Does Capsular Closure Affect Clinical Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing concern of iatrogenic hip instability after capsulotomy during surgery. Greater emphasis is now being placed on capsular closure during surgery. There are no prospective studies that address whether capsular closure has any effect on outcomes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes after interportal capsulotomy repair compared with no repair. We hypothesized that restoration of normal capsular anatomy with interportal repair will achieve clinical outcomes similar to those for no repair. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Adult patients with femoral acetabular impingement indicated for hip arthroscopy were randomized into either the capsular repair (CR) or the no repair (NR) groups. All patients underwent standard hip arthroscopy with labral repair with or without CAM/pincer lesion resection. Clinical outcomes were measured via the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) subscale, Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog scale for pain, International Hip Outcome Tool, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (56 hips) were included (26 men and 30 women) with a mean age of 33 years. The HOS-ADL score significantly improved at 2 years in both the NR group (from 68.1 ± 20.5 to 88.6 ± 20.0; P < .001) and the CR group (from 59.2 ± 18.8 to 91.7 ± 12.3; P < .001). The HOS-SS score also significantly improved in both the NR group (from 41.1 ± 25.8 to 84.1 ± 21.9; P < .001) and the CR group (from 32.7 ± 23.7 to 77.7 ± 23.0; P < .001). Improvement was noted for all secondary outcome measures; however, there was no significant difference between the groups at any time point. Between 1 and 2 years, the NR group showed significant worsening on the HOS-ADL (-1.21 ± 5.09 vs 4.28 ± 7.91; P = .044), mHHS (1.08 ± 10.04 vs 10.12 ± 11.76; P = .042), and VR-12 Physical (-2.15 ± 5.52 vs 4.49 ± 7.30; P = .014) subsets compared with the CR group. CONCLUSION: There was significant improvement in the VR-12 Physical subscale at 2 years postoperatively in the capsular CR group compared with the NR group. Capsular closure appears to have no detrimental effect on functional outcome scores after hip arthroscopy. We recommend restoration of native anatomy if possible when performing hip arthroscopy.

MRIs Are Less Accurate Tools for the Most Critically Worrisome Pedicles Compared to CT Scans.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomographic (CT) scan imaging modalities. OBJECTIVE: To determine MRI's capability of identifying pedicle morphology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Understanding pedicle morphology is important for accurate placement of pedicle screws. The gold standard modality to assess pedicle morphology is CT scan. However, CT scans carry the risk of radiation exposure. We have studied MRI as a potential alternative to CT scan. METHODS: Nine hundred seventy pedicles in 33 spinal deformity patients were reviewed. Pedicle morphology was classified as follows: Type A (normal pedicle): >4-mm cancellous channel; Type B: 2-4-mm channel; Type C: any size cortical channel; and Type D: <2-mm cortical or cancellous channel. Pedicles in the same patients were classified on both low-dose CT scan and MRI. Concordance and discordance rates of MRI relative to CT scan in classification of pedicles into types A, B, C, and D were calculated for the entire length of the thoracolumbar spine and subgrouped into spinal sections. All images were evaluated by a single fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: CT scan had 809 Type A, 126 Type B, 29 Type C, and 6 Type D pedicles. Group II (MRI) had 735 Type A, 203 Type B, 30 Type C, and 2 Type D pedicles. Analysis of the entire spinal column showed a concordance rate of 86.7% in classification of the pedicles into the 4 types. In the upper thoracic region, the concordance rate was 77.1%, main thoracic 85.5%, thoracolumbar 96%, and lumbar 98.1%. MRI has a poor overall accuracy for detecting Type C pedicles, only a 44.8% concordance with CT scan. MRI overcalls Type B pedicles, often calling Type A pedicles Type B. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is an inferior alternative to CT scan as it has poor accuracy to properly detect pedicle abnormalities. The more severe the pedicle abnormality, the less diagnostic value the MRI has. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic.

Triggered EMG Potentials in Determining Neuroanatomical Safe Zone for Transpsoas Lumbar Approach: Are They Reliable?

