Insights into the capsid structure of banana bunchy top virus.

Banana is the major staple food crop for approximately 400 million people. Bunchy top disease of banana is one of the most devastating diseases caused by banana bunchy top virus (BBTV), which results in stunting of plants, bunchy appearance of leaves and a significant loss of yield. While many isolates of BBTV from various regions of India have been characterized by different groups, no structural study exists for this important virus. To bridge this gap, the pET28a clone of the coat protein (CP) gene from BBTV isolate of Hill banana grown in lower Pulney Hills (Virupakshi) of Tamilnadu was expressed in BL21 (DE3) pLysS. Purification of the CP was achieved by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. In vitro capsid assembly studied using sucrose density gradient centrifugation suggested that the CP did not assemble as a virus-like particle (VLP), but remained as smaller oligomers. Studies using dynamic light scattering (DLS) indicate that the purified protein is poly-dispersed, represented majorly as pentamers. Homology modeling studies provided useful insights into the probable fold of the CP suggesting that it is a ß-sandwich, similar to that seen in the majority of plant viruses. In silico capsid reconstruction aided the understanding of the quaternary organization of subunits in the capsid and their molecular interactions. The location of the aphid-binding EAG motif was identified on the surface loops close to the pentameric axis indicating its role in vector-mediated transmission. Comparison with the CP and capsid structure of geminiviruses provided useful insights into the mode of nucleic acid binding and the role of genome during capsid assembly. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-022-03204-4.

Efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension based chemotherapy in metastatic ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective study.

The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic epithelial ovarian carcinoma. In the present multicenter study, the medical records of patients who received NDLS (60-75 mg/m2; 3-weekly cycles) based chemotherapy for metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer in routine clinical care were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were followed-up from September 2014 until September 2018. The efficacy endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate measured in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Of the 13 patients evaluated, 46.2% (6/13) received NDLS-based first-line chemotherapy and 53.8% (7/13) patients received second-line chemotherapy [platinum-sensitive, 57.1% (4/7); platinum-resistant, 42.9% (3/7)]. The ORRs were 60.0% (3/5) and 57.1% (4/7) for patients receiving first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively. The estimated median OS for patients receiving NDLS-based first-line chemotherapy was 17.4 months (follow-up duration, 4.3-49.4 months). The estimated median OS was 26.1 months (follow-up duration, 5.1-37.5 months) in patients with platinum-sensitive disease, whereas the OS was 14.8 months (follow-up duration, 3.5-14.8 months) in patients with platinum-resistant disease. No grade III/IV adverse events (AEs) were observed; ≥1 AE in grade I-II was reported in 84.6% (11/13) of patients. Overall, NDLS-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well-tolerated in the management of metastatic epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

A Multicentric, Retrospective Efficacy and Safety Study of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective study, we analyzed the medical charts of mCRPC patients, who were treated with NDLS administered as 2-weekly (50 mg/m2) or 3-weekly regimens (75 mg/m2). The study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (>50% PSA decline from baseline), PSA progression (PSA increase from baseline beyond 12 weeks: ≥25% and ≥2 ng/mL), median PSA decline, and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: Data of 24 patients with mCRPC were analyzed in this study. NDLS was administered as a 2-weekly regimen in 37.5% (9/24; all first-line) patients and as a 3-weekly regimen in 62.5% patients (15/24; first-line: 20% (3/15), second-line: 80% (12/15)). Overall, PSA response was reported in 66.7% (16/24) patients. The PSA response was 77.8% (7/9 patients) in the 2-weekly group and 60% (9/15 patients) in the 3-weekly group. The median decline in PSA was 96.31% in the 2-weekly group and 83.29% in the 3-weekly group; the median TTF was 6.7 and 6.5 months in the 2 weekly group and 3-weekly group, respectively. The median OS was 14.6 months (follow-up: 5.5-25.8 months) in the 2-weekly group whereas it was not reached in the 3-weekly group (follow-up: 7.9-15.6 months). The most common hematological AEs were anemia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia whereas nausea, weakness, constipation, vomiting, and diarrhea were the most common (≥10%) nonhematological AEs. Overall, NDLS treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (2-weekly or 3-weekly) was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension-based chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A multicenter retrospective study.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is the most common cancer in Indian men. Docetaxel alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents is recommended for the management of SCCHN. The present multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel docetaxel formulation 'nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS)'-based chemotherapy in SCCHN. The medical records of patients with SCCHN, who were treated with NDLS-based chemotherapy and followed up between August 2014 and September 2018, were reviewed. The efficacy endpoints were overall response rate [ORR; complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] and disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease) for patients receiving NDLS-based induction or palliative chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Efficacy evaluation was available in 30/34 patients (induction, 20/23; palliative, 10/11). NDLS-based induction chemotherapy showed an ORR and DCR of 95% and a median OS of 43.5 months (follow-up duration, 0.6-80.3 months). For NDLS-based palliative chemotherapy, the ORR and DCR were 50% and the median OS time was 4.6 months (follow-up duration, 1.8 to 14.3 months). At least one adverse event was reported in 82.6% patients. No new safety concerns were reported. Overall, NDLS-based chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of SCCHN.

Efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension based chemotherapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

The current retrospective multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS; DoceAqualip) based chemotherapy in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The medical charts of patients with gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, who were treated with NDLS (50-75 mg/m2; 3 weekly cycles) based chemotherapy and followed-up from April 2014 to September 2018, were analyzed. The study endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Of the 43 patients with gastric (n=39) and GEJ (n=4) adenocarcinoma, efficacy evaluation was available in 35 (neoadjuvant, 17/18 patients; metastatic, 18/25 patients). In the neoadjuvant setting, an ORR of 58.82% and a DCR of 94.11% were observed, whereas in the metastatic setting, the ORR was 77.77% and the DCR was 83.33%. In the neoadjuvant setting, at a follow-up ranging from 0.7 to 41.2 months, the median OS was not reached. In the metastatic setting, the median OS was 31.9 months at a follow-up ranging from 0.2 to 50.3 months. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in 24 patients. Anemia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common hematological AEs, while nausea, vomiting and weakness were the most common non-hematological AEs. NDLS based treatment was well-tolerated without any new safety concerns. Overall, NDLS-based chemotherapy was effective and well-tolerated in the management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma.

A rapid and sensitive lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) test for the on-site detection of banana bract mosaic virus in banana plants.

Banana bract mosaic virus (BBrMV) is a serious pathogen threatening the cultivation of banana and plantain worldwide. This study reports the development of a practical, rapid, sensitive, specific and user-friendly lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) test for the on-site detection of BBrMV. The BBrMV coat protein (CP) was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified and used to immunize rabbits to produce a polyclonal antiserum (anti-BBrMVCP). The test was based on a double-antibody sandwich format. Protein-A affinity column-purified anti-BBrMVCP Immunoglobulins (IgG) (16 µg/mL), conjugated to ∼30 nm gold nanoparticles, was applied onto the conjugate pad. The anti-BBrMVCP IgG and goat anti-rabbit IgG were printed on the surface of a nitrocellulose filter membrane as the test line and control line, respectively. A positive result could be confirmed visually by the presence of a pink band that developed on the LFIA strip within 5-10 min. The detection limit of the test was 10 ng of the expressed recombinant BBrMV CP (rBBrMVCP), and a 1:20 dilution of the BBrMV-infected crude extract. This LFIA test was validated using 114 banana leaf samples randomly collected from the field and the results indicated a very high diagnostic sensitivity (99.04 %) and specificity (100 %) for the test. A Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.861 obtained also indicated a very good agreement between the LFIA developed in this study and ELISA. This assay could be adopted by farmers, tissue culture industries and quarantine departments for surveys and surveillance. This is the first report on the development of a LFIA-based test for BBrMV detection.

Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension-Based Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Results from a Multicenter Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip)-based chemotherapy in breast cancer. METHODS: Medical charts of patients with breast cancer, who were treated and followed up with NDLS (75-100 mg/m2; 3-week cycle)-based chemotherapy from August 2014 to September 2018, were analyzed in this multicenter, retrospective study. The study endpoints were overall response rate (ORR: complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]) and disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+stable disease [SD]) in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were evaluated for all settings. RESULTS: Of 91 patients (neoadjuvant: 12, adjuvant: 61, metastatic: 18), efficacy evaluation in 29 patients (neoadjuvant: 12/12, metastatic: 17/18) demonstrated an ORR and DCR of 100%, respectively, in the neoadjuvant setting, and an ORR of 64.7% and DCR of 70.6%, respectively, in the metastatic setting. At a median follow-up of 21.6 months (range: 2.1 to 49.9 months), median OS was not reached in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and it was 30.4 months in metastatic settings. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in 59.3% of patients. Anemia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia were the most common hematological AEs reported while hyperglycemia and alteration in liver function tests were the most common non-hematological AEs. NDLS-based treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns. CONCLUSION: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of breast cancer. Further, NDLS is being evaluated prospectively in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03671044).

Efficacy and Safety of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension-Based Chemotherapy in Sarcoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip) based chemotherapy in patients with sarcoma. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter (6 centers), observational study, we analyzed the medical charts of adult patients of either sex, who were treated with NDLS (75 mg/m2 in 3-weekly cycles) based chemotherapy for the treatment of sarcoma. The efficacy outcomes were overall response rate (ORR: complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) and disease control rate (DCR: CR + PR + stable disease (SD)) in patients who received NDLS-based chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were evaluated for all settings. RESULTS: Of 11 patients (neoadjuvant: 1, adjuvant: 3, and metastatic: 7) in this study, majority had leiomyosarcoma (63.6%, 7/11) followed by extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC), high grade pleomorphic sarcoma of mandible, malignant fibrous histiocytoma of right thigh, and osteosarcoma of femur (9.1% each, 1/11 each). NDLS plus gemcitabine combination was used in 10 patients (90.9%), and NDLS plus cyclophosphamide was used in one patient with EMC (9.1%). Efficacy evaluation was performed for 7 patients (neoadjuvant: 1/1; metastatic: 6/7). Complete response was reported in one patient (soft tissue sarcoma of mandible) treated in neoadjuvant setting. In metastatic setting, ORR was 50% and DCR was 66.7% (CR: 16.7% (1/6), PR: 33.3% (2/6), SD: 16.7% (1/6)). At a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range: 0.06-20.2 months), median OS was not reached in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, but it was 15.8 months in metastatic setting. At least 1 AE was reported in 7 (63.6%) patients. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and anemia were the hematological AEs, whereas nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were the most common nonhematological AEs. NDLS treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns. CONCLUSION: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of sarcoma. Further prospective trials are needed to confirm the data.

Effectiveness and tolerability of nimotuzumab in unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer: Indian hospital-based retrospective evidence.

CONTEXT: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overly expressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and is important prognostic and predictive biomarker. Nimotuzumab is a humanized anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody and has documented promising clinical outcomes and survival rates in various solid tumors with high EGFR expression. AIMS: Attempt to fill gap on paucity of data in India on the efficacy of Nimotuzumab in the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic ESCC. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Hospital records of 15 patients with unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic esophageal cancers, histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma being treated with Nimotuzumab along with standard treatments from October 2006 to November 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The tumor response rate and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. All patients were assessed for toxicity and adverse events (AEs) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4. RESULTS: Majority had lower thoracic esophageal cancer. Tumor response rate observed was as follows 33% had a complete response, 67% had a partial response, and objective response rate was 100%. Survival rate at 1-, 3-, and 5-year was 58.33%, 29.17%, and 29.17%, respectively. Median OS was 26.8 months (95% confidence interval, 2.63-not reached). No Grade III or Grade IV AEs were observed. No added toxicity was observed due to nimotuzumab. CONCLUSIONS: Nimotuzumab combined with standard treatment in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC improved the survival rate and achieved a better tumor response rate without accumulation of toxicity and was well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab in unresectable, recurrent, and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A hospital-based retrospective evidence.

