Combination of vonoprazan and amoxicillin as the first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled study.

The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) decreased gradually. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of a 14-day combination of vonoprazan and amoxicillin as the first-line eradication therapy for H. pylori infection and compared them with those of the bismuth quadruple therapy. A prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was designed, involving patients with H. pylori infection in 6 institutions who did not receive any treatment yet. They were randomly assigned into the VA-dual group (vonoprazan 20 mg b.i.d + amoxicillin 750 mg q.i.d) or EACP-quadruple group (esomeprazole 20 mg + amoxicillin 1000 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + colloidal bismuth subcitrate 220 mg b.i.d) for 14 days in a ratio of 1:1. At least 28 days later, the eradication rate was detected by the 13C-urea breath test (UBT). A total of 562 patients from February 2022 to September 2022 were enrolled and 316 were random. In the ITT analysis, the eradication rates of H. pylori in the VA-dual group and EACP-quadruple group were 89.9% and 81.0%, respectively, p = 0.037. In the PP analysis were 97.9% and 90.8%, p = 0.009. The different eradication rate was 8.9% (95% CI 1.2-16.5%) and 7.2% (95% CI 1.8-12.4%) in ITT and PP analyses, both lower limit of the 95%CI was still higher than the prespecified margin. In addition, the incidence of adverse events in the VA-dual group was significantly lower than that in the EACP-quadruple group (19.0% vs. 43.0%, P < 0.001). The efficacy and safety of a 14-day combination therapy of vonoprazan and amoxicillin in eradicating H. pylori are superior to bismuth quadruple therapy, and this combination significantly reduces the use of antibiotics.

Effects of metformin on survival outcomes of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recent epidemiological studies indicated that metformin might improve the survival of various cancers. However, its benefit on pancreatic cancer was controversial. METHODS: We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the benefit of metformin on pancreatic cancer. A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase. Relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials including181 pancreatic patients, revealed that metformin use was not associated with an improved overall survival at 6 months (RR=0.90, 95% CI=0.67-1.21), overall survival (HR=1.19, 95% CI=0.86-1.63) and progression-free survival (HR=1.39, 95% CI=0.97-1.99). But the meta-analysis of 8 cohorts, involving 2805 pancreatic patients with diabetes, demonstrated a favorable result with improved overall survival (HR=0.78, 95% CI=0.66-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Observations in the cohort studies supported a favorable role of metformin while the data from randomized controlled trials did not support that. Therefore, more high-quality RCTs are warranted.

Effects of hydrotalcite combined with esomeprazole on gastric ulcer healing quality: A clinical observation study.

AIM: To evaluate the effects of hydrotalcite combined with esomeprazole on gastric ulcer healing quality. METHODS: Forty-eight patients diagnosed with gastric ulcer between June 2014 and February 2016 were randomly allocated to the combination therapy group or monotherapy group. The former received hydrotalcite combined with esomeprazole, and the latter received esomeprazole alone, for 8 wk. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were recruited and acted as the healthy control group. Endoscopic ulcer healing was observed using white light endoscopy and narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy. The composition of collagen fibers, amount of collagen deposition, expression of factor VIII and TGF-ß1, and hydroxyproline content were analyzed by Masson staining, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescent imaging and ELISA. RESULTS: Following treatment, changes in the gastric microvascular network were statistically different between the combination therapy group and the monotherapy group (P < 0.05). There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in collagen deposition, expression level of Factor VIII and TGF-ß1, and hydroxyproline content in the two treatment groups compared with the healthy control group. These parameters in the combination therapy group were significantly higher than in the monotherapy group (P < 0.05). The ratio of collagen I to collagen III was statistically different among the three groups, and was significantly higher in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hydrotalcite combined with esomeprazole is superior to esomeprazole alone in improving gastric ulcer healing quality in terms of improving microvascular morphology, degree of structure maturity and function of regenerated mucosa.

Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory responses play decisive roles in tumor development, immune surveillance, and responses to therapy. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as an inflammation index, has been reported to be a predictor for poor prognosis of various cancers. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of NLR in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted through PubMed and EMBASE. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the association between NLR and three outcomes: overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Seven cohorts involving 959 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our pooled results demonstrated that elevated NLR was associated with poor overall survival (HR: 13.41, 95% CI: 4.90-36.72), disease-free survival (HR: 4.37, 95% CI: 2.33-8.19), and recurrence-free survival (HR: 3.64, 95% CI: 1.88-7.05). CONCLUSION: An elevated NLR is a valuable and easily available prognostic marker for rectal cancer. It is associated with unfavorable overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival. NLR could be a useful candidate factor for making treatment decisions for individual patients with rectal cancer.