Interim Report of a Japanese Phase II Trial for Cardiac Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia　- Focus on Target Determination.

Background: Cardiac radiotherapy using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has attracted attention as a minimally invasive treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, a standardized protocol and software program for determining the irradiation target have not been established. Here, we report the first preclinical stereotactic radioregulation antiarrhythmic therapy trial in Japan, focused on the target-setting process. Methods and Results: From 2019 onwards, 3 patients (age range 60-91 years) presenting with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled. Two patients were extremely serious and urgent, and were followed up for 6 and 30 months. To determine the irradiation targets, we aggregated electrophysiological, structural, and functional data and reflected them in an American Heart Association 17-segment model, as per the current recommendations. However, in all 3 patients, invasive electrophysiological study, phase-contrast computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging could not be performed; therefore, electrophysiological and structural information was limited. As alternatives, high-resolution ambulatory electrocardiography and nuclear medicine studies were useful in assessing arrhythmic substrates; however, concerns regarding test weighting and multiple scoring remain. Risks to surrounding organs were fully taken into account. Conclusions: In patients requiring cardiac SBRT, the information needed for target planning is sometimes limited to minimally invasive tests. Although there are issues to be resolved, this is a promising option for the life-saving treatment of patients in critical situations.

Factors Involved in the Choice Between Thoracic and Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath Holds During Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is used with adjuvant radiation therapy after left breast cancer surgery to reduce radiation dose to the heart. In this study we determined whether thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH) or abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) should be selected based on patient background. METHODS: Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy plans were created under the same conditions using free breathing (FB), T-DIBH, and A-DIBH CT scans of patients who had previously undergone treatment at our hospital. RESULTS: A-DIBH decreased the left lung dose compared to FB. In comparing T-DIBH and A-DIBH, the heart maximum and left lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH. The differences in the heart mean dose (Dmean) between FB, and T-DIBH and A-DIBH were correlated with the cardiothoracic ratio, heart volume, and left lung volume. The difference in the heart Dmean and the left lung dose of T-DIBH and A-DIBH correlated with the forced vital capacity (FVC). CONCLUSIONS: A-DIBH is preferable over T-DIBH with respect to the heart and left lung doses; however, with respect to the heart Dmean, T-DIBH was more effective in reducing the dose in some cases, and the FVC was a relevant factor in this study.

Effect on Heart and Lung Doses Reduction of Abdominal and Thoracic Deep Inspiratory Breath-hold Assuming Involved-field Radiation Therapy in Patients with Simulated Esophageal Cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lung and heart doses in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using involved-field irradiation in patients with middle-to-lower thoracic esophageal cancer during free breathing (FB), abdominal deep inspiratory breath-hold (A-DIBH), and thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH) images. METHODS: Computed tomography images of A-DIBH, T-DIBH, and FB from 25 patients with breast cancer were used to simulate patients with esophageal cancer. The irradiation field was set at an involved-field, and target and risk organs were outlined according to uniform criteria. VMAT optimization was performed, and lung and heart doses were evaluated. RESULTS: A-DIBH had a lower lung V20 Gy than FB and a lower lung V40 Gy, V30 Gy, V20 Gy than T-DIBH. The heart all dose indices were lower in T-DIBH than FB, and the heart V10 Gy was lower in A-DIBH than FB. However, the heart Dmean was comparable with A-DIBH and T-DIBH. CONCLUSIONS: A-DIBH had significant dose advantages for lungs compared to FB and T-DIBH, and the heart Dmean was comparable to T-DIBH. Therefore, when performing DIBH, A-DIBH is suggested for radiotherapy in patients with middle-to-lower thoracic esophageal cancer, excluding irradiation of the prophylactic area.

Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep-inspiration breath-holds: A comparative dosimetric study.

Deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces the radiation dose to the heart and lungs during breast radiotherapy in cancer. However, there is not enough discussion about suitable breathing methods for DIBH. Therefore, we investigated the radiation doses and organ and body surface displacement in abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) and thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH). Free-breathing, A-DIBH, and T-DIBH computed tomography images of 100 patients were used. After contouring the targets, heart, and lungs, radiotherapy plans were created. We investigated the heart and lung doses, the associations between the heart and left lung displacements, and the thorax and abdominal surface displacements. No significant differences were observed in the target dose indices. However, the heart and lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH than in T-DIBH for all the indices; the mean heart and lung doses were 1.69 and 3.48 Gy, and 1.91 and 3.55 Gy in A-DIBH and T-DIBH, respectively. The inferior displacement of the heart and the left lung was more significant in A-DIBH. Therefore, inferior expansion of the heart and lungs may be responsible for the respective dose reductions. The abdominal surface displaced more than the thoracic surface in both A-DIBH and T-DIBH, and thoracic surface displacement was greater in T-DIBH than in A-DIBH. Moreover, A-DIBH can be identified because abdominal surface displacement was greater in A-DIBH than in T-DIBH. In conclusion, A-DIBH and T-DIBH could be distinguished by comparing the abdominal and thoracic surfaces of A-DIBH and T-DIBH, thereby ensuring the implementation of A-DIBH and reducing the heart and lung doses.

Examination of the dose distribution of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy using a high-definition multi-leaf collimator for breast cancer patients with irradiated regional lymph nodes.

Background: A high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC) with 5- and 10-mm fine MLCs is useful for radiotherapy. However, it is difficult to irradiate the mammary gland and supraclavicular region using a HD-MLC because of the narrow field of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the dose distribution of the VMAT dose using a HD-MLC in 15 patients with left breast cancer undergoing postoperative irradiation of breast and regional lymph nodes, including the internal mammary node. Materials and methods: The following four plans were generated: three-arc VMAT using HD-MLC (HD-VMAT), two tangential arcs and one-arc VMAT using HD-MLC (tHD-VMAT), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using HD-MLC, and two-arc VMAT using the Millennium 120-leaf MLC (M-VMAT). We assessed the doses to the target volume and organs at risk. Results: The target dose distributions were higher for HD-VMAT than 3DCRT. There were no significant differences in the heart mean dose (Dmean) or lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20 Gy) between HD-VMAT and 3DCRT. The heart Dmean and lung V20 Gy of tHD-VMAT were higher than those of HD-VMAT, and the heart Dmean of M-VMAT was higher than that of HD-VMAT. However, the target doses of tHD-VMAT, M-VMAT, and HD-VMAT were equivalent. Conclusions: In cases of the mammary gland and regional lymph node irradiation, including the internal mammary node in patients with left breast cancer, HD-VMAT was not inferior to M-VMAT and provided a better dose distribution to the target volume and organs at risk compared with 3DCRT and tHD-VMAT.

Comparing the toxicity and disease control rate of radiotherapy for prostate cancer between salvage settings after high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy and initial settings.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the toxicity and disease control rate of radiotherapy for prostate cancer in salvage settings after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy (HIFU cohort) with those in radical settings (non-HIFU cohort). From 2012 to 2020, 215 patients were identified for this study and 17 were treated in the salvage settings after HIFU. The median follow-up time was 34.5 months (range: 7-102 months, inter-quartile range [IQR]: 16-64 months). Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events were evaluated in acute and late periods with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5, and the rates of biochemical-clinical failure free survival (BCFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. The cumulative incidence of late GU Grade 2 or greater toxicity after five years was significantly different between the non-HIFU and HIFU cohorts with rates of 7.3% and 26.2%, respectively (P = 0.03). Regarding GI Grade 2 or greater toxicity, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts. The 5y-BCFS was 84.2% in the non-HIFU cohort and 69.5% in the HIFU cohort with no significant difference (P = 0.10) and the 5y-OS was 95.9% and 92.3%, respectively (P = 0.47). We concluded that the possibility of increased late GU Grade 2 or greater should be considered when applying salvage radiotherapy for local recurrence after HIFU.

Suitability of Metastatic Lung Tumors for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

We investigated factors influencing local control of lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and determined the type of lesions for which SBRT is more suitable. Ninety-six patients and 196 tumors were included. Median follow-up duration was 32.0 months (range 4.7-95.8). The two-year local recurrence rate was 15.2% (95% confidence interval: 10.2-21.3). Multivariate analysis revealed biological effective dose, ultracentral tumor location, reirradiation, and prior chemotherapy as significant factors. SBRT is suitable for lung metastases, especially for peripheral tumors and those located in the inner lung parenchyma. For ultracentral lesions and recurrent lesions after SBRT, metastasectomy is recommended.

