RESUMO
Background: In coronary procedures, although the radial approach protects patients from hemorrhagic complications, it is technically more complex than the femoral approach. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that the radial approach is the procedure of choice in ACS patients due to the high risk of bleeding; and to identify independent predictors of the choice for radial access. Methods: Patients admitted for ACS who underwent invasive coronary procedure were included. We registered the type of access (femoral or radial) chosen by the physician for the first angiography; the investigators did not interfere with this choosing process. Student's t-test was used for comparisons between the CRUSADE and ACUITY scores. Predictors of radial access were compared between the groups. Statistical significance was defined by p < 0,05.Results: Radial access was chosen in 67% of 347 consecutive patients. Patients who underwent radial approach had lower risk of bleeding determined by CRUSADE (30 ± 14 vs. 37 ± 15; p < 0.001) as compared with femoral access. In multivariate analysis, four variables were identified as independent predictors negatively associated with radial access age (OR = 0.98; 95%CI = 0.96 0.99), creatinine (OR = 0.54; 95%CI = 0.3 0.98), signs of left ventricular failure (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22 0.92) and previous CABG (OR = 0.022; 95%CI = 0.003 0.166). Conclusion: The propensity to choose radial over femoral access in coronary intervention was not primarily influenced by patients' bleeding risk. Predictors of this decision, identified in the study, indicated less complex patients, suggesting that the difficulty in performing the technique was a stronger determinant than its potential antihemorrhagic effect
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Artéria Radial , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Artéria Femoral , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Cateterismo/métodos , Stents , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Angioplastia/métodos , Hemorragia/complicações , Angina InstávelRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The GRACE Score was derived and validated from a cohort in which octogenarians and nonagenarians were poorly represented. OBJECTIVE: To test the accuracy of the GRACE score in predicting in-hospital mortality of very elderly individuals with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted in the intensive coronary care unit of a tertiary center from September 2011 to August 2016. Patients consecutively admitted due to ACS were selected, and the very elderly group was defined by age ≥ 80 years. The GRACE Score was based on admission data and its accuracy was tested regarding prediction of in-hospital death. Statistical significance was defined by p value < 0,05. RESULTS: A total of 994 individuals was studied, 57% male, 77% with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and 173 (17%) very elderly patients. The mean age of the sample was 65 ± 13 years, and the mean age of very elderly patients subgroup was 85 ± 3.7 years. The C-statistics of the GRACE Score in very elderly patients was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.78 - 0.93), with no difference when compared to the value for younger individuals 0.83 (95% CI = 0.75 - 0.91), with p = 0.69. The calibration of the score in very elderly patients was described by χ2 test of Hosmer-Lemeshow = 2.2 (p = 0.98), while the remaining patients presented χ2 = 9.0 (p = 0.35). Logistic regression analysis for death prediction did not show interaction between GRACE Score and variable of very elderly patients (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: The GRACE Score in very elderly patients is accurate in predicting in-hospital ACS mortality, similarly to younger patients.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Medição de Risco/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Abstract Background: The GRACE Score was derived and validated from a cohort in which octogenarians and nonagenarians were poorly represented. Objective: To test the accuracy of the GRACE score in predicting in-hospital mortality of very elderly individuals with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods: Prospective observational study conducted in the intensive coronary care unit of a tertiary center from September 2011 to August 2016. Patients consecutively admitted due to ACS were selected, and the very elderly group was defined by age ≥ 80 years. The GRACE Score was based on admission data and its accuracy was tested regarding prediction of in-hospital death. Statistical significance was defined by p value < 0,05. Results: A total of 994 individuals was studied, 57% male, 77% with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and 173 (17%) very elderly patients. The mean age of the sample was 65 ± 13 years, and the mean age of very elderly patients subgroup was 85 ± 3.7 years. The C-statistics of the GRACE Score in very elderly patients was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.78 - 0.93), with no difference when compared to the value for younger individuals 0.83 (95% CI = 0.75 - 0.91), with p = 0.69. The calibration of the score in very elderly patients was described by χ2 test of Hosmer-Lemeshow = 2.2 (p = 0.98), while the remaining patients presented χ2 = 9.0 (p = 0.35). Logistic regression analysis for death prediction did not show interaction between GRACE Score and variable of very elderly patients (p = 0.25). Conclusion: The GRACE Score in very elderly patients is accurate in predicting in-hospital ACS mortality, similarly to younger patients.