STUDY DESIGN: In vivo analysis in swine model. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of triggered EMG (t-EMG) and its reliability in lateral lumbar interbody fusions surgery. We also aim to document changes in psoas muscle produced during the approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral lumbar interbody fusions is preferred over direct anterior approach because of lower complications, blood loss, and shorter recovery time. Threshold-EMGs are utilized for real-time feedback about nerve location; however, neurological deficits are widely reported, and are unique to this approach. Multiple factors have been hypothesized including neuropraxia from retractors and compression from psoas hematoma/edema. The variable reports of neurological complication even with t-EMGs indicate the need to study them further. METHODS: Eight swines underwent left-sided retroperitoneal approach. The nerve on the surface of the psoas was identified and threshold-EMGs were obtained utilizing a ball-tip, and needle probe. First EMG and threshold responses required to elicit 20-µV responses were recorded for 2 mm incremental distances up to 10 mm. In the second part, a K-wire was inserted into the mid-lumbar disc space, and a tubular retractor docked and dilated adequately. Postmortem CT scans were carried out to evaluate changes in psoas muscle. RESULTS: A t-EMG stimulus threshold of <5 mA indicates a higher probability that the probe is close to or on the nerve, but this was not proportional to the distance suggesting limitations for nerve mapping. Negative predictive value of t-EMGs is 76.5% with the ball-tipped probe and 80% with the needle probe for t-EMG ≥10 mA and indicates that even with higher thresholds, the nerve may be much closer than anticipated. Postoperative hematoma was not seen on CT scans. CONCLUSION: Threshold measurements are unreliable in estimating distance from the nerve in an individual subject and higher values do not always correspond to a 'safe zone." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Increased Risk of Infection in Obese Adolescents After Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Original research. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative risk factors associated with obesity in children undergoing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The authors hypothesized that patients with a high body mass index (BMI) percentile would be associated with increased morbidity as measured by various intraoperative parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have evaluated the effects of increased BMI in children undergoing surgery. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis represents 80% of idiopathic scoliosis cases and is the most common indication for surgery. METHODS: Patients were divided into 3 groups: normal weight (n = 144) (5% < BMI < 85%), overweight (n = 25) (BMI > 85% to 95%), and obese (n = 38) (BMI > 95%). Patients with BMI less than 5% were excluded from this study because they were underweight. Perioperative data were collected and analyzed based on differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were included in this study. There was a significant difference in the length of anesthesia (p = .032). The rate of infection was 11% in the obese group, 12% in the overweight group, and 3% in the normal weight group (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Even with pedicle screw instrumentation, the researchers saw an increase in infection in overweight and obese patients. Patients should be counseled before surgery for weight loss to limit surgical complications such as possible risk of postoperative wound infection.

Prevalence, Distribution, and Surgical Relevance of Abnormal Pedicles in Spines with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis vs. No Deformity: A CT-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: A thorough understanding of pedicle morphology is necessary for pedicle screw placement. Previous studies classifying pedicle morphology, to our knowledge, have neither discussed the range of abnormal morphology nor correlated patient or curve characteristics with abnormal morphology to identify at-risk pedicles. METHODS: With the use of computed tomography (CT) images, we analyzed a total of 6116 pedicles from ninety-five patients without spinal deformity (forty-two females and fifty-three males) and ninety-one patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (sixty-eight females and twenty-three males). Pedicle morphology was classified as: Type A, a cancellous channel of >4 mm; Type B, a cancellous channel of 2 to 4 mm; Type C, a cortical channel of ≥2 mm; or Type D, a cortical or cancellous channel of <2 mm. Types B, C, and D were defined as abnormal. Patient demographic data and pedicle distribution were assessed for prevalence and likelihood of abnormal pedicle morphology. Postoperative CT images from fifty-nine patients with AIS were used to assess screw placement. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher rate of abnormal pedicles in patients with AIS (p = 0.001). More abnormal pedicles were located in the thoracic spine compared with the lumbar spine both in patients without deformity (13.3% versus 2.0%) and patients with AIS (31.9% versus 2.4%). Significantly more abnormal pedicles were located on the concavity (p < 0.001), within the periapical region (p = 0.02), and on the apex of the curve (p = 0.03). Three times as many pedicle screws were misplaced in abnormal pedicles compared with normal pedicles (21% versus 7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal pedicles in the patients with AIS. Of the abnormal pedicles in these patients, most were in the thoracic spine, on the concave side, and in the periapical and apical regions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of abnormal pedicles may enable surgeons to anticipate and plan for difficult screw placement and further decrease risk to the patient.