Repeated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: In clinical practice, whether cirrhotic livers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can withstand repeated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and toxicities in these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study included patients with HCC who were treated with SBRT at least twice between January 2012 and June 2019. Local control and overall survival rates were calculated. Liver function before and after irradiation was evaluated using the Child-Pugh score and modified albumin-bilirubin grade. All toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent 136 courses (148 lesions) of SBRT, which was mostly performed for out-of-field tumors but 3 in-field recurrences. The median follow-up duration from the first SBRT was 52.6 months (range, 15.7-89.3 months). The median gross tumor volume was 4.6 cm3 (range, 0.8-55.2 cm3) at the second SBRT. The 3-year local control rate was 94.5% (95% confidence interval, 88.0%-97.5%). The 3-year overall survival rate after the second course was 62.8% (95% confidence interval, 45.1%-76.2%). Although the Child-Pugh score did not deteriorate after the second course, deterioration of the modified albumin-bilirubin grade at 6, 12, and 24 months was statistically significant compared with that before the second course. One patient (1.9%) experienced grade 3 hypoalbuminemia and 2 patients (3.8%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia 6 months after the second course. Mild fatigue and nausea were reported in 9 (17.3%) and 6 (11.5%) patients, respectively. One instance of grade 5 toxicity was observed. Two patients (1.5%) had grade 2 gastric ulcers. No other grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicities occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated SBRT is feasible and produces minimal toxicity in patients with HCC and Child-Pugh scores of ≤7 and a low normal liver dose.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with bulky lymph node metastasis: Five case reports.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) has not been accepted as a general therapy for gastric cancer because of its localized effect and toxicity for radiosensitive organs. However, if radiation therapy could compensate for the limited or inadequate treatment choices available for elderly patients and/or those at high risk, the available therapeutic options for advanced gastric cancer might increase. From this perspective, we present our experiences of five patients with advanced gastric cancer in whom we used NACRT therapy with interesting results. CASE SUMMARY: We admitted five patients with clinical Stage III gastric cancer and bulky lymph node metastasis or adjacent organ invasion at the time of diagnosis. A total of 50 Gy of preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy was delivered to the patients in doses of 2.0 Gy/d, together with a regimen of concomitant chemotherapy comprising two courses of oral tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1; 65 mg/m2 per day) for three consecutive weeks followed by two weeks of rest, starting at the same time as radiotherapy. All patients underwent no residual tumor resection and a pathological complete response of the primary tumors was achieved in two patients. The incidence of hematological toxicity was low, although the digestive toxicities of anorexia and diarrhea developed in three of the five patients, necessitating termination of radiation therapy at 30 Gy and S-1 at three weeks. However, even 30 Gy of irradiation and half the dose of S-1 resulted in sufficient downstaging, indicating that even a reduced amount of NACRT could confer considerable effects. CONCLUSION: Slightly reduced NACRT might be useful and safe for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Questionnaire survey comparing surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer: lessons from patients with experience of both modalities.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is some controversy regarding indications for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer patients. We investigated the treatment preferences of patients with experience of both surgery and SBRT using a questionnaire survey. METHODS: Of lung cancer patients treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2017, we identified those who also previously underwent surgery for lung cancer. These patients were asked about their experiences of surgery and SBRT including perceived condition, distress, stress, convenience, adverse effects, and satisfaction during and after treatment. Participants were also asked about treatment decision-making for hypothetical scenarios. RESULTS: Of 653 lung cancer patients treated with SBRT, 149 also underwent surgery for lung cancer, 52 of whom participated in this questionnaire. The median age at the time of this survey was 76 years (range, 59-91 years). Significantly more participants had a favorable impression of SBRT during and after treatment (all question items; P<0.01). In terms of overall satisfaction, 27 patients preferred SBRT and three patients preferred surgery. In a hypothetical scenario (equivalent treatment outcomes) aged 70 years and faced with decision-making for first-time lung cancer treatment, significantly more patients selected SBRT (P<0.01): 38 patients selected SBRT. In a scenario with 20% better survivals for surgical resection, 14 patients selected SBRT, 12 selected surgery, and 26 were indecisive (P=0.47). In a scenario at age 80 years, significantly more patients selected SBRT (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with experience of both surgery and SBRT for lung cancer prefer SBRT. This information would be helpful at treatment decision-making.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer using RapidArc delivery and a steep dose gradient: prescription of 60% isodose line of maximum dose fitting to the planning target volume.

