Bloodstream infections in prolonged use of axillary-placed, intra-aortic balloon-pump support: A single-center study.

Infections from prolonged use of axillary intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) have not been well studied. Bloodstream infection (BSI) occurred in 13% of our patients; however, no difference in outcome was noted between those with BSI and those without. Further studies regarding protocol developments that minimize BSI risk are needed.

Vancomycin dosing in high-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: An inverse relationship exists between vancomycin serum concentrations and the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), reflected through the dialysate flow rate (DFR). There remains a lack of evidence to guide initial vancomycin dosing in the setting of high-intensity CRRT (i.e., DFR >30 mL/kg/h). Additionally, recommendations for pharmacokinetic monitoring of vancomycin have transitioned from a trough-based to area under the curve (AUC)-based dosing strategy to optimize efficacy and safety. Therefore, an improved understanding of the impact of CRRT intensity on AUC/MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) has the potential to enhance vancomycin dosing in this patient population. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to evaluate current vancomycin dosing strategies and achievement of pharmacokinetic targets in patients on high-intensity CRRT. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult critically ill patients admitted to Houston Methodist Hospital between May 2019 and October 2021 and received vancomycin therapy while on high-intensity CRRT. High-intensity CRRT was defined by a DFR that was both ≥3 L/h and >30 mL/kg/h. Depending on the initial vancomycin dosing strategy, patients were stratified into either the traditional (15 mg/kg/day) or enhanced (≥15 mg/kg/day) dosing group. The primary outcome was the percent of patients who attained steady-state AUC24 /MIC ≥400 mg*h/L at the first obtained vancomycin level in the enhanced group compared with the traditional group. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were included in the final analysis, 56 in the traditional and 69 in the enhanced dosing group. The primary end point occurred in 74% and 54% of patients in the enhanced and traditional dosing groups, respectively (p = 0.029). Therapeutic vancomycin trough levels (10-20 µg/mL) were more commonly achieved in the enhanced dosing group compared with the traditional dosing group (66.7% vs. 45%, p = 0.013). As DFR rose, increasingly higher doses of vancomycin, up to 27 mg/kg/day, were required to achieve the therapeutic targets. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the influence of variable CRRT intensities on vancomycin AUC/MIC. Our findings suggest that vancomycin doses of ≥15 mg/kg/day are needed to achieve early therapeutic targets in patients on high-intensity CRRT.

Direct oral to parenteral anticoagulant transitions: Role of factor Xa inhibitor-specific anti-Xa concentrations.

OBJECTIVES: The increasing use of oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) has led to a growing interest in the clinical utility of laboratory monitoring to enhance safety and effectiveness. Particularly, the use of FXaI-specific anti-Xa concentrations has gained traction and been advocated for several indications, but limited studies have explored the role of anti-Xa concentrations in guiding inpatient transitions from oral to parenteral anticoagulants. Therefore, additional data on such approaches are warranted to help balance bleeding and thrombotic risks in the higher acuity inpatient setting. This study sought to compare two strategies for oral-to-parenteral anticoagulant transitions: FXaI anti-Xa concentration-guided versus standard of care (i.e., per-package insert). STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational, single-center, retrospective cohort study conducted from May 2016 to May 2021. Hospitalized patients converted from an oral FXaI (apixaban or rivaroxaban) to therapeutic parenteral anticoagulation with or without FXaI anti-Xa concentration guidance were reviewed. The primary outcome of major bleeding, according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria, was compared between groups. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to evaluate patient characteristics associated with major bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 845 patients (388 in the concentration-guided group and 457 in the non-concentration-guided group) met the inclusion criteria. Major bleeding was significantly lower in the concentration-guided versus the non-concentration-guided group (2.2% vs. 11.3%; p < 0.001, respectively). There were no differences between the groups in thromboembolic complications (1.8% concentration guided vs. 1.5% non-concentration guided; p = 0.72) despite a significantly longer time from last oral FXaI dose to parenteral anticoagulant initiation in the concentration-guided group (27.9 h vs. 15.1 h; p < 0.01). The concentration-guided group had an 80% lower risk of major bleeding compared with the non-concentration-guided group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.39; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests using FXaI anti-Xa concentrations to guide the transition from oral to parenteral anticoagulants may be beneficial in reducing major bleeds in select patient populations.

Perioperative cangrelor in patients with recent percutaneous coronary intervention undergoing liver transplantation: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the perioperative setting is challenging, particularly in complex patient populations, such as those with underlying coagulopathy and/or recent percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: In this case series, we describe the perioperative use of cangrelor bridge therapy in two patients undergoing liver transplantation after recent coronary drug-eluting stent placement. OUTCOMES: In both patient cases, cangrelor use as a P2Y12 bridge at a dose of 0.75 µg/kg/min was safe and effective. Both patients were successfully switched back to their oral DAPT regimen post-operatively without additive bleeding or thrombotic complications. CONCLUSION: The use of cangrelor as bridge therapy in high-risk perioperative liver transplant patients appears to be a viable option when DAPT is warranted.