Scoliosis surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis does not alter lung volume: a 3-dimensional computed tomography-based study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the change in lung volume after the surgical correction of scoliosis using a volumetric reconstruction of lung volume from computed tomographic (CT) scans. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previously published studies have shown that pulmonary function tests improve after scoliosis correction; however, these results are not consistent. CT-based volumetric studies in patients with scoliosis have previously shown differences in lung volume and lung volume ratio when compared with a normal population. To date, no study exists that analyzes changes in these parameters after scoliosis surgery. METHODS: A total of 29 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who had pre- and postoperative CT scans on file were included in this study. Three-dimensional lung volume reconstruction was performed (TeraRecon software, TeraRecon, Inc., Foster City, CA). Appropriate masking methods were used to isolate the lung tissue. Total lung volumes, left and right lung volumes, and left/right lung volume ratio were obtained from the pre- and postoperative CT scans. Hemithoracic symmetry, pre- and postoperative Cobb angle, and kyphosis were also calculated. RESULTS: Neither total lung volume nor left/right lung volume ratio changed significantly postoperatively. Surgery did not significantly change total lung volume (P = 0.87), right lung volume (P = 0.69), left lung volume (P = 0.70), or the ratio between right and left lung volumes (P = 0.87). Hemithoracic asymmetry was significantly improved (P < 0.001). Median preoperative major Cobb angle was 53.2° and median preoperative kyphosis was 32.8°. Postoperatively, the median major Cobb angle was 15.0°, resulting in a 70% Cobb correction, and mean postoperative kyphosis was 31.1°. CONCLUSION: Corrective scoliosis surgery does not alter total lung volume or the ratio of right-to-left lung volume. Deformity correction leads to an improvement in the symmetry of the thoracic architecture and costovertebral joint mechanics, as evidenced by the improved hemithoracic asymmetry. Thus, the change in pulmonary function tests, which has been previously documented, may be a dynamic rather than a static phenomenon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Comparative analysis of perioperative differences between hybrid versus pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare perioperative parameters and outcomes between pedicle screw and hybrid instrumentation for the treatment of AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screws have been shown to allow for better correction and fewer revisions than hybrid systems. However, no study has compared perioperative parameters and their effects on patient morbidity between these 2 types of instrumentation. METHODS: Fifty-six pediatric patients with AIS were included in the study. Twenty-seven patients were treated with hybrid instrumentation and 29 patients were treated with all pedicle screw (APS) instrumentation. Intraoperative and perioperative measures were compared. RESULTS: The mean preoperative major Cobb angle was 58.7 degrees in the hybrid group and 54.5 degrees in the APS group (P = 0.222). Patients in the hybrid group required more time in the intensive care unit (2.0 vs. 1.1 d, P = 0.041), more time to initial mobilization (5.1 vs. 2.1 d, P < 0.001), and more days using patient-controlled analgesia (5.7 vs. 4.4 d, P = 0.020). The hybrid group averaged less estimated blood loss than the APS group (619.6 vs. 947.4 mL, P = 0.011). There was no difference in surgical time (P = 0.183) or length of stay (P = 0.072) between the groups. Thoracolumbosacral orthoses were used in 81.5% of patients in the hybrid group, but in no patients in the APS group (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 37.0% of patients in the hybrid group and 17.2% of patients in the APS group (P = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates several advantages of pedicle screw constructs over hybrid constructs in the surgical treatment of AIS. The benefits of pedicle screw systems extend directly to the patient and can lower the overall cost of treatment.

Minimally invasive scoliosis surgery: an innovative technique in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Minimally invasive spine surgery is becoming more common in the treatment of adult lumbar degenerative disorders. Minimally invasive techniques have been utilized for multilevel pathology, including adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis. The next logical step is to apply minimally invasive surgical techniques to the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, there are significant technical challenges of performing minimally invasive surgery on this patient population. For more than two years, we have been utilizing minimally invasive spine surgery techniques in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. We have developed the present technique to allow for utilization of all standard reduction maneuvers through three small midline skin incisions. Our technique allows easy passage of contoured rods, placement of pedicle screws without image guidance, and allows adequate facet osteotomy to enable fusion. There are multiple potential advantages of this technique, including: less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, earlier mobilization, and relatively less pain and need for pain medication. The operative time needed to complete this surgery is longer. We feel that a minimally invasive approach, although technically challenging, is a feasible option in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Although there are multiple perceived benefits, long term data is needed before it can be recommended for routine use.

Treatment of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a survey of pediatric rheumatologists.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the opinions and current practice of pediatric rheumatologists regarding treatment of chronic pain in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Standardized questionnaires were distributed to pediatric rheumatologists who are members of the Children's Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance. Demographic data, opinions, and attitudes were solicited about pain assessment, current treatment of JIA with residual pain, and actual use of opioids to treat pain in children with JIA. RESULTS: Of 99 rheumatologists who were contacted, 53 responses were received (53.5%). No significant demographic differences were found in attitudes about pain management and use of opioids. A total of 77.3% of respondents agreed that there are patients who continue to have significant pain despite adequate treatment. However, 59.6% disagreed with the use of opioid analgesics for treatment of those patients. Cross tabulations showed significant relationships between attitudes about opioid use and concerns for side effects, including drowsiness, fatigue, and constipation (chi(2) = 1.16, P > 0.05), as well as addiction (chi(2) = 5.51, P = 0.019). Thirty percent of those who strongly disagreed with opioid use and 52.4% of those who disagreed had in fact prescribed opioids in the past year. The most commonly prescribed opioids were codeine and oxycodone. Practitioners' perceived knowledge of the drugs significantly affected their likelihood to prescribe them. CONCLUSION: Pediatric rheumatologists are divided in their attitudes regarding treatment of residual pain in children with JIA. Concern for side effects appears to be a major factor in the decision to prescribe these analgesics. More data are needed to facilitate clearer cost-benefit analyses in the decision to prescribe opioids to this clinical population.