We retrospectively investigated outcomes, including pulmonary toxicities, of stereotactic body radiation therapy using RapidArc and a risk-adapted 60% isodose plan for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients. We evaluated patients staged as cT1a-2bN0M0 between 2011 and 2017 and treated with a total dose of 40-60 Gy in five fractions to the 60% isodose line of the maximum dose encompassing the planning target volume with curative intent. Comorbidities and age were rated using an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI). Factors associated with overall survival (OS) were investigated. A total of 237 patients with 250 lesions were eligible. The median follow-up was 28.0 months. The local recurrence rate at 3 years was 0.8%; none of the patients developed isolated local recurrence. OS, deaths from lung cancer, and deaths from intercurrent disease at 3 years were 72.7%, 8.2% and 19.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis for correlating factors with OS, AACCI and maximal standardized uptake value on [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography remained significant. Grade ≥3 toxicities were limited to radiation pneumonitis in six (2.4%) patients (Grade 3 in four patients and Grade 5 in two patients). Among those, three patients had idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. The total dose was unrelated to the incidence of Grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis (P = 0.69). Using the 60% isodose prescription and RapidArc, maximal local control was achieved with acceptable toxicities. Although the OS may depend on patient background, dose escalation aiming at higher local control can be beneficial for medically inoperable patients.

Suicide in patients with gastric cancer: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to examine the rate of suicide in patients with gastric cancer and to identify factors associated with increased risk of suicide using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. METHODS: The database was queried for patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer from 1998 to 2011. The rate of suicide and standardized mortality ratio were calculated. Multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with increased risk of suicide. RESULTS: A total of 65 535 patients with 109 597 person-years of follow-up were included. A total of 68 patients died of suicide. The age-adjusted rate of suicide was 34.6 per 100 000 person-years (standardized mortality ratios, 4.07; 95% confidence interval, 3.18-5.13). The rate of suicide was highest within the first 3 months after cancer diagnosis (standardized mortality ratios, 67.67; 95% confidence interval, 40.74-106.15). Results of multivariable analyses showed that male sex (incidence rate ratio, 7.15; 95% confidence interval, 3.05-16.78; P < 0.0001), White race (incidence rate ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-10.35; P = 0.0491), unmarried status (incidence rate ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.30; P = 0.0060) and distant stage disease (incidence rate ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-4.92; P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with increased risk of suicide. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with gastric cancer have an ~4-fold higher risk of suicide compared with the general US population. The suicide risk is highest within the first 3 months after diagnosis. Male sex, White race, unmarried status and distant stage disease are significantly associated with increased risk of suicide.

Seed migration after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy by using loose seeds: Japanese prostate cancer outcome study of permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (J-POPS) multi-institutional cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and associated factors of loose seed migration were investigated in cohort 1 of the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS). METHODS: The study subjects were 2160 patients, consisting of 1641 patients who underwent permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (PI) and 519 patients who underwent PI combined with external beam radiation therapy (PI + EBRT). The presence or absence of seed migration to the chest and abdominal/pelvic region was determined. RESULTS: Seed migration was observed in 22.7 % of PI group patients and 18.1 % of PI + EBRT group patients (p = 0.0276). Migration to the lungs and abdominal/pelvic region was observed in 14.6 % and 11.1 % of the patients in the PI group, and 11.2 % and 8.5 % of the patients in the PI + EBRT group, respectively. In the PI group, the number of implanted seeds was associated with the seed migration incidence. Neither the PI nor the PI + EBRT group showed any difference in the volume of the prostate receiving 100 % of the prescribed dose (V100 [%]) or the minimal dose received by 90 % of the prostate volume (D90 [Gy]) between the patients with and without seed migration. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective cohort study investigating the largest number of past cases showed no difference in D90 (Gy) or V100 (%) between seed migration or the absence thereof in both the PI group and PI + EBRT group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00534196.

Effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival in resected pancreatic cancer: a propensity score surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer remains controversial. The aim is to demonstrate a survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify patients who were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas from 2004 to 2009, underwent cancer-directed surgery, and received either no radiotherapy or postoperative radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses using a propensity score matching were conducted to determine the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 2,532 patients were included. The median overall and disease-specific survival were significantly longer in the adjuvant radiotherapy group than in no radiotherapy group (overall survival, 20 months vs. 16 months, respectively; disease-specific survival, 22 months vs. 18 months, respectively; both P < 0.0001). In multivariable Cox proportional analyses, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with a significant overall and disease-specific survival benefit (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. We concluded that adjuvant radiotherapy might be included in the standard treatment for resected pancreatic cancer.

A prospective longitudinal survey of erectile dysfunction in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Few studies have evaluated changes in erectile function with time before and after prostate brachytherapy using the International Index of Erectile Function-15, a sensitive, validated tool for assessing male sexual dysfunction. In this prospective study we evaluated the natural history of erectile function after prostate brachytherapy without supplemental therapy (external beam radiotherapy, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors or androgen deprivation therapy) using the International Index of Erectile Function-15. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 119 patients who were followed at least 12 months after prostate brachytherapy between 2004 and 2010. Sexual and erectile function status were assessed before brachytherapy (baseline), and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months postoperatively using the International Index of Erectile Function-15. RESULTS: Mean total International Index of Erectile Function-15 score, and scores on the erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction domains 3 months after brachytherapy were significantly lower than at baseline (p <0.05). They remained lower until 36 months after prostate brachytherapy. Erectile function was maintained 12 months after brachytherapy in 16 of the 48 men (33.3%) with a baseline erectile function domain score of 11 or greater. There was no significant difference in clinical features except the age of patients who maintained the erectile function domain score and their counterparts 12 months after brachytherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that age 70 years or greater was the only predictive factor for deteriorating erectile function after brachytherapy (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a global decrease in all domains of the International Index of Erectile Function-15 score 12 months after prostate brachytherapy. Also, patient age may influence the preservation of brachytherapy related potency.

Rectal injury during permanent seed implantation for prostate brachytherapy.

Serious complications have not been previously reported during seed implantation for prostate brachytherapy. We present an unreported case of rectal injury caused by an ultrasound probe. A 67-year-old male presented with a serum prostate-specific antigen level of 5.50 ng/ml, a Gleason score of 7 (3 + 4) and clinical T2a adenocarcinoma of the prostate. A transperineal permanent prostate brachytherapy implantation was performed. The patient subsequently complained of abdominal pain postoperatively. A gastrointestinal perforation was suspected based on an abdominal X-ray obtained on the day after the brachytherapy. Rectal injury was recognized during an exploratory laparotomy, and a primary closure and temporary diversion ileostomy were performed. The healing of the injury was confirmed by colonoscopy and an ileostomy closure was performed 2 months after the temporary diversion. The investigating committee for this accident concluded that the ultrasound probe had perforated the rectum. This is the first case of a rectal injury during seed implantation for prostate brachytherapy.

Preimplant factors affecting prostate D90 after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds.

The dose received by 90% of the prostate volume (D90) is the key parameter of dosimetric analysis in prostate brachytherapy. The aim of this analysis was to identify preimplant factors affecting prostate D90 after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds. We reviewed the records of 210 patients who underwent transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds for clinical T1/T2 prostate cancer at our institution. Patients who received supplemental external-beam radiation therapy were excluded. One hundred and nine patients (51.9%) received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT). One month after seed implantation, postimplant computed tomography and dosimetric analysis were performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify preimplant factors affecting postimplant prostate D90. The postimplant prostate D90 values ranged from 123.3 to 234.1 Gy (mean ± standard error, 177.1 ± 1.4 Gy). Postimplant prostate D90 differed significantly between patients who had and had not undergone NHT (P = 0.001). In addition, simple regression analyses showed positive correlations with the estimated preimplant prostate D90, preimplant prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), total radioactivity, number of needles, and number of seeds. On stepwise multiple regression analysis, postimplant prostate D90 showed significant negative correlations with NHT and preimplant prostate volume by TRUS, and a significant positive correlation with total radioactivity. In conclusion, NHT, preimplant prostate volume by TRUS, and total radioactivity are significant preimplant factors affecting postimplant prostate D90 in prostate cancer patients treated with transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds.