Resumo Fundamento: O Escore GRACE foi derivado e validado por coorte de questionável representatividade de indivíduos octogenários e nonagenários. Objetivo: Testar a acurácia do Escore GRACE na predição de óbito hospitalar em indivíduos muito idosos com síndromes coronarianas agudas (SCAs). Métodos: Coleta prospectiva realizada em unidade coronariana de hospital terciário, durante o período de setembro de 2011 a agosto de 2016. Indivíduos consecutivamente internados com SCA foram selecionados e o grupo muito idoso definido por idade ≥ 80 anos. A acurácia do Escore GRACE foi testada quanto à predição de óbito hospitalar. A significância estatística foi definida por valor p < 0,05. Resultados: Foram estudados 994 indivíduos, sendo 57% do sexo masculino, 77% com SCA sem supradesnível do segmento ST e 173 pacientes muito idosos. A média geral de idade foi 65 ± 13 anos, e a média de idade dos pacientes muito idosos, 85 ± 3,7 anos. A estatística-C do Escore GRACE em indivíduos muito idosos foi de 0,86 (95% IC = 0,78 - 0,93), sem diferença em relação aos indivíduos mais jovens (0,83; 95% IC = 0,75 - 0,91), com p = 0,69. A calibração do escore em muito idosos foi descrita por Teste χ2 de Hosmer-Lemeshow = 2,2 (p = 0,98), enquanto os demais pacientes apresentaram χ2 = 9,0 (p = 0,35). A análise de regressão logística para predição de óbito não revelou interação entre Escore GRACE e a variável muito idoso (p = 0,25). Conclusão: O Escore GRACE em indivíduos muito idosos é acurado para predição de mortalidade hospitalar em SCA, semelhante para indivíduos mais jovens.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Medição de Risco/métodos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Abstract Background: When performing coronary angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the anatomical extent of coronary disease usually prevails in the prognostic reasoning. It has not yet been proven if clinical data should be accounted for in risk stratification together with anatomical data. Objective: To test the hypothesis that clinical data increment the prognostic value of anatomical data in patients with ACS. Methods: Patients admitted with objective criteria for ACS and who underwent angiography during hospitalization were included. Primary outcome was defined as in-hospital cardiovascular death, and the prognostic value of the SYNTAX Score (anatomical data) was compared to that of the SYNTAX-GRACE Score, which resulted from the incorporation of the GRACE Score into the SYNTAX score. The Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) was calculated to evaluate the SYNTAX-GRACE Score ability to correctly reclassify information from the traditional SYNTAX model. Results: This study assessed 365 patients (mean age, 64 ± 14 years; 58% male). In-hospital cardiovascular mortality was 4.4%, and the SYNTAX Score was a predictor of that outcome with a C-statistic of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70 - 0.92; p < 0.001). The GRACE Score was a predictor of in-hospital cardiac death independently of the SYNTAX Score (p < 0.001, logistic regression). After incorporation into the predictive model, the GRACE Score increased the discrimination capacity of the SYNTAX Score from 0.81 to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87 - 0.96; p = 0.04). Conclusion: In patients with ACS, clinical data complement the prognostic value of coronary anatomy. Risk stratification should be based on the clinical-anatomical paradigm, rather than on angiographic data only.
