New bioanalytical method for the quantification of (-) - hydroxycitric acid in human plasma using UPLC-MS/MS and its application in a Garcinia cambogia pharmacokinetic study.

A new, rapid, selective and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the quantification of (-) - hydroxycitric acid (HCA) in human plasma, using DL-malic acid-2,3,3-d3 as internal standard (IS) and simple protein precipitation for the sample preparations. HCA is a highly polar compound make challenging its determination in biological fluids. A specific chromatography column Acquity UPLC HSS T3 (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm), eluted with mobile phase composed of acetonitrile/ammonium hydroxide 0,1 % (15:85, v/v) were applied for the HCA quantification. The bioanalytical method showed high-throughput achieving as fast chromatographic run as 1 min per sample. No matrix effect was observed with excellent mean chromatographic peak areas ratio of 0.98 ± 0.07 and CV% of 7.17 from normal, lipemic and hemolyzed plasma lots. Calibration curves range was linear at 0.05-10 µg/mL, presenting adequate mean correlation coefficient great than 0.99. Excellent intra-assay and inter-assay precision were achieved, ranging from 5.02-12.01 % (CV%) as well as great intra- and inter-assay accuracy from 0.29-9.20 % (RE%). UPLC-MS/MS bioanalytical method was efficiently applied to the HCA pharmacokinetic study analyzing more than 670 plasma samples.

Aqueous humor concentrations of topical fluoroquinolones alone or in combination with a steroid.

PURPOSE: To compare the aqueous humor (AH) concentrations of moxifloxacin 0.5% and gatifloxacin 0.3% solutions alone or when treatment was combined with steroids, and to correlate these concentrations with the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for the most common endophthalmitis-causing organisms. METHODS: Patients undergoing phacoemulsification were enrolled to receive one drop of one of the following solutions: moxifloxacin (G1), moxifloxacin + dexamethasone (G2), gatifloxacin (G3), or gatifloxacin + c (G4), every 15 min, 1h before surgery. AH samples were collected before surgery and analyzed using HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The mean antibiotic concentrations in the AH were: G1= 1280.8 ng/mL; G2= 1644.3 ng/mL; G3= 433.7 ng/mL; and G4= 308.1 ng/mL. The mean concentrations statistically differed between G1 and G2 (p=0.01), and G3 and G4 (p=0.008). All samples achieved the MIC for Staphylococcus epidermidis; 100% of the samples from G1 and G2, and 97% from G3 and G4 reached the MIC for fluoroquinolone-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; 100% of the samples from G1 and G2, 88% from G3, and 72% from G4 reached the MIC for enterococci (p<0.001); and 100% of samples from G1 and G2, 59% from G3, and 36% from G4 reached the MIC for Streptococcus pneumoniae (p<0.001). For fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus, 23% from G1, 44% from G2, and no samples from G3 or G4 achieved the MIC (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin + dexamethasone demonstrated a higher concen-tration in the AH than the moxifloxacin alone. Gatifloxacin + steroids demonstrated less penetration into the anterior chamber than gatifloxacin alone. Moxifloxacin was superior to gatifloxacin considering the MIC for enterococci, S. pneumoniae, and fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus.

Aqueous humor concentrations of topical fluoroquinolones alone or in combination with a steroid / Concentração de fluorquinolonas no humor aquoso após instilação tópica das associações com corticosteroides

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the aqueous humor (AH) concentrations of moxifloxacin 0.5% and gatifloxacin 0.3% solutions alone or when treatment was combined with steroids, and to correlate these concentrations with the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for the most common endophthalmitis-causing organisms. Methods: Patients undergoing phacoemulsification were enrolled to receive one drop of one of the following solutions: moxifloxacin (G1), moxifloxacin + dexamethasone (G2), gatifloxacin (G3), or gatifloxacin + c (G4), every 15 min, 1h before surgery. AH samples were collected before surgery and analyzed using HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: The mean antibiotic concentrations in the AH were: G1= 1280.8 ng/mL; G2= 1644.3 ng/mL; G3= 433.7 ng/mL; and G4= 308.1 ng/mL. The mean concentrations statistically differed between G1 and G2 (p=0.01), and G3 and G4 (p=0.008). All samples achieved the MIC for Staphylococcus epidermidis; 100% of the samples from G1 and G2, and 97% from G3 and G4 reached the MIC for fluoroquinolone-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; 100% of the samples from G1 and G2, 88% from G3, and 72% from G4 reached the MIC for enterococci (p<0.001); and 100% of samples from G1 and G2, 59% from G3, and 36% from G4 reached the MIC for Streptococcus pneumoniae (p<0.001). For fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus, 23% from G1, 44% from G2, and no samples from G3 or G4 achieved the MIC (p<0.001). Conclusions: Moxifloxacin + dexamethasone demonstrated a higher concen­tration in the AH than the moxifloxacin alone. Gatifloxacin + steroids demonstrated less penetration into the anterior chamber than gatifloxacin alone. Moxifloxacin was superior to gatifloxacin considering the MIC for enterococci, S. pneumoniae, and fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus.