Dose volume histogram analysis of focal liver reaction in follow-up multiphasic CT following stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate threshold dose (TD) of focal liver reaction (FLR) following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In consecutive 50 patients receiving SBRT for small HCC, 38 patients receiving SBRT and follow up >6 months, FLR on follow-up CT had been previously studied. Patients with good concordance between FLR and highly irradiated area were eligible. Dose volume histogram (DVH) was used to identify TDs for FLR. Clinical factors were analyzed for correlation with TDs. RESULTS: Of 24 eligible patients, 23 had Child-Pugh score A and 1 scored B. Presence of FLR peaked at a median of 6 (range; 3-12) months. The median and 95% confidential intervals of TDs of pre-contrast and portal-venous phase CT were 32.4 Gy (30.3-35.4) and 34.4 Gy (31.9-36.0), respectively. Each median coefficient representing the concordance was 74.9% (range; 55.8-98.0%) and 80.5% (range; 70.8-92.4%), respectively. No clinical factors significantly correlated with the TDs. CONCLUSION: We proposed 30 Gy/5 fractions as TD of FLRs following SBRT for patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis. This TD will enable us to predict injured liver volume and to avoid complication beforehand from toxicity. Further pathological and clinical studies, in addition to more practical and precise data of DVH, are needed to clarify the significance of FLRs.

Prostate brachytherapy seed migration to a left varicocele.

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of seed migration to a left varicocele after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose iodine-125 ((125)I) seeds. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 73-year-old man presented with a serum prostate-specific antigen level of 5.21 ng/mL, Gleason score of 7 (3+4), and clinical T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The patient underwent transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds followed by external beam radiation therapy. Two weeks after seed implantation, a followup pelvic radiograph was obtained. One month after seed implantation, a pelvic computed tomography scan for postimplant dosimetric analysis was carried out. Subsequent ultrasound examination of the scrotum was undertaken. RESULTS: Two weeks after seed implantation, an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph showed that a migrated seed was overlapped by the scrotum. Postimplant pelvic computed tomography revealed that a seed had migrated to the left side of the scrotum. Subsequent ultrasound examination of the scrotum revealed that the patient had a left varicocele to which the seed had migrated. The patient had no symptoms related to the migrated seed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of seed migration to a left varicocele after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds. For the present case, we suggest that the seed moved from the prostate to the left varicocele through the pelvic veins, bypassing the systemic circulation.

Incidence of seed migration to the chest, abdomen, and pelvis after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine the incidence of seed migration not only to the chest, but also to the abdomen and pelvis after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 267 patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds. After seed implantation, orthogonal chest radiographs, an abdominal radiograph, and a pelvic radiograph were undertaken routinely to document the occurrence and sites of seed migration. The incidence of seed migration to the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was calculated. All patients who had seed migration to the abdomen and pelvis subsequently underwent a computed tomography scan to identify the exact location of the migrated seeds. Postimplant dosimetric analysis was undertaken, and dosimetric results were compared between patients with and without seed migration. RESULTS: A total of 19,236 seeds were implanted in 267 patients. Overall, 91 of 19,236 (0.47%) seeds migrated in 66 of 267 (24.7%) patients. Sixty-nine (0.36%) seeds migrated to the chest in 54 (20.2%) patients. Seven (0.036%) seeds migrated to the abdomen in six (2.2%) patients. Fifteen (0.078%) seeds migrated to the pelvis in 15 (5.6%) patients. Seed migration occurred predominantly within two weeks after seed implantation. None of the 66 patients had symptoms related to the migrated seeds. Postimplant prostate D90 was not significantly different between patients with and without seed migration. CONCLUSION: We showed the incidence of seed migration to the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Seed migration did not have a significant effect on postimplant prostate D90.