Resumo Fundamento: Uma vez realizada a coronariografia em pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda (SCA), a extensão anatômica da doença coronária prevalece no raciocínio prognóstico. Não está estabelecido se dados clínicos devem também ser contabilizados na estimativa de risco, uma vez que se tenha conhecimento da anatomia coronária. Objetivo: Testar a hipótese de que dados clínicos incrementam o valor prognóstico da avaliação anatômica em pacientes com SCA. Métodos: Indivíduos admitidos com critérios objetivos de SCA e que realizaram coronariografia durante o internamento foram incluídos no estudo. Desfecho primário foi definido como óbito cardiovascular hospitalar, sendo comparado o valor prognóstico do Escore SYNTAX (anatomia) com o do escore SYNTAX-GRACE, resultante da incorporação do Escore GRACE ao Escore SYNTAX. O cálculo do Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) foi realizado para avaliar a capacidade do modelo SYNTAX-GRACE para reclassificar corretamente a informação do modelo SYNTAX tradicional. Resultados: Foram estudados 365 pacientes, idade 64±14 anos, 58% masculinos. A mortalidade cardiovascular durante hospitalização foi de 4,4% e o Escore SYNTAX foi preditor desse desfecho com estatística-C de 0,81 (IC 95% = 0,70 - 0,92; p < 0,001). O Escore GRACE mostrou-se preditor de óbito cardiovascular intra-hospitalar, independente do Escore SYNTAX (p < 0,001 por regressão logística). Ao ser incorporado ao modelo preditor, o Escore GRACE incrementou a capacidade discriminatória do SYNTAX de 0,81 para 0,92 (IC 95% = 0,87 - 0,96; p = 0,04). Conclusão: Em pacientes com SCA, dados clínicos complementam o valor prognóstico da anatomia coronária, devendo a estratificação de risco ser baseada no paradigma clínico-anatômico e não apenas em dados angiográficos.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Dados de Saúde Gerados pelo Paciente , Prognóstico , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Curva ROC , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Angiografia Coronária , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: When performing coronary angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the anatomical extent of coronary disease usually prevails in the prognostic reasoning. It has not yet been proven if clinical data should be accounted for in risk stratification together with anatomical data. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that clinical data increment the prognostic value of anatomical data in patients with ACS. METHODS: Patients admitted with objective criteria for ACS and who underwent angiography during hospitalization were included. Primary outcome was defined as in-hospital cardiovascular death, and the prognostic value of the SYNTAX Score (anatomical data) was compared to that of the SYNTAX-GRACE Score, which resulted from the incorporation of the GRACE Score into the SYNTAX score. The Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) was calculated to evaluate the SYNTAX-GRACE Score ability to correctly reclassify information from the traditional SYNTAX model. RESULTS: This study assessed 365 patients (mean age, 64 ± 14 years; 58% male). In-hospital cardiovascular mortality was 4.4%, and the SYNTAX Score was a predictor of that outcome with a C-statistic of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70 - 0.92; p < 0.001). The GRACE Score was a predictor of in-hospital cardiac death independently of the SYNTAX Score (p < 0.001, logistic regression). After incorporation into the predictive model, the GRACE Score increased the discrimination capacity of the SYNTAX Score from 0.81 to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87 - 0.96; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In patients with ACS, clinical data complement the prognostic value of coronary anatomy. Risk stratification should be based on the clinical-anatomical paradigm, rather than on angiographic data only.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Dados de Saúde Gerados pelo Paciente , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Angiografia Coronária , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
AIM: To test accuracy and reproducibility of gestalt to predict obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with acute chest pain. METHODS: We studied individuals who were consecutively admitted to our Chest Pain Unit. At admission, investigators performed a standardized interview and recorded 14 chest pain features. Based on these features, a cardiologist who was blind to other clinical characteristics made unstructured judgment of CAD probability, both numerically and categorically. As the reference standard for testing the accuracy of gestalt, angiography was required to rule-in CAD, while either angiography or non-invasive test could be used to rule-out. In order to assess reproducibility, a second cardiologist did the same procedure. RESULTS: In a sample of 330 patients, the prevalence of obstructive CAD was 48%. Gestalt's numerical probability was associated with CAD, but the area under the curve of 0.61 (95%CI: 0.55-0.67) indicated low level of accuracy. Accordingly, categorical definition of typical chest pain had a sensitivity of 48% (95%CI: 40%-55%) and specificity of 66% (95%CI: 59%-73%), yielding a negligible positive likelihood ratio of 1.4 (95%CI: 0.65-2.0) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.79 (95%CI: 0.62-1.02). Agreement between the two cardiologists was poor in the numerical classification (95% limits of agreement = -71% to 51%) and categorical definition of typical pain (Kappa = 0.29; 95%CI: 0.21-0.37). CONCLUSION: Clinical judgment based on a combination of chest pain features is neither accurate nor reproducible in predicting obstructive CAD in the acute setting.