RESUMO Objetivos: Comparar a concentração no humor aquoso entre as soluções de moxifloxacina 0,5% e gatifloxacina 0,3% sozinhas ou combinadas com corticosteroides, e correlacionar a concentração com a concentração inibitória mínima (MIC) para os agentes microbianos mais comumente relacionados a endoftalmites. Métodos: Pacientes que seriam submetidos a cirurgia de catarata foram selecionados para receber 1 gota a cada 15 min, 1 hora antes do procedimento de uma das seguintes soluções: moxifloxacina (G1), moxifloxacina + dexametasona (G2), gatifloxacina (G3) ou gatifloxacina + prednisolona (G4). Amostras do humor aquoso foram coletadas antes do início da cirurgia. Espectrofotometria de massa por HPLC determinou a concentração do antibiótico nas amostras. Resultados: A concentração media de antibiótico nas amostras foram: G1= 1280,8 ng/mL; G2= 1644,3 ng/mL; G3= 433,7 ng/mL; G4= 308,1 ng/mL. Concentração média entre G1 e 2 (p=0,01), e G3 e 4 (p=0,008). Todas as amostras alcançaram MIC para S. epidermidis; 100% das amostras do G1 e 2, e 97% do G3 e 4 atingiram o MIC para S. aureus fluoroquinolona-sensível; 100% das amostras do G1 e 2, 88% do G3 e 72% do G4 atingiram o MIC para Enterococci (p<0,001); e 100% das amostras do G1 e 2, 59% do G3 e 36% do G4 atingiram o MIC para S. pneumoniae (p<0,001). Para o S. aureus resistente a fluoroquinolona, 23% do G1, 44% do G2, e nenhuma das amostras G3 e 4 atingiram o MIC (p<0,001). Conclusão: Moxifloxacina + dexamethasona demonstrou maior concentração no humor aquoso comparado com a moxifloxacina sozinha. Gatifloxacina + esteróide demonstrou menor penetração na câmara anterior comparado a solução de ga­ti­floxacin sem corticóide. A moxifloxacina foi superior a gatifloxacina considerando o MIC para Enterococci, S. pneumoniae e S. aureus fluorquinolona resistente.

Aqueous Humor Penetration and Biological Activity of Moxifloxacin 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution Alone or with Dexamethasone 0.1.

PURPOSE: To compare aqueous humor concentrations of topically applied moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution alone or in combination with dexamethasone 0.1% and to correlate these concentrations with the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for common endophthalmitis-causing organisms. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients undergoing routine phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation received either moxifloxacin 0.5% alone or moxifloxacin 0.5% combined with dexamethasone. For both groups, 1 drop of the test solution was instilled 4 times daily 1 day preoperatively and 1 drop 1 h preoperatively. An aqueous humor sample obtained immediately before paracentesis was submitted to high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to determine the moxifloxacin concentration. RESULTS: The mean concentrations of moxifloxacin were 986.6 ng/mL in the moxifloxacin with dexamethasone group and 741.3 ng/mL in the moxifloxacin group (P = 0.13). Moxifloxacin concentrations of all samples exceeded the MICs for Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. All samples in the moxifloxacin with dexamethasone group and 94% in the moxifloxacin group achieved the MIC for Enterococcus species. For quinolone-resistant S. aureus, the MIC was achieved in 29% in the moxifloxacin with dexamethasone group and 9% in the moxifloxacin group (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Aqueous humor moxifloxacin concentrations were higher when topically administrated in combination with dexamethasone compared to the moxifloxacin alone. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the MICs of the most common pathogens associated with endophthalmitis were exceeded in both study groups.

A fast and sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of N-butylscopolamine in human plasma: application in a bioequivalence study.

We have developed and validated a fast and sensitive ultra high-performance liquid chromatography with positive ion electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method for determining N-butylscopolamine levels in human plasma using propranolol as an internal standard. The acquisition was set up in the multiple reaction monitoring mode with the transitions m/z 360.3 → 138.0 for N-butylscopolamine and m/z 260.2 → 116.1 for IS. This method uses a liquid-liquid extraction process with dichloromethane. The analyte and IS were chromatographed on a C18 , 50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm column through isocratic elution with acetonitrile-5 mm ammonium acetate (adjusted to pH 3.0 with formic acid). The method was linear in the 1-1000 pg/mL range for N-butylscopolamine and was selective, precise, accurate and robust. The validated method was successfully applied to perform a bioequivalence study of the reference (Buscopan® , from Boehringer Ingelheim) and the test sample coated-tablet formulations (from Foundation for Popular Remedy), both containing 10 mg of N-butylscopolamine bromide administered as a single dose. Using 58 healthy volunteers and accounting for the high intra-individual variability confirmed by statistical calculations (38%), the two formulations were considered bioequivalent because the rate and extent of absorption (within 80-125% interval), satisfying international requirements.

Automated determination of venlafaxine in human plasma by on-line SPE-LC-MS/MS. Application to a bioequivalence study.

A new automated SPE-LC-ESI-MS/MS method was developed and validated to quantify venlafaxine in human plasma using fluoxetine as an internal standard. The analytes were automatically extracted from plasma by C18 SPE cartridges, separated on a C8 RP column and analyzed by MS in the multiple reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode. The method has a chromatographic run time of 4.0 min and a linear calibration curve over the range of 0.25-200 ng/mL (r >0.997). The between-run precisions, based on the percent RSD for replicate quality controls (0.75; 80, and 200 ng/mL), were < 8.5% for all concentrations. The between-run accuracies, based on the percent relative error, were < 4.0%. This method was successfully employed in a bioequivalence study of two venlafaxine capsule formulations (test formulation from Eurofarma (Brazil) and Efexor XR, reference formulation, from Wyeth-Whitehall, Brazil) in 48 healthy volunteers of both sexes who received a single 150 mg dose of each formulation. More than 3000 samples were analyzed eliminating the analyst's exposure to hazardous organic solvents normally employed in off-line liquid-liquid extractions. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the individual ratio geometric mean for Test/Reference was 91.6-103.4% for AUC(0-48 h) and 102.2-112.6% for C(max). Since both 90% CI for AUC(0-48 h) and C(max) were included in the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), the test formulation was considered bioequivalent to Efexor XR according to both the rate and extent of absorption.