Safety of left innominate vein division during aortic arch surgery.

BACKGROUND: The surgical approach to the aortic arch via median sternotomy can be hindered by the left innominate vein (LIV). Retraction of the LIV may injure the vein. The safety of LIV ligation has been controversial. Opinion has also differed regarding whether a divided vein should be reanastomosed after arch replacement is completed. We report our experience with division and ligation of the LIV for improved aortic arch exposure and facilitated excision of mediastinal tumors. METHODS: From January 1996 to June 1998, the LIV was divided and ligated in 14 patients (8 men, 4 women) after consideration of local anatomy, adequacy of aortic arch exposure, level of distal aortic anastomosis, and in case of mediastinal tumors, extent of involvement of mediastinal structures. The LIV was divided between clamps, doubly ligated, and the ends oversewn. Patients were assessed at 1 month and at yearly intervals for upper extremity edema and neurologic symptoms. RESULTS: In 12 patients LIV division improved aortic arch access, and in 2 patients, it facilitated excision of mediastinal tumors. The mean age of patients was 56 years (range 22 to 80). Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 30 months. All patients had left upper extremity edema for 7 to 10 days, which resolved with arm elevation. One early patient required reexploration for bleeding from the LIV stump. One patient died because of multiorgan dysfunction. None had any residual left upper extremity edema or neurologic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, although not uniformly or commonly necessary, division of the LIV can safely be utilized to facilitate aortic arch exposure without significant long-term morbidity. LIV reanastomosis is not necessary.

Free radial artery grafts: surgical technique and results.

In the search for alternative conduits, the use of radial artery (RA) grafts has found renewed interest. This study sought to evaluate prospectively the perioperative morbidity, including the postoperative complications in the donor forearm, and mortality in the routine use of RA grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery. Data were obtained prospectively on 200 consecutive patients who underwent coronary revascularization using at least one RA graft from January 1995 to April 1997. The mean age of the patents was 61.9+/-10.5 years (mean+/-standard deviation [SD]). The RA was obtained from one forearm in 197 patients and both forearms in 3 patients. Two patients (1%) required exploration for donor site hematomas, 4 patients (2%) had temporary perioperative dysesthesias in the region of the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm, and none had donor site wound infection. Two patients (1%) had a myocardial infarction with electrocardiographic changes in the areas grafted by the RA in the immediate postoperative period, indicating graft failure. The two deaths in the series were due to comorbid factors. Our data suggest that the RA is a safe and suitable conduit for coronary revascularization, and it provides good clinical results. Long-term follow-up of these patients is necessary to confirm the patency of RA conduits. Free RA grafts have the potential for use in other areas of surgery where a conduit is necessary for revascularization procedures.

Mesenteric ischemia secondary to cocaine abuse: case reports and literature review.

In summary, we report two cases of mesenteric ischemia following cocaine abuse in young women. In such cases it is always difficult to prove a direct causal relationship between the abuse of cocaine and mesenteric ischemia. Both our patients were relatively young (in their thirties) and did not have any history of atherosclerosis, and their urine toxicity screens were positive for the use of cocaine. Cocaine-related hospital visits are on the increase. Mesenteric ischemia should be considered in the differential diagnosis when evaluating a young patient with a history of cocaine abuse presenting with an acute abdomen.

Anterior cervical osteophytes: a rare cause of dysphagia.

Anterior cervical osteophyte is a rare cause of dysphagia usually occurring in the elderly. We report two cases in which the anterior cervical osteophytes impinged upon the esophagus, and we describe their surgical management. Initial investigation of a case of dysphagia should be directed to the common causes; however, in the elderly and in those with disorders of the cervical spine an anterior cervical osteophyte may be the cause of dysphagia.