Clinicians and policymakers need to consider the nature and timing of vaccine-related discussions and invoke deliberative approaches to policy-making.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde , Imunidade Coletiva , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/ética , Vacinação/ética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comunicação , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Pediatria , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Vacinas/administração & dosagem
14.
Prev Med Rep ; 2: 892-898, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26594616

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The quadrivalent and 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are licensed for administration among 9-26-year-old males and females, with routine vaccination recommended for 11-12-year-olds. Despite the availability of the vaccine at younger ages, few studies have explored vaccine uptake prior to age 13, and national HPV vaccination surveillance data is limited to 13-17-year-olds. Our objective was to examine rates and predictors of HPV vaccine initiation among 9-13-year-olds in the United States. METHODS: A national sample of mothers of 9-13-year-olds in the United States (N=2,446) completed a 2014 Web-based survey assessing socio-demographic characteristics, child's HPV vaccination history, provider communication regarding the vaccine, and other attitudes and behaviors pertaining to vaccination and healthcare utilization. The main outcome measure was child's initiation of the HPV vaccine (i.e., receipt of one or more doses). RESULTS: Approximately 35% of the full sample and 27.5% of the 9-10-year-olds had initiated HPV vaccination. Females were more likely than males to have initiated HPV vaccination by the age of 13 but not by younger ages. Strength of health provider recommendation regarding HPV vaccination was a particularly salient predictor of vaccine initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately a third of children may be initiating the HPV vaccine series before or during the targeted age range for routine administration of the vaccine. Because coverage remains below national targets, further research aimed at increasing vaccination during early adolescence is needed. Improving providers' communication with parents about the HPV vaccine may be one potential mechanism for increasing vaccine coverage.

15.
Pediatrics ; 134(3): e675-83, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25136038

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Emphasizing societal benefits of vaccines has been linked to increased vaccination intentions in adults. It is unclear if this pattern holds for parents deciding whether to vaccinate their children. The objective was to determine whether emphasizing the benefits of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination directly to the vaccine recipient or to society differentially impacts parents' vaccine intentions for their infants. METHODS: In a national online survey, parents (N = 802) of infants <12 months old were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 4 MMR vaccine messages: (1) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Information Statement (VIS), (2) VIS and information emphasizing the MMR vaccine's benefits to the child, (3) VIS and information emphasizing societal benefits, or (4) VIS and information emphasizing benefits both to the child and society. Parents reported their likelihood of vaccinating their infants for MMR on a response scale of 0 (extremely unlikely) to 100 (extremely likely). RESULTS: Compared with the VIS-only group (mean intention = 86.3), parents reported increased vaccine intentions for their infants when receiving additional information emphasizing the MMR vaccine's benefits either directly to the child (mean intention = 91.6, P = .01) or to both the child and society (mean intention = 90.8, P = .03). Emphasizing the MMR vaccine's benefits only to society did not increase intentions (mean intention = 86.4, P = .97). CONCLUSIONS: We did not see increases in parents' MMR vaccine intentions for their infants when societal benefits were emphasized without mention of benefits directly to the child. This finding suggests that providers should emphasize benefits directly to the child. Mentioning societal benefits seems to neither add value to, nor interfere with, information highlighting benefits directly to the child.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Coleta de Dados/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Adulto Jovem
16.
Am Psychol ; 69(4): 409-29, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24820690

RESUMO

This article reports on the outcome of a presidential initiative of 2012 American Psychological Association President Suzanne Bennett Johnson to delineate competencies for primary care (PC) psychology in six broad domains: science, systems, professionalism, relationships, application, and education. Essential knowledge, skills, and attitudes are described for each PC psychology competency. Two behavioral examples are provided to illustrate each competency. Clinical vignettes demonstrate the competencies in action. Delineation of these competencies is intended to inform education, practice, and research in PC psychology and efforts to further develop team-based competencies in PC.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Psicologia Clínica/normas , Sociedades Científicas/normas , Humanos
17.
Health Psychol ; 33(9): 1074-83, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24611739