Evaluation of Inhaled Alprostadil in Hospitalized Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent inhaled alprostadil (iPGE1) may be a viable alternative to inhaled nitric oxide or epoprostenol for management of right ventricular failure, pulmonary hypertension (pHTN) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, limited evidence exists regarding iPGE1 use in adults, ideal dosing strategies, or optimal use cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients receiving iPGE1 and identify specific sub-populations warranting further research. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive analysis of inpatients who received at least one dose of iPGE1. The primary outcome was to describe patient characteristics and alprostadil dosing strategies. Secondary outcomes included changes in respiratory support requirements, hemodynamics, and inotropic/vasoactive use. Outcomes were stratified and compared based on primary therapeutic indication (cardiac or pulmonary). RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received iPGE1 40 (75%) for pulmonary (pHTN or ARDS) and 14 (25%) for cardiac indications. There was no difference between indications in the number of patients de-escalated from level of respiratory (53% vs 57%, P = 0.76), inotropic (70% vs 57%, P = 0.39), or vasopressor support (78% vs 57%, P = 0.17). Furthermore, there was no significant improvement in cardiopulmonary parameters at multiple time intervals after iPGE1 initiation. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This is the largest study to date on the use of intermittent iPGE1 in adults. Alprostadil was safely utilized in novel populations; however, efficacy as evaluated by clinical or surrogate endpoints could not be demonstrated and further investigation is needed to determine its potential and optimal place in therapy.

Direct Oral to Parenteral Anticoagulants: Strategies for Inpatient Transition.

The primary objective of this study was to describe the impact on bleeding rates of 2 different strategies for transitioning from a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) to a parenteral anticoagulant: a delayed, clinically driven strategy versus the standard per-package-insert strategy. This was a single-center descriptive cohort study conducted at a large academic medical center. Included patients were 18 years or older, admitted as an inpatient, and had received at least 1 dose of a DOAC prior to initiation of therapeutic parenteral anticoagulation. The primary end point was the incidence of major bleeds on the transition from a DOAC to a parenteral anticoagulant via a standard versus an intentionally delayed strategy. The secondary outcomes evaluated renal function, reason for delay, DOAC anti-factor Xa concentration, international normalized ratio values, blood product administration, and thrombotic complications. A total of 300 patients were included. The primary end point of bleeding was higher in the delayed group than the standard group, 25% and 12%, respectively (odds ratio, 0.39; P < .05). In both groups, patients who bled had a higher severity of illness, a greater incidence of acute kidney injury, and, when available, higher median DOAC anti-factor Xa concentrations. Despite a more conservative approach, patients in the delayed group experienced more bleeding, most likely attributable to a higher severity of illness, which highlights emerging challenges of inpatient anticoagulation management. Further prospective studies analyzing DOAC pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in acutely ill patients are warranted.

Second victim syndrome and the pharmacy learner.

This commentary describes the concept of second victim syndrome and its application to pharmacy learners and preceptors. Although there is published literature regarding implementation of second victim syndrome programs at an institutional level, there is limited guidance regarding the second victim syndrome in the context of a pharmacy training environment; however, there are known risk factors such as medication safety events, failure to rescue events, or overall lack of experience of a clinician. With a growing awareness of the mental health concerns of health care providers, this is a potential area for growth and skill development for pharmacists of all levels. As pharmacy leaders and role models, we have a fundamental ethical responsibility to take care of our learners, particularly when it comes to emotionally challenging patient care scenarios. By giving a name to what our learners may be experiencing, the second victim syndrome, we can progress toward improving the well-being of these learners and increase their ability to be effective pharmacists. Involvement with medication safety events or patients with negative outcomes has been shown to have adverse professional outcomes, and this article describes steps that can be taken by preceptors and peers to help facilitate professional growth and recovery. Second victim is an underappreciated phenomenon that can have a profound impact on pharmacists' well-being. Strategies for proactive recognition and intervention are vital.

Use of Tissue Plasminogen Activator Alteplase for Suspected Impella Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Impella devices are being increasingly used to manage cardiogenic shock. The incidence of thrombosis and hemolysis in patients on Impella support increases with longer durations of use, and the management of Impella thrombosis remains ill-defined. METHODS: In this case series, we describe our institutional use of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) alteplase in the Impella purge solution (0.04 or 0.08 mg/ml tPA in sterile water) for management of suspected Impella thrombosis in five patients, each with a different clinical course, treatment, and outcome. Given the limited evidence on the diagnosis of Impella thrombosis, suspicion was driven by the presence of decreased purge flow rates, increased purge pressures, and markers of hemolysis such as elevated lactate dehydrogenase and hematuria. OUTCOMES: In all cases, tPA administration resulted in resolution of low purge flow rates and high purge pressures. No major bleeding complications were directly associated with tPA. Two patients were bridged successfully to heart transplantation, two patients underwent left ventricular assist device implantation, and one patient died after withdrawal of care. CONCLUSION: Based on our experience, tPA administration appears to be a viable and safe salvage option to delay or prevent device exchange in the setting of suspected Impella thrombosis.

Management of Anticoagulation with Impella® Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices and Review of New Literature.

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition that may occur secondary to a variety of cardiac conditions, and may require temporary support with percutaneous ventricular devices like the Impella®. Anticoagulation in patients with Impella® devices can often be complicated due to unpredictable purge flow rates, pre-existing coagulopathy, or heparin allergies. The purpose of this article is to discuss the various options for anticoagulation in the setting of Impella®. The article will also describe recent updates (2014-current) in literature surrounding anticoagulation therapy for Impella® devices. At total of 228 articles were initially obtained through the PubMed search, with inclusion of 6 articles. A total of 51 patients had data in the six studies that were included in the review. Heparin for anticoagulation in the purge solution, at two different dextrose concentrations (5% and 20%), was associated with similar therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time rates, thrombotic and bleeding events. One case series described the use of argatroban in the purge solution for anticoagulation in two patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, without bleeding or thrombotic complications. Pump thrombosis was not reported in any of the six studies. Anticoagulation in the setting of mechanical circulatory support devices is a challenging aspect of critical care. Institutions should have set protocols that clearly define the options for anticoagulation. Future studies that look at longer durations of support and possible operation of the Impella® device with a heparin-free purge solution are needed.