CONTEXT: Role of nimotuzumab in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) is well established in India; however, no clinical evidence is available for its role in recurrent and/or metastatic HNC. AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab when added to standard treatment in unresectable, recurrent, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Hospital records of 14 patients diagnosed with recurrent and/or metastatic HNC with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma and being treated with nimotuzumab along with standard treatments from December 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The tumor response rate and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Toxicity and adverse events (AEs) were assessed as per common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v 4. RESULTS: Oral cavity was most commonly involved region followed by hypopharynx and oropharynx. At 24 weeks after completion of treatment, overall response rate (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) was 75%. Survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 77.80%, 64.81%, and 64.81%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 15.17 months, median OS was not reached. All AEs were either Grade I (66.7%) or Grade II (33.3%). No Grade III or Grade IV AEs were observed. No added toxicity was observed due to nimotuzumab. CONCLUSIONS: In the first of its kind study, the addition of nimotuzumab to standard treatment showed promising response rate as well as survival outcomes in recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN patients without producing additional toxicity.

Paclitaxel injection concentrate for nanodispersion versus nab-paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized, comparative phase II/III study.

Paclitaxel is widely used in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Formulations of paclitaxel contain surfactants and solvents or albumin derived from human blood. The use of co-solvents such as polyoxyethylated castor oil is thought to contribute to toxicity profile and hypersensitivity reactions as well as leaching of plasticizers from polyvinyl chloride bags and infusion sets. Currently, nab-paclitaxel, an albumin-bound paclitaxel in nanometer range continues to be the preferred taxane formulation used in clinic. This study (CTRI/2010/091/001116) investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a polyoxyethylated castor oil- and albumin-free formulation of paclitaxel [paclitaxel injection concentrate for nanodispersion (PICN)] compared with nab-paclitaxel in women with refractory MBC. The current study was a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, comparative phase II/III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of PICN (260 mg/m(2) [n = 64] and 295 mg/m(2) [n = 58] every 3 weeks) compared with nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks [n = 58]) in women 18 and 70 years old with confirmed MBC. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed with imaging every 2 cycles. An independent analysis of radiologic data was performed for evaluable patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was a secondary efficacy measure. Independent radiologist-assessed ORRs in the evaluable population of women aged ≥70 years were 35, 49, and 43 % in the PICN 260 mg/m(2), PICN 295 mg/m(2), and nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2) arms, respectively. Median PFS in the evaluable population was 23, 35, and 34 weeks in the PICN 260 mg/m(2), PICN 295 mg/m(2), and nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2) arms, respectively. Adverse events occurred in similar proportions of patients across treatment arms. Hypersensitivity reactions were not frequently observed with the clinical use of PICN across the treatment cohorts. In women with metastatic breast cancer, PICN at 260 and 295 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was effective and well tolerated and showed similar tolerability compared with nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Statistically, significant differences were not observed in the PICN and nab-paclitaxel treatment arms for radiologist-assessed ORR or median PFS. The novel paclitaxel formulation, PICN, offers apart from efficacy, potential safety advantage of decreased use of corticosteroid pretreatment and the absence of the risk of transmission of blood product-borne disease.

Open-label, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dendritic cell immunotherapy in patients with refractory solid malignancies, on supportive care.

BACKGROUND AIMS: A phase II clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell (DC) formulation for the management of refractory solid malignant tumors was conducted across six sites in India with an objective to study safety and efficacy. METHODS: A total of 51 patients with refractory cancer (either sex) with life expectancy ≥3 months, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≤2, available tumor tissue and adequate organ and bone marrow function were recruited. Monocytes obtained by leukapheresis, differentiated into DCs by cytokines and primed with autologous tumor lysate (fresh tissue biopsy or paraffin block). On the 8th day, mature DCs were analyzed for expression of CD40, CD80, CD83, CD86, DC205 and DC209. The treatment regime consisted of six doses (intravenous) over 14 weeks with 2 post-treatment follow-up visits, 6 weeks apart. Safety was assessed at all visits and responses were evaluated on days 58, 100 and 184 or at end of the study. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were evaluated for safety and efficacy. One adverse event classified as possibly related was an episode of rigors or chills with mild pyrexia during one infusion. Objective response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors was 28.9% (11/38) and immune-related response criteria was 42.1% (16/38); 90% confidence interval for objective response rate was (17.2, 43.3) and (28.5, 56.7) by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors and immune-related response criteria, respectively. The median time to treatment progression was >9 weeks. Median overall survival was 397 days. An increase in the expression of interferon-γ was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy was safe. The responses, time to treatment progression and survival are encouraging for patients with aggressive refractory disease.