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of asking Anticipated Regret Questions (ARQ) and risk presentation format on enhancing attitudes and behavioral intentions of mothers to have their daughters receive the HPV vaccine. DESIGN: The study used a 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design with a no message control, involving 2 anticipated regret conditions (asked or not asked) and HPV risk presentation format (text only or graphical presentation of risk). Data were collected from a national sample of 320 mothers of girls ages 11-16. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was mothers' intention to vaccinate their daughters with all 3 doses of the HPV shots. Message involvement, perceived ease of message comprehension, and health beliefs regarding HPV infection and the HPV vaccine were also measured. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated there was a significant interactive effect of asking anticipated regret and risk presentation format on message involvement and behavioral intention. ARQ positively influenced behavioral intention only among mothers exposed to the graphical presentation of HPV-related statistics. This effect was mediated by message involvement. Thus, the combined effect of the graphical message and anticipated-regret questions on behavioral intentions was mediated by increased emotional involvement with the information concerning cervical cancer and HPV vaccination. These findings are consistent with the view that the formation of health-behavior intentions often involves the interplay of both affective and cognitive processing.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Mães/psicologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , Intenção , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Núcleo Familiar , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/psicologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/transmissão , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/microbiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/psicologia
18.
Pediatrics ; 130(3): 522-30, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22926181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Herd immunity is an important benefit of childhood immunization, but it is unknown if the concept of benefit to others influences parents' decisions to immunize their children. Our objective was to determine if the concept of "benefit to others" has been found in the literature to influence parents' motivation for childhood immunization. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline through October 2010 for articles on parental/guardian decision-making regarding child immunization. Studies were included if they presented original work, elicited responses from parents/guardians of children <18 years old, and addressed vaccinating children for the benefit of others. RESULTS: The search yielded 5876 titles; 91 articles were identified for full review. Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies identified benefit to others as 1 among several motivating factors for immunization by using interviews or focus groups. Nine studies included the concept of benefit to others in surveys but did not rank its relative importance. In 3 studies, the importance of benefit to others was ranked relative to other motivating factors. One to six percent of parents ranked benefit to others as their primary reason to vaccinate their children, and 37% of parents ranked benefit to others as their second most important factor in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be some parental willingness to immunize children for the benefit of others, but its relative importance as a motivator is largely unknown. Further work is needed to explore this concept as a possible motivational tool for increasing childhood immunization uptake.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Imunidade Coletiva , Imunização/psicologia , Pais/psicologia , Atitude , Criança , Humanos , Motivação , Responsabilidade Social
19.
Acad Med ; 86(12): 1532-8, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22030765

RESUMO

Standard approaches to teaching the management of psychosocial issues in pediatrics--visits to community-based organizations and stand-alone block rotations in developmental-behavioral pediatrics and community pediatrics--neither expose residents to models of interdisciplinary collaboration between faculty preceptors and community providers nor take advantage of the efficacy of learning in continuity clinics. The authors describe their project, developed from an existing Community Pediatrics Training Initiative with long-standing relationships with a domestic violence shelter, a community center for Latino families, and a special needs resource organization for parents. They lay out in detail the project's innovative use of partners from community-based organizations, colocated within pediatric continuity clinics, who teach both residents and faculty about community resources and linkages with multidisciplinary providers. The authors present lessons learned by faculty preceptors, residents, the community partners, and project staff that can guide future applications of this model in other residency training programs. Faculty and residents indicated an increased awareness of available community resources and how linkages can be incorporated into pediatric outpatient visits. Community partners identified keys to successful co-teaching, including readiness to adopt an assertive communication style and frequent presence in the clinics. Project staff recognized the challenges of staff turnover at community-based organizations and the need to choose community partners with expertise that fits the sociodemographic issues of the clinic's patients.


Assuntos
Medicina Comunitária/educação , Currículo , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Internato e Residência , Pediatria/educação , Adolescente , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Criança , Transtornos do Comportamento Infantil/terapia , Pré-Escolar , Competência Clínica , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/terapia , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
20.
Vaccine ; 29(27): 4507-11, 2011 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21527303

RESUMO

The number of current and future vaccines for adults has been steadily increasing. Yet, vaccine coverage rates for adult vaccinations have historically been low, and less is known about how adults in the mid-adult age range make vaccine decisions for themselves. The purpose of this study was to assess which vaccine characteristics affect vaccine decision-making among mid-adult women. Adult women, aged 27-55 (n=258) rated 9 hypothetical vaccine scenarios, each of which was defined along 4 dimensions: mode of transmission (STI or non-STI), severity of infection (curable, chronic, or fatal), vaccine efficacy (50%, 70%, or 90%), and availability of behavioral methods for prevention (available or not available). Ratings ranged from 0 to 100. Conjoint analysis was used to assess the effect of relative preferences for the vaccine scenario characteristics on participant ratings of scenarios. The mean vaccine scenario rating was 78.2. Nearly half (40%, n=104) of participants rated all nine scenarios the same, with the majority of those (84%) holding strongly positive views. Conjoint analysis of the other 154 participants who discriminated between scenarios indicated that the main drivers for vaccine acceptability were severity of the disease and the efficacy of the vaccine to prevent the disease. Mode of transmission and availability of a preventative behavioral measure did not play a significant role. Future studies should further assess how women's understanding of severity of the disease and efficacy of the vaccine to prevent disease may be useful for increasing vaccine acceptability.


Assuntos
Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas/classificação , Vacinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...